Content deleted Content added
Typo |
Changing short description from "Used to identify entrants to the US who may be criminals" to "System to identify high risk entrants to the US" |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|System to identify high risk entrants to the US}}
The '''Automated Targeting System'''
These ratings take many details into account, such as country of origin, how travel to the U.S. was funded, and the visitor's driving record. Other more mundane details are also
The existence of such a system was first discovered by the public in November 2006, when a mention of it appeared in the [[Federal Register]]. The system was first implemented in the late 1990s, and was significantly expanded shortly after the [[9/11 Terrorist Attacks]].
== Exemption from Privacy Act ==
Following the controversial [[Passenger Name Record]] agreement signed with the [[European Union]] (EU) in 2007, the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|Bush administration]] proposed to exempt the Automated Targeting System from the requirements of the [[1974 Privacy Act]] for access to records and for an accounting of disclosures.<ref name=Exemption>[[Statewatch]], [http://www.statewatch.org/news/2007/sep/04eu-usa-pnr-exemptions.htm US changes the privacy rules to exemption access to personal data] September 2007</ref> Those proposed exemptions were finalized on February 3, 2010.<ref name=ExemptionFinalized>PapersPlease.org, [http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/02/08/dhs-exempts-dossiers-used-for-targeting-from-the-privacy-act/ DHS exempts dossiers used for
== Litigation ==
Lawsuits have been filed under both the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) seeking disclosure of information about ATS as well as records from ATS dossiers about individuals.
'''EFF v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''Shearson v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''In 't Veld v. Department of Homeland Security'''
'''Hasbrouck v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection'''
'''Gellman v. Department of Homeland Security et al.'''
== Opposition ==
Line 26 ⟶ 32:
The [[American Civil Liberties Union]] had similar concerns:
<blockquote>"Never before in American history has our government gotten into the business of creating mass 'risk assessment' ratings of its own citizens," said Barry Steinhardt, Director of the ACLU's Technology and Liberty Project. "That is a radical new step with far-reaching implications – but one that has been taken almost thoughtlessly by expanding a cargo-tracking system to incorporate human beings, and with little public notice, discussion, or debate."<ref>[
The [[Association of Corporate Travel Executives]] (ACTE) requested an immediate suspension of the program, stating:
<blockquote>While ATS is undoubtedly raising red flags among privacy advocates and other groups that question the legality and intent of such programs, ACTE is primarily concerned with the economic impact this initiative will have on the business travel community. Delays, missed flights, canceled meetings, and potential arrests will generate staggering costs. In an ACTE survey dating to 2004, 97 percent of respondents stated that programs like this will have a negative impact on travel. This could very will be the impetus for businesses to fully explore alternatives to travel.<ref>[http://www.acte.org/resources/view_article.php?id=113 ACTE.org<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927022355/http://www.acte.org/resources/view_article.php?id=113 |date=September 27, 2007 }}</ref></blockquote>
[[Bruce Schneier]], noted security specialist and writer, wrote about ATS:
Line 38 ⟶ 44:
The [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] expressed their concerns:
<blockquote>The Automated Targeting System (ATS) will create and assign "risk assessments" to tens of millions of citizens as they enter and leave the country. Individuals will have no way to access information about their "risk assessment" scores or to correct any false information about them. But once the assessment is made, the government will retain the information for 40 years -- as well as make it available to untold numbers of federal, state, local, and foreign agencies in addition to contractors, grantees, consultants, and others.<ref>[
The Identity Project (Papersplease.org) filed a series of formal comments <ref>[http://papersplease.org/wp/policy/#ATS Policy Analysis: ATS | PapersPlease.org]</ref> objecting to the ATS:
Line 51 ⟶ 57:
== External links ==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20061205172921/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061201/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/traveler_screening Associated Press article discussing ATS]
*[
*[
*[http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/07/2015236&from=rss Slashdot article discussing ATS]
*[http://www.epic.org/privacy/travel/ats/ EPIC - Automated Targeting System]
*[
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20070107113519/http://www.acte.org/initiatives/TravellerSecurity.php ACTE - North America Traveler Security and Data Privacy publications on ATS]
[[Category:United States Department of Homeland Security]]
|