Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuck (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Stuck (programming language): I am willing to change my !vote if suitable sources can be found. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''Delete'''. If someone does want to redirect the title to [[Esoteric programming language]] then that's fine, but since nobody is proposing a merge the content will be deleted. '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#FF0000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 21:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
===[[Stuck (programming language)]]===
:{{la|Stuck (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuck (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 12#{{anchorencode:Stuck (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stuck_(programming_language) Stats]</span>)
Line 19 ⟶ 25:
:If you can find secondary sources, please identify them. I am willing to change my !vote if suitable sources can be found, even if they are not yet cited in the article. But from what I can see, no such sources exist. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 14:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': does not appear to meet [[WP:GNG]]. I will totally reconsider if decent sources can be produced, but I could not find them. I admit it doesn't help that "stuck" is a word so often used in the context of programming. [[User:Ubiquity|ubiquity]] ([[User talk:Ubiquity|talk]]) 14:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Upon further research, even the sources I linked to in the paragraph above (i.e. GitBook, Wiki, and Forum posts) turned out to be written by different online aliases of the language's author. I have to agree. Not independently verifiable. Unfortunate that there isn't more to go on.
Would this be better as a mention on the [[Esoteric programming language|Esoteric programming languages]] page? Or does it not belong there either? I was just hoping that if someone else had the same experience that I did, they would be able to rely on Wikipedia to provide some information. Thanks. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MichaelMolter|MichaelMolter]] ([[User talk:MichaelMolter|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MichaelMolter|contribs]]) 12:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: The bar for inclusion on [[Esoteric programming language]] seems very low. Many of the languages mentioned are not documented at all, and Stuck is, putting it well ahead of the pack. I have taken the liberty of adding a paragraph about Stuck to the page. I still think the page under discussion should be deleted, but I wouldn't dispute changing it to a redirect. [[User:Ubiquity|ubiquity]] ([[User talk:Ubiquity|talk]]) 13:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as there's still not enough convincing information and substance to suggest its own currently convincing article. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 04:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||