Content deleted Content added
remove {{howto|date=January 2013}} |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
'''Collaborative methods''' are processes, behaviors, and conversations that relate to the [[collaboration]] between individuals.<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref> These methods specifically aim to increase the success of [[team]]s as they engage in collaborative [[problem solving]]. Forms, rubrics, charts and graphs are useful in these situations to [[Objectivity (journalism)|objectively]] document [[Personality psychology|personal traits]] with the goal of improving performance in current and future projects.
==Group Setup==▼
{{Main|Collaboration#History}}
Deliberate setup of a team—before beginning work—increases the potential for high performance.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} To do so, the following components of collaboration should be an initial focus:
==Group models==
Four group models are common in collaboration:<ref name="spencelecture"
;Chance
:''Collaboration by chance'' is the most basic model and underlies all four. The team is a random pick of whoever is available without any specific regard for the skills or needs of each member.
Line 77 ⟶ 80:
[[File:Evaluating-thinking-styles.png|thumb|upright|A chart used to evaluate the thinking style of persons, particularly for use in collaborative teams.]]
There are two main components of thinking styles: internal and external,{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} they share similarities to the [[extraversion and introversion]] traits seen in human [[Personality psychology|personalities]]. The two thinking styles are dichotomies and can be used as axes when charting personal evaluation; note that "there is no 'right' place on the grid."<ref name="spencelecture" />
==== Creation of ideas ====
Line 193 ⟶ 196:
A main barrier to collaboration may be the difficulty in achieving agreement when diverse viewpoints exist.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} This can make effective decision-making more difficult. Even if collaboration members do manage to agree they are very likely to be agreeing from a different perspective. This is often called a cultural boundary. For example:
* A culture where rank or job title is important makes it hard for a lower rank person, who may be more qualified than their superior for the job
* "[[stranger danger]]"; which can be expressed as a reluctance to share with others unknown to you
* "needle in a haystack"; people believe that others may have already solved your problem but how do you find them
Line 207 ⟶ 210:
== See also ==
{{
* [[Appreciative inquiry]]
* [[Attitude (psychology)]]
Line 214 ⟶ 217:
* [[Devil's advocate]]
* [[Game theory]]
▲* [[General theory of collaboration]]
* [[Group dynamics]]
* [[Polytely]]
Line 227 ⟶ 229:
* [[Social psychology]]
* [[Sociomapping]]
{{
== References ==
Line 233 ⟶ 235:
== Further reading ==
* Bennis, Warren, and Patricia W. Biederman. ''Organizing Genius.'' Cambridge,
* Marcum, James W. ''After the Information Age: A Dynamic Learning Manifesto.'' Vol. 231. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2006.
* Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration."'' Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20080410234154/http://revolutionphiladelphia.aiga.org/resources/content/2/5/7/0/documents/MSpence.pdf
{{Management}}
[[Category:Collaboration]]
|