Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Toyota Celica 2004 GT-S: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
===[[Media:
[[Image:TC2004GTS-AP.
This is a self-nomination. This picture illustrates the [[Toyota Celica]] article. A picture was taken by me specifically for this article (at the time, only older model was pictured, and, considering how Celica changed over time, it was not enough).
*Nominate and '''support'''.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus)]] 15:11, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
**Do you have a larger resolution version perhaps? -- [[User:Solitude|[[User:Solitude|Solitude]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Solitude|talk]]</sup>]] 15:30, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
***I can rescan it. What resolution would you like to use?—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus)]] 16:01, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
*Oppose. While it may be a nice crisp picture, I would really have to stretch to see it in any way suitable as a featured picture. It is not "beautiful, striking, shocking, impressive, titillating, fascinating, or in short just brilliant" in any way. Nice snapshot though. Wish my car looked that good. [[User:Denni|Denni]][[User_talk:Denni|<span style="color:#228822;">☯</span>]] 23:23, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)
**Comment. Couldn't you say that it's just about as "beautiful, striking, shocking..." as [[:Image:Corvette-je-1958.jpg]]? Or perhaps it's the change in background from nice scenery to a brick wall? [[User:Enochlau|Enochlau]] 20:45, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. A good photo, but not a featured picture. Definitely upload a higher resolution version though. [[User:Ed g2s|<span style="font-family:verdana;">ed g2s</span>]] • [[User talk:ed_g2s|<span style="font-family:verdana;">talk</span>]] 04:50, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. Don't like the lighting. Shadows too prevalent. I don't think this shot would be good enough for a Toyota catalogue... so I don't think it's featured quality. -- [[User:Gareth Owen|GWO]]
*:And if shadows are removed?—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus)]] 15:55, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
*'''Support''' --[[User:ScottyBoy900Q|'''ScottyBoy900Q''']][[User talk:ScottyBoy900Q|<span style="color:red;">'''∞'''</span>]] 00:10, 06 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' [[User:BrokenSegue|[[User:BrokenSegue|'''B'''roken'''S'''egue]]]] 03:38, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*Oppose. [[User:Janderk|Janderk]] 14:17, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Oppose.''' [[User:Andrewphelps|'''andrewphelps''']] 23:52, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC) '''How''' in God's name is this image "beautiful, striking, shocking, impressive, titillating, fascinating" or "brilliant"? It's a picture of a car, and one that is of standard composition and light quality. It's not entirely in focus, the background is ugly, and the crop is too loose. It's completely non-unique. The list of "Featured Pictures" should be extremely short! Images in this list elicit an immediate and uncontrollable "Wow" upon viewing. // Appendage: By the way, I am not trying to be an ass or criticize anyone's contributions. I just want this list taken seriously.
*Oppose. Nice shot but not feature-quality.
**'''Not promoted. +2/-5. [[User:Ed g2s|<span style="font-family:verdana;">ed g2s</span>]] • [[User talk:ed_g2s|<span style="font-family:verdana;">talk</span>]] 04:43, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)'''
<br style="clear:both;" />
| |||
![→[[Media:FILENAME.jpg|Toyota Celica, 2004 GT-S Model]]](/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Toyota_Celica_2004_GT-S#Media:FILENAME.jpg|Toyota_Celica,_2004_GT-S_Model){kind=link}