Logical Framework Approach: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:58, 21 June 2015

Latest revision as of 15:15, 25 May 2025

(29 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{about|the management tool|the automated theorem proving approach|logical framework}}

The '''Logical Framework Approach''' ('''LFA)''') is a management toolmethodology mainly used for designing, [[Monitoring and Evaluation|monitoring, and evaluating]] [[international development]] projects. Variations of this tool are known as '''Goal Oriented Project Planning''' ('''GOPP)''') or '''Objectives Oriented Project Planning''' ('''OOPP)''').

==Background==

The Logical Framework Approach was developed in 1969 for the [[U.S. Agency for International Development]] (USAID). It is based on a worldwide study by Leon J. Rosenberg, a principal of Fry Consultants Inc.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20131004220343/http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADW881.pdf Final Report, Contract csd-2510, July 24, 1970]</ref> FromIn 1970 toand 1971, 30USAID countries adoptedimplemented the method in 30 country assistance programs under the guidance of Practical Concepts Incorporated, founded by Rosenberg.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20140714121413/http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaec576.pdf Practical Concepts Incorporated, "Guidelines for Teaching Logical Framework Concepts"]</ref>

It has been widely used by multilateral donor organizations, such as [[Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo|AECID]], [[Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit|GIZ]], [[Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency|SIDA]], [[Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation|NORAD]], [[DFID]], [[Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation|SDC]], [[UNDP]], [[European Commission|EC]] and the [[Inter-American Development Bank]]. Some [[Nonnon-governmental organization|non-governmental organizations]]s offer LFA training to ground-level field staff.<ref>[http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/pdf/R&R-24-Winter-2012.pdf Fernando, Renuka. "Getting on With It: Monitoring and Evaluation in the Third Sector" Risk and Regulation. London School of Economics. Winter 2012.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130424232428/http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/pdf/R%26R-24-Winter-2012.pdf |date=2013-04-24 }}</ref> It has also gained popularity in the private sector, for example, in health care.<ref>{{Citationcite neededjournal|datelast1=JuneGoeschel|first1=Christine 2014}}A.|last2=Weiss|first2=William TerryM.|last3=Pronovost|first3=Peter SchmidtJ.|title=Using hasa beenlogic activemodel into extendingdesign theand LFA.{{Ciationevaluate neededquality and patient safety improvement programs|journal=International Journal for Quality in Health Care|date=1 August 2012|volume=24|issue=4|pages=330–337|url=https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/24/4/330/1795580|accessdate=12 JanuaryNovember 20152017|doi=10.1093/intqhc/mzs029|pmid=22745358|doi-access=free|url-access=subscription}}</ref>

==Description==

The Logical Framework Approach continues to gain adherents, though it is a management tool invented more than 40 years ago. This phenomenon has been the subject of several doctoral theses.{{Citation needed|date = January 2015}}

The Logical Framework Approach takes the form of a four-by-four project table, often referred to as a "Logframe".

The rows represent types of events that take place as a project is implemented: ''Activities'', ''Outputs'', ''Purpose'' and ''Goal'' (from bottom to top on the left hand side — see EC web site under external links).

In the 1990s, it was often mandatory for aid organizations to use the LFA method in their project proposals. However, its use has become increasingly optional in recent years.{{Citation needed|date = January 2015}}

The columns represent types of information about the events: a ''Narrative'' description, ''Objectively Verifiable Indicators'' (OVIs) of these events taking place, ''Means of Verification'' (MoV) where information will be available on the OVIs, and ''Assumptions''. Assumptions are external factors that could have an influence, whether positive or negative, on the events described in the narrative column.

The Logical Framework Approach is sometimes confused with Logical Framework (LF or Log frame). The Logical Framework Approach is a project design methodology, whereas the Logical Frame is a document.

The list of assumptions should include the factors that may impact the project's success but cannot be directly controlled by the project or program managers. In some cases, these include what could be ''killer assumptions'', which if invalid will have major negative consequences for the project. A good project design should be able to substantiate its assumptions, especially those with a high potential to have a negative impact.

==Description==

The Logical Framework takes the form of a four-by-four project table. The four rows describe four different types of events that take place as a project is implemented: ''Activities'', ''Outputs'', ''Purpose'' and ''Goal'' (from bottom to top on the left hand side — see EC web site under external links). The four columns provide different types of information about the events in each row. The first column is used to provide a ''Narrative'' description of the event. The second column lists one or more ''Objectively Verifiable Indicators'' (OVIs) of these events taking place. The third column describes the ''Means of Verification'' (MoV) where information will be available on the OVIs, and the fourth column lists the ''Assumptions''. Assumptions are external factors that could have an influence, whether positive or negative, on the events described in the narrative column. The list of assumptions should include the factors that have a potential impact on the success of the project, but which cannot be directly controlled by the project or program managers. In some cases these may include what could be ''killer assumptions'', which if proved wrong will have major negative consequences for the project. A good project design should be able to substantiate its assumptions, especially those with a high potential to have a negative impact.

===Temporal logic model===

Line 24:

These are viewed as a hierarchy of hypotheses, with the project or program manager sharing responsibility with higher management for the validity of hypotheses beyond the output level. Thus, Rosenberg brought the essence of scientific method to non-scientific endeavors.

The "Assumptions" column is important in clarifying the extent to which the project or program objectives depend on external factors, and greatly clarify "[[force majeure]]" which are out of control of the project delivery partners — an area that was of particular interest when the [[Canadian International Development Agency]] (CIDA) at least briefly used the LFA as the essence of contracts.{{Clarification needed|reason = Too technical for the average reader.|date = January 2015}}

The LFA is also used in other contexts, both personal and corporate. When developed within an organization, it can articulate a common interpretation of the objectives of a project and how they will be achieved. The indicators and means of verification force clarifications as one would for a scientific endeavor, as in "you haven't defined it until you say how you will measure it." Tracking progress against carefully defined output indicators provides a clear basis for monitoring progress; verifying purpose and goal level progress then simplifies evaluation. Given a well constructed logical framework, an informed skeptic and a project advocate should be able to agree on exactly what the project attempts to accomplish, and how likely it is to succeed—in terms of programmatic (goal-level) as well as project (purpose-level) objective.

One of its purposes in its early uses was to identify the span of control of 'project management'. In some countries with less than perfect governance and managerial systems, it became an excuse for failure. Externally sourced technical assistance managers were able to say that all activities foreseen have been implemented and all required outputs produced, but because of the sub-optimal systems in the country, which are beyond the control of the project's management, the purpose(s) have not been achieved and so the goal has not been attained.<ref>http://pdf2.hegoa.efaber.net/entry/content/927/The_Logical_Framework_Making_CIDA.pdf {{CitationBare neededURL PDF|date =March January 20152022}}</ref>

==Handbooks==

The Logical Framework Approach, Handbook for objectives-oriented planning, Fourth edition, [[Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation|NORAD]], 1999, {{ISBN |82-7548-160-0}}.

Strategic Project Management Made Simple: Practical Tools for Leaders and Teams, by Terry Schmidt. (Wiley, 2009) ISBN 978-0-470-41158-2

Strategic Project Management Made Simple: PracticalSolution Tools for Leaders and Teams, by Terry Schmidt. (Wiley, 20092021) {{ISBN |978-01-470119-4115871817-28}}

[http://usaidprojectstarter.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/The-Logical-Framework-A-Managers-Guide.pdf The Logical Framework: A Manager's Guide to a Scientific Approach to Design and Evaluation, by Practical Concepts, Incorporated, 1979]

==References==

Line 41 ⟶ 39:

==External links==

{{commons category|Logic framework|lcfirst=yes}}

* USAID-related [https://web.archive.org/web/20110721064857/http://dec.usaid.gov/index.cfm?p=search.getSqlResults&q_webcol=logframe logical framework documents] available through USAID's ''Development Experience System (DEXS)''.

* [http://www.mande.co.uk/logframe.htm Working with the Logical Framework] Explanations of how the Logical Framework works.

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20041215130331/http://ciaris.ilo.org/english/tos/actcycle/planific/methodes/fiche_7.htm Centre for Informatic Apprenticeship and Resources in Social Inclusion] Short description.

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120824053010/http://www.ausaid.gov.au/ausguide/Documents/ausguideline3.3.pdf AusGuideline 3.3 The Logical Framework Approach]

* [httphttps://ec.europa.eu/europeaidinternational-partnerships/multimediafunding/publications/publications/manualsmanaging-tools/t101_en.htmproject_en Project Cycle Management Guidelines] (European Commission)

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130424232428/http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/pdf/R&R%26R-24-Winter-2012.pdf Fernando, Renuka. "Getting on With It: Monitoring and Evaluation in the Third Sector" Risk and Regulation. London School of Economics. Winter 2012.]

* [http://lgausa.com/logframe_approach.htm Example of the LFA as a design methodology]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Logical Framework Approach}}

[[Category:Project management techniques]]