Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lithuania: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:21, 3 August 2006

Latest revision as of 02:04, 19 August 2025

(741 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{User:MiszaBot/config

'''New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.'''

| algo = old(90d)

| archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lithuania/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 3

| maxarchivesize = 250K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 4

}}

{{talk header|wp=yes|WT:LITHUANIA}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Lithuania}}

}}

{{archives|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=90|list=

#[[/Archive 1 |2006–2007]]

#[[/Archive 2 |2008–2015 ]]

#[[/Archive 3 |2015–]]

}}

'''''New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.'''''

== Lithuania-myth-stub ==

== Requested move at [[Talk:Operation Ostra Brama#Requested move 13 April 2025]] ==

IMO it is needed, because there are about 50-60 stubs, that in my opiniuon are deadends, and now they clog up Lithuania-stub place, and are only relatively related to it.--[[User:Lokyz|Lokyz]] 14:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Operation Ostra Brama#Requested move 13 April 2025]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. '''<span style="font-family: 'Georgia';">[[User:Valorrr|<span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #a6a6a6"><span style="color: #8c8c8c;">Valorrr</span></span>]] <span style="color: #000000">^{([[User talk:Valorrr|<span style="color: #000000"><span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #8c8c8c">lets chat</span></span>]])}</span></span>''' 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

:Yes, that's one thing... I really believe all those stubs should be merged into one article/list because 95% of them are destined to be stubs forever (just there is no info about those reconstructed deities) and all of them have dubious claims. It would be much easier to find out any wrong statements in one big list than in 60 sub-stubs.

:If merged, mythology stub is not needed. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

== Collaboration[[Talk:Algirdas of the weekPaleckis]] ==

It would be nice if someone else could take a look at this article. There is one section with (in my view) significant NPOV and OR issues, bordering on [[WP:SOAPBOX]]. [[Special:Contributions/98.170.164.88|98.170.164.88]] ([[User talk:98.170.164.88|talk]]) 17:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

is it needed, will someone participate?--[[User:Lokyz|Lokyz]] 14:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

:I believe it's a bit too early for that. First, let's get the whole project up and going. It's a good idea, but now right now and right here. Let's better think what is needed for the project to become alive? Here are some thoughts:

:# Category tree to explain/plan future categories

:# Article index - list of all existing articles about Lithuania and what needs to be done to them; at the same time articles could be assessed (stub-ok-featured; not important-very important). I might attempt to compile the list of articles (more or less from my watchlist)

:# Article talk template - "this article is part of WikiProject Lithuania" (btw, P in wikiproject is capitalized)

:# Compilation of missing articles

:# Comprehensive resource page

:That's just some basic ideas. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

::also adding on going votes related with LT [[User:M.K|M.K.]]

== Good article reassessment for [[The Holocaust in Lithuania]] ==

So this is next step:)

[[The Holocaust in Lithuania]] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Holocaust in Lithuania/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 01:18, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Anyone should free to edit/make this page structure better. For now it is as programmer call it - in early alpha. Altoug, I do have feeling it could become tool.

: sorry I still not see vote issue, could you please point me directly; I do not find it :)[[User:M.K|M.K.]]

:: Discussions ... - if you need a separate section for vote add it, altough, IMO it would seem as a conspiracy untill this page is not official. We could mark this feature as a '' will be enabled out of beta''. Would this satisfy you? because i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.--[[User:Lokyz|Lokyz]] 21:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

::: eee... I mean to notify editors which article related with LT is going a vote procedures like Jogaila was and etc. '' i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.'' -sorry but I did not recall this your statement, maybe I missed some issues...[[User:M.K|M.K.]] 21:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

:In case it is useful for editors looking to improve the article, I will note a recent academic book that is available for free via open access: [https://uplopen.com/books/m/10.1515/9798887194912 ''Crisis, War, and the Holocaust in Lithuania''] (2025). It is one of the most comprehensive works on this subject that I have seen. [[Special:Contributions/98.170.164.88|98.170.164.88]] ([[User talk:98.170.164.88|talk]]) 15:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

== Category ==

Should we add <nowiki>[[Category:Lithuania]]</nowiki> (or any othe category) to this, to be accessible by more editors or should we wait?--[[User:Lokyz|Lokyz]] 22:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

:There are many other things to do first. [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

==Tasks for the weekend==

So, let's decide what we are going to do over the weekend.

First, I think, we need to decide if we want to do article assesment on quality (see, for example, {{tl|Grading scheme}}) and/or importance. See for example existing template on [[Talk:Audrys Cardinal Bačkis]]. Should we have one like that? If so, start developing rating standards, rating template, categories, etc.

Second, start compiling a list of missing articles. Start with really important ones.

Third, since Lokyz seems to be the most involved with categories, you could make some sort of category tree to show existing categories and categories that might be needed. (btw, to link a category, you should put : in front of the word category. example: [[:category:Lithuania]]) [[User:Renata3|Renata]] 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)