Gorman polar form: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:56, 17 May 2017

Latest revision as of 08:59, 9 November 2023

(13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Gorman polar form''' is a [[functional form]] for [[indirect utility function]]s in [[economics]]. Imposing this form on [[utility]] allows the researcher to treat a society of utility-maximizers as if it consisted of a single [[Representative agent|'representative' individual]]. [[W. M. Gorman|Gorman]] showed that having the [[function (mathematics)|function]] take Gorman polar form is both [[necessary and sufficient]] for this condition to hold.

== Motivation ==

Standard [[consumer theory]] is developed for a single consumer. The consumer has a utility function, from which his demand curves can be calculated. Then, it is possible to predict the behavior of the consumer in certain conditions, price or income changes. But in reality, there are many different consumers, each with his own utility function and demand curve. How can we use consumer theory to predict the behavior of an entire society? One option is to represent an entire society as a single "mega consumer", which has an aggregate utility function and aggregate demand curve. But in what cases is it indeed possible to represent an entire society as a single consumer?

Formally:<ref name=Alp>{{cite web | url=http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/economics/14-452-economic-growth-fall-2009/recitations/MIT14_452F09_rec2.pdf | title=Gorman's Aggregation Theorem | date=2009 | accessdateaccess-date=2 December 2015 | author=Simsek, Alp}}</ref> consider an economy with <math>n</math> consumers, each of whom has a [[demand function]] that depends on his income <math>m^i</math> and the price system:

:<math>x^i(p,m^i)</math>

The aggregate demand of society is, in general, a function of the price system and the entire distribution of incomes:

:<math>X(p,m^1,\dots,m^n) = \sum_{i=1}^n {x^i(p,m^i)}</math>

To represent the entire society as a single consumer, the aggregate demand must be a function of only the prices and the ''total'' income, regardless of its distribution:

:<math>X(p,m^1,\dots,m^n) = X\left(p, \sum_{i=1}^n {m^i} \right)</math>

Under what conditions is it possible to represent the aggregate demand in this way?

Line 37:

the indirect utility function has (assuming an interior solution) the form:

::<math>v_i(p, m) = v_i(p) + m</math>

which is a special casescase of the Gorman form.

Indeed, the marshallianMarshallian demand function for the nonlinear good of consumers with quasilinear utilities does not depend on the income at all (in this quasilinear case, the demand for the linear good is linear in income):

::<math>x_i(p, m) = (-\frac{dv(p)/dm)/(}{v(p)/dp_i)} = -\frac{1/(}{dv(p)/dp_i)} = (v_i')^ {-1}(p)= v_i'(p)^{-1}</math>

Hence, the aggregate demand function for the nonlinear good also does not depend on income:

::<math>X(p, M) = \sum_{i=1}^n{(v_i')^{-1}(p)}</math>

Line 48:

::<math>(U')^{-1}(p) = \sum_{i=1}^n{(v_i')^{-1}(p)}</math>

In the special case in which all agents have the same utility function <math>u(x,m)=u(x)+m</math>, the aggregate utility function is:

::<math>U(x,M) = n \cdot u\left(\frac{x \over }{n}\right) + M</math>

=== [[Homothetic preferences]] ===

The indirect utility function has the form:

::<math>v(p, m_i) = v(p)\cdot m</math>

which is also a special casescase of the Gorman form.

Particularly: linear, Leontief and Cobb-Douglas utilities are homothetic and thus have the Gorman form.

Line 69:

== Application ==

Many applications of Gorman polar form are summarized in various texts and in Honohan and Neary's article.<ref>{{cite citedjournal at|last=Honohan the|first=Patrick end|author-link=J. ofPeter thisNeary article|last2=Neary |first2=J. Peter |title=W. M. Gorman (1923–2003) |journal=The Economic and Social Review |volume=34 |issue=2 |year=2003 |pages=195–209 |url=http://www.esr.ie/Vol34_2Neary.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050110001924/http://www.esr.ie/Vol34_2Neary.pdf |archive-date=2005-01-10 }}</ref> These applications include the ease of estimation of <math>f^i(p)</math> and <math>g(p)</math> in certain cases. But the most important application is for the theorist of economics, in that it allows a researcher to treat a society of utility-maximizing individuals as a single individual. In other words, under these conditions a community [[indifference curve|indifference mapping]] is guaranteed to exist.

== See also ==

Line 77:

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

*{{cite book |last=Antonelli |first=G. B. |year=1886 |title=Sulla Teoria Matematica dell’Economiadell'Economia Politica |___location=Pisa }} English translation in {{cite book |editor1-first=J. S. |editor1-last=Chipman |editor2-first=L. |editor2-last=Hurwicz |editor3-first=M. K. |editor3-last=Richter |editor4-first=H. F. |display-editors = 3 |editor4-last=Sonnenschein |title=Preferences, Utility and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium |___location=New York |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich |year=1971 |pages=333–360 |isbn= }}

*{{cite journal |first=W. M. |last=Gorman |title=On a class of preference fields |journal=Metroeconomica |volume=13 |issue=2 |year=1961 |pages=53–56 |doi= 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1961.tb00819.x}}

*{{cite journal |last=HonohanNataf |first=Patrick |authorlink=JA. Peter Neary |last2year=Neary1953 |first2title=J.Sur Peterdes |title=W.questions M.d'agrégation Gormanen (1923–2003)économétrie |journal=ThePublications Economicde andl'Institut Socialde ReviewStatistique de l'Université de Paris |volume=34 |issue=2, |year=2003Fasc. Vol. 4 |pages=195–209 |url=http://www.esr.ie/Vol34_2Neary.pdf5–61 }}

*{{cite journal |last=Nataf |first=A. |year=1953 |title=Sur des questions d’agrégation en économétrie |journal=Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris |volume=2, Fasc. Vol. 4 |pages=5–61 }}

[[Category:Utility function types]]