Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Fix Linter errors.
 
Line 2:
*[[/Archive2]] to mid-April 2006
*[[/Archive3]] to mid-June 2006
*[[/Archive4]] to mid-August 2006
*[[/Archive5]] to mid-November 2006
*[[/Archive6]] to mid-January 2007
*[[/Archive7]] to mid-October 2007
*[[/Archive8]] to September 2009
*[[/Archive9]] to June 2010
*[[/Archive10]] through 2010
 
== [[Handing]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Soil|WikiProject Soil]] ==
I am pretty sure this project will interest you. You are needed. Cheers! -- [[User:Paleorthid|Paleorthid]] 07:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
:Oh, sorry to disappoint, but my recent edits in that direction were just to help out a new user. I actually know squat about soil. Good luck with the project though! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 07:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 
To continue your brilliant exercise in [[toilet paper orientation|orientation]] - take a look if you would at [[handing]] (no, it's not some perversion, it's absolutely safe for work. It ''is'' about work, that is, woodwork). Or let it do down the drains of Wiktionary? [[User talk:East of Borschov|East of Borschov]] 21:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
== Carbonated beer ==
:Hmm, I'm betting that an article could be written on that -- it's a design decision, and one can find books that spend paragraphs on it. But those books make my head hurt. :-) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 00:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
::Any idea why the Toilet paper oritnetation page is suddenly active again? Is it being linked off site somewhere? I dont see it on the Main Page or as a secondary link from something that is. '''[[User:Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]][[User talk:Soap|<span style="color:#057602;">''Soap''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Soap|<span style="color:green;">—</span>]]''' 12:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
:::Well, it's been linked from [http://www.fark.com/comments/5919702/?cpp=1 Fark], but the traffic spike started at least 12 hours before that link went live. I don't know what the initial cause was. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 
== Block of [[User:Tcshasaposse]] ==
Not all beer has carbon dioxide added to it. A lot of beers are carbonated naturally (especially in Europe, Russia, Africa and South America). Same with cider and other fermented beverages. If you wish to say that a certain beverage has naturally occuring carbonatation, then the category Fermented Beverages already does that. If you wish to say that beer is a force-carbonated beverage, then you would need to pick and choose your beers with care - a blanket categorisation would be inappropriate. And, because beers are available in both naturally carbonated and force-carbonated states, you might need to consider breaking the category down into Naturally Carbonated and Force Carbonated. Hmmmm. It could get awkward as some beers are available in both naturally carbonated and force carbonated conditions. Some beers - such as cask conditioned beers - allow the natural carbonation to burn off so they end up as uncarbonated as wine and water. That is, there is some carbon dioxide present, but it's so soft as not to be noticable. I can see that there might be some interest and value in having force-carbonated beers identified as a breed apart from naturally carbonated beers, but it would be a tricky task to do, and might be more trouble than it is worth. [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] 07:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Some time ago you have blocked [[User:Tcshasaposse]] due to a conflict with the [[WP:NOSHARE]] policy. I wonder whether this issue could be solved in the positive since these user(s)' additions were quite helpful in the coverage of complexity-theoretic topics. It would have been a serious loss in qualified input if we'd just told them to go away. Unfortunately, the block entry points to the user talk page, which has been deleted. Can you provide some insight into this? [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 12:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
:Well, it was strange for me to see that beer's only category was one shared with wine, which usually isn't carbonated. But I'm no expert, and yes, it all does sound like trouble! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 07:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:Sure! The user talk page was apparently deleted as part of a now-defunct process; see [[:Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages]] and [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_July_12#Category:Temporary_Wikipedian_userpages]]. Since you've asked about its contents, I've simply undeleted the user talk page: [[User talk:Tcshasaposse]]. Thanks, [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
==Pando==
Thanks for commenting on the [[Pando (Quaking Aspen)]] article. We are currently trying to have it achieve [[featured article]] status. Any input on its [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Pando_%28Quaking_Aspen%29|peer review]] would be helpful. Thank you again. [[User:Globeism|Globeism]] 16:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 
::Thanks a lot for the reply! I wonder though whether violating [[WP:NOSHARE]] was such a serious concern that the account had to be blocked. I'm worried that we may have lost help from a group of students. On the other hand there wasn't a lot of activity during the latter months so it probably wouldn't have changed anything. Well, thanks again! [[User:Nageh|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh|talk]]) 23:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
== Electrons and light ==
 
:::No prob! Yeah, I'm not sure if I scared them away, or if they were done anyway, or if they found other ways to edit but never said so... or what. I probably should have been more patient. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 02:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Melchoir. I read your comments at [[talk:Electron]] and I '''think''' I incorporated what I learned there into the [[Electron]] article. Please check my edits carefully. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 12:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== "Adidas"[[Toilet ispaper "adidas"orientation]] ==
Techincally, "Adidas" is actually "adidas". The official title of the page is capitalized because of technical issues. [[User:NoseNuggets|NoseNuggets]] 5:50 PM US EDT June 11 2006
:Did you see my link to [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks)]]? The vanity of trademark owners does not force us to break the rules of English. See also the article [[Adidas]] itself, which uses "Adidas" throughout, and [[Talk:Adidas]], where this very issue was beaten to death not so long ago. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Hi, seeing that you created this article, you may want to have a look at this: [http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/comments/Toilet_Paper_Orientation/ The J-Walk Blog: Toilet paper orientation]. —[[User:Bruce1ee|Bruce1ee]]<sup>[[User talk:Bruce1ee|''talk'']]</sup> 07:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
== new page patrollers ==
 
:Thanks!
Melchoir, sorry to pester you; I have been quiet, though busy submitting articles, for some time.
One of my articles was picked up on by a user called ValentinejoeSmith, who is labelled on his userpage as a new article patroller. I know it's a self-labelling. He has had an account for a shorter time than I have. Given that I, as I have indicated to you, would like to be an admin as and when I have enough experience, am I missing out on something?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
:I'm not sure what you're asking. Could you rephrase? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 
And [http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/wikipedia-this-is-a-mans-world-2206207.html this]. --<span style="font-family:serif;">[[User: Candlewicke|<span style="color:red">can</span>]][[User:Candlewicke/List of signatories|<span style="color:black">dle</span>]][[WP:ITN/C|•]][[User talk:Candlewicke|<span style="color:green">wicke</span>]]</span> 01:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
::Just trying to express my neophytic urge to be helpful.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:Nice. In other news, Michael Bywater hates knowledge. ;-) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Okay, well, if you have a specific question about newpage patrolling I'll be glad to answer it, but it seems like you know what's up. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== [[Garrick Mallery]] ==
Melchoir, I want to be helpful and constructive, and I am learning what's up. I feel that I could help new users, but I don't know how to locate them. I feel I could help users writing their first articles, but cannot identify them. Should I just keep quiet and write articles, or can I help? If so, how?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 
I came across the Mallery article with AWB. The article appears to be word for word from the ''Brief memoirs of Colonel Garrick Mallery'' book. You may want to rewrite the article and trim it down. [[User:Bgwhite|Bgwhite]] ([[User talk:Bgwhite|talk]]) 05:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
:Ah, you're asking how you can join the effort. Well, the best hub for information is [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee]]; it's got a lot of great links, too many for me to reproduce here. Another approach is [[Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol]], especially the "Patrolling new pages" section, which offers advice on hanging around [[Special:Newpages]]. Often new contributors will enter Wikipedia by starting a new article, even if they're not completely ready for it, and they'll probably need more help than the users who enter by correcting typos. Generally, on [[Special:Newpages]] the new users will be the ones whose talk pages are [[asldiuywwer|redlinks]]; this means that no one has welcomed them yet. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
:You're absolutely right, and that's a good idea. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 06:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:The Corre (2011)|ts=08:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)}}
 
== Re: Gullibility ==
==Noble rhubarb==
Hi Melchoir - thanks for the note! I'll have a look at it tomorrow. A very useful source (for species for which accounts have been done) is the [http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=2 Flora of China] ([http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=242343391 ''Rheum nobile''] is in). Hooker was actually a very good botanist, the only problems with his text is for the few species subsequently reclassified, and the archaic language and measurements; once they're all updated (and any opinion that would count as POV in wikipedia removed!), it's fairly safe to include. - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 22:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
:Great, I look forward to it! Yeah, Hooker can get a little enthusiastic; I was amused by the [[Cyclobalanopsis lamellosa|"certainly by far the noblest species of Oak known"]]. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
::Hi Melchoir - I've had a quick run through - not a lot to add to what was already there. The main thing I changed was the distribution; Fl. China gives it a much wider range than just the eastern Himalaya. I've never really got the hang of embedded refs, could you check over in case I got the formatting wrong! I'll probably have another look later on, in case I think of anything else - [[User:MPF|MPF]] 23:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
:::Interesting... my source says "endemic to the alpine zone of the eastern Himalayas" in passing while citing two papers that I don't have access to. Perhaps there was a misunderstanding? Ah well. The refs look fine. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Semi'd. Good luck, [[User:David Fuchs|<span style="color:#cc6600;">Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs</span>]]<sup><small>([[User talk:David Fuchs|<span style="color:#ff6600;">talk</span>]])</small></sup> 15:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
== DYK ==
 
==Nice job==
Perhaps your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baby_Got_Back&action=historysubmit&diff=422474545&oldid=422390351 well done] expansion of [[Baby Got Back]] will quiet some of the clamor that the article desperately needs a lyrical synopsis. Cheers, <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color:#D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 15:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
:Let's hope! :) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 17:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
:: BTW, I later realized that I'd left a dismissive comment to your suggestion on the Baby Got Back talk page. I've retracted it, and sincerely apologize for not reading it closely enough, and as a result, misinterpreting your intention. Kudos to your patience; I guess mine was running thin yesterday. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color:#D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 20:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Euler on infinite series]] ==
{| class="messagebox standard-talk"
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
 
The article [[Euler on infinite series]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Not an encyclopedia article. This quote is not itself a notable topic for an article, and although Euler's treatment of divergent series might be sufficiently notable, that's not what's in this article. Has been tagged for transwiki for four years with no progress.'''
 
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
 
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Euler on infinite series|the article's talk page]].
 
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 04:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 
:(shrug) Perhaps it wasn't meant to be. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 03:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Gullibility==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#14 April 2011|14 April 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Gullibility]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that in the early [[19th century]], the word '''''[[gullibility|gullible]]''''' wasn't in the [[dictionary]]?'' You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201104/Gullibility quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 
== Thanks for the ref help ==
 
I've been trying to figure out how to consolidate the refs--now I can work from your example. Cheers, [[User:Khazar|Khazar]] ([[User talk:Khazar|talk]]) 01:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 
:No prob, glad I could help! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 
==Marsupial Lawns==
{{Talkback|mmdrewser}}
{{Talkback|mmdrewser}}
 
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Marsupial lawn]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Marsupial lawn|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shadygrove2007|Shadygrove2007]] ([[User talk:Shadygrove2007|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shadygrove2007|contribs]]) 13:13, 22 April 2011</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
:See [[User talk:Mmdrewser]]... [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 09:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 
== Chowk Bazaar ==
 
The user replied, see [[User talk:Eshahalim#Chowk Bazaar]]. Cheers, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;Chzz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;">&nbsp;►&nbsp;</span>]]</span></small> 09:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
:Right, thanks! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 09:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 
== Thanks For Fixing The References. ==
 
I appreciate it. I'm kind of new to Wikipedia, so I'm glad you helped me. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Logan The Master|Logan The Master]] ([[User talk:Logan The Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Logan The Master|contribs]]) 02:28, 25 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== I fixed the Ultra Machine article. ==
 
At least I think I did. I changed it a bit because I realized it was extremely similar to the Nintendo Wiki's article. I really wasn't trying to plagiarize. [[User:Logan The Master|Logan The Master]] ([[User talk:Logan The Master|talk]]) 14:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Logan The Master
 
== Vopenka ==
 
Hi, Are you familiar with the motivation for his set theory? I couldn't really make heads or tails of it on the related pages. [[User:Tkuvho|Tkuvho]] ([[User talk:Tkuvho|talk]]) 08:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
:Nope, never heard of him until today. :-) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 08:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
==[[:Syzygy (astronomy)]]==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]]
This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Syzygy (astronomy)]], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Syzygy.
 
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
 
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public ___domain|public ___domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 05:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
==[[:Syzygy (poetry)]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]]
This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a search with the contents of [[:Syzygy (poetry)]], and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: [[:Syzygy]]. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see [[Help:Moving a page]] for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]] and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] to preserve attribution history.
 
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article.<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-wikipage--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 05:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== Opinion on APG III ==
 
Hi Melchoir,
 
First of all, I am flattered by your curiosity with my opinion on APG III system.
As always I say: '''classifications are mere suggestions''', with weak and strong points.
 
I was against APG I system by its tendency in to found only in researches in the chloroplast genoma and to do drastic changes in the Angiosperm families; and against APG II system by the informality of taxa (bracket taxa, plain clades, etc) and in a general way by its intransigence in accepting paraphyletic groups as being natural groups (and even polyphyletic, in my opinion: in essence ''all'' taxa are polyphyletic ones), because I see them it taxa as a structure more than three-dimensional, an element can in your two-dimensionality to seem not to have phylogenetic relationship with another, but arranged (graphically, like a reticular system) of another way like the three-dimensional manner this would be evident.
 
Other critic is that APG always tended to "lumping" taxa in entities unprovided morphological characteristics clear that distinguished them (i. e., the synapomorphies) turning them metaphysical "entities" without the necessary practicability to work with the real biodiversity.
 
But I have faith that APG in its version III made a very positive effort to improve the acceptance of its schema in a more universal way. I see this version as a "ripening".
Cheers. [[User:Berton|Berton]] ([[User talk:Berton|talk]]) 14:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 
:Very interesting, thanks for explaining! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 18:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 
==Redirecting [[Superchalifraglisticxpealidocious]]==
What is your opinion on just having that page deleted? The spelling differences between that and [[Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious]] are more than minimal, as there are 4 differences between the two? [[User:Inks.LWC|Inks.LWC]] ([[User talk:Inks.LWC|talk]]) 00:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
:(shrug) That would be fine, go ahead and prod it if you want. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== Request unprotection ==
 
would you please consider un-protecting {{Pagelinks|iTalkBB}} please? I understand that "continually recreated" can be a problem, but permanently protecting a page which could be used to describe a corporation that actually exists based on the meager participation at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/iTalkBB]] seems like overkill, to me. Especially considering that you've salted the ''entire'' history by moving and deleting the userfied page as well ({{Pagelinks|User:Banazir/ITalkBB}}). Thanks.<br/>—&nbsp;[[User:Ohms law|<span style="font-family: Courier New, monospace ;font-style:italic">V = IR</span>]] <span style="font-variant:small-caps">([[User talk:Ohms law|Talk]]&thinsp;•&thinsp;[[Special:Contributions/Ohms law|Contribs]])</span> 01:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
:Okay, fair enough! Done. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== Need Some Help ==
 
Could you help me categorize this?: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo arcade games]]. I don't know what it falls under. [[User:Logan The Master|Logan The Master]] ([[User talk:Logan The Master|talk]]) 15:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
:Sure! I put it under cat=O. Games/Sports and Science/Technology didn't really seem to fit. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 19:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
::Thank you! [[User:Logan The Master|Logan The Master]] ([[User talk:Logan The Master|talk]]) 14:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[Ken Allen]] ==
 
The [[Ken Allen]] article, to which you recently added some "further reading" references, spiked to 3,500 page views that day - as opposed to the usual average of 20-30 per day. Do you have any idea why? Do your "further reading" posts have that much power? 0;-D Thanks --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 02:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 
:Well, I found it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/hninf/ . Who knows how they found it? :-) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 02:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
::Then I'm baffled. I knew it hadn't been at DYK, and I couldn't find anything in the news. Life's little mysteries! --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 03:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 
== Christian Menses ==
 
Stop deleting/blocking the creating of this page. It was put upon to make the page as I see fit for him.
And I can verify this anyway you need me too. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:B5nny|B5nny]] ([[User talk:B5nny|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/B5nny|contribs]]) 03:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Your fix of my manual page redirect ==
 
Hi. Regarding your fix of my manual page move/redirect (at [[O lucenti, o sereni occhi (Handel)]]): thanks for doing that. I was just realizing the problem with my manual move (no history) when you came along and saved the day. For my own information, what is the official procedure I should go through if I want to have a page renamed? Thanks again. [[User:GFHandel|GFHandel]]&nbsp;[[User_talk:GFHandel|&#9836;]]&nbsp; 21:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 
== Thanks for your helpful additions to [[Nasothek]] ==
 
I usually look for appropriate categories to use in articles similar to the one I'm creating, but it did not occur to me we would have a category for Noses. Thanks for finding it and congratulations on your DYK for [[Toilet paper orientation]]. <span style="font-family:sans-serif;color:black;"> <span class="texhtml" style="text-shadow:#0099cc 0.12em 0.12em 0.12em;"> '''''[[User:Sharktopus|<span style="color:black;">Sharktopus</span>]]'''''</span> [[user talk: Sharktopus|<sup style="color:black;">talk</sup>]]</span> 06:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
:No prob, and thank you! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 
== Zombo.com ==
 
You can ask for the title to be unsalted at [[WP:RFUP]] and move your draft out of userspace. No need to go to DRV. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, [[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters]] and a clue-bat • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otters want attention]])</sup> 01:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
:You're probably right, but it's a strange case... anyway, since it's already at DRV, we might as well let it play out there. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 02:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[PTF 11kly]] ==
 
I finished my editing pass about 3 minutes after your talk page post; it's all yours! --[[User:Christopher Thomas|Christopher Thomas]] ([[User talk:Christopher Thomas|talk]]) 09:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 09:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
 
==DYK for 2011 University of Miami athletics scandal==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#27 August 2011|27 August 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[2011 University of Miami athletics scandal]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that [[Nevin Shapiro|"Little Luke"]]{{'s}} [[Ponzi scheme]] may lead to the "[[death penalty (NCAA)|death penalty]]" for '''[[2011 University of Miami athletics scandal|Miami]]'''?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/2011 University of Miami athletics scandal|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/2011 University of Miami athletics scandal]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/2011 University of Miami athletics scandal|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/2011 University of Miami athletics scandal]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201108/2011_University_of_Miami_athletics_scandal quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 16:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
==Chandravadana and Mohiya==
It's not clear to me ''why'' they are notable from the text you have restored. Or are Indian saints (if that's what they are) notable by definition? And why are saints in a census?<b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;">[[User:Jimfbleak|<span style="color:red;">Jimfbleak</span>]] - </b>[[User talk:Jimfbleak|<span style="font-family:arial; color:green;"> talk to me?</span>]] 16:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
:Okay, so the prose sucks, but that's not an excuse to speedy an article with four sources. I keep telling the newbies that sources are all you need to guarantee that an article survives; I'd hate to be made a liar on that account!
:They're categorized as saints because they're described in the book on saints. Unfortunately, I only have small snippets from Google, so I'm not sure exactly what the book says about their status. They're described in the census not in a listing of residents, but in an expository section about the town. Again, I have only snippets; I don't know the full context. The census seems to cite another source for the stories, but I can't tell what that other source is. And the census isn't carried by any libraries near me. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
:I wrote [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chandravadana_and_Mohiyar&diff=450365729&oldid=450018035 a bit more]. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[Rage comic]] ==
 
It is not a website, but it is web content. That is covered by db-web as "an article about a web site, blog, web forum, '''webcomic''', podcast, browser game, or similar web content", right? →<span style="font-family:Euclid Fraktur">[[User:Σ|<span style="color:#BA0000;">Σ</span>]][[User talk:Σ|<span style="color:#003366;">τ</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Σ|<span style="color:#003366;">c</span>]].</span> 04:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
:No, it's a format that web comics can take, rather than a webcomic in itself. In other words, it's more like [[Mobile comic]] or [[Pixel art]] than [[A Softer World]] or [[Dinosaur Comics]]. It doesn't have a homepage, and there's no one trying to promote it to increase ad revenue. It's just a meme. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 04:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 
== A kitten for you! ==
 
[[File:Cucciolo gatto Bibo.jpg|left|150px]]
this means war, no further comment
 
 
[[User:SEinternational|SEinternational]] ([[User talk:SEinternational|talk]]) 02:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both"/>
 
== Richat Stucture Comment ==
 
In [[Talk:Richat Structure]], you asked:
 
"Are you one of the authors of the paper?"
 
After I posted my comments to the talk section for the Richat Structure, I looked up the ISPs for "83.44.199.232" and "81.34.65.152". They both belong to Telefonica de Espana (AS3352), Madrid, Spain. [[User:Paul H.|Paul H.]] ([[User talk:Paul H.|talk]]) 04:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 
== Thank you, I will read. ==
 
Thank you, I will read. I do not need help so far but it should be made easier to make new articles entries. I copied from other similar articles for the wikicoding and the duplicate reference part was more complicated but I found the help page. If I made mistakes please accept my apologies, I used a lot the preview function to see if it was showing properly. Nottan Oakser <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NottanOaks|NottanOaks]] ([[User talk:NottanOaks|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NottanOaks|contribs]]) 07:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
==Asmara==
Thank you for that.
Can you help me out with the [[Asmara]] page, I don't want anything I've edited to be deleted without a valid reason. --[[User:Tron9698|Tron9698]] ([[User talk:Tron9698|talk]]) 20:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 
:I'm not too familiar with that page. What are you concerned about, that might be deleted? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 20:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==New Page Patrol survey==
{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
| [[Image:NPPbarnstar.jpg|right|70px]]
<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big>
----
Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The [[WP:WMF|WMF]] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
'''Please click [https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9RSKYC9 HERE] to take part.'''<br>
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
----
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Survey|NPP Survey]]</small>
|}
 
== Re:Userspace draft template ==
 
Hi Melchoir, I have added the userspace draft template to all my sandbox pages. Thanks for letting me know about that template. <span style="color:navy;">— [[User:Ganeshk|<span style="color:navy;">Ganeshk</span>]] ([[User talk:Ganeshk|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</span> 10:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==DYK nomination of Order of the Occult Hand==
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Order of the Occult Hand]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Order of the Occult Hand|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 17:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 
== Net force versus resultant force ==
 
I have just started editing the net force article, as you suggested (see the article and its discussion). May need a few days to continue (as well as to join discussion on CG).--[[User:Ilevanat|Ilevanat]] ([[User talk:Ilevanat|talk]]) 21:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 
:Sounds good! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 
I have finally completed the net force article, though it may need some polishing. Would appreciate your comments. Now can come back to the CG discussion, but for comments on potential energy minimum a few words on starting assumprions would be helpful.--[[User:Ilevanat|Ilevanat]] ([[User talk:Ilevanat|talk]]) 01:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 
:Thanks, I've commented there. I'll also add a short explanation at CG. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 03:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 
==Talkback==
{{talkback|ContinueWithCaution|ts=19:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)}}
[[User:ContinueWithCaution|C<sub>(u)</sub>]][[User_talk:ContinueWithCaution|w<sub>(t)</sub>]][[Special:Contributions/ContinueWithCaution|C<sub>(c)</sub>]] 19:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[African wax print]] ==
 
Hi
 
I noticed you were involved with the person who started the page, indeed some dialogue ensued between the two of you.
 
It appears that there may have been a little possibility of COI, as well as the copyright issue currently raised there. I do not know if there was any discussion over those two matters when the page was being created but, as the Wikipage was after the posted date on the website, you may want to weigh in on any discussions.
 
Thanks [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 09:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 
:Thanks for the notification! Although there's a clear case of COI, I think the article isn't too promotional; it would be easier to clean it up than to delete it and start over, if that were the only problem. However, the copyright issue is thornier. [[User:Juliakeck]] might be the copyright holder, but she might not be aware of our free licensing. I'll run the article through the process. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 08:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 
::I figured that any discussions about Juliakeck sending a note from the original website might receive a more favourable response if it came from you than someone they have not dealt with before (assuming they are the same Juliak Keck!). Hope it all works out :¬) [[User:Chaosdruid|Chaosdruid]] ([[User talk:Chaosdruid|talk]]) 21:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Order of the Occult Hand==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#17 November 2011|17 November 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Order of the Occult Hand]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that a media conspiracy calling itself the '''[[Order of the Occult Hand]]''' has infiltrated ''[[The Boston Globe]]'', the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', and ''[[The Washington Times]]''?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Order of the Occult Hand|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Order of the Occult Hand]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Order of the Occult Hand|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Order of the Occult Hand]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201111/Order_of_the_Occult_Hand quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 08:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Second Generation (advertisement)==
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#20 November 2011|20 November 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Second Generation (advertisement)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the TV ad "'''[[Second Generation (advertisement)|Second Generation]]'''" features young basketball players recreating [[Michael Jordan]]'s most famous moves from memory?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Second Generation (advertisement)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Second Generation (advertisement)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Second Generation (advertisement)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Second Generation (advertisement)]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201111/Second_Generation_(advertisement) quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 
== [[b:0.999...]] ==
Great to see you around WB. If you need any help let me know. For example if you want to transwiki [[0.999...]] into WB to scavange from, that is within my abilities. Welcome again! [[User:Thenub314|Thenub314]] ([[User talk:Thenub314|talk]]) 18:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks a lot! I'm not sure that the transwiki is necessary, but I'll keep the option in mind! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 19:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fans==
 
'''[[:Category:Fans]]''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 January 5#Category:Fans|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 04:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 
== [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for merging]] of [[Template:Expand further/doc]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|alt=|link=]][[Template:Expand further/doc]] has been nominated for merging with [[Template:Incomplete]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Expand further/doc|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00; background:#006400;"> talk to me</span>]]</sub> 22:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 
== Summation of Grandi's series ==
 
Hi.
In early March, about 5 years ago, you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Summation_of_Grandi%27s_series&action=historysubmit&diff=113534149&oldid=111467363 added] two notes that should've (probably / hopefully) been expanded by anyone knowledgeable enough. I'm sorry i don't fit that description, so i'm not able to do it myself. Could you please at least rephrase those two statements, so that they won't look so out of place?
Thank you. -- [[User:Jokes Free4Me|Jokes Free4Me]] ([[User talk:Jokes Free4Me|talk]]) 05:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 
:Sure, I won't have much to say, but at least I can make them complete sentences. Thanks for checking! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 
== [[commons:File:3-adic integers with dual colorings.svg]] and [[commons:File:2-adic integers with dual colorings.svg]] ==
 
Nice idea to show values of characters! Also, tips in a SVG image is a novelty for me. [[User:Incnis Mrsi|Incnis Mrsi]] ([[User talk:Incnis Mrsi|talk]]) 10:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 
:Thanks! I was just reading the SVG standard to figure out how to generate such images, and I discovered that SVG documents can contain not only browser-readable semantics, but also CSS and Javascript! I have a scripted version that displays both groups side-by-side and colors one when you hover over an element from the other... but Wikipedia doesn't allow scripted SVG, so we can't use it anytime soon.
:Anyway, if you have suggestions for improvements, just let me know! I'm heavily automated the production of these diagrams, so making changes is easy. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Expand further]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Expand further]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Expand further|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 23:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 
== Some thoughts about the center of mass article ==
 
After a while, I revisited the CM article, after Teapeat had merged CG into it. Not a bad merger, but I believe it could be improved, without re-engaging in the lengthy disscussion we previously had. Would you care to visit the article discussion page?--[[User:Ilevanat|Ilevanat]] ([[User talk:Ilevanat|talk]]) 23:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 
:Eh, alright. :) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 
==Jeff Ireland==
its funny lmao
:(eyeroll) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 04:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 
Not a dolphins fan, but let the fans have their fun. This guy pretty much ruined any chance of their team being relevant for the next 5 years. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.79.109.15|174.79.109.15]] ([[User talk:174.79.109.15|talk]]) 14:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Bah! If they want to trade funny screenshots on forums, that's what DOM editors are for. There's no need to make it harder for ordinary readers to get their information. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 18:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 
== File:Rach21theme.svg listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Rach21theme.svg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 March 25#File:Rach21theme.svg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 21:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 
== Blocking user ==
 
Please block [[User:Gireesh chemrakadan]]. He is making self-promotional articles of his name.[[User:Solomon7968|Solomon7968]] ([[User talk:Solomon7968|talk]]) 06:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 
:Eh, it hasn't gotten to the point where that's necessary, at least not yet. If he persists, he'll get some warning messages, and if he still persists, a block may become appropriate. Anyway, thanks for following up! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 06:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 
== A barnstar for you! ==
 
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I like your dual diagrams on p-adic numbers. I am fascinated by p-adic numbers. But I dont see much description explaining the diagrams. Can you please send more info on this. Thx a lot . my email: ''(redacted)'' [[User:Posinfl|Posinfl]] ([[User talk:Posinfl|talk]]) 20:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.png|Updated DYK query]]
|On June 12, '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Noble rhubarb]]''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on [[:Template talk:Did you know|the "Did you know?" talk page]].
|}
 
:Thanks! Have you read the description at [[Commons:File:3-adic integers with dual colorings.svg]]? If you have more specific questions, I'll be very happy to answer them; I do want to make the diagrams as useful as possible! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 20:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
==All caps==
Can you peek at [[Martin_Beck_(vaudeville)]]. I am disagreeing with another person on the proper use of ALL CAPS in headlines for the New York Times. I believe they should be reduced to "The Title Case" as the NYT itself does in its transcription project. See: [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (ALL CAPS)]] [[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] 02:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== [[Chrysiridia]] ==
:I like the proposed guideline, so I'd tend to agree with you. Why don't you contact the other user, explain your thoughts, and offer that same link to the Manual of Style? I'm sure there won't be violence over so small a matter! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 02:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 
I was trying to clean things up prior this article being featured when I noticed that the subfamily showed three species and the genus article did not exist. So I added the genus article and a species stub for ''C. croesus'' to get rid of the red links. Turns out it wasn't that simple. There may be two species or many more. I see someone changed ''C. riphearia'' to ''C. prometheus'' so I don't know the exact number of species in the genus or which are synonyms. Perhaps the wording should be changed to be a little vague until it is established exactly which are the correct members of the genus. I will do some additional checking myself. Cheers. [[User:Dger|Dger]] ([[User talk:Dger|talk]]) 21:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
==First Timer==
:It looks like there are actually three species in this genus. One is on St. Helena, not Africa but close. [[User:Dger|Dger]] ([[User talk:Dger|talk]]) 23:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey there, you messaged me about my first article Houseboating and I was ust wondering if I'm doing things right? Ive never wikid before. I hope I'm not going to delete your whole page or soemthing by writing this... <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Cyberwiglet|Cyberwiglet]] ([[User talk:Cyberwiglet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cyberwiglet|contribs]]) 03:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC{{{3|}}})</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned2] -->
:Right, see your talk page. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 03:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 
==Merge discussion for [[Kenza Farah]] Albums==
== I'm getting it ==
An article that you have been involved in editing has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going [[ Talk:Kenza Farah#Merging/Spliting Albums |here]], and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 17:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, this is fun. I will try to figure out the style guide and make the necessary changes. Thanks again
([[User:Cyberwiglet|Andrew Reed]] 03:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC))
:It is, isn't it? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 03:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== copyvioHellrazor960 ==
 
You blocked this user indef about a year ago as a VOA. Now he's asking for a second chance. Thoughts? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 18:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Melchoir; I came across an article called "Shi Xie" in random search. The English is dreadful, and it's clearly a translation of a pre-existing text. Hence a copyright violation as I cannot belive that a Chinese National would write such an article in Chinese and then translate it. It is admittedly an extraordinarily obscure topic. Do we care?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
:Eh, he had a short enough career, and it was long enough ago, that he's probably sincere. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 18:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 
==Pacola==
:Hmm... that's a problem, if we can't find the original source. It is the kind of thing I'd care about, but without information there's not much we can do. Most of the writing seems to be from [[User:Littlelittleman4]], who hasn't been around. You can still try asking him, I guess. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
No, I know that they are two separate settlements and there is a difference. Thank you though. [[User:Oakley77|Oakley77]] ([[User talk:Oakley77|talk]]) 18:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 
== UncatKyotoMiyazaki ==
 
Yes,that was a typo. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:KyotoMiyazaki|KyotoMiyazaki]] ([[User talk:KyotoMiyazaki|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/KyotoMiyazaki|contribs]]) 21:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hold up a sec. I appreciate the thought, but could you stop uncategorizing the oil redirects, please? I'm in the process of turning redirects into stubs (see [[Talk:List of vegetable oils]]). It'd be great not to have to redo what I've done in putting them in the right category in the first place. That said, it's not a huge deal either way, if you really feel strongly about it. If you'd like to leave a comment on any of the talk pages of the oil pages you edited, I'll see it. Thanks. [[User:Waitak|Waitak]] 12:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== [[Parity of zero]] ==
:I actually do feel strongly about it. When you categorize a redirect, it gives the impression that there's an article with that name when there isn't. This is confusing and disappointing to the reader, and it frustrates possible collaboration, since other editors can't tell where the gaps in our coverage are. I appreciate the coordination work you've done at [[Talk:List of vegetable oils]], but not everyone knows it's there; I didn't until just now! Anyway, is it so much extra work to copy in the category code during article/stub creation? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 14:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Do you want my issues with portions of that article here, at the Wikiproject talk page or at the Article talk page? While I have issues with pieces of it, I also have issues with the entire article. It seems to span so much conceptually that like having one article on Grease that includes everything from the use in Ammunition causing the Sepoy Rebellion to the casting of John Travolta.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 13:05, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
::I know just what you mean. I'm not doing wholesale categorization of redirects, though I see it might look like I am. I agonized for quite a while over what the right approach to stubs versus redirects might be. My philosophy for vegetable oil redirects has become:
:Jumped into it whole hog on the article page. I really do feel that concept of the article is that bad. (Individual pieces of it are certainly well referenced *that* is not the issue)[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 00:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
::* If there's nothing that points to it, delete it
==Thanks==
::* Go through and make proper stubs for all of the missing articles
Thanks for your improvement to my stubs. As you probably gathered, I didn't really know what I was doing, just trying to avoid lots of re links in an article I'm working on <b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;">[[User:Jimfbleak|<span style="color:red;">Jimfbleak</span>]] - </b>[[User talk:Jimfbleak|<span style="font-family:arial; color:green;"> talk to me?</span>]] 10:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
::* If a redirect exists that's pointed to by anything but [[List of vegetable oils]], leave it, categorize it, but go back and write a stub reasonably soon.
:No prob, thanks for starting the articles in the first place! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 01:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
::I've just gone through the process of registering a stub template ({{tl|vegetable-oil-stub}}) for the stub candidates in [[Talk:List of vegetable oils]]. So, no, it's not a lot of work to go back and redo the categories when I (and, I hope, others) write the stubs in the near future... but I'd still rather you'd leave them if you can deal with it. It's useful in the short term, and of very limited negative effect for all of the above reasons. Thanks for the gracious response. [[User:Waitak|Waitak]] 05:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Riley Huntley|ts=09:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)}}
Cheers, [[User:Riley Huntley|Riley Huntley]] <small><sub>[[User talk:Riley_Huntley|<span style="color:red;">'''talk'''</span>]]</sub> ''No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.''</small> 09:44, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 
==DYK for Equidissection==
:::Okay, obviously you've given this a lot of thought, and I'm certainly not going to go back and delete the cats again; how could I sleep at night if I started a revert war over redirect pages? Your plan makes sense, and there's nothing wrong with stubs. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 05:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
{{tmbox
|style = notice
|small =
|image = {{#switch: {{Currentdaymonth}} | 31 October = [[Image:Emblem-very-very-evil.svg|15x25px|Updated DYK query]] | [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]}}
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#26 August 2012|26 August 2012]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Equidissection]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that when a [[square]] is '''[[equidissection|cut into triangles of equal area]]''' ''(pictured)'', the number of [[triangle]]s is always [[even number|even]]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Equidissection|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Equidissection]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Equidissection|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Equidissection]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201208/Equidissection quick check])</small> and it will be added to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}} [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 16:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 
==Need help to move article==
== [http://academia.wikia.com/wiki/Check_sort Check sort peer review] ==
Hi [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]], sorry to bother you. I really urgently please need your help. As you are a administrator, I need your help to "[[Wikipedia:Moving a page|Move]]" the article [[Tinchy Stryder]] to the article [[Kwasi Danquah III]] for me, so that the article history will be intacted. My regards [[User:MarkMysoe|MarkMysoe]] ([[User talk:MarkMysoe|talk]]) 08:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 
:Thanks for asking! I think you did the right thing in opening a formal move request on the talk page. We'll see where it goes! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 08:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Thought you might be interested in commenting on the [http://academia.wikia.com/wiki/Check_sort Check sort and the Rapid sort] method of performance analysis using '''''Class determination''''' rather than [[Big O notation]]. Thanks. <small> ...[[User:Pce3@ij.net|IMHO]] ([[User talk:Pce3@ij.net|Talk]])</small> 22:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== Invitation to comment at [[Monty Hall problem]] RfC ==
:Actually, I haven't the first idea! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
You are invited to comment on the following RfC:
==World cup group prods==
Why are you taking down the nomination for deletion after only an hour or 2? [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 23:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
'''[[Talk:Monty Hall problem#Conditional or Simple solutions for the Monty Hall problem?]]'''
:You may want to re-read the {{tl|prod}} tags you added yourself. They say "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason." I object. So I removed them. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 22:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 
== [[:File:GrothInt.svg]] missing description details ==
Well, neither has happen and is impossible to do it. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 23:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
<div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;">'''Dear uploader:''' The media file you uploaded as [[:File:GrothInt.svg]] is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
:Huh? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for [[Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion|deletion]],
It is impossible to improve the article and I personally don't find your objection is credible. [[User:Kingjeff|Kingjeff]] 23:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
 
If you have any questions please see [[Help:Image page#Description of the image|Help:Image page]]. Thank you. [[User:Hyacinth|Hyacinth]] ([[User talk:Hyacinth|talk]]) 23:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Add-desc -->
:Okay, I see you're attempting to AfD the articles. You haven't done this before, I guess? I'll help you out, but I won't write a reason for you. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== botheringYouTube video ==
 
I clicked the YouTube link for the video on the song Regulate and the video does not load. Is the link valid anymore?--[[Special:Contributions/98.87.95.230|98.87.95.230]] ([[User talk:98.87.95.230|talk]]) 20:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Melchoir; since you sent me the standard welcome message, I feel that I have bothered you more than I should have. If you feel that I should tap more generally available sources, I do hope that you will say so.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:I think so. Replying on the article talk page... [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
:No, I'm happy to help! Anyway, people tend to be more frank on the internet; rest assured that if you start annyoing me, or anyone else around here, we'll probably tell you! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Expand article]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Expand article]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Expand article|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> &nbsp;[[User:Ryan Vesey|'''''Ryan''''']]&nbsp;[[User talk:Ryan Vesey|'''''Vesey''''']] 19:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 
== http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gullibility&oldid=562718872&diff=prev ==
== Naming of article ==
 
Hi Melchoir (very much like your name, Melchior?) Would [[:File:Corbul şi vulpea saŭ Fleva şi Nădejde, Lumea Vechĭe, 15 ian 1896.JPG this]] o, your opinion be a more suitable image? [[User:Lotje|Lotje]] ([[User talk:Lotje|talk]]) 04:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Ah, yes, sorry about that. I didn't know that those sorts of plants had a "+" in their name. I'll be more careful next time. [[User:Mr. Lefty|'''Mr. L''']][[WP:EA|<font color="Green">'''e'''</font>]][[User:Mr. Lefty|'''fty''']] <sub>[[User talk:Mr. Lefty|''Talk to me!'']]</sub> 01:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:Well, if you're going for the fox and raven story, you could also use [[:File:Frivolous Fables fox and raven.gif|Frivolous Fables fox and raven.gif]], which is a little more direct. It doesn't have to be perfect; I just didn't want to slander some unknown stranger with the earlier image! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 05:08, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
:No prob, before today I'd never seen it either! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 01:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== "thank" function in history ==
 
I have been trying to figure out how this works, and was searching Help, and noticed that you suggested something exactly this back in 2008. Sorry if my question is mis-directed to you - but wanted to try. Somebody thanked me for an edit a few days ago, and I forgot exactly which edit it was and now want to think about it. (an editor thanked me that I have been somewhat at odds with and it was a sweet gesture - so a nice relationship builder which is important around here). But I cannot find any log or other record of the 'thank' so am all at a loss. Do you know if there is any log where I can see which edit this "thanks" was for? Again, sorry if my question is misdirected. (btw I will watch for an answer here, if you should like to give one) [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 15:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
== Deletion of notable person's family ==
 
:No prob, I think [[Special:Notifications]] should show the thanks!
George Garnier is most definitely a notable person, as is William Gray. In fact, infinitely more so than your pedantic, common, cantankerous, unworthy and wholly internet-based personality. Piss off.
:I actually don't remember suggesting such a feature. Out of curiosity, I don't suppose you have a link? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 17:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
 
::ooo - thanks for the link to special: notifications! cool, and exactly what I wanted. Makes me wonder what else is "special" that way. will have to go hunting one of these days! [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_21#Lightweight_thanking_mechanism_in_article_histories Here] is where I found the suggestion for "lightweight thanking mechanism" that looks like it is from you! thanks again. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 18:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Miami Vice|Miami Vice]] 17:10, 19 June 2006
 
== Mallery ==
It has also occured to me that you have also taken part in deleting some of the most incredible topics (fact or fiction) ever devised by human-kind, including 'List of Magic Negroes' and List of notable people to have been stung by jellyfish'. You are an incredible bore.
 
:IThank leftyou severalfor explanatorythe linksthank onyou your(I talkshould page.have Readused them.my sandbox!) [[User:MelchoirWQUlrich|MelchoirWQUlrich]] ([[User talk:WQUlrich|talk]]) 1618:5750, 1915 JuneAugust 20062013 (UTC)
:Hey, whatever it takes, I'm just glad you did what needed doing! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 03:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 
== Main Page appearance: Parity of zero ==
I've read them, but I don't really have any care for them. Those rules (or "guidelines") aren't much use when an article explaining that '0.9999...is equal to 1' is supposedly more valuable than those persons' pages that I created. Who are you to enforce these guidelines? I spent many hours trying to create amusing but informative articles on my friends (who are, at the very least, sons of important British families (families that exist on Wikipedia anyway) and are responsible for upholding their roles in society). The fact is that Wikipedia is a universal source of information and whether or not a person is notable is down to the opinion of the user. Yet you patrol the otherwise wonderful Wikipedia like a policeman when it really doesn't need policing at all, just looking after. You can cut away the branches and leaves that would naturally stem from the Wikipedia 'tree' but in the end one is left with something that is unnatural and, more severely, is in no way unique. It could be the fountain of knowledge that it strives to be but without the human, organic growth that it should sustain, it never will (partly with thanks to people like you). Good day.
 
This is a note to let the main editors of [[Parity of zero]] know that the article will be appearing as [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article|today's featured article]] on August 29, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or one of his delegates ({{user|Dabomb87}}, {{user|Gimmetoo}}, and {{user|Bencherlite}}), or start a discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests]]. You can view the TFA blurb at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 29, 2013]]. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions]]. The blurb as it stands now is below:
[[User:Miami Vice|Miami Vice]] 18:57, 19 June 2006 GMT
 
<blockquote>
:Wow. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 17:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
<div style="float: left; margin: 0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|100px|A balance scale containing zero objects, divided into two equal groups]]</div>
'''[[Parity of zero|Zero is an even number]]'''. In other words, [[0 (number)|zero]]'s ''[[parity (mathematics)|parity]]''—the quality of an [[integer]] being even or odd—is even. It fits the definition of "even" as an integer [[multiple (mathematics)|multiple]] of [[2 (number)|2]], namely {{nowrap|0 × 2}}. As a result, zero has all the properties of even numbers: 0 is [[divisible]] by 2, 0 is surrounded on both sides by odd numbers, 0 is the [[addition|sum]] of an integer (0) with itself, and a set of 0&nbsp;objects can be split into two equal sets ''(example pictured)''. Zero is the additive [[identity element]] of the [[group (mathematics)|group]] of even integers, and it is the starting case from which other even [[natural number]]s are [[recursive definition|recursively defined]]. Applications of this recursion from [[graph theory]] to [[computational geometry]] rely on zero being even. Among the general public, the parity of zero can be a source of confusion. In [[reaction time]] experiments, most people are slower to identify 0 as even than 2, 4, 6, or 8. Some students of mathematics—and some teachers—think that zero is odd, or both even and odd, or neither. Researchers in [[mathematics education]] propose that these misconceptions can become learning opportunities. Studying equalities like {{nowrap|1=0 × 2 = 0}} can address students' doubts about calling 0 a [[number]] and using it in [[arithmetic]]. {{TFAFULL|Parity of zero}}
</blockquote>
[[User:UcuchaBot|UcuchaBot]] ([[User talk:UcuchaBot|talk]]) 23:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
{{clear}}
 
== [[WP:FOUR]] for [[Parity of zero]] ==
Don't be crass, particularly while I'm still typing. [[User:Miami Vice|Miami Vice]] 18:59, 19 June 2006 GMT
 
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
:Do you have any idea how '''''common''''' it is for egotistical kids to write articles on themselves in Wikipedia? Do you know how many no-name American teens fill the ranks you have just eagerly joined?
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Four Award.svg|100px]]
:This place is built on a few fundamental principles: [[WP:V]], [[WP:NOR]], and [[WP:NPOV]]. These principles, in turn, demand that we delete the vanity pages you people write about yourselves. Of course Wikipedia needs policing. If we didn't get rid of all your silly autobiographies, it would be MySpace within a week. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Four Award'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Congratulations! You have been awarded the [[Wikipedia:Four Award|Four Award]] for your work from beginning to end on '''[[Parity of zero]]'''. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]] / [[WP:FOUR]] / [[WP:CHICAGO]] / [[WP:WAWARD]])</small> 06:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
|}--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]] / [[WP:FOUR]] / [[WP:CHICAGO]] / [[WP:WAWARD]])</small> 06:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 
Congrats on the TFA, so soon!!♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 10:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
It's quite obvious that you haven't really taken in anything I've actually written to you on your talk page, let alone the articles that I've been creating today. If it was ''looked after'' properly it would most certainly not turn into MySpace or a half-arsed version of Google for that matter. Instead it would be the single most valuable website in the world.
 
: Thanks! Yes, it was quite the pleasant surprise to see it scheduled! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
And please don't ever bung me into the same group as "no-name American teens" because that's the same group of people that you once were part of. And I could never possibly be a part of that. How ''truly'' offensive.
 
==Gary Mackay-Steven‎ transfer==
:What a completely unexpected reaction. Look, is there a reason you're still talking to me? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 
I just did it because someone else said that he had signed for Leeds and he hadn't. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Weslington12|Weslington12]] ([[User talk:Weslington12|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Weslington12|contribs]]) 01:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Only one, since you're obviously the voice of reason here - let's say that I sourced the facts that I stated on my friend's articles - e.g. The fact that George Garnier is actually son of Edward Garnier MP and that he has recently photographed Will Self as well as the editor of The Times - would they still have been deleted?
 
:(Replied at [[User talk:Weslington12]]) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
:I can only speculate, since I did not delete the article and I don't know what sources you have in mind. If it's georgegarnier.com, forget it. Otherwise, who knows? Just keep in mind that verifiability is not the only policy around here. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 19:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== ErkPrecious ==
 
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 ); border-radius: 1em; border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix">
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_water_chestnut&diff=next&oldid=57639157]. I am horrified at my mistake there, and that it sat so long! Thanks for fixing it. &mdash;[[User:Bunchofgrapes|Bunchofgrapes]] ([[User talk:Bunchofgrapes|talk]]) 03:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
<div>
:Yup! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 03:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); border-radius: 0.5em;">[[File:Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg|67px]]</div>
'''orientation'''<br />
Thank you for quality articles about basics, such as [[Parity of zero]] and [[toilet paper orientation]], keeping them clean with {{diff|Toilet paper orientation|510713140|510695972|respect for the sources}}, for Schubert's [[Wiegenlied, D. 498 (Schubert)|lullaby]] for a mel(low) choir, - you are an [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious|awesome Wikipedian]]!
 
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 22:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
== new page ==
</div></div>
 
Wow, thank you! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Melchoir, I am doing some new page patrolling, and hit a page called "list of topics in sexual ethics". I left it alone. Is it all right?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 00:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
: A year ago, you were the 589th recipient of my [[User talk:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky Prize]], --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
:Well, I don't see any glaring problems right off the bat. If you have a concern, you could always leave a note on the talk page or contact the author. If you just have a gut feeling, but you're not sure what's wrong, perhaps [[Wikipedia:Cleanup resources]] will give you ideas? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 00:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
: Six years ago, you were recipient no. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#Melchoir|589]] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
== Great minds think alike ==
 
==DYK for Butt fumble==
We actually did the same thing twice - I realized what I had done and reverted it, but it didn't go through because it was identical to yours. Jinks. [[User:Supadawg|Supadawg]] - [[User talk:Supadawg|Talk]] 00:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
{{tmbox
:Awesome. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 00:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
|style = notice
|small =
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#11 September 2013|11 September 2013]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Butt fumble]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the '''[[butt fumble]]''', an infamous play in [[American football]], was retired as an undefeated champion of ''[[SportsCenter]]'s'' "Worst of the Worst" poll, having won a record-breaking 40 weeks in a row?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Butt fumble]]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201309/Butt_fumble quick check])</small> and it will be added to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[WP:Did you know|The DYK project]] ([[T:TDYK|nominate]]) 00:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
:Well done on almost 9000 views. I have added it to [[WP:DYKSTATS]], on top of the list for September. [[User:StAnselm|<b>St</b>]][[Special:Contributions/StAnselm|Anselm]] ([[User talk:StAnselm|talk]]) 22:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 00:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Derivation of the center of mass]] ==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
 
The article [[Derivation of the center of mass]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32; because of the following concern:
== New editors/articles ==
:'''[[WP:Content forking|content fork]] that occurred in 2011 and then was left an orphan with no references. Duplicates material in [[Center of mass#Definition]]. [[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]] ([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]]) 21:47, 1 November 2013 (UTC)'''
 
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
Melchoir, I have taken you at your word (I hope). I have labelled myself as a new page patroller; I have been inserting welcome templates in the talk pages of apparently serious new users (not many) adding wikify templates (quite a lot) adding stub messages where obviously called for, and flagging a few articles for deletion where they were obviously autobiographical, content-free or obscene. Am I supposed to do this, or should I leave these things for an admin?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 16:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Derivation of the center of mass|the article's talk page]].
:Sure, you're allowed to do tasks that, in other communities, might be left to admins. In fact, it's encouraged, and as a non-admin patroller myself, let me be the first to thank you for pitching in! Generally speaking, if the wiki software doesn't bar you from doing something for not being an admin, the community isn't going to bar you either. And one last thought: taking an interest in administrative tasks and generally "acting as if you're an admin" is, or so I hear, one of the best ways to demonstrate competence and trustworthiness so that the community will actually ''make'' you an admin later on. So, keep up the good work, and be bold! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 17:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]] ([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]]) 21:47, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
:: Thank you. A piece of information, please. In marking new articles for deletion, I know about{db-bio} and {db-empty} (I have used only one bracket to avoid generating the message). What word does one use to label an obscene article, given that {db-obscene} doesn't work?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 18:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
==Disambiguation link notification for November 26==
:::A full list of db tags is at [[WP:CSD]]. For an obscene article, {{tl|db-attack}} or {{tl|nonsense}}, or simply {{tl|d}}, might be appropriate. By the way, you can use {{tl|tl}} to mention templates without using them, like I've done here. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
:::{{tl|db-vand}} might also work. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 19:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Beast Quake]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Alex Brown]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Beast_Quake|check to confirm]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Beast_Quake|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>
== Thanks ==
 
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Melchoir: Thanks for your edits of the new article [[Flue gas stack]] that I created last night. I don't really mind one way or the other, but I am curious as to why you thought the pluralized article title needed to be singularized (if I may invent a few words). - [[User:Mbeychok|mbeychok]] 17:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== Notification of automated file description generation ==
:Ah, that would be [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals)]]. Sorry for not linkking to it earlier! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 19:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Your upload of [[:File:AdditionTable.svg]] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
 
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions [[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|here]]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])'' 11:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
== Merging ==
 
*Another one of your uploads, [[:File:AdditionRealCauchy.svg]], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])'' 11:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
I have found two articles (both by editor called Helicopter). One is called "Mcdonalds"; one is called "Mcdonalds restaurants". leaving aside the possibility of classing them as advertising, they should be merged, but I don't know the template to add to suggest this. Help.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 
*Another one of your uploads, [[:File:AdditionRealDedekind.svg]], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by [[User:Theo's Little Bot|Theo's Little Bot]] ([[User:Theo's Little Bot/opt-out|opt-out]])'' 11:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
:I can't find the user or the articles, but the tags you seek are at [[Wikipedia:Cleanup resources#Merging and splitting]]. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 
==Re: File permission problem with File:HD 106906 b image.jpg==
::I spelled him wrong; it's Helicoptor.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 23:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your diligence for maintaining legal standards. I am just notifying you that I have had an email conversation with the author of the image, Vanessa Bailey, who has agreed to send her own individual consent notification to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. I forwarded her acknowledgement, so that you folks would refrain from deleting it until it's processed. Anyways, I just wanted to let you know that it's been taken care of and I understand your concern. Thank you! [[User:DarthBotto|D<small>ARTH</small>B<small>OTTO</small>]]<sub>&nbsp;[[User talk:DarthBotto|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/DarthBotto|cont]]</sub> 01:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 
== Your [[WP:GA|GA]] nomination of [[Second Generation (advertisement)]]==
:::Oh, I see. [[User:Helicoptor]] appears to have made a clumsy attempt to split [[McDonald's]] into several sub-articles. If you're familiar with [[Wikipedia:Summary style]], you could help out that effort, I guess. Or to recombine the pieces, most of the work has already been done, and the satellite articles could be nominated for deletion or redirected back to the original. The safeest thing to do is to ask around on [[Talk:McDonald's]]; I'm sure plenty of people are watching it. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[Second Generation (advertisement)]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MusikAnimal|MusikAnimal]]</small> -- {{User-multi
|doc=yes
|User=MusikAnimal
|1=t
}} 02:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 
The article [[Second Generation (advertisement)]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Second Generation (advertisement)]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MusikAnimal|MusikAnimal]]</small> -- {{User-multi
== copy-vio ==
|doc=yes
|User=MusikAnimal
|1=t
}} 04:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 
The article [[Second Generation (advertisement)]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has passed [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:Second Generation (advertisement)]] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MusikAnimal|MusikAnimal]]</small> -- {{User-multi
Melchoir: going back to my comment about User Helicoptor; please take a look at this guy's output just this evening. No-one can write that many well-written articles that fast, surely? He has got to be pinching the stuff from somewhere.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 23:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
|doc=yes
|User=MusikAnimal
|1=t
}} 01:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:Cool, thanks! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 04:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
:Ah, right, he seems to be copying content from other Wikipedia articles without coming out and saying so. A few users have left helpful messages at [[User talk:Helicoptor]], so we probably don't need to do anything more for now. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== EmailContext ==
 
I found this, the initial sentence of a new article:
I'd like to email you privately but you have not configured the "email this user function". Could you please email me user said function and tell me your email address? [[User:Savidan|savidan]]<sup>[[User_talk:Savidan|(talk)]] [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:#008000;">(e@)</span>]]</sup> 07:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
:: Some Monte Carlo methods require independent samples to be drawn from a one-dimensional distribution in sorted order.
What???? There is nothing in that sentence that even attempts to hint to the lay reader that statistics is what this is about! I know you have some experience here. You shouldn't start an article with a sentence like that. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 06:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:Okay! {{diff|Sampling_in_order|589558527|589556577}} [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 06:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
:Right, sorry, I've now reactivated the feature. I guess I never confirmed it after that became a requirement. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== editor tracingSignatures ==
 
Well, I know and use that, I either type 4tidles, or press the 4tidles at Insert or Wiki markup sections beneath the editing pane. I only have customized my signature, after seeing that automated signature by Signbot or whoever, looks far superior than the default signature. Customizing signatures can be done over there, just in case... --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal-signature
Hi: another question (I seem to find so many). I know it is possible to locate all the edits of a named author, and i'm sure it's stupidly easy when you know. How do you do it?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 01:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
:<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;manual signature: comment added by [[User:ThoAppelsin|ThoAppelsin]] ([[User talk:ThoAppelsin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ThoAppelsin|contribs]])</span></small> 21:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
:No prob, if you visit the user's user page or talk page, the "User contributions" link will appear in the toolbox on the left-hand side of the screen. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 04:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
::I said it would be stupidly easy!--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 11:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:Ah, that's cool! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 21:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
== major revisions complete ==
 
== Euler ==
The [[Half-life computation]] article has undergone substantial revision which has hopefully addressed everyone's concerns. If you have any further comments after looking at the article again, please list the items you do not like, make whatever comment you have and please be specific and allow time for further revision. If there is any reason I can not comply with your wishes then I will let you know the reason why. <small> ...[[User:Pce3@ij.net|IMHO]] ([[User talk:Pce3@ij.net|Talk]])</small> 12:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Hi, The evaluation of the alternating integer series in Euler seems easier to source. See e.g., Ayoub, Raymond Euler and the zeta function. Amer. Math. Monthly 81 (1974), 1067–1086. [[User:Tkuvho|Tkuvho]] ([[User talk:Tkuvho|talk]]) 14:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
==Sunflower and Fibonacci number==
:Right, which is why the article on [[1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + · · ·]] mentions Euler in the lead. But thanks for the additional reference! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 19:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for asking. I added the sunflower head image since I made it the other day with the Fibonacci in mind and although I am sure the image is relevant for the article [http://www.popmath.org.uk/rpamaths/rpampages/sunflower.html] I would prefer to leave it for someone more qualified to add the right commentary. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] 05:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:Okay, thanks for the link! I'll take a shot at it in a bit. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 06:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:I counted 34/55 around the outside and added it to the article. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 06:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:And I've taken the liverty of pasting it onto [[Sunflower]] as well. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 06:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
::Reads good. Thanks. [[User:Shyamal|Shyamal]] 06:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== blockApril 2014 GA Thanks ==
 
On behalf of [[WP:CHICAGO]], I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to [[Second Generation (advertisement)]]. {{User Good Article|Second Generation (advertisement)}}.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]] / [[WP:FOUR]] / [[WP:CHICAGO]] / [[WP:WAWARD]])</small> 19:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Melchoir: I just got briefly, and obviously accidentally blocked by an admin of username [[AmiDaniel]], who's user page says she has health problems. The block was clearly transient, because here I am. But if one does get blocked accidentally, as in this case, what do you do? According to my on-screen message I was confused, Lord knows why, with a user:polikarpos, who the message said weas blocked indefinitely. In that situation, how would I unblock?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 20:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
:Cool, you're welcome! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 22:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
:Um, are you completely sure about what happened? Your [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Anthony.bradbury block log] is clean... [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 20:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
== Unidan article ==
::Good. But I saw the message, could not (briefly) edit, and I can read. And how else would I get the Admin's name? I am ok now, sure, but it's worrying. Incidentally, if you say my log is clean, I also got briefly blocked on my second or third day with Wiki by Arwel Parry, and he denied it as well. Is it possible for intentional vandals to clone ISP addresses?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Hi, I saw that you edited the [[Ben Eisenkop]] article. I think the title of the article should be [[Unidan]], as per [[WP:NICKNAME]], and [[Ben Eisenkop]] should be the redirect. That is what I did for [[Shitty Watercolour]] too. I can't move [[Ben Eisenkop]] to [[Unidan]] since the latter already exists as a redirect. I see you are an administrator - if you agree with my reasoning, can you please perform the required page move(s)? Thank you, [[User:AlmostGrad|AlmostGrad]] ([[User talk:AlmostGrad|talk]]) 21:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
:::I doubt it, but now that you mention IP addresses... do you surf from dynamic IP? If so, you may be running into the [[Wikipedia:Autoblock]] feature. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:Hmm, we should probably wait until the AfD closes. (I've been wrong before, but it seems like it'll be kept!) [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 04:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
:: Now that the AfD has been closed as keep, can you please swap the source and the target of the redirect? The article should be called [[Unidan]], the name he is most commonly known by, per [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. -- [[User:AlmostGrad|AlmostGrad]] ([[User talk:AlmostGrad|talk]]) 22:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 
Hello Melchoir do you do you remember me when my username used to be neptunekh
I don't think so. Just a common old home PC bought 2 years ago. I am the only user. My worry is, as I say, given that I am NOT vandalising anything - see my contributions - if I were to get accidentally blocked again, how to do I make contact to get unblocked? I do take your point about my block log, but it did happen. The block message from User:AmiDaniel was addressed to User:Polikarpos, which is not me, and it was telling him that he was blocked indefinitely; that's scary. AmiDaniel does not answer, but her user page says she has health problems.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I have a gemstone question for you: does [[phantom quartz]] come ever in a silver or grey colour? Thanks you! [[User:Venustar84|Venustar84]] ([[User talk:Venustar84|talk]]) 17:16, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 
== Request for comment ==
:And you don't use AOL or anything? Well, AmiDaniel was active earlier just today, so she's not gone, and I'm sure she'll respond to you in time. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Pre-RfA_opinion_page|here]] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. [[User:Jim Cartar|Jim Carter]] through [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
::I'm on BT Yahoo. AmiDaniel perhaps has gone to bed. Incidentally, user page is rather ambiguous as to whether he/she is male or female.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators -->
 
== Request ==
:::Well, I don't know how BT Yahoo works, but it sure sounds like an autoblock to me.
 
Hi, I'd like to use your file [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-adic_integers_with_dual_colorings.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-adic_integers_with_dual_colorings.svg] on my American Mathematical Society blog called
And I am really sorry to nag, but you do not answer the question. If I get accidentally permanently blocked, how do I make contact?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[http://blogs.ams.org/visualinsight/ Visual Insight]. It's a great image! Can I use it?
 
The AMS demands that I get people to "sign" an electronic permissions form unless allowing the AMS to use the image - they don't want to get sued. You have a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, which says "You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)". However, I don't think you've specified how you want to be attributed. So, they may make me make you use the form.
:Contact the admin and be patient? If you're really dying for a speedier response, you could also try [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]]. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 22:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 
[[User:John Baez|John Baez]] ([[User talk:John Baez|talk]]) 06:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
::Ok, so I'm being paranoid. But I did try while blocked to contact the Admin and got a message to say that I couldn't because I was blocked. That's my point.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
==[[WP:JSTOR]] access==
Hello, [[WP:The Wikipedia Library]] has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at [[WP:JSTOR]] . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at [[Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved]]. Thanks much, [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 21:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
<small>Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at [[Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved]].</small>
 
:::Oh! Sorry, I misunderstood. If you wish to protest a block ''while'' still being blocked, you can apply {{tl|unblock}} to your talk page, which you should still be able to edit. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 00:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 
==[[Vesuvianite]]==
==Featured article project==
Hi I cleaned up the Vesuvianite gemstone article a bit. Can you wikify or edit it more? Thank you. [[User:Venustar84|Venustar84]] ([[User talk:Venustar84|talk]]) 18:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I would like to nominate [[Asian arowana]] for featured article status some time in the near future. I am writing to ask for your help in improving the article in any possible way in preparation for nomination. Thanks! --[[User:Ginkgo100|Ginkgo100]] <sup>[[User talk:Ginkgo100|''talk'']] · [[Special:Contributions/Ginkgo100|''contribs'']]</sup> 18:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
:Done and replied at [[User talk:Venustar84#Vesuvianite]] [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 18:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 
==Thanks for cleaning up the Vesuvianite article==
== 0.999 Proof ==
I used to be user neptunekh. You can call me by my real first name Kristine. [[User:Venustar84|Venustar84]] ([[User talk:Venustar84|talk]]) 18:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 
== Zeta Function Regularization ==
Melchoir: I always thought the "0.9999 infinitum equals one" proof was as simple as this:
 
Hi,
8/9 = 0.8888888…
I found you edited the page 1+2+3+4+... of Wikipedia, where I found the following statement (in the paragraph
"Zeta Function Regularization"):
 
More generally $\zeta(s)$ will always be given by the degree zero term of the Laurent series expansion
1/9 = 0.1111111…
around $h=0$ of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-s} e^{hn}$.
 
Do you have some reference for this statement?
0.8888888… + 0.1111111… = 0.9999999…
It seems wrong to me.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Best Regards,
Maurizio Barbato (user: PoppiesInAWheatField)[[User:PoppiesInAWheatField|PoppiesInAWheatField]] ([[User talk:PoppiesInAWheatField|talk]]) 12:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:Hi Maurizio! I didn't write that sentence. It was added in this change: {{diff|title=1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E2%8B%AF|diff=prev|oldid=590834705}} by [[User:Chinju]]. You may want to contact him instead or raise the issue at [[Talk:1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯]]. Thanks, [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 18:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
8/9 + 1/9 = 9/9
 
==Vesuvianite==
9/9 = 1
I added even more to the Vesuvianite article. Do you wanna edit it more? Thank you. [[User:Venustar84|Venustar84]] ([[User talk:Venustar84|talk]]) 01:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 
== Thanks :) ==
0.9999999… = 1
 
Thanks for your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Basic_bitch]]. I'm obviously somewhat biased since I created the article ;) but I appreciate your very level-headed arguments against the WP:NEO/WP:WINAD stuff. Frankly, I was waiting for the inevitable deletion nom as soon as I moved the draft into the article namespace, but I was lax in checking my watchlist and missed the discussion (it seems folks aren't taking [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#After_nominating:_Notify_interested_projects_and_editors|Wikietiquette]] seriously these days...).
Separate issue. What happened to&nbsp;</font><font color="#FF0000">LeBofSportif</font></font></font>? He's now a dead link.
 
Anyway, if you ever need another pair of eyes/hands to do some copyediting or are in the market for translation/cleanup assistance from Russian or Ukrainian sources, just [[User_talk:Accedie|holler]] :) Cheers, [[User:Accedie|<span style="font-family:courier; color:black;">'''Accedie'''</span>]][[User talk:Accedie|<span style="font-family:courier; color:black;"><sup>'''talk to me'''</sup></span>]] 19:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 
== The Wikipedia Library needs you! ==
 
[[File:Wikipedia Library owl.svg|110px|right|link=WP:The Wikipedia Library]]
We hope [[WP:TWL|The Wikipedia Library]] has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and ''we need your help!''
 
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
*'''Account coordinators''': help distribute free research access
*'''Partner coordinators''': seek new donations from partners
*'''Communications coordinators''': share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
*'''Technical coordinators''': advise on building tools to support the library's work
*'''Outreach coordinators''': connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
*'''Research coordinators''': run reference services
<br>
<div style="text-align:center; font-size:larger;">[[Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Coordinators/Signup|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-progressive">Sign up now</span>]]</div>
Another issue. Can you tell me more about yourself and your background. Can you e-mail me this somehow if you don't want to share it in a public forum?
<br/>Send on behalf of [[Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library|The Wikipedia Library]] using [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
<br>[[User:Greg L|Greg L]] 06:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:EuroCarGT@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Nikkimaria/BBlist&oldid=670298116 -->
 
== Invitation to WikiProject TAFI ==
:Well, the argument is fine as long as one assumes that 1/9 = 0.1111111… and that addition of decimal expansions works. And like the equality "0.9999999… = 1" itself, these are both perfectly true statements and provable in a variety of formalisms. Unfortunately, such proofs are even more obscure than the proofs that 0.9999999… = 1, so some people are unprepared to believe your assumptions.
:Looking at [[Special:Contributions/LeBofSportif]], the user seems to still be around, no?
:As for me, I'm fine talking about myself as long as it doesn't just give away my identity. (I'm assuming that there aren't any really driven investigators watching my Wikipedia talk page!) I'm a 22-year old American with a B.A. each in math and physics. Theoretically I should be contributing on biological macromolecules, planetary ring dynamics, mathematical billiards, and quantum error correction, but for the most part I've found it more fun to branch out on Wikipedia. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 19:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 
{| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:3px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%"
|-
|rowspan=2| [[File:Articles for improvement star.svg|95px]]
|-
|{{color|#000080|Hello, Melchoir}}. You're invited to join '''{{LinkColor|blue|Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement| WikiProject Today's articles for improvement}}'''. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's [[Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominated articles|Nominated articles]] page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's [[Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement|talk page]]. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of [[Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement/Members|members]]. '''[[User:Bananasoldier|<span style="color:green">Bananasoldier</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Bananasoldier#top|talk]]) 00:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
|}
 
Hi! We're a WikiProject that runs weekly collaborations. Feel free to check us out! Regardless, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. '''[[User:Bananasoldier|<span style="color:green">Bananasoldier</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Bananasoldier#top|talk]]) 00:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 
== You've got mail? (media request) ==
 
{{YGM|subject=Media Request - the Daily Dot - Toilet Paper Orientation}}
 
Hope to hear from you soon!
 
==[[Judith Clegg]] on main page==
I admit that I am not familiar with computer terminology, and I appreciate your expertise in the matter. But changing the hook, while on the main page, to suggest that her father encouraged her to take up [[computer programming]] at the age of 7 is a bit of a stretch. It would have been better to make a piped link to [[computer programming]] and call it what the source did: "how to code".
:... that the father of British [[Management consulting|strategy consultant]] and tech entrepreneur '''[[Judith Clegg]]''' encouraged her to learn [[Computer programming|how to code]] when she was 7 or 8 years old? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 09:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
::That distinction does not make sense, since the purpose of a programming language is to program a computer. But it's off the front page now, so I don't really care. ''shrug'' [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]]) 20:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 
== [[Polymath project]] request ==
There has been another [http://polymathprojects.org/2015/12/28/polymath-proposal-explaining-identities-for-irreducible-polynomials/ polymath project solved]! Can you add this information to the "Problem solved" section of the article please? I think it can go under the heading of "Polymath proposal problem" under "Problem solved" section. This problem was going to become a polymath project, but someone else proved it so quickly before it becoming a polymath project (with number). However, I think it is another achievement worth mentioning in the article. Due to my limited mathematics background, I don't think I'm able to write about it as well as someone like you. Thank you! [[User:Pendragon5|Pendragon5]] ([[User talk:Pendragon5|talk]]) 02:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 
== Extended confirmed protection ==
 
{{ivmbox|1=Hello, Melchoir. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
 
[[WP:BLUELOCK|Extended confirmed protection]] (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned [[WP:EXTENDEDCONFIRMED|"extended confirmed" user right]] was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 129#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection|this community discussion]] with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
 
In July and August 2016, [[WP:ECP2016|a request for comment]] established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
* '''Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective'''. It should not be used as a first resort.
* '''A bot will post a notification at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] of each use'''. MusikBot currently does this by updating [[User:MusikBot/ECPMonitor/Report|a report]], which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review [[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Extended confirmed protection|the protection policy]] carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. <br><small>This message was sent to the administrators' [[Wikipedia:Administrators/Message list|mass message list]]. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)</small> |2=Padlock-blue.svg}}
<!--Message sent following discussion at WT:PP-->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=737471142 -->
 
== Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins ==
 
Hello,
 
Please note that [[Time-based One-time Password Algorithm|TOTP]] based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your [[Special:Preferences|preferences page]] in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the [[Help:Two-factor authentication|developing help page]] for additional information. '''Important''': Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Two-Factor_Authentication_now_available_for_admins|thread on the administrators' noticeboard]]. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mike V@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mike_V/All_admins&oldid=749162175 -->
 
== A new user right for New Page Patrollers ==
 
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}.
 
A new user group, [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers|'''New Page Reviewer''']], has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at [[Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer|PERM]]. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
 
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Templates|here]] but very often a friendly custom message works best.
 
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at [[WT:NPR]]. <small>''(Sent to all admins)''</small>.[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=748418714 -->
 
== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==
 
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Melchoir. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
 
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/10&oldid=750552495 -->
 
== UTRS Account Request ==
 
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. <!-- Please sign with THREE tildes (~~~), NOT four. This avoids archive bots archiving this message before your account gets approved. --> [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] ([[User talk:Melchoir#top|talk]])
:I have activated your account on the UTRS system. Thank you for volunteering.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 20:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 
== Administrators' newsletter - February 2017 ==
 
[[Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter|News and updates for administrators]] from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please [[Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Subscribe|subscribe]]. Your [[Wikipedia talk:Administrators' newsletter|feedback]] is welcomed.
 
[[File:Admin mop.PNG|20px]] '''Administrator changes'''
:[[File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg|20px]] [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Schwede66|Schwede66]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/K6ka|K6ka]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ferret|Ferret]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyberpower678 2|Cyberpower678]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mz7|Mz7]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Primefac 2|Primefac]] • [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dodger67 2|Dodger67]]
:[[File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg|20px]] [[Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2017#January 2017|Briangotts]] • [[Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2017#January 2017|JeremyA]] • [[Special:Permalink/762731058#Desysop request|BU Rob13]]
 
[[File:Green check.svg|20px]] '''Guideline and policy news'''
:*A [[Wikipedia talk:Administrators#Workshopping an RfC on the inactivity policy|discussion]] to workshop proposals to amend the [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Lengthy inactivity|administrator inactivity policy]] at [[Wikipedia talk:Administrators]] has been in process since late December 2016.
:*[[Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016]] closed with no consensus for implementing [[Wikipedia:Pending changes#Effect of various protection levels|Pending changes level 2]] with new criteria for use.
:*Following [[Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Activity requirements|an RfC]], an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
 
[[File:Octicons-tools.svg|20px]] '''Technical news'''
:*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. ([[Phab:T34950|T34950]])
:*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Make PC2 no longer available to admins|RfC]] closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. ([[Phab:T156448|T156448]])
:* The Foundation has [[:mailarchive:wikimedia-l/2017-January/086013.html|announced]] a new [[meta:Community health initiative|community health initiative]] to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
 
[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|20px]] '''Arbitration'''
:*The Arbitration Committee released [[Special:Permalink/762120256#Response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing|a response]] to the Wikimedia Foundation's [[Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing|statement on paid editing and outing]].
 
[[File:Nuvola apps knewsticker.png|20px]] '''Obituaries'''
:* [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
 
----
{{center|[[Wikipedia talk:Administrators' newsletter/17/1|Discuss this newsletter]] • [[Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Subscribe|Subscribe]] • [[Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Archive|Archive]]}}
 
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_newsletter/First_issue&oldid=763126991 -->
 
== Invitation to Admin confidence survey ==
 
Hello,
 
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
 
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
 
<big>To take the survey sign up '''[[en:Wikipedia:Community health initiative on English Wikipedia/Administrator confidence survey|here]]''' and we will send you a link to the form.</big>
 
We really appreciate your input!
 
<small>Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all [[en:Wikipedia:Mass message senders|massmessage mailings]] from the Anti-harassment tools team. </small>
 
For the Anti-harassment tools team, [[User:SPoore (WMF)|SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative]] ([[User talk:SPoore (WMF)|talk]]) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:SPoore (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:SPoore_(WMF)/Admin_confidence_survey_massmessage_list_2&oldid=17224940 -->
 
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
 
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Melchoir. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
 
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 -->
==[[:Category:Nothing]] has been nominated for discussion==
 
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Category:Nothing]]''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 March 20#Category:Nothing|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy/justasig|talk]]) 13:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
 
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Melchoir. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
 
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
 
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 -->
 
== ArbCom 2019 special circular ==
 
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;">
{|
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| [[File:Warning sign font awesome.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle]]
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|must]] secure their accounts'''</span>
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
* [[Special:ChangePassword|Change your password now]] if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, [https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords exposed], or weak
* [[Wikipedia:User_account_security#Two-factor authentication (2FA)|Enable two-factor authentication now]] for improved security
|}
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span>
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none">
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">
 
{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;"
Hello. I stumbled upon the 0.999...=1 argument and decided if I might ask of your opinion. Although my understanding of mathematics may appear crude to a pure mathematician, it is my understanding that people are generally confused about how one number may be equal another number that appears to be different. Could I be correct in saying that 0.9999... is merely a "representation" of a number, i.e., the way that we lazily write an infinite limit, which is indeed equal to the number one. Thus, when we write 0.999...=1, we are formally saying that this colloquially written limit is equal to one, NOT that one number is equal to a seemingly different number. If formally correct, perhaps this should be explained in that article.
|{{null}}
[[User:Krea|Krea]] 19:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
; Why have I received this message?
: All administrators are receiving it.
 
; What prompted you to send this message?
:It would be much better to say that "0.999..." is a representation of a number that happens to be 1, even though technically it is just a string of eight characters. Likewise, "one", "unity", "the integer after zero", and "1" itself are English phrases that represent 1. But if you take away the quote marks you're dealing with live ammo, and these are all identically the same thing, set, and concept.
: Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were [[WP:LEVEL1|desysopped on an emergency basis]]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh [[WP:RFA|Request for Adminship (RfA)]] after losing control of their account.
:I'm sure this all has something to do with [[use-mention distinction]]s and linguistics, but the mathematics going on is that we don't ''want'' to distinguish between 1+1 and 2, between 1.5 and 3/2, between -0 and 0, or between 0.999... and 1. If nothing is equal to anything else, then we can all sit around congratulating ourselves on our powers of distinction, but we can't do any mathematics!. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 20:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 
; What do I need to do?
Should somebody not make all this clear in the article rather than leaving it as a sentence or two; saying something like: "0.999... is the representation of a number constructed through an infinite sum that equals one."?
: Only to follow the instructions in this message.
[[User:Krea|Krea]] 16:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.
 
; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
:Well, I don't agree with that sentence, because 0.999... isn't a representation of 1; 0.999... is the same as 1. What's wrong with the current language: "It should be no surprise that a notation allows a single number to be written in different ways.", with the example? [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
: You can find out more about 2FA at [[m:2FA]].
|}</div>
</div>
 
<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|recent motion]]. Thank you for your attention. For the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]], [[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
I didn't say 0.999... is a representation of 1, I said that the ''notation'' 0.999... is a representation of an infinite summation, the evaluation of which is 1. To avoid confusing less knowledgeable readers, I thought that that fact should be made explicity clear. As it is, only a mathematician who knew this would understand that particular sentence for all that it is: the lay person would overlook it - especially since the discussion before that sentence is, mostly, pointless: What was the significance of mentioning irrationals?
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular -->
[[User:Krea|Krea]] 20:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->
 
== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) ==
:The article [[Proof that 0.999... equals 1]] does not mention irrationals. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
"There also exist numbers that are not quotients of integers, such as the square root of two (1.41421356…) and pi (3.14159265…) with an endless number of digits that do not repeat."
[[User:Krea|Krea]] 21:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Security|required]] to "have strong passwords and [[Wikipedia:Personal security practices|follow appropriate personal security practices]]." We have [[Special:Permalink/891851004#Return of permissions for compromised administrator accounts|updated]] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, [[WP:2FA|two-factor authentication]] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
:Ah, didn't see that. Yeah, the background rambles a bit, but I don't see how to fix it. Anyway, as for the meaning of the notation "0.999...", the article should (but perhaps doesn't) make clear that it can literally mean many things: the limit of a certain sequence, the sum of a certain series, the unique point in certain nested intervals, a certain equivalence class of rational Cauchy sequences, a certain cut of rationals, etc., and it doesn't matter which of these we take to be the "true" meaning, because they are all equal to the real number 1. Also, it's dangerous ground to start distinguishing between an infinite summation and its "evaluation". As I've been trying to say, in mathematical writing, everything is evaluated by default. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 00:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
Well, I'm not overly bothered about it to be fair (I think I was bored that day), it's just that I thought it could be made more clear that 0.999... is just another way of writing 1, and that the reason for this lies in the idea of a limit. When I first came across this as a kid, the book said that this was a proof that no number lies between 0.999... and unity. I remember being a little confused and not really understanding why 0.999... equaled 1 until I was introduced to the very powerful concept of the limit. So, it's no big deal really... [[User:Krea|Krea]] 17:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 
For the Arbitration Committee, -[[User:Cameron11598|Cameron11598]] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
== Caesium v.s. Cesium ==
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction -->
From: [[User:Greg L|Greg L]] 01:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)<br> The NIST and other U.S. scientific organizations spell element #55 “cesium”. Someone re-directed Wiki inquiries to the British spelling "Caesium". I would have fixed this if I knew how. Do you know how to do this?
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->
:Yes, but if you check out [[Talk:Caesium]], it's a fight that you aren't going to want to join! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 02:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
==[[:Category:Ancestries of individuals]] has been nominated for discussion==
 
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Category:Ancestries of individuals]]''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 15#Category:Ancestries of individuals|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Rathfelder|Rathfelder]] ([[User talk:Rathfelder|talk]]) 21:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
:: I went to Talk and read what was there. I was amazed at the group-think paralysis that can develop in various situations. I added my two cents. [[User:Greg L|Greg L]] 17:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 
== Is zero even listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
== Spiders ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Is zero even]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Is zero even'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 8#Is zero even|the redirect discussion]] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> — <span style="font-family:gill sans">[[User:the Man in Question|the Man in Question]]</span> [[User talk:the Man in Question|<small>(in question)</small>]] 00:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
Hi there: advice, please. An editor user:Sarefo is currently adding very brief articles about, possibly, every spider known to science. Not objectionable, and certainly not vandalism, but really not very useful. From the speed with which they appear, I feel he must be using a bot. It's harmless, but totally clogs the newpage screen. Add notability tags? Do nothing? Mark as copyvio? Or what?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 14:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
:Probably the only code I would personally add is
{{tl|arachnid-stub}}
[[:Category:Jumping spiders]]
:where they aren't already there. You certainly aren't alone with your concerns; see [[User talk:Sarefo]]. But a stub notice is probably enough. As for copyvios or unregistered bots, unless you have some more direct evidence that a user is engaging in such behavior, I'd be careful about making accusations. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 
::Melchoir, I was not intending to make any accusations; just pointing out that it is not possible to type that fast. And my comment about copyvio was with a question mark. I have done nothing to any of the articles, nor have I contacted the user.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 20:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]
:::I understand, I'm just saying. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.
 
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators]]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at [[WP:BN|the bureaucrats' noticeboard]].
== Algeria ==
 
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->—&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89 bot|JJMC89 '''bot''']] 00:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Melchoir: In NP patrolling I have come across an article called "Algerian radio" (the upper/lower cases are as quoted) I has to be a copyvio, but there are so many Google hits on Algeria as to make proving it very tricky. Any advice?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
:Looks like it's already been deleted, so I don't know what to say. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 23:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 
== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
::Nothing to say; it's gone.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 17:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 
== Confusion ==
 
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Melchoir: would you be so good as to look at an article entitled [[Steventon End]]? It seems to be uncertain as to whether it's talking about a football team or a cricket team, neither of which are called Steventon. Only one editor is listed, albeit many times; I can't figure if he has been subtly vandalised or gone barking mad!--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 11:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
 
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators]]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at [[WP:BN|the bureaucrats' noticeboard]].
:He's now got the name right, but the confusion persists. I have left a message on his talk page.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 17:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->—&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89 bot|JJMC89 '''bot''']] 00:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
::Sorry, I've been away. That page history does look strange; I thought new user accounts weren't allowed to move pages for a few days. I proposed a while ago to allow them to move pages they create immediately, for exactly this purpose of clarifying titles where they know best; maybe someone implemented it! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 17:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 
== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
== Vandalism ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Established [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|policy]] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
 
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at [[WP:BN]].
Hi there: just had my userpage vandalised for the first time: now I really feel that I belong with the good guys!--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 18:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
:Congratulations! [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 00:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
== Greetings fellow random page patroller! ==
 
== Precious anniversary ==
I have to say they look a heck of a lot better than they did 2 years ago when I started "randopatrolling"... I don't know if that's your experience?
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
==[[:Category:Genealogies of individuals]] has been nominated for merging==
 
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Category:Genealogies of individuals]]''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Category:Genealogies of individuals|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Marcocapelle|Marcocapelle]] ([[User talk:Marcocapelle|talk]]) 17:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
You seem to have come across some blatant OR by [[User:Rimini]] in the past. I've done a little fact-checking and it seems your suspicions are confirmed, so it's being AFD'd. The user also made one change to the [[Risk]] article, deleting a sensible section and replacing it with a link to that OR nonsense. Quite disturbingly, it's been there for months, at least until I reverted. I guess unless an expert checks out the diffs, these edits (which aren't obvious vandalism) can slip through the net.
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Knockdavie Castle]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]
 
The article [[:Knockdavie Castle]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
On the other hand, since our task is just to check whether an entire page need categorizing, stubbing, cleanup or indeed outright deletion, we've got it pretty easy. [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] 20:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''No indication of notability'''</blockquote>
 
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
:Actually, nowadays I tend to patrol Newpages more, since it's easier to find the needy articles. That's probably how I found [[Copernicus factor]]; I like to go back a couple days in the Newpages queue to sift through articles that other patrollers missed. When I do check Random, though, it does seem to be a bit better. Certainly the census-designated places are showing up much less often! You're also right about having it easy. I once tried picking through the POV backlog instead, and it's damn hard to fix some of those. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 21:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Knockdavie Castle|the article's talk page]].
::What I try to do is include a couple of helpful external links (if I can find any!) on a substandard or dodgy-looking page so that other editors will find it easier to add to the article, if it takes their interest. But I have to say, I don't fancy taking on the "references needed" backlog either! [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] 23:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:pepperbeast|<strong><span style="font-family: 'Segoe Script';"><span style="color: #a10;">Pepper</span><span style="color: #0c1;">Beast</span></span></strong>]] [[User talk:pepperbeast|<span style="color: #200">(talk)</span>]] 14:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
== vandalism ==
== Nomination of [[:Dear husband]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Dear husband]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
 
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear husband]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Melchoir, could you do me a favour? I was experimenting with {{tl|test4}} and with [[WP:AIV]], and I think I might have accidentally accused myself of vandalism. Could you please check in a day or two and make sure that i haven't been blocked?--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 21:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
:Uh... okay. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 02:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
::Okay, so I'm paranoid (but am I paranoid enough?), but I have been briefly blocked on two occasions, without committing even the tiniest infringement. Hence my (unjustified) concern.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 18:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="color:green;">[[User:JDDJS|<span style="color:green;">JDDJS</span>]] ([[User talk:JDDJS|<span style="color:purple;">talk to me</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/JDDJS|<span style="color:purple;">see what I've done</span>]])</span> 21:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 
== Featured article review for [[0.999...]] ==
:::Fair enough. It's just that I didn't see where on AIV you were in trouble. And even if you were accused, the admins at AIV are generally pretty responsible on checking out claims and giving people the benefit of the doubt. I've only had to go there a couple of times -- I don't know if you've had the opportunity yet -- but in my experience it works well. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 18:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 
I have nominated [[0.999...]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/0.999.../archive2|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 21:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
==Campa Cola==
==Your draft article, [[User:Melchoir/Equidissection]]==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
 
Hello, Melchoir. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|draft]] page you started, "[[User:Melchoir/Equidissection|Equidissection]]".
Mate I saw you removed the categorisation (Category:Soft Drinks) from the article. I wonder why that was because I feel that categorisation should be there. Hope to hear from you soon.
[[User:Unitedroad|Unitedroad]] 08:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
:I removed [[Campa Cola]] from [[:Category:Soft drinks]] because the article is already in the subcategory [[:Category:Cola]] due to carrying the {{tl|colas}} template. That's all. [[User:Melchoir|Melchoir]] 08:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|User:Melchoir/Equidissection|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
== Thomas Kinkade ==
 
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hey, this is [[User:Haricotvert | HaricotVert]]. I noticed you reverted mine and some other individual's additions to the "Cristicisms (artistic)" stub in the [[Thomas Kinkade]] article with the concern that it was hearsay. I understand the concern and I am aware of Wikipedia's policies regarding sources and POV, but those were both legitimate criticisms. Under the definition of [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/criticism criticism] they both should not be deleted, since they were, indeed, criticisms. A criticism does not require sources or verification - a criticism is inherently an opinion, not fact. This is equally true for those that praise Kinkade - those that enjoy his work may say how quaint or moving or "luminescent" his work is, but that does not stop it from being an opinion as well.
 
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Broom and a Mop|Broom and a Mop]] ([[User talk:Broom and a Mop|talk]]) 01:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Since the section is entitled "criticism" (and was a stub to boot) it seems natural that people would post critical comments there, including their own. Perhaps it would have been easier to just flag it with "Citation needed" or flag the section with a "this article does not cite its sources" tag instead of outright deleting it? Maybe a "Praise of Kinkade" section is needed to balance out the POV? I guess I'm just wondering what provoked you to delete things that clearly *were* criticisms by definition as "hearsay," as if we need to have a doctorate or be widely published in order to critique the work of artists.