Collaborative method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:17, 21 October 2016

Latest revision as of 01:00, 16 January 2025

(8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Collaborative methods''' are processes, behaviors, and conversations that relate to the [[collaboration]] between individuals.<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref> These methods specifically aim to increase the success of [[team]]s as they engage in collaborative [[problem solving]]. Forms, rubrics, charts and graphs are useful in these situations to [[Objectivity (journalism)|objectively]] document [[Personality psychology|personal traits]] with the goal of improving performance in current and future projects.

{{lead missing|date=June 2016}}

{{howto|date=January 2013}}

== History of collaboration ==

{{Main|Collaboration#History}}

==Group setup==

Line 6 ⟶ 8:

==Group models==

Four group models are common in collaboration:<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref>

;Chance

:''Collaboration by chance'' is the most basic model and underlies all four. The team is a random pick of whoever is available without any specific regard for the skills or needs of each member.

Line 78 ⟶ 80:

[[File:Evaluating-thinking-styles.png|thumb|upright|A chart used to evaluate the thinking style of persons, particularly for use in collaborative teams.]]

There are two main components of thinking styles: internal and external,{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} they share similarities to the [[extraversion and introversion]] traits seen in human [[Personality psychology|personalities]]. The two thinking styles are dichotomies and can be used as axes when charting personal evaluation; note that "there is no 'right' place on the grid."<ref name="spencelecture" />

==== Creation of ideas ====

Line 208 ⟶ 210:

== See also ==

{{colbegin|div col|colwidth=22em}}

* [[Appreciative inquiry]]

* [[Attitude (psychology)]]

Line 227 ⟶ 229:

* [[Social psychology]]

* [[Sociomapping]]

{{colenddiv col end}}

== References ==

Line 233 ⟶ 235:

== Further reading ==

* Bennis, Warren, and Patricia W. Biederman. ''Organizing Genius.'' Cambridge, MAMassachusetts: Perseus, 1997.

* Marcum, James W. ''After the Information Age: A Dynamic Learning Manifesto.'' Vol. 231. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2006.

* Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration."'' Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20080410234154/http://revolutionphiladelphia.aiga.org/resources/content/2/5/7/0/documents/MSpence.pdf

{{Management}}

[[Category:Collaboration]]