User talk:ProgrammingGeek/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:21, 7 April 2017

Latest revision as of 21:53, 12 February 2023

(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 114:

|}

: Looks delicious, thanks! '''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''' ([[User:ProgrammingGeek|Page!]] • [[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|Talk!]] • [[Special:Contributions/ProgrammingGeek|Contribs!]]) 16:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

== 10:47:12, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Carlomagno4 ==

{{Lafc|username=Carlomagno4|ts=10:47:12, 19 December 2016|declined=Draft:JadoPado}}

Hi ProgrammingGeek

Thanks for reviewing my article. Can you please guide me and let me know more details on why my article about JadoPado has been rejected? will be great help so i can fix it and submit it again.

Thanks a lot in advance.

Regards

== 18:36:22, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Oldyorke ==

{{Lafc|username=Oldyorke|ts=18:36:22, 19 December 2016|declined=Draft:The_Unknown_Woman_(Rahway_1887)}}

Hi there - check out these new sources - this story was covered heavily in both the contemporary press and recent published literature - let me know thoughts!

== 13:23:53, 5 January 2017 review of submission by SunSetter ==

{{Lafc|username=SunSetter|ts=13:23:53, 5 January 2017|declined=Draft:Carbon_Tracker_Initiative}}

Thank you for reviewing my submission. I must say that I am surprised at the rejection, given that all the main sources cited to establish the notability of the organisation are external & independent - notably Reuters, the Financial Times and the Guardian. They are not references to Carbon Tracker's own website (which are mostly links to the pieces of research cited)

As such, could you kindly explain which parts read like an advertisement? Please note that the Bill McKibben reference on number of shares & likes is taken from another Wikipedia page. Upon rereading, perhaps some of the historical bits of the organisation could be trimmed down, but other than that, I genuinely am puzzled.

Many thanks and happy new year!

== Re: Bio-Cancer draft ==

What is still needed for the [[Draft:Bio-Cancer|Bio-Cancer draft]]? I took charge of that draft after it was submitted by a new editor, who I believe has left the project since March. I fail to see what is now keeping this article from being created - there are six independent reliable sources that discuss the band in detail. There are two paragraphs on content. If I'd created this article directly, instead of going through AfC, I wouldn't see it nominated for deletion. Can you please explain exactly what the problem is?--[[User:3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">'''3family6'''</fontspan>]] ([[User talk:3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;"><u>Talk to me</u></fontspan>]] &#124; <small>[[Special:Contributions/3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:purple;">See what I have done</fontspan>]]</small>) 15:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

: The page is create-protected. Please file a request to unprotect it at [[WP:RFPP]]. '''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''' ([[User:ProgrammingGeek|Page!]] • [[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|Talk!]] • [[Special:Contributions/ProgrammingGeek|Contribs!]]) 16:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

::Thanks. I might also try moving it to a userspace draft. I feel responsible for this article, as I worked at mentoring the editor who submitted it.--[[User:3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">'''3family6'''</fontspan>]] ([[User talk:3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;"><u>Talk to me</u></fontspan>]] &#124; <small>[[Special:Contributions/3family6|<fontspan colorstyle="color:purple;">See what I have done</fontspan>]]</small>) 19:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

== Pending changes reviewer granted ==

Line 178 ⟶ 203:

== Merry Christmas! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#01902a; background-color:#fff; border-width:3px; text-align:left; padding:2px;"><div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:6px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:PoertschachPörtschach Stiller Advent See-Weihnachtsbaum 28112014 855.jpg|x100px|left]]

[[User:Redolta|Redolta]] is wishing you a [[Mary Poppins|Merry]] [[Christmas]]! This greeting (and season) promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a [[Christmas|Merry Christmas]], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br />

<br>

[[User:Redolta|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Red'''</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">'''olta'''</fontspan>]][[User talk:Redolta|📱]] ^{<small>[[Special:Contribs/Redolta|<fontspan style="color:#0000ff;">Cont</fontspan><fontspan style="color:#000000;">ribs</fontspan>]]</small>} 00:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

</div></div><noinclude>

Line 279 ⟶ 304:

:: {{ping|ProgrammingGeek}} Much appreciated! Thanks for the quick response as well. Cheers! --[[User:Rickarm|Rickarm]] ([[User talk:Rickarm|talk]]) 04:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Mark Mercedes ==

You recently over ruled Dr Strauss and approved the creation of the article [[Mark Mercedes]] from draft form. Could you please explain the reason for this over rule? Dr Strauss made it clear that there were nowhere near enough third party sources and substantive mainstream media coverage. The consequent two edits from the 59 IP provided only provided a single article from a mainstream newspaper about Mercedes specifically about his retirement - an article that appears promotional and biased calling Mercedes a "pioneer" judging by the link (which is broken by the way). If he was a pioneer there would be a lot more coverage of this description and there isn't. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.34.93|101.182.34.93]] ([[User talk:101.182.34.93|talk]]) 08:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

: {{ping|101.182.34.93}} My rationale was that everything in the article is sourced and he passes [[WP:NWRESTLE]]. [[User:ProgrammingGeek|'''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''']][[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|^{<span style="color:Green"> talk</span><span style="color:Orange">to</span>me}]] 11:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Question ==

Hello [[User:ProgrammingGeek]] Thank you for the warm welcome :) May I ask if the edits I made regarding the prison name and month arrested were removed because I failed to cite them? If so sorry about that! I'll make sure I add the sources in the future! Thanks! [[User:SonWithOpenArms|SonWithOpenArms]] ([[User talk:SonWithOpenArms|talk]]) 05:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC) [[User:SonWithOpenArms]]

: that's all it was. Also, when linking to another page, make sure to use brackets ([) as opposed to braces ({). [[User:ProgrammingGeek|'''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''']][[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|^{<span style="color:Green"> talk</span><span style="color:Orange">to</span>me}]] 11:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

==re:==

"""Chinese history book claim Tang forces under Li Jingxing gained three victories over Silla forces in Maeso.In 675,Silla sent an envoy to offer Tang an apology and payed tribute to the Tang Dynasty again.Both Chinese and Korean sources mentioned this. According to this,Chinese sources seem to be the truth.About the strength of Tang forces,after the decisive Tibetan victory in the Battle of Dafei River in 670,Tang put most of its troops in the Western Front against the Tibetan Empire,so it was impossible for the Tang Dynasty to launch 300'000 troops against Silla.Korean sources about the strength of Tang forces probably be greatly exaggerated."""

:There is no source support for this content.--[[Special:Contributions/36.232.202.101|36.232.202.101]] ([[User talk:36.232.202.101|talk]]) 14:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Whittington Hospital ==

Why have you reverted my edits? [[Special:Contributions/2.25.221.186|2.25.221.186]] ([[User talk:2.25.221.186|talk]]) 17:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Requesting your review and Feedback ==

Hello ProgrammingGeek,

I recently wrote a Draft wiki page on the "Species Branding Hypothesis"...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Species_Branding_Hypothesis

It deals with a hypothesis which could potentially solve an age old problem in Biology 'The species problem'...

I will be very thankful, if you could give me your review and Feedback...

Kind regards,

Joseph. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jayabalan.joseph|Jayabalan.joseph]] ([[User talk:Jayabalan.joseph#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jayabalan.joseph|contribs]]) 18:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{Ping|Jayabalan.joseph}} as suggested on the page, request a review at [[WP:WikiProject Biology]]. I don't know anything about biology. [[User:ProgrammingGeek|'''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''']][[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|^{<span style="color:Green"> talk</span><span style="color:Orange">to</span>me}]] 19:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Can you pl suggest me whom I could contact... <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jayabalan.joseph|Jayabalan.joseph]] ([[User talk:Jayabalan.joseph#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jayabalan.joseph|contribs]]) 19:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->