Talk:Abstraction inversion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Bad Examples: examples still bad, whole article unclear
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computer science}}.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computerbanner scienceshell|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=Low}}
 
}}
== Facade pattern? ==
 
Line 67 ⟶ 68:
Perhaps this is a java example, if you were to create a Thread that ran on a 100ms timer, and it called the garbage collector - that would be re-implementing the garbage collection in way??
[[Special:Contributions/76.28.198.13|76.28.198.13]] ([[User talk:76.28.198.13|talk]]) 00:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 
Even worse, Lua recently added integer types that it uses for whole values.
--[[User:Steinm07|Steinm07]] ([[User talk:Steinm07|talk]]) 11:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 
== Examples still bad ==
 
Most examples are still bad as of 2015-01-27. They seem opinionated and poorly supported. It's very hard to understand, from this article and its examples, exactly what Abstraction Inversion is, and how it differs from plain Abstraction. This is a very poor article. [[Special:Contributions/200.0.230.235|200.0.230.235]] ([[User talk:200.0.230.235|talk]]) 15:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)