Free Republic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
JBKramer (talk | contribs)
External links: removing blogs and other
 
Line 1:
{{Short description|Internet forum for conservatives}}
'''Free Republic''' is a moderated [[Internet forum]] and activist site for [[conservativism|conservatives]] from the [[United States]]. It bills itself as "the premier on-line gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web."
{{Multiple issues|
{{update|date=October 2017}}
{{Undue weight|date=March 2020}}
{{primary sources|date=August 2022}}
{{unreliable sources|date=August 2022}}
}}
{{Infobox website
|name = FreeRepublic
|logo = [[File:Free Republic logo.jpg|200px|Free Republic logo]]
|caption = logo displaying motto
|url = {{URL|http://www.freerepublic.com/}}
|commercial = Yes
|type = [[Internet forum|Forum]]
|language = [[English language|English]]
|registration = Required to post
|owner = Jim Robinson
|author = Jim Robinson, John Robinson
|launch_date = {{Start date and age|1997|02}}
|current_status = Active
|revenue = Donations (not deductible)
}}
'''Free Republic''' is a moderated [[Internet forum]] and chat site for self-described [[conservatism|conservatives]], primarily within the [[United States]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-30-pro-war-money_x.htm|title=Conservatives 'fed up' with protesters|publisher=USATODAY|access-date=2008-02-07|first1=Patrick|last1=O'Driscoll|date=March 31, 2003}}</ref> It presents articles and comments posted [[pseudonym]]ously by registered members, known as "Freepers",<ref name="Stein">{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/13/free/print.html|title=Free for all at Free Republic|date=1999-07-13|work=Salon.com}}</ref> using screen names. The site is supported entirely by donations, with [[pledge drive]]s known as "Freepathons" held each quarter.
 
Free Republic has been involved in several organized conservative campaigns including against CBS anchor [[Dan Rather]] after Rather reported on documents about President [[George W. Bush]]'s service record which turned out to be forgeries, and against [[The Chicks|the Dixie Chicks]] for their antiwar statements.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.image.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/complete_report/CBS_Report.pdf|title=Complete report|work=CBS News}}</ref> Freepers were instrumental in raising the question of a lack of authenticity in the so-called "[[Killian documents authenticity issues|Killian memos]]".
[[Image:Free Republic logo.gif|150px|right|Free Republic logo]]
 
==Local chapters and forum policies==
Free Republic's mission statement is:
There are local chapters "unconnected with ''Free Republic''", organized through ping lists, [[e-mail]], and Free Republic mail.<ref>[http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/19991101.htm "Free Republic's Reply Memorandum." ''Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic.'' U.S. District Court, C.D.Cal., Case No. 98-7840. November 1, 1999.]</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/19991029rob.htm|title=Document: Declaration of James Robinson in LA Times v. Free Republic, 10/_/99.|work=techlawjournal.com}}</ref> Some are only "ping list" groups, members who include their names in a list to be "pinged" on news articles of a certain nature. Some cover presidential events (daily picture, prayer, and speech threads), some focus on contemporary conservative issues such as the [[Second Amendment to the United States Constitution|Second Amendment]], the [[anti-abortion]] movement, or opposing [[gay marriage]]. The more active chapters [[Community organizing|organize]] live protests, which they call "Freeps." Since the [[2000 United States presidential election|2000 election]], these are often counter-protests, responses to protests by opposition groups, or small rallies.
<blockquote>
"Broadly stated, the goals of this site are to further conservatism, expose political corruption, and recover a truly constitutional form of government.
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and pro-America."
</blockquote>
 
As concerns policies and purpose, the main page of Free Republic states,
==Origins and funding==
Free Republic was founded in [[1996]] by Jim Robinson of [[Fresno, California]]. The site gained popularity during the President [[Clinton impeachment]] controversy when protests and write-in campaigns were organized on it.
 
"Opinions expressed on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Free Republic or its operators. Please enjoy our forum, but also please remember to use common courtesy when posting and refrain from posting personal attacks, profanity, vulgarity, threats, racial or religious bigotry, or any other materials offensive or otherwise inappropriate for a conservative family audience."
The site is funded by donations requested through "Freepathons." These fundraising events occur each quarter, and are intended to raise funds to support Free Republic operations and compensate Robinson and others for their time.
 
"Free Republic does not advocate or condone racism, violence, rebellion, secession, or an overthrow of the government. Free Republic advocates a return to constitutionally limited government, reserving all government powers not expressly delegated by the constitution to the United States to the States respectively, or the people, emphasizing sovereign state governments, local government, self-government and self-rule, while restricting government powers to only those enumerated in the constitution and maximizing individual rights and liberty as originally envisioned and established by our Founding Fathers and secured and defended by the blood of patriots and statesmen for over two hundred years."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Robinson |first1=Jim |title=Welcome to Free Republic! Conservatives for God, Family, Country! |url=https://freerepublic.com/home.htm |website=Free Republic |access-date=21 July 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Robinson |first1=Jim |title=Reminder: No profanity, no racism, no personal attacks, no threats, no violence, etc. |url=https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3713751/posts |website=Free Republic |access-date=21 July 2021}}</ref>
Free Republic operates on an annual budget of approximately $260,000. [https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/budget].
 
== ForumsSite funding ==
The FreeRepublic.com website is funded through individual contributions each quarter through fundraising on the website. The website generates approximately $250,000 each year by its own admission.
=== Format ===
Free Republic's content consists largely of news stories and opinion pieces posted by its active user base, and discussion of these pieces by the users. Users generally post the full text of news stories. This has caused controversy due to the issue of copyright violation, and led to a lawsuit whose settlement is discussed later in this article.
 
=== Board users =History==
Like most Internet chat forums, anyone can easily register as a user. Free Republic refers to its users as "members," but the site is free, with no fixed membership structure or dues. Some users of Free Republic organize themselves in ad hoc groups to plan local meets. (See discussion on [[Free_Republic#Social_organization_and_events|Freeps]] below.)
 
===1996–2000: Clinton Administration===
There is a member directory, but like most on-line communities, nearly everyone has a pseudonym. Few users divulge their true identities in their on-line profiles. However, many freepers meet in person on annual freeper cruises, titled "Freeps Ahoy."
Founded in September 1996 as a sole proprietorship by Founder, Chairman and President James C. "Jim" Robinson<ref>Robinson, James C. [http://www.psnw.com/~jimrob/resume.htm Biographical Resume] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070523150304/http://www.psnw.com/~jimrob/resume.htm |date=2007-05-23 }}</ref> of [[Fresno, California]], Free Republic opened to the general public in February 1997. Robinson filed for [[Limited liability company|LLC]] status on September 11, 1998.<ref>California LP/LLC Search [http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowLpllcAllList?QueryLpllcNumber=199825410007 Number 199825410007] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080111203722/http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowLpllcAllList?QueryLpllcNumber=199825410007 |date=2008-01-11 }} Free Republic LLC</ref> It has always been a for-profit company and thus donations have never been [[tax exempt]].<ref>Morrow, Margaret M., J. [http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/19991108.htm Tentative Order] Case No. CV 98-7840-MMM (AJWx) Los Angeles Times et al. vs. Free Republic et al.</ref>
 
Free Republic gained popularity during the [[Clinton impeachment]] from 1997 till 1999, a time when it was linked on the ''[[Drudge Report]]'' as "[[Whitewater]] Archives," when protests and write-in campaigns were organized through the website. Many were also introduced to the site through an impeachment rally in Washington, attended by over 3000 participants, called the "March for Justice," broadcast live on [[Halloween]] 1998 by [[C-SPAN]]. Featured speakers included [[Alan Keyes]], [[Bob Barr]], Reverend [[Jesse Lee Peterson]] of B.O.N.D. and [[Larry Klayman]]; [[Ann Coulter]], [[Lucianne Goldberg]] and [[Matt Drudge]] also attended.<ref>Political Research Associates [http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v13n1/PE_V13_N1.pdf ''The Public Eye''] Spring 1999, Volume XIII, No. 1</ref> Other Free Republic events over the years have also been televised by C-SPAN.<ref>[http://www.american-partisan.com/cols/2002/king/qtr4/1028.htm fetched 2006-12-30]</ref><ref>York, Anthony April 2, 2001 [http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/04/02/blue/index.html ''Katherine Harris, woman of the year?''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070929144338/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/04/02/blue/index.html |date=2007-09-29 }} Salon.com, fetched 2006-12-30</ref>
All user accounts include an intra-site mail feature that can send, receive and store private messages to other users, without the use of external personal e-mail.
 
Drudge dropped the link to Free Republic by February 1999, "because they were doing racist stuff over the [Clinton love child]... I click on and I see this headline, '[[Nigger]] Baby.'" Drudge quickly restored the link, but later dropped it again for unknown reasons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/mugger021299.asp|title=Mugger|work=jewishworldreview.com}}</ref> As of April 2008 the Free Republic link is back on Drudge.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.drudgereport.com|title=DRUDGE REPORT 2015®|work=drudgereport.com}}</ref>
Members can alert each other to articles, posts, or ongoing discussions of mutual interest via ping lists, lists of users interested in a certain subject. Members can also ping each other individually and can use an alert window to be alerted with a sound when someone replies to one of their posts.
 
In its early years, Free Republic generally allowed its members to post copyrighted news stories in entirety to its forum, regardless of whether permission had been granted by content owners, until the site was sued in 1998 by ''[[The Washington Post]]'' and ''[[The Los Angeles Times]]'' for copyright infringement. The newspapers obtained a permanent [[injunction]], although stipulated damages of $1 million were reduced to $10,000 during [[legal settlement|settlement]] negotiations which allowed the defendants to drop their [[appeal]].<ref>[http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/ Techlawjournal.com]</ref> The case, often cited when arguing [[cyberlaw]], is called ''[[L.A. Times v. Free Republic]]''.
As of [[November 9]], [[2006]], Alexa, a company that ranks the Internet's 100,000 most visited sites, and measures their traffic in users per million, estimated that Free Republic reached approximately three hundred and fifty users per million each day, and ranked at number 2,919 of all sites. Comparatively, by [[Alexa Internet]]'s estimation, [[DailyKos]] ranked 1,803 and reached 710 per million, [[Wikipedia.org]] reached over 51,000 thousand per million each day and ranked at 14, [[Yahoo!]] reached 285,000 and ranked at no. 1, and [[Google]] reached 268,000 and ranked at no. 3. Visits at Free Republic tend to spike sharply upward during election seasons and when news breaks which captures its users' interest. [http://www.seobook.com/archives/000944.shtml] [http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000310021602/]
 
From 1996 to 2000, the bulletin board was virtually unmoderated. This policy was central to the website's "[[fair use]]" defense in the copyright infringement litigation, wherein it stated "(t)he website operated by the defendants, www.freerepublic.com, permits anyone who wishes to post news articles or other items and to post commentary about the article as well ... no [[censorship]] is made and all views are permitted.".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/freerep/19991018mem.htm|title=Document: Free Republic's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, 10/18/99.|work=techlawjournal.com}}</ref> This supposed light moderating hand did not prevent the permanent banishment from the site of such "controversial" contributors as crime author Dan E. Moldea, novelist Todd Brendan Fahey, "What Really Happened" website host Mike Rivero, and Internet poet David Martin.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dcdave.com/article5/080514.htm|title=See Martin's exchange with Moldea at the end of the article|work=dcdave.com}}</ref>
Note, however, that Alexa may not be a reliable means of determining traffic to a website. [http://www.seobook.com/archives/000034.shtml][http://www.seobook.com/archives/000944.shtml][http://businesslogs.com/reviews/alexa_totally_unreliable.php]
[[Salon.com]]'s Jeff Stein observed in 1999 that: "[A] swelling number of haters have turned up the volume of death threats, [[gay-bashing]], name-calling and [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] tying [[George H.W. Bush|the father]] of [[United States Republican Party|Republican]] front-runner [[George W. Bush]] to [[drug-dealing]] by the [[CIA]]."<ref name="Stein"/> Robinson "famously blasted George W. Bush's presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket's biggest supporters."<ref name="observer">{{cite web|url=http://www.observer.com/2007/free-republic-purge-conservative-web-site-bans-giuliani-supporters|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070601180620/http://www.observer.com/2007/free-republic-purge-conservative-web-site-bans-giuliani-supporters|url-status=dead|archive-date=2007-06-01|title=Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters|first=Rebecca|last=Sinderbrand|work=Observer}}</ref> These shifts signalled internal battles comparable to the nomination controversies of 2007 "as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support."<ref name="observer"/>
 
[[White House Press Secretary]] and former [[Fox News]] commentator [[Tony Snow]] was a registered member of Free Republic. Snow was not afraid to 'mix it up' with the Freepers who sometimes disagreed with his political philosophy and who called him a "pansy".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/03/22/blue/index1.html|title=Judicial Watch: Bush wins (again)|work=salon.com|access-date=2007-01-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070214043415/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/03/22/blue/index1.html|archive-date=2007-02-14|url-status=dead}}</ref>
=== Discussion generals===
Members post articles from news sources and then discuss them with subsequent replies to the original post, and to each other. Comments posted by users of Free Republic are often critical of liberal political figures, institutions, ideology, liberals in general, and the media. Most of the comments are short, with some posts of longer length and substance.
 
Free Republic had been criticized during the pre-moderation period for the actions of several of its members. In 1999, FReepers ran a campaign to make fake donations to the legal defense fund of Julie Hiatt Steele, who had been charged with obstruction of justice during then-President Bill Clinton's impeachment trial. Hundreds of fraudulent<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00941.htm|title=Criminal Resource Manual 941 18 U.S.C. 1343 -- Elements of Wire Fraud|work=usdoj.gov|date=19 February 2015}}</ref> transactions from this campaign cost Ms. Steele around $4000.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/01/30/frpng.DTL|title=FReep This / How the right-wing is making itself heard|first=Joyce|last=Slaton|date=January 29, 2003|work=The San Francisco Chronicle}}</ref> Some threatened to [[assassinate]] Clinton, like this from February 2001: "If he keeps on he's going to make me come up there. There is only one solution to the Klintons, two 45 rounds and a nice little spot in Marcy Park."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html|title=It's going to be a fun four years|work=salon.com|access-date=2006-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225023451/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html|archive-date=2007-02-25|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The Free Republic community is largely united on certain political staples of the conservative movement, such as opposing liberalism, promoting conservative candidates for various elected offices, abolishing or editing some [[gun control]] laws and stopping the creation of new ones, lowering taxes, reducing personal [[Welfare (financial aid)|welfare]], ending abortion, and opposing what its members consider to be part of the "[[homosexual agenda]]", particularly [[same-sex marriage]] and the repealing of [[sodomy laws]]. On some issues, however, the Free Republic membership is divided. Three main groups can be observed on the forum: [[neoconservatives]], [[paleoconservatives]], and [[libertarians]], with neoconservatism being represented in the large majority of posts. Libertarians arguably remain almost negligible in their numbers on Free Republic, as they are not banned by policy, but widely ridiculed by users with terms such as, "liberal-tarians". A particular example can be found during the [[Terri Schiavo]] court battle, when a Libertarian poster argued against [[George W. Bush]]'s interventionist actions, and was unanimously condemned by hundreds of posters for it -- and ultimately banned for his views.[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1380150/posts] Similarly, opposition to U.S. support for [[Israel]] is not tolerated. Divisive issues, which if a conservative is on the 'wrong side' could get them banned from Free Republic, include [[immigration]] control and immigrant cultural assimilation, [[free trade]], the defense of the [[Theory of evolution]], the state of the Catholic Church (on the religion forum), and the legalization of drugs.
 
When the bar manager of an [[Austin, Texas]] restaurant called [[9-1-1]] to notify authorities that an underage [[Jenna Bush]] had attempted to purchase liquor in June 2001, the bar manager's personal information including her home address, date of birth, driver's license number and physical description was posted on FreeRepublic, along with calls for punitive action.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html|title=New theories on the Gore-Clinton split|work=salon.com|access-date=2006-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225002750/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html|archive-date=2007-02-25|url-status=dead}}</ref> The Clinton threat and some of the bar manager's personal information were removed by Robinson when brought to his attention, and the authors' posting privileges were revoked. He said that the site had had to "delete relatively few posts" over time for violations of its "no-violence" policy despite Free Republic's popularity and ease of registration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html|title=A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum|date=2001-02-09|work=Salon.com|access-date=2006-12-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225023451/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.html|archive-date=2007-02-25|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html|title=The jihad against Chuy's|access-date=2006-12-11|date=2001-06-06|work=Salon.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070225002750/http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/06/06/blue/index.html|archive-date=2007-02-25|url-status=dead}}</ref>
An example of the breakdown of members might be discerned from a theoretical poll put out by the forum administrators in early 2006 which asked if its members would continue to vote for the [[GOP]] if Republicans in the federal government failed to act aggressively on [[illegal immigration]]. The poll found that only 46% of its registered users would vote for Republicans in the [[United States House elections, 2006]], 31% would vote for [[third parties]], 20% would stay home and a marginal 2.5% would vote for the Democrats[http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=146;results=1]. [[John McCain]]'s image on the forums is emblematic of the forum users' staunch conservatism. McCain is widely hated by forum members. A recent internal poll illustrated that less than 45% of users would vote for McCain if he were the Republican nominee for president in 2008, with some 10-15% saying they would prefer to sit the election out and another 30% pledging to vote for third party candidates. [[Rudy Guiliani]], however, is a major source of division on the forums, earning both wide praise and support and opposition that is much more evenly distributed than the overwhelmingly negative reaction to the more conservative John McCain.
 
=== 2001–2004: Bush's first term and Killian documents ===
Free Republic, like many politically oriented sites, does not seek to be a board that represents all political viewpoints, but those to the right of the political center, on issues concerning America. Articles posted which contain unwelcome reports or views (usually liberal) are customarily ridiculed and tagged with the words ''BARF ALERT'' after the headline. The "BARF ALERT" has two purposes: to warn readers in advance of news or opinion articles running counter to the prevailing perspective of the site's intended audience, and to protect the poster by distancing him- or herself from those views or news reports. This is often used by "moles" from left-leaning discussion boards who want to present Free Republic users with news that runs counter to their belief system without getting "Zotted".
In January 2001, the forum organized the inaugural "Free Republic Gala and Count the Silverware Ball".<ref>[http://www.princeton67.com/notes0/010321.htm Class of 67 Class Notes 03/21/2001<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> It was attended by radio personality James Golden, who was one of the first high-profile conservatives to invest in the site and the Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson of B.O.N.D.<ref>[http://home.att.net/~alanj.hall/BushInaugural/PhotoPage3.html The FreeRepublic Inaugural Ball & Count The White House Silverware Party<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080112021723/http://home.att.net/~alanj.hall/BushInaugural/PhotoPage3.html |date=2008-01-12 }}</ref>
 
[[File:FReepers.jpg|thumb|right|Members of the independent ''D.C. Chapter'' counter-[[protest]] at an [[anti-war]] demonstration at [[Arlington National Cemetery]] on October 2, 2004.]]
Another common term is ''[[zot|ZOT!]]'' which refers to the banning of a user for posting unwelcome material or for making comments which a forum moderator then uses as a reason or excuse to ban. The moderators on Free Republic often ban, without warning or explanation, posters who criticize [[Israel]], the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]] or the [[U.S. invasion of Afghanistan|operation in Afghanistan]], the Bush Administration's policies on immigration, Catholic complaints about the Catholic Church (on the religion forum), or who express any opinion which diverges from the site's political purposes, or that of a particular forum moderator. Ample examples exist of criticism of the President and Congress for not being sufficiently conservative or living up to the group's ideals. Generally, the amount of latitude one has to express his views expands significantly as he becomes better known on the site, establishes relationships with other users, and provides evidence of adhering to the rules and stated goals of the site and its owner, although this is no guarantee against a banning if one runs afoul of a particular forum's moderator. If banned in one forum, the member is banned from the entire site. There is no warning system on Free Republic, and no explanation is required to ban a user. It is not a 'democracy', and there is no provision for appeal. A poster becomes aware that he has been banned when he attempts to post or reply on Free Republic and is instead presented with the notice: "Your posting privilege has been revoked."
During the [[2004 United States presidential election|2004 election]], [[Jerome Corsi]], a [[SBVT|Swift Boat Vet]] and co-author of the book ''[[Unfit for Command]]'' that attacked the [[Vietnam War]] record of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, apologized in the national media for comments that he made on Free Republic under the user name "jrlc."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-08-10-book-author-sorry_x.htm|title=USATODAY.com - Anti-Kerry book author sorry for slurs|work=usatoday.com}}</ref>
 
One of the first responses to "[[Killian documents|Memogate]]", the controversy surrounding [[CBS News]]' use of documents of questionable origin during the 2004 presidential campaign, came on Free Republic the night of the broadcast.<ref>[http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/complete_report/CBS_Report.pdf CBS News] Report of the Investigative Panel p 163</ref> When the "Killian memos" (which were allegedly created during the 1970s) were shown during a CBS News broadcast, a Republican lawyer going by the pseudonym of "Buckhead"<ref name="Wallsten">Wallsten, Peter. [http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04262/381287.stm "Blogger alleging CBS memos as frauds is GOP lawyer."] ''Los Angeles Times,'' 18 September 2004.</ref> mentioned the memos' proportional spacing and made the claim that such printing was "not widespread until the mid to late 90s".<ref>{{cite news| url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002039080_buckhead18.html | work=The Seattle Times | title=The Seattle Times: Nation & World: "Buckhead," who said CBS memos were forged, is a GOP-linked attorney}}</ref> Buckhead's post and some responses spread across the blogosphere rapidly, and were picked up by the Drudge Report the following afternoon.<ref name="Drudge">[http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2004/09/09/20040909_185002.htm " '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake."] Drudge Report Archives. (Retrieved February 5, 2007.)</ref> Within minutes of Buckhead's post, there was some dispute as to whether the Executive line of IBM typewriters had proportionally spaced fonts at the time, arising from a comment on the [[Power Line]] blog. The dispute made headlines when an investigative panel set up to examine [[Killian documents authenticity issues|authenticity issues]] with the documents "was not able to reach a definitive conclusion".<ref name="Dobbs">Dobbs, Michael, and Allen, Mike. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9967-2004Sep9.html "Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush."] ''The Washington Post,'' September 10, 2004.</ref> Canadian journalist Ivor Tossell later opined that Free Republic was "central to the network of websites that uncovered the forged memos about Bush's Vietnam service that appeared on CBS News and ultimately cost Dan Rather his job."<ref name="Tossell">Tossell, Ivor. "[https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20061027.gtweb27/BNStory/Technology/home Free Republic: glass ant farm for zealots]" ''The Globe And Mail,'' 20 October 2006.</ref>
===Sub-Forums===
{{details|Killian documents authenticity issues}}
 
====MD4Bush Incident====
Free Republic is divided into a number of sub-forums. A reader may view threads from one forum at a time, or threads in all of them at once. The forums are:
In October 2004, the "MD4Bush" account was created to investigate the source of false rumors that Democratic [[Mayor of Baltimore]] [[Martin O'Malley]] had committed [[adultery]].<ref name="snyder">Snyder, David and Mosk, Matthew. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15385-2005Feb10.html "Uproar Brings Focus on Role Of Bloggers."] ''Washington Post,'' 11 February 2005.</ref> These rumors were suspected to be coming from the camp of [[Governor of Maryland]] [[Robert Ehrlich]].<ref name="snyder"/> O'Malley was a likely (and eventual) opponent of Ehrlich in the [[2006 Maryland gubernatorial election|2006 gubernatorial race]].<ref name="snyder"/> Using this alias, MD4Bush allegedly lured Joseph Steffen, aide to Ehrlich, who had a Free Republic membership as "NCPAC," into contact.<ref name="snyder"/> MD4Bush then allegedly brought up the O'Malley rumors, and baited Steffen into giving responses on the Free Republic "private message" system, appearing to take credit for spreading the rumors.<ref name="snyder"/>
 
Ehrlich fired Steffen when the contents of these messages were published in ''[[The Washington Post]]'' on February 9, 2005.<ref name="rivera">Rivera, Ray. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/02/AR2005110203228.html?nav=rss_metro/md "Ehrlich Firing Probe Advances."] ''Washington Post,'' 3 November 2005.</ref> "Kristinn Taylor, a spokesman for FreeRepublic.com, said [Maryland Democratic Party communications director] Ryan O'Doherty's Democratic Party address was one of at least three used to operate the identity of MD4BUSH."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080112014315/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/baltsun/access/942526801.html?dids=942526801:942526801&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Dec+16%2C+2005&author=JENNIFER+SKALKA&pub=The+Sun&desc=Democrat%27s+e-mail+address+tied+to+postings+ "Democrat's e-mail address tied to postings."] ''Baltimore Sun,'' Dec. 16, 2005</ref> Taylor charged that ''Post'' reporter Matthew Mosk's access to the MD4Bush account was a violation of the Free Republic users agreement, and they were "looking into whether the ''Washington Post'' violated the [[Electronic Communications Privacy Act]] when ''Post'' reporter Matthew Mosk accessed the Free Republic account of MD4Bush."<ref>[http://media.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2NhNzQ2MWI5OWExN2YwMDk1Zjk5Yjg1NWU1YTg2ZjI= Sprueill, Stephen. "Did the ''Washington Post'' Violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act?" ''National Review Online, November 10, 2005.]</ref>
; Bloggers & Personal : User questions or opinion pieces, called "vanity threads" or "vanities", are posted in here, as well as blog entries from users. Vanities posted in the News/Activism forum are often moved here.
The e-mail address used in October 2004 to open the MD4Bush account was later changed to rodoherty@mddems.org, then changed for a third time. Anyone who had the password to the MD4Bush account could change the e-mail registration address at any time. It is not known how many people may have had access to that password. The e-mail address information obtained does not shed light on the actual users of the MD4Bush account, nor does it reveal whether someone attached the Ryan O'Doherty e-mail address to the account without his knowledge.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wbaltv.com/11investigates/5538206/detail.html|title=I-Team Uncovers MD4Bush E-Mail Addresses|date=26 March 2015|work=WBAL-TV}}</ref>
; General/Chat : This catch-all category for threads that don't fit into one of the other forums.
; GOP Club : The GOP Club contains threads pertaining to [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] business, as well as political news and analysis threads.
; News/Activism : This forum is unofficially the "main" forum where most posting takes place. The other forums tend to be more limited in scope. Threads started in this forum are sometimes moved into one of the others by the moderators.
; Religion : For religious topics. (see below)
; RLC Liberty Caucus : The RLC forum is the most moribund of forums on Free Republic. It is for threads relating to the [[Republican Liberty Caucus]] or the [[Libertarian Party (United States)|Libertarian Party]].
; Smoky Backroom : Threads that have have become flamewars are moved here by the moderators. Few threads start in the Smoky Backroom.
; VetsCoR : This forum is for military topics and supporting the troops.
 
=== 2005–2009: Bush's second term ===
The Religion forum tends to be dominated by discussions of the Roman Catholic Church and the crisis of Anglicanism. It is probably the most heavily moderated forum on Free Republic. A number of banned [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Christians]], unhappy with the moderation of the forum, chose to create their own forum called [[Angelqueen]] [http://angelqueen.org/forum/index.php]. The principal ongoing complaint from those on the latter site was that the Free Republic continued to violate its own stated policies by allowing a notorious poster, sinkspur [http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8932&highlight=sinkspur], to remain in good standing. [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/abbott/060815]
In January 2005, Free Republic organized an unofficial Inaugural Ball at the Washington Plaza Hotel to celebrate the reelection of President Bush and [[Vice President of the United States|Vice President]] [[Dick Cheney]] and to honor the men and women serving in the [[United States Armed Forces]]. The event was promoted to feature then [[Arkansas]] Republican Governor [[Mike Huckabee]] and his [[rock and roll|rock]] band [[Capitol Offense (band)|Capitol Offense]].<ref>[http://www.presidential-inauguration.com/freerball.htm Free Republic Inaugural Ball 2005<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070324052314/http://www.presidential-inauguration.com/freerball.htm |date=2007-03-24 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10286-2005Jan14.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|title=Inauguration: Free Republic|first=Kristinn|last=Taylor|date=January 19, 2005|access-date=May 2, 2010}}</ref>
 
===Copyright=Dixie andChicks fair useboycott====
{{Rquote|right|It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone single-handedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that." — [[Natalie Maines]] of the [[Dixie Chicks]], speaking about Free Republic.<ref name="Haysen">Haysen, Kirsten. [http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,20541859-5006343,00.html "Not Ready to Make Nice."] ''Adelaide Now,'' October 7, 2006. Retrieved February 4, 2007.</ref>}}
Because it has been a practice of Free Republic to allow its users to copy and paste copyrighted news stories in their entirety to its discussion boards, Free Republic was sued by ''[[The Washington Post]]'' and the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. ([[Reuters]] and ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' were part of the original consortium threatening legal action, but they dropped out before the lawsuit was filed.) The tort complaint of $1,000,000 was filed in the 9th District Circuit Court. Many members view the lawsuit as an unsuccessful conspiracy by a "liberal media" to stifle the organization; founder Robinson referred to the suit as "a life and death struggle with elements of the socialist propaganda machine."
The band [[Dixie Chicks]] and lead singer [[Natalie Maines]] claim that Free Republic was instrumental in fueling a nationwide [[boycott]] of their music, which was organized by some former fans and radio stations after Maines made anti-Bush comments in 2003. In their 2006 documentary ''[[Shut Up and Sing]]'' as well as in interviews, the Dixie Chicks have often mentioned Free Republic in reference to the boycott, which sharply reduced sales of their [[CD]]s and concert tickets.
 
[[File:MFJII 02.jpg|thumb|Jim Robinson, waving a U.S. flag at right, musters about two dozen other Freepers for the March for Justice II rally at the Upper Senate Park on the [[United States Capitol]] grounds on Thursday, April 7, 2005.]]
In a negotiated settlement, Free Republic agreed to remove the posted articles from the sites listed in the complaint, and paid these two newspapers $5,000 each. Neither party was awarded any damages, legal fees or costs. Today, other publishers, such as [[Condé Nast Publications]], have joined ''The Washington Post'' and the ''Los Angeles Times'' in objecting to the posting of entire copyrighted articles. Users now post excerpts from such publishers (as allowed by [[fair use]]), and the site filters submissions against a [[watchlist]] of "banned" sources, by request of their [[webmaster]] or as a result of the lawsuit, as a precaution against future lawsuits.
 
Maines was quoted as saying: "It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone single-handedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that."<ref name="Haysen"/> "And I think it was originally started by the Free Republic. And they were very organized in calling radio stations across the country and telling them that they would never listen to their station, when they didn't even live in that town." Kristinn Taylor of Free Republic's dominant Washington, D.C. chapter attended the screening of the documentary, hosted by the liberal advocacy group [[Center for American Progress]]. He was invited to join in a discussion after the screening and complimented the director on the film.<ref>[https://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/washingtonwhispers/061025/dixie_chicks_flick_is_a_good_o.htm Washington Whispers - Nation & World (usnews.com)<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.citypaper.com/film/story.asp?id=12989 Film: Shut Up and Sing Takes A Candid Look At Pop Music's Most Fearless Women | 12/6/2006<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070212083713/http://www.citypaper.com/film/story.asp?id=12989 |date=2007-02-12 }}</ref>
=== Terminology ===
The Free Republic [[subculture]] has developed several specific expressions:
; Freeper : An active member of the Free Republic site.
; Freep : An event organized by a local Free Republic chapter. Freeps are often presented as responses to protests by various politically [[left-wing]] groups. Freepers, as Free Republic's active users are called, will assemble at some point with signs and banners, generally designed and hand-drawn by individual members. See [[#Social Organization and Events|Social Organization and Events]].
; Freeping : The participation in a Freep. For example, if a Freep was organized because of an appearance by Bill Clinton, a group of Freepers would say they were going to Freep [[Bill Clinton]] and would then congregate and Freep. Afterwards, one would say Bill Clinton had been Freeped. In some cases, freeping is the act of directing the members to influence an online poll. See [[#Influencing polls|Influencing polls]]. However, these could just be considered online freeps.
; Freepathon : A quarterly fundraising event, aimed to collect donations for running the site.
; Freeploader : A pejorative term to address those who may not have donated to the site. The term is not part of the official lexicon of the site, but its use is not discouraged by management. Many posters at Free Republic who do donate do not make their donations known as they prefer to donate privately. It has become a source of irritation to some freepers that this practice has begun, as some freepers do not have the financial means to donate, or as mentioned, wish to do so anonymously.
; BTTT or Bump : Means "bump to the top" of the queue of articles to be read.
; [[Zot!]] : An expression for an individual who has been banned.
; IBTZ : Means "in before the zot."
; Freeptard : A pejorative term for Freepers used by posters on libertal or left-wing sites such as Democratic Underground or the Daily Kos blog. [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=freeptard] [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1269436/posts]
; DUmmie : A pejorative term for members of [[Democratic underground|Democratic Underground]].
 
{{details|Dixie Chicks controversy}}
=== Influencing polls ===
Some forum posts are aimed at influencing polls on other websites. Media websites (including newspapers, television networks, and America Online) run occasional "polls" that do not use the sampling methods of formal opinion polls, but instead invite everyone to respond. Known as "freeping" a poll, it involves posting a message thread directing members to vote en masse in an online poll and including a link to the poll with the intended goal of significantly affecting the final outcome. The practice of alerting members of online voting opportunities is not unique to Free Republic and is employed by many other activist websites of all political stripes, however, Free Republic is believed to be the first online message board to try to influence online polls in this manner. The Free Republic’s members have been known to have been involved in vandalism against websites they perceive to be liberal, with members often calling for a coordinated [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1549132/posts][http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535547/posts] vandalism against information websites they perceived to have a liberal bias, primarily related to major racial and political topics.
 
====Allegations of unfair treatment of Giuliani supporters and others who digress from popular opinions====
=== Political influence ===
In 2007, moderators removed the posting privileges of many members who supported the presidential campaign of then current Republican front-runner [[Rudy Giuliani]]. The ''[[New York Observer]]'' reported:
<blockquote>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Starting in April 2007 ... members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign...<ref name="observer" /></blockquote>
 
Robinson himself endorsed [[Fred Thompson]] and was an enthusiastic backer of his campaign.<ref>Hackbarth, Sean. ''Jim Robinson, founder of Free Republic has 'endorsed' Fred Thompson.'' Fred Thompson campaign press release. 3 January 2008.</ref> Robinson has frequently banned fellow conservatives and others who don't completely share his political mindset. Among those claiming to have been permanently banned are several participants in the debate over the violent death of Bill Clinton's Deputy White House Counsel, [[Vince Foster]]. They include Hugh Turley of FBICover-up.com, David Martin of DCDave.com, and Dan E. Moldea of Moldea.com.<ref>[http://www.dcdave.com/article5/080514.htm The Improbability of the D.C. Madam's Suicide], David Martin, June 10, 2008. See May 31, 2008, email from Martin to Moldea near the bottom of the page.</ref> During and after the [[2008 U.S. Presidential election]], according to political commentator [[Sean Hannity]], "[E]veryone I knew basically left because of so much childish, immature personal attacks. The propensity there to eat their own. And a lot of the people—most of the people—I knew that were on it left."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sean_hannity_vs_free_republic/|title=Sean Hannity vs. Free Republic|work=outsidethebeltway.com|date=17 February 2005}}</ref>
Free Republic posters contributed to breaking "[[Killian documents|Rathergate]]," the controversy surrounding [[CBS News]]' use of questionable documents during the [[2004 US presidential campaign]]. Nineteen minutes after its broadcast began, poster "TankerKC" questioned the documents on-line, stating they were "not in the style that we used when I came into the [[USAF]]." Another poster, "Buckhead" (later identified as Atlanta attorney Harry W. MacDougald), made an on-line observation that the documents were in a proportionally spaced font, and stated, "these documents are forgeries," less than four hours after CBS broadcast their story [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/posts]. He ended his "Post 47" on that thread with the words, "This should be pursued aggressively." The following morning, Scott Johnson, a co-author of the Internet blog [[Power Line]] [http://powerlineblog.com/archives/007917.php/], received an e-mail which "...quoted from and linked to [the] post." He published the quote and a link to the Free Republic thread, saying, "'Hey, anybody else out there among our readers have any information about this?'" The discussion quickly spread across the Internet via blogs, and the Drudge Report and the Associated Press later picked it up. The questioning of the document's legitimacy -- they were found to be 100% identical to how the same documents would look in Microsoft Word, which wouldn't be invented until almost twenty years later -- caused CBS to investigate internally and eventually retract the story.
 
====Instigating Birther rumors about Barack Obama====
Also during that campaign, [[Jerome Corsi]], co-author of the controversial book ''[[Unfit for Command]]'' that attacked the [[Vietnam war]] record of Democratic presidential candidate Senator [[John Kerry]], apologized in the national media for homophobic and anti-Islam comments, as well as slurs made against liberal political figures, that he made on Free Republic under the user name "jrlc." The posts were discovered and made public by [[Media Matters for America]], a liberal website [http://mediamatters.org/items/200408060010]. Concerning the remarks, Corsi said, "I don't stand by any of those comments and I apologize if they offended anybody," and, "...the politically incorrect humor I posted on this site is evidently not funny to everyone. Detractors should have interviewed my dog. No matter how I frame a comment, "Chico" has yet to laugh." Subsequently, [[John O'Neill (Vietnam veteran)|John O'Neill]], the book's other co-author, attempted to distance himself from Corsi and attempted to downplay Corsi's involvement in the writing of the book.
On March 1, 2008, a Free Republic poster made the earliest recorded report on the internet of a rumor that then-candidate [[Barack Obama]] was secretly born outside the United States, and was falsely claiming to have been born in Hawaii. The poster may have been inspired by a legal hypothetical expressing a similar fact pattern posted at the law blog [[The Volokh Conspiracy]] the previous day. The Free Republic poster's claim was then promulgated across other blogs in the months that followed, eventually developing into the [[Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories|birther]] movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/sep/20/hillary-clinton-and-birther-movement-still-no-ther/|title=Hillary Clinton and the birther movement: Still nothing there|work=PolitiFact.com|date=September 20, 2016}}</ref>
 
===2009: Obama administration===
==Social organization and events==
[[James von Brunn]], the white supremacist who [[United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting|killed a security guard]] at the [[United States Holocaust Memorial Museum|Holocaust Museum]] in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2009, posted an article on another site questioning the citizenship of President [[Barack Obama]] (a view held by so-called "[[Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories|birthers]]"); the article was then pasted into a thread on Free Republic. The thread was deleted by moderators after the shooting, but later restored when a review found that it had not violated posting guidelines.<ref>{{Cite news|issn=0740-5421|last=Hesse|first=Monica|title=Notoriety Trumps Preservation as Some Web Sites Scrub Hateful Posts|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=2009-06-14|date=2009-06-12|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR2009061104031.html}}</ref>
[[Image:FReepers.jpg|thumb|180px|right|Freepers counter-[[protest]] at an [[anti-war]] demonstration at [[Arlington National Cemetery]] on [[October 2]], [[2004]].]]
There are local chapters within Free Republic which are organized through ping lists, e-mail, and Free Republic mail.
 
In July 2009, after Obama's eleven-year-old daughter [[Family of Barack Obama#Immediate family|Malia]] was photographed wearing a T-shirt with the [[Peace symbols#Peace symbol|peace symbol]], a Free Republic thread featured racially charged comments about Obama's wife and children, using such terms as "[[Ghetto#African American ghettos|ghetto]] street trash". After the thread was criticized, it was eventually suppressed and placed under review. It was then restored to the site intact. Only after persistent criticism did site administrators remove it a second time.<ref name="sun">{{Cite news|last=Parry|first=Chris |title=Conservative Free Republic blog in free speech flap after racial slurs directed at Obama children|newspaper=[[The Vancouver Sun]]|date=July 12, 2009|url=https://vancouversun.com/entertainment/Conservative+Free+Republic+blog+free+speech+flap+after+racial+slurs+directed+Obama+children/1782375/story.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100104080736/http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/Conservative+Free+Republic+blog+free+speech+flap+after+racial+slurs+directed+Obama+children/1782375/story.html|archive-date=January 4, 2010}}</ref> In an email response to the incident, Jim Robinson called Obama an "[[Anti-Americanism|American-hating]] [[Marxist]] pig."<ref name="sun" />
The more active chapters [[Community organizing|organize]] live protests, which they call "Freeps." Often these are counter protests, as responses to protests by groups whom they oppose. "Freepers," as Free Republic's active users are called, will assemble at a predetermined ___location with signs and banners which are generally designed and hand-drawn by individual members.
 
In April 2012, after [[Rick Santorum]]'s suspension of his presidential campaign left [[Mitt Romney]] the presumptive Republican nominee, Robinson posted: "FR will never support the abortionist, homosexualist, socialist, mandate loving, constitution trampling liar Mitt Romney,"<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2871012/posts|title=Notice: Free Republic has been in full rebellion mode since 2008 and will remain so for the duration|website=www.freerepublic.com|access-date=2017-10-20}}</ref> and indeed, initially, Robinson, the Free Republic site, and many 'Freepers' did not embrace the candidacy of presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney. Robinson posted to the site, "I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing [[Republican in Name Only|RINO]]S like Romney or [[Rudy Giuliani|Giuliani]] into the White House!! Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!!"<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2725798/posts|title=NOTICE: FR DOES NOT AND WILL NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONIST, GAY RIGHTS PUSHING BIG GOVERNMENT STATISTS|website=www.freerepublic.com|access-date=2017-10-20}}</ref>
==Inspiration==
Free Republic has spawned a number of other, similar sites in other countries - predominantly English-speaking western countries. The most successful of these has been [[Free Dominion]], in Canada.
 
==Influencing online polls==
== Criticism ==
Media web sites, including newspapers, television networks, and [[America Online]], run occasional "polls" that do not use the [[Sampling (statistics)|sampling]] methods of formal [[opinion poll]]s, but instead invite all Internet users to respond. Some Free Republic forum messages, usually captioned "Freep this poll!", urge Free Republic members to vote ''en masse'' in these polls, to deliberately skew results and render the polls useless. Members are also urged to "'Freep' C-Span's 'Washington Journal' with telephone calls pointing out media bias."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fairpress.org/handbook.htm|title=fairpress.org}}</ref>
=== Allegations of extremism ===
Many posts on Free Republic are devoted to the ridicule of persons or groups perceived as anathema to conservatives. The site's officially stated policy is to remove blatantly racist or bigoted postings. [http://www.freerepublic.com/help.htm#guidelines]
 
"Whenever a poll is posted on Free Republic.com, everybody goes and votes the right way, and there's nothing wrong with that," says Marinelle Thompson, Freeper and founder of [[Gun politics in the United States|gun rights]] group Second Amendment Sisters. "We just do it for a laugh. It doesn't really mean anything." The polls can also be manipulated, said Vlae Kershner, SF Gate News Director (and poll writer): "People are finding a way of getting around our system that only allows one vote, and they're voting hundreds of times. It's not thousands of people voting one way; it's one or two people voting hundreds of times."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/01/30/frpng.DTL|title=FReep This / How the right-wing is making itself heard|work=SFGate|date=30 January 2003}}</ref>
Free Republic is often accused of being extremist and far-right. Even popular conservative talk show host [[Sean Hannity]] has described the site as "fringe". [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1344622/posts] Some conservatives who formerly contributed to the site, including [[Matt Drudge]] and [[Lucianne Goldberg]], have stopped doing so; Goldberg commented that Robinson had "let all the [[Year 2000 problem|Y2K]], gun-nut, [[Jew]]-baiting crazies take over and [[Flaming|flame]] the plain-old conservatives." [http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/13/free/print.html]
 
==References==
Free Republic's members often condone and applaud acts of [[Political violence|politically motivated violence]], such as the [[Kent State University shootings|Kent State shootings]], [[right-wing]] [[dictatorships]] and the [[Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse|alleged prisoner abuse]] committed by American and Iraqi government officials.[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723669/posts] [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1343144/posts] [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698620/posts].
{{Reflist|2}}
 
Jim Robinson, the founder of the forums, has publicly called for all homosexuals to be removed from "churches, universities, schools, the military, the Boy Scouts" and other public institutions. [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1713830/posts] He has endorsed what many people would consider to be [[anti-science]] views. He has described the [[theory of evolution]] as not being science, but "socialist dogma" which is imposed "on our school children". [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725737/posts?page=91#91] He has also equated the theory with [[homosexuality]], [[paganism]], and [[Islamic extremism]]. [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725737/posts?page=194#194]. These attitudes have driven some members of the site to an alternate forum, [[Darwin Central]]. [http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=1372]
 
===Call for US authorities to end Free Republic's 'misuse' of the net===
 
In August 2006, after what were considered offensive comments were posted on Free Republic about a Bahraini Guantanamo detainee there was a call by the [[Bahrain Centre for Human Rights]], an organization with close links to [[Islamist]] parties and the now defunct [[Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain]], for the US authorities to act 'to end the misuse of the net'. The Center said "These comments are sickening - and are an incitement to racial or religious hatred. What they are saying goes against human rights by spreading hatred and we should urge the government to work for an end to the misuse of the Internet to spread hatred against certain races or religions'[http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/arc_Articles.asp?Article=151887&Sn=BNEW&IssueID=29140]. Previously Free Republic had listed the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain as a 'terrorist organization' (but see http://www.tkb.org/Incident.jsp?incID=7925, http://www.tkb.org/Incident.jsp?incID=7944, so on).
 
===Cyber stalking===
 
Some members of Free Republic have been accused of [[cyberstalking]].
 
The owner of a restaurant who notified authorities when an underage [[Jenna Bush]] attempted to illegally purchase liquor at the establishment. The owner's name, residential address, maps and directions, date of birth, drivers license and registration information, physical description, and information about her infant child were posted on the Free Republic forums by some users. Some of these users then advocated violence toward the restaurant's patrons, as well as destroying it physically. [http://www.apj.us/20010609GodFreepers.html][http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b1c06357d1e.htm].
 
*[http://www.scamdy.com/FBI/ Original complaint against Andy Stephenson]
*[http://peopleforchange.net/commentaries/andy/ The Stalking of Andy Stephenson by Beth Ferrari]
*[http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0528/050713_news_andy.php Seattle Weekly: "A Fight To The End"]
* [http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0529/050720_news_mossback.php Seattle Weekly: "Internet Martyr - The life and cruel death of Andy Stephenson."]
 
==See also==
*[[Democratic Underground]] - Liberal counterpart of Free Republic
*[[Killian documents]]
 
==External links==
* [http://www.freerepublic.com/home.htm Official website]
* [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts Statement by the founder of Free Republic]
* Pitt, William Rivers. "[http://www.apj.us/20010609GodFreepers.html God Sees The Freepers]." Editorial. [http://www.truthout.com Truthout]: [[9 June]] [[2001]].
* Pitt, William Rivers. "[http://www.apj.us/20010612GodStillSeesFreepers.html God Still Sees The Freepers]." Editorial. [http://www.truthout.com Truthout]: [[12 June]] [[2001]].
* Niman, Michael I. [http://mediastudy.com/articles/av3-13-03.html "Disturbing the Peace: Creepy 'FReepers' Target Activists]." ArtVoice: [[13 March]] [[2003]].
*[http://www.freerepublicsucks.s5.com/Links.html Free Republic Sucks] Website with links to anti-FReeper sites and online forums, with an explanation of their provenance. No longer updated.
* Stein, Jeff. [http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/13/free/ "Free-for-all at Free Republic: Lucianne Goldberg, Matt Drudge and other friends abandon the Clinton-bashing Web site over its attacks on George W. Bush] Salon, [[13 July]] [[1999]].
*[http://mediamatters.org/items/200408060010 Comments made by Jerome Corsi on Free Republic]
*[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/posts FreeRepublic.com] Original FR thread with Buckhead's "Post 47" regarding Rathergate.
*[http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/09/18/cbs_theatre.html Journalism.nyu.edu] on source verification, Dan Rather, and CBS.
*[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/805832/posts/ History of FR] by Jim Robinson.
 
[[Category:InternetAmerican forumsconservative websites]]
[[Category:ConservativePolitical weblogsInternet forums]]
[[Category:PoliticalInternet websitesproperties established in 1997]]
[[Category:Anti-Islam sentiment]]
[[Category:Activists]]
[[Category:Politics and technology]]
[[Category:1996 establishments]]
[[Category:Internet activism]]