Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 17:10, 9 September 2018 edit GermanJoe (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 75,283 edits fix - misplaced post (moved) ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:08, 15 March 2025 edit undo YannickFran (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,642 edits →VSCodium under the 'Java' heading: Reply Tag: Reply
(18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject Computing\|class=Start\|importance=\|software=yes\|software-importance=}}▼ {{WikiProject Computer science\|class=start\|importance=low}}▼ {{User:MiszaBot/config \|archiveheader = {{aan}} Line 9 ⟶ 7: \|archive = Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments/Archive %(counter)d }} {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\| ~~{{Auto archiving notice \|bot=MiszaBot III \|age=365 \|units=days}}~~ ▲{{WikiProject Computing~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=\|software=yes\|software-importance=}} ~~{{archive box\|auto=yes}}~~ ▲{{WikiProject Computer science~~\|class=start~~\|importance=low}} \|}}▼ {{archive box\|auto=yes\|age=365\|units=days\|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} == Restructure == Line 76 ⟶ 77: :::Again, you can do this by adding a new table (or even, a new article) that exists to compare multi-language IDEs. It's not necessary to restructure the existing tables and introduce a different set of problems. There's always going to be a split over which mode is preferred, and absolute consensus is unlikely to exist either way. So feel free to just do your own thing without being destructive. [[User:Ham Pastrami\|Ham Pastrami]] ([[User talk:Ham Pastrami\|talk]]) 20:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC) ::: I agree with Jwmurphy, today most IDE have plugin to support wide range of language. The current organization is a mess. We can have some colones with the most current language (C, PHP, Python, ...) and a colones with "others supported language" with comma separated language name. [[User:Gagarine\|Gagarine]] ([[User talk:Gagarine\|talk]]) 13:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC) ::::Current list is definitely not good, I agree with the comments above. This list may serve those who are looking for IDEs for a particular language but many IDEs support multiple languages and a lot of people would be looking for a general list of IDEs [[Special:Contributions/82.194.57.136\|82.194.57.136]] ([[User talk:82.194.57.136\|talk]]) 07:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC) ::::: [[User:Jwmurphy\|Jwmurphy]] was completely right and unfortunately now 14 years later it shows for anyone to see, the lemma is a pure mess, inconsistent, and also with huge gaps. E.g. "Ruby" has only 6 or so listed, while MOST of the IDEs listed at Python would do the job, too. So what now, copy 30 IDEs to Ruby and all other languages that these IDEs support? That makes no sense. The proposal of Jmurphy should be realized now to fix this mess. --[[User:Tomakos\|Tomakos]] ([[User talk:Tomakos\|talk]]) 02:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC) == Smalltalk == I found it a shame that the mother of all IDEs (ST80 and its offspring) is not even mentioned. Also, what about Lisp systems? 15 November 2008 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.161.254.73\|84.161.254.73]] ([[User talk:84.161.254.73\|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~== Autocomplete feature is a bit unclear... ==~~ ~~Some IDEs only has autocomplete for keywords, some others can even list methods of objects.~~ Could we add a "" to the "Yes" to let others distinguish them? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ppc123\|Ppc123]] ([[User talk:Ppc123\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ppc123\|contribs]]) 02:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~== Scheme/Racket ==~~ Should there be a section on IDE's aimed at Scheme or Racket programming? Probably the most widely-used one is [http://racket-lang.org DrRacket], and that's the only one I've used in recent years, but I'm sure there are others. ~~[[User:Sbloch\|Sbloch]] ([[User talk:Sbloch\|talk]]) 13:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)~~ == Adjusted Python Editor/IDE list == Line 204 ⟶ 195: {{collapse bottom}} ~~== Something is wrong with some of the sortable tables ==~~ On the current version of the page, some of the sortable tables only sort the first time (as ascending) on the column you choose. After that, clicking to sort on that column or any other column does not work. I checked this in two browsers and compared to other Wiki pages. This issue exists on this page alone (out of the ones I checked). Having reviewed the code, I cannot immediately see why this is happening with my limited wiki-coding knowledge. However, I was hoping someone else with greater knowledge might see this and figure out why this is happening. ~~Example is the C/C++ table. Might it be due to number of items????~~ ~~UPDATE: I opened my JavaScript Console in my browser. On the C/C++ table alone, the following error is produced on the second click to re-sort the table:~~ {\| \|- \| colspan="2" width="500pt" valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'format' of undefined</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&… ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:3~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">buildCache</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&…~~ ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:3~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">$headers.filter.on.mousedown.onselectstart</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&…~~ ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:12~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">jQuery.event.dispatch</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery%2Cmediawiki%2CSpinner%7C…~~ ~~jquery.l%7Cmw.MwEmbedSupport&only=scripts&skin=vector&version=20130817T022511Z:45~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">elemData.handle.eventHandle</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery%2Cmediawiki%2CSpinner%7C…~~ ~~jquery.l%7Cmw.MwEmbedSupport&only=scripts&skin=vector&version=20130817T022511Z:38~~ ▲\|} ~~[[User:Kdmckale\|Kdmckale]] ([[User talk:Kdmckale\|talk]]) 21:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)~~ ~~==Multithread debug capacity==~~ What do you think about adding a "multithread debug" information as note [n] in debug column ? ''24 Feb 2013'' <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.251.17.244\|78.251.17.244]] ([[User talk:78.251.17.244\|talk]]) 12:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->▼ == Eclipse ADT == Line 251 ⟶ 213: As clearly mentioned in the lead, entries should be notable. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform or product catalog - I have removed a lot of unsourced non-notable additions from COI editors, and added an editnotice linking to the relevant guidelines. Consensus for inclusion criteria can change of course, but bloated indiscriminate lists of unsourced stuff and non-notable self promotion should be avoided. [[User:GermanJoe\|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe\|talk]]) 12:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC) == Remove "Latest Stable Release" header == The "Latest Stable Release" column is not very useful; in that it gets stale extremely quickly (e.g. Xcode is listed as being 2 years old). ▲~~What~~I dowould ~~you~~suggest ~~think~~instead ~~about~~an ~~adding~~indicator aof ~~"multithread~~whether ~~debug"~~the ~~information~~IDE asis ~~note~~still ~~[n]~~being developed. in ~~debug~~<!-- ~~column ? ''24 Feb 2013''~~Template:Unsigned IP --><~~span style="font-size: smaller;"~~small class="autosigned">—  Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78108.~~251~~49.1770.~~244~~205\|78108.~~251~~49.1770.~~244~~205]] ([[User talk:78108.~~251~~49.1770.~~244~~205#top\|talk]]) 1202:5248, 2421 ~~February~~December ~~2013~~2020 (UTC)</~~span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --~~small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :By using wikidata it should always be quite up to date. [[User:Ebukadneza\|Ebukadneza]] ([[User talk:Ebukadneza\|talk]]) 11:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC) == VSCodium under the 'Java' heading == Could someone clarify why VSCodium is being noted instead of VSCode itself? Although VSCodium is an open-source build of VSCode, these are generally not considered to be IDEs. Additionally, while VSCode does come with [https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/overview out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, HTML, and CSS], it requires an extension pack to work with Java. It may be helpful to mention this in the article, as is done in other instances where VSCode is mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/145.33.121.1\|145.33.121.1]] ([[User talk:145.33.121.1\|talk]]) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC) :VS Code is currently listed under 'Visual Basic .NET', but it is neither billed as an IDE nor dedicated to any one language. I see no reason it should even be mentioned on this page. [[User:Walkersam\|Walkersam]] ([[User talk:Walkersam\|talk]]) 07:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC) :There is no reason for it. As per the requirements of this page, an IDE should have an article written about it before even being considered for inclusion here. VSCodium doesn't have it. The fact that it's just a renamed VS Code link says enough. As such, it's been switched out with VS Code. [[User:YannickFran\|YannickFran]] ([[User talk:YannickFran\|talk]]) 16:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC) == Common Lisp Intellij Plugin/Visual Code plugin == There are plugins available that bring common lisp ide to Intellij/Visual Code, maybe they should be added? [[Special:Contributions/94.74.252.2\|94.74.252.2]] ([[User talk:94.74.252.2\|talk]]) 10:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC) == CoreIDE provides better features than many IDEs listed here == Most of the IDE's listed here are outdated. No one is using them any more. On the other side recently developed CoreIDE comes free with all the features any modern IDE provides. Shouldn't that be listed here? I believe if a developer wants to compare the IDEs then they should see all the modern IDEs not the legacy IDEs which are not even updated or released in the past few years. The title of this article is "Comparison of integrated development environments" then it should compare all the IDEs. It is misleading the reader to assume that there are not anymore IDEs available. If you can not add all the IDEs in the list then better rename the title to- "Comparison of notable integrated development environments" CoreIDE website- https://coreide.com/ [[User:SE.SAURAV\|SE.SAURAV]] ([[User talk:SE.SAURAV\|talk]]) 01:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC) == Cursor editor == Should add something about the Cursor editor at cursor.com. There are assorted articles on the editors from other web sites especially medium.com. Is being compared to VS Code. I'm not sure where to add it so I'll leave it to others to handle. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.75.166.166\|216.75.166.166]] ([[User talk:216.75.166.166#top\|talk]]) 16:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->