Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
m per WP:SDNONE |
||
| (72 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|none}}
{{more citations needed|date=August 2023}}
{{overcolored|date=August 2023}}
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] during 2005. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.<ref>The following motions were released:Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), 2005 SCC 17, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 286</ref>
==Reasons==
{{SCCOpinionKey}}
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:85%"
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| width=200px | ''[[British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v British Columbia (Environmental Appeal Board)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 1 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221515/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc1/2005scc1.html]
| January 20, 2005
| January 20, 2005
| style="background-color:#00CD00;text-align:center"| V<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[R v Clark]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6; 2005 SCC 2 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230442/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc2/2005scc2.html]
| November 2, 2004
| January 27, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[R v Roberts]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 22; 2005 SCC 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042143/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc3/2005scc3.html]
| December 15, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| October 15, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Marche v Halifax Insurance Co]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 47; 2005 SCC 6 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014213/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc6/2005scc6.html]
| November 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| November 8, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Tsiaprailis v Canada]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 113; 2005 SCC 8 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042349/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc8/2005scc8.html]
| November 4, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| December 10, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[UL Canada Inc v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 143; 2005 SCC 10 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120023/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc10/2005scc10.html]
| March 17, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| ''[[Vaughan v Canada]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146; 2005 SCC 11 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120032/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc11/2005scc11.html]
| May 18, 2004<br>January 7, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Nova Scotia (Minister of Health) v JJ]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 177; 2005 SCC 12 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318221726/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc12/2005scc12.html]
| November 4, 2004
| March 18, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc v Saskatchewan]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 188; 2005 SCC 13 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042410/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc13/2005scc13.html]
| January 19, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Solski (Tutor of) v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 201; 2005 SCC 14 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716033420/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc14/2005scc14.html]
| March 22, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Gosselin (Tutor of) v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 238; 2005 SCC 15 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120042/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc15/2005scc15.html]
| March 22, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Okwuobi v Lester B Pearson School Board]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 257; 2005 SCC 16 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060924184146/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc16/2005scc16.html]
| March 22, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v RGL]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 288; 2005 SCC 18 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014054/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc18/2005scc18.html]
| February 11, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v PEC]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 290; 2005 SCC 19 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041402/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc19/2005scc19.html]
| April 19, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Fédération des producteurs de volailles du Québec v Pelland]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 292; 2005 SCC 20 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003610/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc20/2005scc20.html]
| December 9, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Gladstone v Canada (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 325; 2005 SCC 21 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042252/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc21/2005scc21.html]
| February 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| ''[[R v Paice]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 339; 2005 SCC 22 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311011401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc22/2005scc22.html]
| December 15, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Mapara]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 358; 2005 SCC 23 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120104517/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc23/2005scc23.html]
| December 16, 2004
| April 27, 2005
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<br><br><!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#00B2EE" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#79CDCD" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
|
| December 16, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[HL v Canada (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401; 2005 SCC 25 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120108/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc25/2005scc25.html]
| May 13/December 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Canada (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 533; 2005 SCC 26 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015054/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc26/2005scc26.html]
| November 5, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Gunning]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 627; 2005 SCC 27 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112829/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc27/2005scc27.html]
| February 15, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Prebushewski v Dodge City Auto (1984) Ltd]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 649; 2005 SCC 28 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726205332/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc28/2005scc28.html]
| March 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| May 19, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Canada (House of Commons) v Vaid]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667; 2005 SCC 30 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015115/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc30/2005scc30.html]
| October 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Glegg v Smith & Nephew Inc]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 724; 2005 SCC 31 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120119/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc31/2005scc31.html]
| January 13, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| ''[[R v Fice]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 742; 2005 SCC 32 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070314222841/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc32/2005scc32.html]
| January 13, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Royal Bank of Canada v State Farm Fire and Casualty Co]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 779; 2005 SCC 34 [https://archive.today/20060725074429/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc34/2005scc34.html]
| April 13, 2005
| June 9, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[Chaoulli v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791; 2005 SCC 35 [https://web.archive.org/web/20110202122636/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc35/2005scc35.html]
| June 8, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Stender]]'', [2005] 1 S.C.R. 914; 2005 SCC 36 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120104522/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc36/2005scc36.html]
| June 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Orbanski; R v Elias]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 37 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041437/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc37/2005scc37.html]
| October 12, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Ryan v Moore]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 53; 2005 SCC 38 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120104529/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc38/2005scc38.html]
| December 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Mugesera v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 100; 2005 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042216/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc40/2005scc40.html]
| December 8, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Ontario]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 188; 2005 SCC 41 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041452/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc41/2005scc41.html]
| February 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Woods]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 205; 2005 SCC 42 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120094441/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc42/2005scc42.html]
| May 11, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Marshall; R v Bernard]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220; 2005 SCC 43 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041502/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc43/2005scc43.html]
| January 17, 18, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| ''[[Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Minister of Justice)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 286; 2005 SCC 44 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041507/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc44/2005scc44.html]
| November 9, 10, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v GR]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 371; 2005 SCC 45 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215358/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc45/2005scc45.html]
| December 17, 2004
| July 22, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#EE9572" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#EE9572" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#EE9572" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:red" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[GreCon Dimter inc v J R Normand inc]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 401; 2005 SCC 46 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070207121215/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc46/2005scc46.html]
| February 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| January 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 473; 2005 SCC 49 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017164557/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc49/2005scc49.html]
| June 8, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| May 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Medovarski v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]; [[Esteban v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 539; 2005 SCC 51 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041517/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc51/2005scc51.html]
| June 7, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[DIMS Construction inc (Trustee of) v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 564; 2005 SCC 52 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017155602/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc52/2005scc52.html]
| December 8, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Moufarrège v Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 598; 2005 SCC 53 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070427190412/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc53/2005scc53.html]
| October 12, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Canada Trustco Mortgage Co v Canada]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601; 2005 SCC 54 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070428050933/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc54/2005scc54.html]
| March 8, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
|
| March 8, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Reference Re Employment Insurance Act (Can), ss 22 and 23]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 669; 2005 SCC 56 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041537/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc56/2005scc56.html]
| January 11, 2005
| October 20, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[Hilewitz v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]; [[De Jong v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)]]'', [2005] 2 S.C.R. 706; 2005 SCC 57 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041544/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc57/2005scc57.html]
| February 8, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Blackwater v Plint]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 58 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070222003726/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc58/2005scc58.html]
| May 16, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[EB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 45; 2005 SCC 60 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215408/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc60/2005scc60.html]
| December 7, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v RC]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 99; 2005 SCC 61 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070220055350/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc61/2005scc61.html]
| April 20, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Montréal (City of) v 2952-1366 Québec Inc]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141; 2005 SCC 62 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017120454/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc62/2005scc62.html]
| October 14, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Contino v Leonelli-Contino]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 217; 2005 SCC 63 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060711033330/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc63/2005scc63.html]
| January 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Boucher v Stelco Inc]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 279; 2005 SCC 64 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071017164607/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc64/2005scc64.html]
| June 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Kirkbi AG v Ritvik Holdings Inc]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 302; 2005 SCC 65 [https://web.archive.org/web/20061208222048/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc65/2005scc65.html]
| March 16, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
| ''[[R v Pires; R v Lising]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 2005 SCC 66 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041605/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc66/2005scc66.html]
| May 18, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Rodrigue]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 384; 2005 SCC 67 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112910/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc67/2005scc67.html]
| November 17, 2005
| November 17, 2005
| style="background-color:white" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:white" |<!--major-->
|
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[R v Escobar-Benavidez]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 386; 2005 SCC 68 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230502/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc68/2005scc68.html]
| November 18, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage)]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 388; 2005 SCC 69 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070606024606/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc69/2005scc69.html]
| March 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Merk v International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 771]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 425; 2005 SCC 70 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014106/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc70/2005scc70.html]
| February 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Spence]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 458; 2005 SCC 71 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112915/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc71/2005scc71.html]
| June 9, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Boucher (2005)|R v Boucher]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; 2005 SCC 72 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230508/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc72/2005scc72.html]
| May 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Dikranian v Quebec (AG)]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530; 2005 SCC 73 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070521093058/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc73/2005scc73.html]
| March 10, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Charlebois v Saint John (City of)]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 563; 2005 SCC 74 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014114/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc74/2005scc74.html]
| October 20, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v MacKay]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 607; 2005 SCC 75 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112919/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc75/2005scc75.html]
| December 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
! style="font-size:120%" | Case name
! style="font-size:120%" | Argued
! style="font-size:120%" | Decided
! width=50px | McLachlin
! width=50px | Major
! width=50px | Bastarache
! width=50px | Binnie
! width=50px | LeBel
! width=50px | Deschamps
! width=50px | Fish
! width=50px | Abella
! width=50px | Charron
|-
|
| April 23, 2004/January 12, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Zenner v Prince Edward Island College of Optometrists]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 645; 2005 SCC 77 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319015125/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc77/2005scc77.html]
| November 9, 2005
| December 16, 2005
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--mclachlin-->
| style="background-color:#00CD00" |<!--major-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--bastarache-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--binnie-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--lebel-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--deschamps-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--fish-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--abella-->
| style="background-color:#93DB70" |<!--charron-->
|-
| ''[[R v CD; R v CDK]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 668; 2005 SCC 78 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060711033346/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc78/2005scc78.html]
| April 14, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v MacKay]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; 2005 SCC 79 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112929/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc79/2005scc79.html]
| December 15, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Labaye]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 728; 2005 SCC 80 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070520033919/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc80/2005scc80.html]
| April 18, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
| April 18, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[May v Ferndale Institution]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; 2005 SCC 82 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014132/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc82/2005scc82.html]
| May 17, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[Castillo v Castillo]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 870; 2005 SCC 83 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070427190439/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc83/2005scc83.html]
| November 16, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| ''[[R v Wiles]]'', [2005] 3 S.C.R. 895; 2005 SCC 84 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071120094445/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc84/2005scc84.html]
| October 11, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|}
==Individual statistics==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!
!
!
!
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|68 out of 69 (98.5%
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|
|-
|
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
|
{|
|-
| width=
| width=
| width=
| width=
| style="width
|}
| align=center|65 out of 72 (90.3%)
|-
| colspan=5 style="font-size:85%;background:#eee;" | '''Notes on statistics:'''
* A justice is only included in the majority if they have joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full. Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
|}
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
==
* 2005 decisions: [http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/nav/date/2005_01.html CanLII] [https://web.archive.org/web/20120530224125/http://scc.lexum.org/en/dn/2005/01.html LexUM]
{{Supreme Court of Canada}}
[[Category:2005 in Canada|Reasons Of The Supreme Court Of Canada, 2005]]
[[Category:Supreme Court of Canada reasons by year|2005]]
[[Category:2005 in Canadian case law|*]]
| |||