Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
K |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''keep'''--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 06:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
===[[Crux Mathematicorum]]===
:{{la|Crux Mathematicorum}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 25#{{anchorencode:Crux Mathematicorum}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crux_Mathematicorum Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Crux Mathematicorum}})
Journal does not appear to be notable. Could not find non-trivial discussion of it in reliable independent secondary sources. Facebook, Scribd, and references to the journal itself. <
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|list of Education-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mathematics|list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)</small>
Line 11 ⟶ 17:
*'''Keep'''. I agree with David Eppstein. This is a very special journal, but because it does not publish original research, it will not pop up in the usual places that we use for notability checking. [[User:Wcherowi|Bill Cherowitzo ]] ([[User talk:Wcherowi|talk]]) 16:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The journal has been cited in 24 WP articles. — [[User:Rgdboer|Rgdboer]] ([[User talk:Rgdboer|talk]]) 21:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as this seems convincing enough. [[User:SwisterTwister|<
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|