Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.4) |
→Dubious repository metrics in the Future section?: new section |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Computer science}}▼
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
▲{{WikiProject Computer science |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |software=yes |software-importance=Low}}
}}
{{Backwardscopy
|author = Surhone, L. M., Tennoe, M. T., & Henssonow, S. F.
Line 5 ⟶ 9:
|title = SQL:1999: Query languages, ATS (programming language), ABSET
|org = Betascript Publishing
|comments = {{OCLC|722870822}}, {{ISBN
|bot=LivingBot
}}
==Talk==
Hi there, it appears that ATS often performs better than [[C (programming language)|C]] in the [http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/ats.php The Computer Language Benchmarks Game] which I think makes it quite notable to my mind. If someone is willing to take some time to help investigate this I think it might be good! [[User:Errantkid|Errantkid]] ([[User talk:Errantkid|talk]]) 14:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Line 37 ⟶ 41:
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 11:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
== .cats file extension ==
I removed the .cats file extension from the list, since, unlike .sats, .dats, and .hats, .cats is not used for ATS code, but rather for C code that's intended to be used in conjunction with ATS code. <ref>http://ats-lang.sourceforge.net/DOCUMENT/ATS2TUTORIAL/HTML/ATS2TUTORIAL-BOOK-onechunk.html#filename-extensions</ref> It's a bit of a gray area, so if someone better at Wikipedia than me wants to add a footnote/reference that'd be great. --[[User:Ebf526|Ebf526]] ([[User talk:Ebf526|talk]]) 11:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
== Dubious repository metrics in the Future section? ==
Why is Microsoft’s GitHub code forge mentioned specifically with specific without comparing elsewhere? I am uncomfortable with this as a sole metric of popularity. This seems like more of footnote about popularity most likely being low rather than listing specific numbers. [[User:Toastal|Toastal]] ([[User talk:Toastal|talk]]) 14:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||