Talk:Caltrain Modernization Program/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 23:07, 13 September 2017 edit Haha169 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,522 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 12:13, 26 February 2023 edit undo Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs) Bots, Mass message senders 4,087,900 edits m Qwerfjkl (bot) moved page Talk:Electrification of Caltrain/GA1 to Talk:Caltrain Modernization Program/GA1: Move GA subpage to match talk page Tag: PAWS [2.1]
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 114: #It is '''reasonably well written'''. #:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style\|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD\|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT\|layout]], [[WP:WTW\|word choice]], [[WP:WAF\|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list\|lists]])'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #::See comments above #It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability\|verifiable]]'''. Line 129: #:: #It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images\|images]]''', where possible and appropriate. #:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale\|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check\|yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP\|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #::See comments above #:: #'''Overall''': #:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #:: <!-- Template:GAList --> I have now completed the review. You seem to be getting on well with resolving the issues. I will put the article on hold. You normally have 7 days to complete the work, but do let me know if you need a little more time, or if there is anything that is not clear. [[User:Bob1960evens\|Bob1960evens]] ([[User talk:Bob1960evens\|talk]]) 22:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC) * Thank you for taking the time to thoroughly review this article's conformity to the GA criteria. I will spend the next few days working to solve your concerns and let you know when I am done or have any concerns! --[[User:Haha169\|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169\|talk]]) 02:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC) * {{REre\|Bob1960evens}}, I believe Mliu and I have taken care of all of your concerns. Thank you again for taking the time to leave a thorough review, and I hope we have fixed all of the issues! --[[User:Haha169\|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169\|talk]]) 23:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC) **Sorry for the delay in wrapping this up, but I missed the ping somehow. Anyway, I am pleased to see that all of the issues raised have been addressed, and consequently am awarding the article GA status. Well done on an interesting and informative article. Keep up the good work. [[User:Bob1960evens\|Bob1960evens]] ([[User talk:Bob1960evens\|talk]]) 21:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)