Content deleted Content added
Exemplo347 (talk | contribs) Warning: Disruptive editing. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 16:
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/25&oldid=750597077 -->
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Exemplo347|Exemplo347]] ([[User talk:Exemplo347|talk]]) 19:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
== December 2016 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing because it appears that you are not here to [[Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia|build an encyclopedia]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. '''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color:black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color:gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 17:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock -->
{{unblock reviewed | 1=the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead [[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] ([[User talk:Dacheatcode#top|talk]]) 00:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | decline = This is not a vaild unblock request; you've simply copied a portion of [[WP:GAB]] to the request. [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 00:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)}}
*You can't overwrite a declined request, you need to post a new one.--[[User:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ponyo|<span style="color:Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 00:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|reason=the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead. first reason for blocking was because i called someone john podesta and he was really mad about that, can't understand why since he originally made a personal attack on me. only other instance of "vandalism" stemmed from edits made 7 years ago that was reverted by myself anyway. indefinite block here is out of place [[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] ([[User talk:Dacheatcode#top|talk]]) 00:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)|decline=You're blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. In your next unblock request, you might like to address this reason. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 00:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=ive made plenty of contributory edits to wikipedia, my recent attempts to create plausible redirects to chicken nuggets are based off of real world slang as well as documented memes. according to the page that talked about my banning, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Inappropriate_Redirects_from_User%3ADacheatcode) i was banned for vandalism. however, the only vandalism was for an article i edited 7 years ago that i reverted myself. my redirects were called "silly" but not "vandalism." I was also accused of being NOTHERE or whatever because im a 4channer apparently? while i did have an edit war with a user (many editors do) i stopped without any moderator interaction. i also stopped making redirect pages without proper citation. [[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] ([[User talk:Dacheatcode#top|talk]]) 00:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC) | decline = I went looking for these useful edits you've made and wasn't able to find any. And while it does look like you stopped creating redirects, your following edit wasn't any better. I'm certainly not saying you can't ever be unblocked, but I am saying this particular unblock request is entirely unconvincing. You need to convince us you've learned your lesson and will contribute entirely productively from here on out, and this request completely fails to convince me. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 01:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=was blocked for getting in a flame war with some admin years ago iirc - probably doesnt need to be a permaban for a first-time offense from years ago. [[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] ([[User talk:Dacheatcode#top|talk]]) 06:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC) | decline = This request also fails to be convincing. I am declining it- and you will likely get only one more chance before you lose access to this page too. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed| reason =The ban was given over 4 years ago. It was for getting into a flame war/edit war with someone - something that only happened once. I'm not here to continue to start flame wars with people. I think it would be weird to continue to permaban me over a first-time offense that i can't even remember the specifics of. The punishment doesn't match the offense in this case. All I can say is that I'm not going to get into flame/edit wars with people and will try to be productive - i dont use wikipedia often but there are some times where I see misinformation or people using the platform as a way to advertise their brand that I like to edit out as I have done in the past. not sure how else i can make this sound more convincing but ultimately i don't know what else to say - if i go back and vandalize a page i'd probably just get permabanned for real and for a more understandable reason than how i am now. Again i feel like enough time has passed and i'm not going to be edit warring or trying to "not build an encyclopedia" from now on or probably won't even be editing much at all. I understand that what was done in the past is not in line with how wikipedia wants its users to behave. [[User:Dacheatcode|Dacheatcode]] ([[User talk:Dacheatcode#top|talk]]) 08:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)|decline=<!-- stale block -->Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request.<!-- Template:decline stale--> [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 10:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)}}
| |||