Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elm (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:57, 18 February 2018

Latest revision as of 06:58, 10 February 2022

(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

===[[:Elm (programming language)]]===

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''speedy keep'''. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]^{[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]}</span> 14:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

===[[:Elm (programming language)]]===

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Chris-martin|Chris-martin]] ([[User talk:Chris-martin|talk]]) 17:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)</small>

:{{la|Elm (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elm (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 18#{{anchorencode:Elm (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Elm_(programming_language) Stats]</span>)

:({{Find sources AFD|Elm (programming language)}})

There are no secondary sources as references; the reference list consists only of links to Elm documentation, with the exception of two which are the Redux.js documentation and Vue.js documentation. Doing a google on Elm did not bring about any notable references. Even though the language has a passing mention in Sitepoint which is not a reputable reference nothing suggests that this is any more notable than, say, [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PureScript_(programming_language)|PureScript]]. The language is reasonably popular, but popularity isn't the same thing as nontrivial coverage in several reliable sources, which Wikipedia requires. [[User:Chris-martin|Chris-martin]] ([[User talk:Chris-martin|talk]]) 17:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

'''Withdrawn by nominator'''. Enough new secondary sources have been presented in this discussion to convince me. I think we should apply the [[Template:Primary sources]] template and make sure some of these better references make their way into the article. [[User:Chris-martin|Chris-martin]] ([[User talk:Chris-martin|talk]]) 21:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. There's [https://books.google.com/books?id=d5_8MAAACAAJ this] upcoming book, and Czaplicki's dissertation has been cited [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3885079718013853814&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en a bit]. The most relevant citations look like [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A954012&dswid=-29] and [https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3064907] and [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Anand/publication/317267853_Using_Elm_to_Introduce_Algebraic_Thinking_to_K-8_Students/links/592f2ae1aca272fc55d7c586/Using-Elm-to-Introduce-Algebraic-Thinking-to-K-8-Students.pdf]. Finally, I think [https://books.google.com/books?id=NWcNDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA167] and [https://books.google.com/books?id=lc-foAEACAAJ] decisively establish significant coverage in reliable sources. [[User:Υπογράφω|Υπογράφω]] ([[User talk:Υπογράφω|talk]]) 21:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

* '''Keep'''. Here's [https://www.pivotaltracker.com/blog/Elm-pivotal-tracker/ Pivotal Labs talking about their use of Elm]. Here's another [http://blog.noredink.com/post/126978281075/walkthrough-introducing-elm-to-a-js-web-app from NoRedInk]. Elm, while relatively new, is gaining popularity and Wikipedia should keep the article and even expand on it. [[User:Bytemanpacifist|Bytemanpacifist]] ([[User talk:Bytemanpacifist#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bytemanpacifist|contribs]]) 20:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>