Sarma method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:36, 10 August 2018

Latest revision as of 04:34, 14 November 2023

(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)

Line 3:

==History==

[[Sarada K. Sarma|Sarma]] worked in the area of seismic analysis of earth dams under [[NicolasNicholas Ambraseys|Ambraseys]] at [[Imperial College]] for his doctoral studies in the mid 1960s.<ref>Sarma S. K. (1968) ''[https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/16071/2/Sarma-SK-1968-PhD-Thesis.pdf Response characteristics and stability of earth dams during strong earthquakes]''. PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science & Technology, University of London</ref> The methods for seismic analysis of dams available at that time were based on the [[Slope stability analysis#Limit equilibrium analysis|Limit Equilibrium]] approach and were restricted to planar or circular failures surfaces adopting several assumptions regarding force and moment equilibrium (usually satisfying one of the two) and about the magnitude of the forces (such as interslice forces being equal to zero).

Sarma looked into the various available methods of analysis and developed a new method for analysis in seismic conditions and calculating the permanent displacements due to strong shaking. His method was published in the 1970s (the very first publication was in 1973<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Sarma | first1 = S. K. | title = Stability analysis of embankments and slopes | doi = 10.1680/geot.1973.23.3.423 | journal = Géotechnique | volume = 23 | issue = 3 | pages = 423423–433 | year = 1973 | pmidbibcode = | pmc =1973Getq...23..423S }}</ref> and later improvements came in 1975<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Sarma | first1 = S. K. | title = Seismic stability of earth dams and embankments | doi = 10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.743 | journal = Géotechnique | volume = 25 | issue = 4 | pages = 743743–761 | year = 1975 | pmidbibcode = | pmc =1975Getq...25..743S }}</ref> and 1979 <ref>Sarma S. K. (1979), ''Stability analysis of embankments and slopes''. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1979, 105, 1511–1524, {{ISSN|0093-6405}}</ref>).

==Method==

===Assumptions===

The method satisfies all conditions of equilibrium, (i.e. horizontal and vertical force equilibrium and moment equilibrium for each slice). It may be applied to any shape of slip surface as the slip surfaces are not assumed to be vertical, but they may be inclined. It is assumed that magnitudes of vertical side forces follow prescribed patterns. For n slices (or wedges), there are 3n equations and 3n unknowns, and therefore it statically determinate without the need of any further additional assumptions.

===Advantages===

Line 16:

===Use===

The method is used mainly for two purposes, to analyse earth slopes and earth dams. When used to analyse seismic slope stability it can provide the factor of safety against failure for a given earthquake load, i.e. horizontal seismic force iror acceleration (critical acceleration). Besides, it can provide the required earthquake load (force or acceleration) for which a given slope will fail, i.e. the factor of safety will be equal to 1.

When the method is used in the analysis of earth dams (i.e. the slopes of the dam faces), the results of the analysis, i.e. the critical acceleration is used in the [[Newmark's sliding block]] analysis <ref>Newmark, N. M. (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 15 (2) 139–160.</ref> in order to calculate the induced permanent displacements. This follows the assumption that displacements will result if the earthquake induced accelerations exceed the value of the critical acceleration for stability.

Line 24:

===General acceptance===

The Sarma method has been extensively used in seismic analysis software for many years and has been the standard practice until recently for seismic slope stability for many years (similar to the [[Mononobe–Okabe method]] <ref>Okabe, S. (1926) General theory of earth pressures. Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 12 (1)</ref><ref>Mononobe, N & Matsuo, H. (1929) On the determination of earth pressures during earthquakes. Proceedings of the World Engineering Congress, 9.</ref> for retaining walls). Its accuracy has been verified by various researchers and it has been proved to yield results quite similar to the modern ''safe'' Lower Bound numerical stability Limit Analysis methods (e.g. the 51st [[Rankine Lecture]] <ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Sloan | first1 = S. W. | authorlink1author-link1 = Scott W. Sloan| title = Geotechnical stability analysis | doi = 10.1680/geot.12.RL.001 | journal = Géotechnique| volume = 63 | issue = 7 | pages = 531531–571 | year = 2013 | pmidbibcode = 2013Getq...63..531S | pmchdl = 1959.13/1060002 | hdl-access = free }}</ref><ref>[http://bga.city.ac.uk/cms/html/51stRankineLecture.pdf 51st Rankine Lecture – Geotechnical Stability Analysis]</ref>).

===Modern alternatives===

Line 31:

==See also==

* [[Slope stability]]

* [[Slope stability analysis]]

* [[Earthquake engineering]]

* [[Finite element analysismethod]]

* [[Slope stability analysis]]

==References==

Line 49 ⟶ 48:

{{DEFAULTSORT:Sarma Method}}

[[Category:SoilLandslide mechanicsanalysis, prevention and mitigation]]

[[Category:Geotechnical engineering]]

[[Category:Earthquake engineering]]