Wikipedia:Articles for deletion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
KeithTyler (talk | contribs) |
Copying material from Template:Before AfD, see that page's history for attribution. Substituting template that is only used on one page, needlessly making improving the page harder and more cumbersome. |
||
Line 1:
<!-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Don't add your new AfD (articles for deletion) entries by editing this page!
When you nominate a page for deletion, it gets an entry in a sub-sub-page corresponding to the (UTC) date of nomination.
Go back to viewing this page instead of editing it, and look for the link to edit today's sub-sub-page.
Again, don't add your new AfD nominations by editing this page!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -->
{{Short description|Wikipedia article deletion discussions}}
{{redirect2|WP:AFD|Wikipedia:Pages for deletion|the abuse filter documentation|WP:EFD|the information page on April Fools' Day|Wikipedia:April Fools|other types of pages for deletion|WP:XFD}}
{{for|articles nominated for deletion today|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/{{#time:Y F j}}}}
{{Hatnote|{{purge|Click here to refresh this page}}. (For help, see [[Wikipedia:Purge]].)}}
<noinclude>{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}</noinclude>
{{Floating link|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}
{{Shortcut|WP:AFD}}
{{#ifexpr:{{#invoke:XfD old/AfD and MfD|afd|month=total}}>10|{{admin backlog|auto=yes}}}}
{{notice|Before listing an article for deletion here, consider whether a more efficient alternative is appropriate:
* For '''[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion|problems which don't require deletion]]''', including articles needing improvement, duplicate articles, uncontested redirects, copyright violations, or POV problems, [[Wikipedia:be bold|be bold]], and fix or [[:Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates|tag the article]] appropriately.
* Some articles '''may qualify for speedy deletion''', per the [[WP:SPEEDY|speedy deletion criteria and process]].
* For '''non-controversial deletions''', please refer to the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]].
* For a '''potentially controversial merger''', consider listing it at [[Wikipedia:Proposed mergers|proposed mergers]].
Scripts are available to: [[User:Lourdes/AfDList|view all deletion discussions]] and [[User:Lourdes/AfDstarted|those opened]] or [[User:Lourdes/AfDclosing|closing today]].
}}
{{AfDs}}
{{Deletion debates}}
{{XFD backlog|right}}
'''Articles for deletion''' ('''AfD''') is where [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedians]] discuss whether an article should be deleted. Articles listed are normally discussed for at least seven days, after which the [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion process]] proceeds based on community [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]; if consensus is clear prior to the seven day threshold, an AFD may be [[WP:XFD#SNOW|closed early]]. Common outcomes are that the article is [[Wikipedia:ATD|kept]], [[Wikipedia:ATD-M|merged]], [[Wikipedia:ATD-R|redirected]], [[Wikipedia:ATD-I|incubated]], [[Wikipedia:Moving a page|renamed/moved]] to another title, [[Wikipedia:Userfication|userfied]] to a user subpage, or deleted per the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]]. [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|Disambiguation pages]] are also nominated for deletion at AfD.
This page explains what you should consider [[#Before nominating: checks and alternatives|before nominating]], the steps for nominating, and how to discuss an AfD. It also links to the lists of current debates, and two companion processes to AfD: [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] has a clearly defined set of criteria such as [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense|patent nonsense]], whereas [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] is used to suggest deletions that no editor would contest.
'''If you want to nominate an article''', the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia deletion policy]] explains the criteria for deletion, and may help you understand when an article should be nominated for deletion. The [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|guide to deletion]] explains the deletion process. If an article meets the criteria for deletion and you understand the process, consult [[#How to nominate a single page for deletion|the instructions below]]. If you are '''unsure''' whether a page should be nominated for deletion, or if you need more help, try [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion|this talk page]] or [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Wikipedia's help desk]].
== Current and past articles for deletion (AfD) discussions ==
{{/current}}
{{/Old}}
=== [[:Category:AfD debates|Categorized discussions]] ===
'''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Flat|AfDs sorted by topic and country]]'''
{{flatlist|class=nowraplinks}}
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Biographical)|Biographical]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Fiction and the arts)|Fiction and the arts]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Games or sports)|Games and sports]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Media and music)|Media and music]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Organisation, corporation, or product)|Organisation, corporation, or product]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Places and transportation)|Places and transportation]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Science and technology)|Science and technology]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Society topics)|Society topics]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Web or Internet)|Web and Internet]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic)|Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic]]
* [[:Category:AfD debates (Not yet sorted)|Topics not yet sorted]]
{{endflatlist}}
=== Search current and archived AfD discussions by topic ===
<inputbox>
bgcolor=transparent
type=fulltext
prefix=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
</inputbox>
* To find discussions containing the word ''navy'', enter: '''navy'''.<!--This shouold be a table or something so that the code samples align horizontally?-->
* To find discussions about articles whose titles contain ''battleships'', enter: '''intitle:battleships'''.
* To find discussions with ''navy'' anywhere, but ''battleships'' only in the article title, enter: '''navy intitle:battleships'''.
* Or, '''browse archived discussions grouped chronologically''' [[Wikipedia:Archived deletion discussions|here]].
* A '''sortable table of current AfDs''' can be found [[User:Cyberbot_I/Current_AfD's|here]].
== Contributing to AfD discussions ==
=== Wikietiquette ===<!--I suspect this subsection should be integrated with "How to discuss an AfD" below-->
{{Shortcut|WP:AFDEQ}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#General advice}}
* Users participating in AfD discussions are expected to be familiar with the policy of [[Wikipedia:Civility|civility]] and the guidelines [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Wikietiquette]] and [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|"do not bite the newbies"]].
** This also applies to the other deletion pages.
* AfDs are public, and are sometimes quoted in the popular press.<ref name="economist">{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354 |title=The battle for Wikipedia's soul |date=March 6, 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080310000011/http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354 |archive-date=March 10, 2008 |work=[[The Economist]]}}</ref><ref>Seth Finkelstein,[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/sep/28/wikipedia.web20 "I'm on Wikipedia, get me out of here"], ''[[The Guardian]]'', September 28, 2006.<br />"At Wikipedia, contentious decisions are made by a process of elaborate discussion culminating in administrative fiat. Deletions go through a comment period. The process is not a vote, but the result forms a recommendation to the administrators."</ref> Please keep to public-facing levels of civility, just as you should for any edit you make to Wikipedia.
* Avoid [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] against people who disagree with you; avoid the use of sarcastic language and [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]].
* Do not make unsourced negative comments about living people. These may be [[WP:GRAPEVINE|removed by any editor]].
* Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process, [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|it does not operate like one]]. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself. Thus, you should not attempt to structure the AfD process like a vote:
** Do not add tally boxes to the deletion page.
** Do not reorder comments on the deletion page to group them by keep, delete, or other. Such reordering can disrupt the flow of discussion, polarize an issue, and emphasize vote count or word count.
** Do not message editors about AfD nominations because they support your view on the topic. This can be seen as votestacking. See [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]] for guidelines. But if you are proposing deletion of an article, you can send a [[Wikipedia:Canvassing#Friendly notices|friendly notice]] to those who contributed significantly to it and therefore might disagree with you.
* If a number of similar articles are to be nominated, it is best to make this a group nomination so that they can be considered collectively. This avoids excessive repetition which would otherwise tend to overload involved editors. However, group nominations that are too large or too loosely related may be split up or speedy-closed.
* While there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD or deletion review discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, can make the discussion difficult to track, and can lead to inconsistencies when using semi-automated closing [[Wikipedia:scripts|scripts]].
=== How to contribute ===<!--I suspect this subsection should be integrated with "Wikietiquette" above-->
{{Shortcut|WP:AFDFORMAT|WP:DISCUSSAFD}}
AfDs are a place for rational discussion of whether an article is able to meet Wikipedia's article guidelines and policies. Reasonable editors will often disagree, but valid arguments will be given more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers arguments or evidence that do not explain how the article meets/violates policy, they may only need a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion. But a pattern of [[Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Personal point of view|groundless opinion]], [[proof by assertion]], and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider a [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] process outside the current AfD.
There are a number of practices that most Wikipedians use in AfD discussions:
* When editors recommend a course of action, they usually do so in '''[[MOS:BOLD|bold]] text''', e.g., "'''Keep'''", "'''Delete'''", "'''Merge'''", "'''Redirect'''", or other view. A number of [[WP:WMFCLOUD|tools]] which parse AfDs will only recognize bolded words.<ref>The tools [https://tools.wmflabs.org/afdstats/ AfD Statistics] and [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/afdadminstats.html Admin AfD Counter]{{dead link|date=May 2024}} cannot parse unbolded !votes or closures.</ref>
* Start comments or recommendations on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with <code>*</code>), and sign them by adding <code>{{4~}}</code> to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs, making sure it is indented (using multiple <code>*</code>s).
* Please do not accompany comments with [[Wikipedia:Voting templates|label templates]].
* Please disclose whether you have a vested interest in the article, per [[WP:AVOIDCOI]].
* Please have a look at the article before making a recommendation. Do not base your recommendation solely on the information supplied by the nominator or other editors. To understand the situation, it may also help to look at the history of the article. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations. They may contain relevant arguments and further useful information.
When participating, please consider the following:
* The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations on the course of action to be taken that are not sustained by arguments.
* When making your case or responding to others, explain ''how'' the article meets/violates policy rather than merely stating that it meets/violates the policy.
* Use of multiple accounts to reinforce your opinions is absolutely forbidden. Multiple recommendations by users shown to be using "[[Wikipedia:Sock puppet|sock puppets]]" (multiple accounts belonging to the same person) will be discounted and the user manipulating consensus with multiple accounts will likely be [[WP:BLOCK|blocked indefinitely]].
* You can explain your earlier recommendation in response to others but do not repeat a bolded recommendation on a new bulleted line.
* {{anchor|nom-already-implies}}Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this.
* Do not make conflicting recommendations; if you change your mind, modify your original recommendation rather than adding a new one. The recommended way of doing this is to use strike-through by enclosing a retracted statement between <code><nowiki><del></nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki></del></nowiki></code> after the <code>*</code>, as in {{nowrap|1="• '''<del>Delete</del> Keep'''"}}.
* Unregistered or new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their reasons). Conversely, the opinions of logged in users whose accounts predate the article's AfD nomination may be given more weight when determining consensus.
There are many good ways to advocate keeping, deleting or even redirecting an article. These include:
* Arguments commonly used to recommend deletion are: "unverifiable" (violates both [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NEXIST]], i.e., not just currently [[Wikipedia:Glossary#uncited|uncited]]), "original research" (violates [[WP:NOR]]), and "non-notable" in cases where the subject does not meet their respective [[:Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines|notability criteria]]. (In the cases of non-notable biographical articles, it is better to say "does not meet [[WP:BIO]]" to avoid insulting the subject.) Accusations of [[WP:VAIN|vanity]] and other motives should be avoided as they are not in themselves reasons for deletion. The argument "non-neutral point of view" (violates [[WP:NPOV]]) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion either.
* If you wish for an article to be kept, you can directly improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination. You can search out [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and refute the deletion arguments given using policy, guidelines, and examples from our [[WP:GA|good]] and [[WP:FA|featured]] articles. If you believe the article topic is valid and encyclopedic, and it lacks only references and other minor changes to survive, you may request help in the task by listing the article on the [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - Rescue list|rescue list]] in accordance with instructions given at [[WP:RSL]], and then adding the {{tl|rescue list}} template to the AfD discussion by posting {{tlsc|rescue list}} to the discussion thread. Please do ''not'' do this for articles which are likely to be eventually deleted on grounds other than simple incompleteness or poor writing (see [[WP:SNOW]]).{{pb}}If the reasons given in the deletion nomination are later addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin. If the nominator fails to do it when you think it should have been done (people can be busy, so [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] on this point), leave a note on the nominator's talk page to get their attention.
* [[WP:ATD|Alternatives to deletion]] should be considered. If you think the article should be a [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation page]], a [[WP:REDIRECT|redirect]] or [[WP:MERGE|merger]] to another article, then recommend "'''Disambiguation'''", "'''Redirect'''" or "'''Merge'''". Do not recommend deletion in such cases.
You do not have to make a recommendation on every nomination; consider ''not'' participating if:
* A nomination involves a topic with which you are unfamiliar.
* You agree with the consensus that has already been formed.
Please also see [[Wikipedia:Notability]].
== Nominating article(s) for deletion ==
=== Before nominating: checks and alternatives {{anchor|Wikipedia:Before}}===
{{shortcut|WP:BEFORE}}
{{Redirect|WP:BEFORE|the essay on reading discussions before commenting|Wikipedia:Read before commenting|the essay on steps to take before commenting in a deletion discussion|Wikipedia:Before commenting in a deletion discussion}}
{{Notability guide}}
<ol type="A">
<li> '''Read and understand these policies and guidelines:'''
# The [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia deletion policy]], which explains [[WP:DEL#REASON|valid grounds for deletion]] as well as [[WP:ATD|alternatives to deletion]] and the [[WP:DEL#PROCESSES|various deletion processes]].
# The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] ([[WP:N]]), [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] ([[WP:V]]), [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] ([[WP:RS]]), and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not]] ([[WP:NOT]]).
# Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at [[:Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines]], with further related essays at [[:Category:Wikipedia notability]]. [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes|Common outcomes]] may be checked to see if other articles on a specific topic tend to be kept or deleted after an AfD discussion.
</li>
<li> '''Carry out these checks:'''
# Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletion|speedy deletion]], [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] or [[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|speedy keep]].
# If there are [[WP:V|verifiability]], [[WP:N|notability]] or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]]. (See step D.)
# Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
# Read the article's [[Wikipedia:talk page|talk page]] for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
# Check to see if enough time has passed since previous nominations before [[Wikipedia:Renominating_for_deletion|renominating]].
# Check "[[Help:What links here|What links here]]" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
# Check if there are [[Help:Interlanguage links|interlanguage]] links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better-sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-[[Latin alphabet]] (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
</li>
<li> '''Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted:'''
# If the article can be fixed through [[WP:ATD|normal editing]], then it is not a candidate for AfD.
# If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
# If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, or an associated WikiProject, and/or adding [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup|a cleanup tag]], such as {{tlx|notability}}, {{tlx|hoax}}, {{tlx|original research}}, or {{tlx|advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to remedy it.
# If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider [[Wikipedia:merge|merging]] or [[Wikipedia:redirect|redirecting]] to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term. {{shortcut|WP:CONRED}}{{anchor|Controversial redirects}}If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue for discussing the change in addition to the article's talk page.
</li>
<li> '''Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability:'''{{shortcut|WP:DILIGENCE}}{{anchor|Diligence}}
# The minimum search expected is a [https://www.google.com/ normal Google search], a [https://books.google.com/ Google Books] search, and a [https://news.google.com Google News] search; [https://scholar.google.com/ Google Scholar] is suggested for academic subjects.
# Where possible, also please make use of [[Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library|The Wikipedia Library]], which offers free access to various subscription databases of additional resources. Not every resource available in that collection will always be relevant in every situation, so it is not necessary to exhaustively check every database, but there are many resources which may be useful for specialized or older topics that might not Google well.
# If you find a ''lack of sources'', you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an AfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an AfD nomination may still be appropriate. It is a good idea to explain the searches you performed in your nomination statement.
# If you find that adequate sources ''do appear to [[WP:NEXIST|exist]]'', the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, using the advice in [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{tl|unreferenced}}, {{tl|refimprove}}, {{tl|third-party}}, {{tl|primary sources}} and {{tl|one source}}. For a more complete list see [[WP:CTT]].
</li>
</ol>
=== How to nominate a ''single page'' for deletion ===
{{hatnote|Please also take a look at [[Wikipedia:Deletion process]], which includes more information about deletion discussions.}}
{{shortcut|WP:AFDHOWTO|WP:HOWTOAFD}}
{{ombox|small=y|image=none|text=
{{center|'''Does this look too complicated?''' <br>Try this semi-automated process instead:}}
[[File:Twinkle XFD Menu Screenshot.tiff|frameless]]
# Enable [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] in the [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets|Gadgets tab]] of your preferences.
#Go back to the article, and choose "XFD" from the new Twinkle ("TW") menu.
# Fill in the form and submit it.
}}
{{Afd footer}}
=== How to nominate ''multiple related pages'' for deletion ===
{{shortcut|WP:MULTIAFD|WP:BUNDLE}}{{redirect|WP:BUNDLE|citation bundling|WP:CITEBUNDLE}}
Sometimes you will find a number of related articles, all of which you feel should be deleted together. To make it easier for those participating in the discussion, it may be helpful to bundle all of them together into a single nomination. However, for group nominations, '''it is a good idea to first list one article at AfD and see how it goes''', before listing an entire group.
Examples of articles which may be bundled into a single nomination:
* A group of articles with identical content but with slightly different titles.
* A group of [[WP:HOAX|hoax articles]] by the same editor.
* A group of [[WP:ARTSPAM|spam articles]] by the same editor.
* A series of articles on nearly identical manufactured products.
An article with a fair or better chance of standing on its own merits should not be bundled—nominate it separately. For the avoidance of doubt, bundling should not be used to form consensus around policy decisions such as "should Wikipedia include this type of article". Bundling AfDs should be used only for clear-cut deletion discussions based on existing policy. '''If you're unsure, don't bundle it.'''
For the sake of clarity, debates should be bundled ''only'' at the start or near the start of the debate, ideally before any substantive discussion, but may be acceptable following one or two other editors' comments, particularly (but not only) where those comments are "per nom", by [[WP:SPA|single purpose accounts]], the article creator, or were clearly in bad faith.
'''To bundle articles for deletion:'''
{{AfD bundle steps}}
=== Creating an AfD ===
This template can be used by [[WP:AUTOCONFIRM|autoconfirmed]] users to nominate an article for deletion:
<inputbox>
type=create
preload=Template:Afd2 starter
buttonlabel=Nominate this article for deletion
bgcolor=#eeeeff
width=60
</inputbox>
If you do it this way, remember to add {{tlxs|AFD|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{var|subpage name}}}} at the top of the article, as well as list the nomination at the top of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/{{CURRENTYEAR}} {{#time:F j}}|the current AFD log page]].
Alternatively, you can use [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] (TW) to do the same thing, and without having to add the nomination to the current AFD log page, plus a bunch of other things, such as reverting and reporting vandalism and marking articles and templates for speedy deletion. Twinkle can be activated by going to [[Special:Preferences|your preferences page]], click on the "[[Wikipedia:Gadgets|Gadgets]]" tab, make sure the "Twinkle" checkmark under the "Editing gadgets" section is selected, and click on "Save". For more information, see [[Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc]].
=== After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors ===
While it is sufficient to list an article for discussion at AfD ''(see above)'', nominators and others sometimes want to attract more attention from and participation by informed editors. All such efforts must comply with [[Wikipedia:Canvassing|Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing]].
To encourage participation by less experienced editors, please avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations in the messages you leave about the discussion, link to any relevant policies or guidelines, such as [[WP:N|notability]], [[WP:V|verifiability]] or a specific section of [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]], e.g., [[WP:NOTDIR|Wikipedia is not a directory]], and please provide a link to the AfD discussion page itself.
;Deletion sorting
:Once listed, deletion discussions can, optionally, also be transcluded into an appropriate [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] list, such as the ones for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|actors]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music|music]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|academics]], or for specific countries. Since many people watch deletion sorting pages for subject areas that particularly interest them, including your recent AfD listing on one of these pages helps attract people familiar with a particular topic area. Please see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Compact|complete list of lists]].
{{anchor|wikiProjects}}
;Notifying related WikiProjects
:<!-- OLD TEXT (please restore when ArticleAlertbot is resurrected) [[:Category:ArticleAlertbot subscriptions|Many projects]] have subscribed to [[WP:Article alerts|Wikipedia's article alerts service]], a fully automated program that keeps track of AfD discussions for subscribed projects. Projects that have not subscribed may welcome a brief, neutral note on their project's talk page about the AfD. -->
:[[WP:WikiProject|WikiProjects]] are groups of editors that are interested in a particular subject or type of editing. If the article is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, they may welcome a brief, neutral note on their project's talk page(s) about the AfD.
:Tagging the nominated article's talk page with a relevant Wikiproject's banner will result in the article being listed in that project's ''[[WP:AALERTS|Article Alerts]]'' automatically if they [[Wikipedia:Article_alerts/Subscription_list|subscribe to the system]]. For instance, tagging an article with {{tl|WikiProject Physics}} will list the discussion in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts]].
{{anchor|substantial}}
;Notifying substantial contributors to the article
:While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion. One should not notify [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot accounts]], people who have made only insignificant 'minor' edits, or people who have never edited the article. To find the main contributors, look in the [[Help:Page history|page history]] or [[Help:Talk page|talk page]] of the article and/or use the [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-articleinfo/ Page History tool] or [http://vs.aka-online.de/wppagehiststat/ Wikipedia Page History Statistics]. Use: <code>{{tlsp|Afd notice|<var>article name</var>|<var>AfD discussion title</var>}} {{4~}}</code>
At this point, you've done all you need to do as nominator. Sometime after seven days have passed, someone will either close the discussion or, where needed, "[[WP:RELIST|relist]]" it for another seven days of discussion. (The "someone" ''must not'' be you, the nominator. However, if you want to see how it's done, refer to the next section.)
=== Withdrawing a nomination ===
{{See also|#Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)}}
{{shortcut|WP:WDAFD}}
If you change your mind about the nomination, you should withdraw it. This might be because the discussion has produced new information about the topic, or because you realise the nomination was a mistake.
To withdraw a nomination, add a note saying "'''Withdrawn by nominator'''" immediately below your nomination statement at the top of the discussion, give a brief explanation, and sign it.
If no one has supported deletion of the article you may close the discussion yourself as a [[WP:Speedy keep]], or you may leave it for someone else to close the discussion. Withdrawing a nomination can save other editors' time by cutting short the discussion.
== How an AfD discussion is closed ==
{{Main|Wikipedia:Deletion process#Articles for deletion page|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions}}
{{Shortcut|WP:CLOSEAFD|WP:NotEarly}}
* A deletion discussion should normally be allowed to run for seven full days (168 hours), but may be [[WP:XFD#SNOW|closed early]] if the consensus is 100% clear.
* Consensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments.
* The AfD nominator can withdraw the nomination ''and'' close a discussion as [[WP:Speedy keep|speedy keep]] reason #1, if ''all'' other viewpoints expressed were for '''Keep''' ''and'' doing so does not short-circuit an ongoing discussion. For how to perform this, see below, subsection [[#Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)|Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)]]
* An [[WP:Administrators|admin]] who is [[WP:UNINVOLVED|uninvolved]] and has not participated in the deletion discussion will assess the discussion for [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. For how to perform this, see [[WP:AFD/AI]].
* An editor in good standing who is not an administrator, and is also uninvolved, may close AfDs in certain circumstances; closures that non-admins may make are detailed at [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions]]. For how to perform this, see below, subsection [[#Procedure for non-administrator close (other)|Procedure for non-administrator close (other)]]
* If consensus seems unclear the outcome can be listed as '''No consensus''' (with no effect on the article's status) or the discussion may be [[WP:RELIST|relisted]] for further discussion.
* A discussion can be closed sooner than seven days if [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure|any of certain special conditions]] applies.
* Questions or concerns about a closure should first be asked on the [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] of the editor who closed the discussion. If that does not resolve the concerns, the closure can be appealed at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]].
===Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)===
As mentioned [[#How an AfD discussion is closed|above]], the AfD nominator can withdraw the nomination ''and'' close a discussion as [[WP:Speedy keep|speedy keep]] reason #1, if ''all'' other viewpoints expressed were for '''Keep''' ''and'' doing so does not short-circuit an ongoing discussion.
This procedure involves performing edits to three pages, as follows:
* On the deletion discussion page
** Remove the {{tlx|Closing}} tag from the page, if it was placed beforehand.
** Insert at the top of the page: <span style="color: green;"><nowiki>{{subst:Afd top|'''speedy keep'''. Nomination withdrawn. {{subst:nac}}}} ~~~~</nowiki></span>. Put this tag above the article page title. It should be at the very top of the page.
** Remove the line containing <span style="color: green;">{{tlf|REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}}</span>
** Insert at the bottom of the page: <span style="color: green;"><nowiki>{{subst:Afd bottom}}</nowiki></span>
** Publish the page with an edit summary such as <span style="color: green;">Closing AfD, result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).</span>
* On the article page
** Find the article page
*** The name of the votepage might not identically match that of the article
*** The prefix "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion" should not be part of the "votepage" name
** Remove from the top of the page the text beginning <span style="color: green;"><nowiki><!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --></nowiki></span> and ending <span style="color: green;"><nowiki><!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --></nowiki></span>
** Publish the page with an edit summary such as <span style="color: green;">AfD closed as speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).</span>
* Paste the suggested template from the article page on the top of talk page itself. It resembles the following, with PageName and Date prefilled.
** <span style="color: green;"><nowiki>{{Old AfD multi|page</nowiki>{{=}}<var>PageName</var>|date{{=}}<var>Date</var>|result{{=}}<nowiki>'''speedy keep'''}}</nowiki></span>
** Publish the page with an edit summary such as <span style="color: green;">AfD closed as speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).</span>
===Procedure for non-administrator close (other)===
As mentioned [[#How an AfD discussion is closed|above]], an editor in good standing who is not an administrator, and is also uninvolved, may close AfDs in certain circumstances; closures that non-admins may make are detailed at [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions]].
For a result of "keep", this procedure differs from the [[#Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)|Procedure for non-administrator close (nominator withdrawal)]] above, only in the reasons to be listed in the templates and the comments to be annotated in the edit summaries. Follow those instructions, replacing references to "keep (nomination withdrawn)" with the relevant reason.
For any other appropriate result, the procedure is basically the same, with the differences listed in [[WP:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions#Carrying out the AfD close]].
== See also ==
* [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today]]
* [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday]]
**Please '''{{hilite|DO NOT}}''' try to update these pages or start a new one yourself. (Note: These pages are not the deletion log pages referred to in [[#Nominating article(s) for deletion|step III of the instructions, above]]).
* [[:Category:Proposed deletion]] (''Note that this is under the separate Wikipedia process [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion]] rather than Articles for Deletion.'')
* [[:Category:Articles for deletion templates]]
* An editor can use {{tl|Db-u1}} to make a [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#U1|user request]] for starting the process of deleting certain pages from their [[Wikipedia:User pages|userspace]].
<!-- *[[User:Dragons flight/AFD summary|Open AFD debates sorted by age (Dragons flight summary tool)]] //-->
*[[User:Cyberbot I/Current AfD's|Sortable table of open AfDs]]
*[[User:SDZeroBot/AfD sorting|Topic-wise sorted list of open AfDs with nominations statements]]
*[[User:JPxG/Oracle|Oracle for Deletion]] AfD statistics
*[[Wikipedia:List of online newspaper archives]] - sources useful for AFD discussions and [[WP:BEFORE]] searches
* [[Wikipedia:Undeletion policy|Undeletion policy]]
* [[Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators|Deletion guidelines for admins]]
* [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|Deletion process]]
* [[Wikipedia:Alternative outlets|Alternative outlets]]
* [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes|Common outcomes of AfD]]
* [[Wikipedia:Archived deletion discussions|Archived deletion discussions]]
* [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policy consensus|Policy consensus discussions]]
* [[Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions]]
* [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|Deletion review]]
* [[Wikipedia:Non-admin closure|Non-admin closure]]
* [[Wikipedia:Proposed mergers|Proposed mergers]]
* [[Wikipedia:Articles for merging|Articles for merging]], a failed proposal
<!-- *[[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]], which was the name of this process until circa 2005 August 28. -->
==Citations==
{{reflist}}
{{Wikipedia community|state=collapsed}}
[[Category:Wikipedia deletion|Articles for deletion]]
[[Category:Non-talk pages with subpages that are automatically signed]]
| |||