Control track longitudinal timecode: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:30, 12 August 2006

Latest revision as of 17:24, 24 August 2025

(23 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Multiple issues|

CTL (control track longitudinal) [[timecode]], developed by [[JVC]] in the early 1990s, is a unique technique for embedding, or ''striping'', reference [[SMPTE]] timecode onto a videotape.

{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}}

{{cleanup|reason=strongly opinionated arguing, not encyclopedic|date=January 2019}}

{{notability |date=July 2025}}

}}

CTL (control'''Control track longitudinal) [[timecode]]''', or '''CTL timecode''', developed by [[JVC]] in the early 1990s, is a unique technique for embedding, or ''striping'', reference [[SMPTE]] timecode]] onto a videotape.

Similar to the way [[VITC]] timecode is embedded in the vertical interval area of a video signal, CTL timecode embeds SMPTE timecode in the ''[[control track]]'' area of [[helical scan]] video recordings. The advantage of both VITC and CTL timecode is that a preciousan audio track does not have to be sacrificed for [[linear timecode]].

Though a very effective technology, and still probably in limited use today, CTL timecode never really caught on. JVC is apparently the only manufacturer that included CTL timecode capability in their video products, and this was limited to select professional [[S-VHS]] equipment.

When it was introduced, there was a lot of undeservedmuch negativity about CTL timecode, because people misunderstood how it worked. Many incorrectly assumed that CTL timecode was nothing more than a ''control track pulse'' signal. The only real problem with CTL timecode was that JVC chose to call it "CTL timecode".

Though a very effective technology, and still probably in limited use today, CTL timecode never really caught on. JVC is apparently the only manufacturer that included CTL timecode capability in their video products, and this was limited to select professional [[S-VHS]] equipment.

Control Track Pulse: Most are familiar with the digital "counters" on VHS recorders and camcorders, viewed via the onscreen display (OSD) and/or a decicateddedicated LED display. These numbers are sometimes in real -time format (hours : minutes : seconds), but are often only an ambiguous 4 digit sequential counter. These numbers advance up or down based on the machine counting a tape's control track pulses. This type of display is useful only as a simple and temporary reference, as it is very inaccurate, and the counter is reset to zero when a tape is inserted. A basic 4 digit counter is almost completely worthless, as their rate of advance was never standardized by manufacturers.

Conversely, CTL timecode is an ''absolute'' timecode with specific digital references for every frame of video.<ref>{{Cite web |title=BR-S500U S-VHS PLAYER, EDIT FEEDER |url=http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/tech_desc.jsp?model_id=MDL100042&feature_id=02#:~:text=the%20BR%2DS500U.-,CTL%20TIME%20CODE%20SYSTEM,-The%20BR%2DS500U/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240823020024/http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/tech_desc.jsp?model_id=MDL100042&feature_id=02 |archive-date=2024-08-23 |access-date=2025-08-24 |website=JVC Professional Video |language=en}}</ref> Thus, a tape with CTL timecode can always display current timecode position accurately, even if the tape is moved from one machine to another. CTL timecode embedding can be transferred when making a copy, as long as the recording machine supports CTL timecode. Because CTL timecode ''is'' SMPTE timecode, its timecode can be interchanged with other SMPTE timecode schemes, like VITC and linearLTC (linear, audio track) timecode, as well as SMPTE timecode devices like timecode readers, generators, window dub inserters, MIDI synchronizers, and edit controllers.

When it was introduced, there was a lot of undeserved negativity about CTL timecode, because people misunderstood how it worked. Many incorrectly assumed that CTL timecode was nothing more than a ''control track pulse'' signal. The only real problem with CTL timecode was that JVC chose to call it "CTL timecode".

CTL timecode is vulnerable to any gaps or problems in a tape's control track, but so is LTC and VITC timecode. The acronym ''LOCT'' (pronounced ''locked''), used by many video professionals, can mean "Loss of Control Track", and/or "Loss of Continuous Timecode".

==See also==

Control Track Pulse: Most are familiar with the digital "counters" on VHS recorders and camcorders, viewed via the onscreen display (OSD) and/or a decicated LED display. These numbers are sometimes in real time format (hours : minutes : seconds), but are often only an ambiguous 4 digit sequential counter. These numbers advance up or down based on the machine counting a tape's control track pulses. This type of display is useful only as a simple and temporary reference, as it is very inaccurate, and the counter is reset to zero when a tape is inserted. A basic 4 digit counter is almost completely worthless, as their rate of advance was never standardized by manufacturers.

*[[AES-EBU embedded timecode]]

*[[Burnt-in timecode]]

*[[MIDI timecode]]

*[[Rewritable consumer timecode]]

==References==

{{reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Ctl Timecode}}

Conversely, CTL timecode is an ''absolute'' timecode with specific digital references for every frame of video. Thus, a tape with CTL timecode can always display current timecode position accurately, even if the tape is moved from one machine to another. CTL timecode embedding can be transferred when making a copy, as long as the recording machine supports CTL timecode. Because CTL timecode is SMPTE timecode, its timecode can be interchanged with other SMPTE timecode schemes, like VITC and linear (audio track) timecode, as well as SMPTE timecode devices like timecode readers, generators, window dub inserters, and edit controllers.

[[Category:Timecodes]]