Talk:Identity-based encryption: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:55, 12 December 2015

Latest revision as of 19:48, 3 February 2024

(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject Cryptographybanner shell|class=C|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Cryptography|importance=High}}

}}

I don't know this area well - but it looks to me as if this should be merged into [[identity based encryption]] now. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 21:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

: I think we need to verify that there's no copyright problems first :( [[User:Matt Crypto|&mdash; Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 22:28, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Line 10 ⟶ 11:

The so-called advantage, "if there are only a finite number of users, after all users have been issued with keys the third party's secret can be destroyed" seems more like a mitigation of the drawback that the PKG has all the private keys rather than an actual advantage. [[Special:Contributions/87.253.81.146|87.253.81.146]] ([[User talk:87.253.81.146|talk]]) 16:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm not competent to make changes to this page, but the criticism above is repeated in the paper [http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/moral-fn.pdf] (see the general criticism about the underplaying of the role of the PKG on page 19 and the specific mention of this wikipedia page in footnote 81 on page 20). [[User:Zosterae|Zosterae]] ([[User talk:Zosterae|talk]]) 20:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

= Sakai Kasahara =

Line 24 ⟶ 25:

Waters continued Boneh's work and developed an IBE without random oracle ( "Efficient Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles", [http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/180.pdf see here] for example).

Shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere ? (He apparently worked with Boneh as a Post doc in Stanford) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/109.28.114.45|109.28.114.45]] ([[User talk:109.28.114.45|talk]]) 02:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on [[ID-based encryption]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/809587902|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:

*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.crypto.rub.de/its_seminar_ws0708.html

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090416044556/http://www.larc.usp.br/~pbarreto/pblounge.html to http://www.larc.usp.br/~pbarreto/pblounge.html

*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080314104119/http://www.ferris.com/2006/05/30/the-total-cost-of-ownership-for-voltage-identity-based-encryption-solutions/ to http://www.ferris.com/2006/05/30/the-total-cost-of-ownership-for-voltage-identity-based-encryption-solutions/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 02:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

== Breaking via quantum computing is a drawback specific to ID-bases encryption? ==

While the statement "IBE solutions may rely on cryptographic techniques that are insecure against code breaking quantum computer attacks (see Shor's algorithm)" is true, I do not think that this drawback is specific to ID-based encryption, so I feel it is a bit unfair to account to it as its disadvantage. There is absolutely nothing that would disallow quantum algorithm attack resistance encryption to be used in ID-based encryption.

== Requested move 30 September 2020 ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top (modified) -->

:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

----

<span id="reqmovetag"></span>{{check talk wp}}

{{Tmbox

|small =

|imageright =

|type = move

|text = '''It was proposed in this section that [[:ID-based encryption]] be [[Wikipedia:Moving a page|renamed and moved]]&#32;to {{no redirect| Identity-based encryption }}.'''

----

<small>'''{{smallcaps|result:}}'''</small><br />'''Moved.''' No objections. No minimum participation required per [[WP:RMCLOSE]]; treating as a [[WP:BOLD]] move. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> -[[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 21:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

----

<div class="floatleft">''Links:'' [{{fullurl:Special:Log/move|page={{Urlencode:ID-based encryption}}}} current log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log/move|page={{Urlencode: Identity-based encryption }}}} target log] • [{{fullurl:Special:MovePage|wpOldTitle={{Urlencode:{{ARTICLEPAGENAME}}}}&wpNewTitle={{Urlencode: Identity-based encryption }}&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]; consensus at [[{{TALKPAGENAME: Identity-based encryption }}]]}}&wpMovetalk=1}} direct move]</div>

<div class="floatright">{{resize|65%|''This is template {{tls|Requested move/end}}''}}</div>

<!-- This is template "subst:Requested move/end". -->

}}

[[:ID-based encryption]] → {{no redirect|Identity-based encryption}} – Avoids the use of "ID" which is unclear if it is an acronym or abbreviation, and whether it refers to "identity document" [[User:Frap|Frap]] ([[User talk:Frap|talk]]) 09:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

----

: ''The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''<!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->

</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>

== What does ''IBS system'' mean ? ==

THe article states that ''IBS systems cannot be used for non-repudiation''. What does IBS refer to ?<br/>

Or is it a typo error and should read ''IBE systems cannot be used for non-repudiation'' ? -- Juergen [[Special:Contributions/89.244.93.204|89.244.93.204]] ([[User talk:89.244.93.204|talk]]) 14:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)