Talk:Cumulative distribution function: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:31, 11 December 2018

Latest revision as of 17:00, 1 May 2025

(30 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=

{{maths rating|frequentlyviewed=yes

{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance = high}}

|field = probability and statistics

{{WikiProject Statistics|importance = high}}

|class = C

|historical =

}}

{{WPStatistics

|importance = high

|class = C

}}

{{annual readership}}

{{archive box|auto=yes}}

== Logistic? ==

[[User:Thatsme314|Thatsme314]] asserted in an edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cumulative_distribution_function&oldid=904343161...

"In the case of a [[continuous distribution]], it gives the area under the [[probability density function]] from minus infinity to <math>x</math>, and is a [[Logistic distribution|logistic]] [[Logistic distribution|distribution]]. Cumulative distribution functions are also used to specify the distribution of [[multivariate random variable]]s."

Am I misunderstanding what is meant here? The obvious reading is clearly wrong, but perhaps there is a less obvious reading that I am missing. Best clase, it still needed clarification so I deleted it.

--[[User:Livingthingdan|Livingthingdan]] ([[User talk:Livingthingdan|talk]]) 07:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

== Serious Error ==

Line 76 ⟶ 80:

There are several problems here, particularly with inconsistent notations. But there are structural problems in defining the cdfs of the discrete distributions, as the formulae given are only valid at the integer points (within the range of the distribution) and would give incorrect values of the cdf at non-integer values. Also several of the functions involved require definitions/wikilinks. So, if the table is to be included, thought needs to be given to possibly dividing it into discrete/continuous tables and/or adding extra columns. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 09:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Melcombe}} I certainly hope we won't see tables that say "cumulative density function" instead of "cumulative distribution function". [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 18:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

== citation needed.... really? ==

Line 123 ⟶ 128:

I went through and changed the notation <math>F_X(x)</math> to <math>F(x)</math> everywhere in the definition section to try to obtain notational consistency through the article, but the change was reverted by Nijdam with edit summary "Difference between cdf of X and just a cdf". But that conflicts with much notation in the article that uses F(x) for the cdf of X. In the Properties section:

:''<i>the CDF of ''X'' will be discontinuous at the points ''x''_''i'' and constant in between:''</i>

::<math>F(x) = \operatorname{P}(X\leq x) = \sum_{x_i \leq x} \operatorname{P}(X = x_i) = \sum_{x_i \leq x} p(x_i).</math>

:''<i>If the CDF ''F'' of ''X'' is [[continuous function|continuous]], then ''X'' is a [[continuous random variable]]; if furthermore ''F'' is [[absolute continuity|absolutely continuous]], then there exists a [[Lebesgue integral|Lebesgue-integrable]] function ''f''(''x'') such that''</i>

::<math>F(b)-F(a) = \operatorname{P}(a< X\leq b) = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx</math>

:''<i>for all real numbers ''a'' and ''b''. The function ''f'' is equal to the [[derivative]] of ''F'' [[almost everywhere]], and it is called the [[probability density function]] of the distribution of ''X''.''</i>

In the Examples section:

:''<i>As an example, suppose ''X'' is [[uniform distribution (continuous)|uniformly distributed]] on the unit interval [0,&nbsp;1]. Then the CDF of X is given by''</i>

::<math>F(x) = \begin{cases}

Line 161 ⟶ 166:

== Continuous Random Variables ==

Elsewhere on Wikipedia, and in many published books, a continuous random variable has an ''absolutely'' continuous c.d.f., not merely continuous as stated in the properties section. I suggest that this page should also state that the c.d.f. is absolutely continuous so that there is a p.d.f. [[User:Paulruud|Paulruud]] ([[User talk:Paulruud|talk]]) 17:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)<small><span class="autosigned">

== Definition as expectation value ==

Line 167 ⟶ 172:

I found this in the introduction of [[Characteristic function (probability theory)|Characteristic function]]:

''The characteristic function provides an alternative way for describing a [[random variable]]. Similarly to the [[cumulative distribution function]]''

:<math>F_X(x) = \operatorname{E} \left [\mathbf{1}_{\{X\leq x\}} \right],</math>

''<i>( where '''1'''_{{''X ≤ x''}} is the [[indicator function]] — it is equal to 1 when {{nowrap|''X ≤ x''}}, and zero otherwise), which completely determines behavior and properties of the probability distribution of the random variable ''X'', the '''characteristic function'''''</i>

: <math> \varphi_X(t) = \operatorname{E} \left [ e^{itX} \right ]</math>

Line 176 ⟶ 181:

The notation <math>F_X(x) = \operatorname{E} \left [\mathbf{1}_{\{X\leq x\}} \right]</math> is so confusing I ask the community a clarification in this page ([[Characteristic function (probability theory)|Characteristic function]]).

== Inverse distribution function (quantile function) error? ==

In the properties listing it says:

# <math>F^{-1}(p) \leq x</math> if and only if <math>y \leq F(p)</math>

it does not define y and p as argument of F seems odd. [[User:Yak90|Yak90]] ([[User talk:Yak90|talk]]) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

== Kind of reciprocity ==

Line 191 ⟶ 190:

== Colors in the first graph are too similar ==

Please use clearly distinguishable colors, that work also with color vision deficiency. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.219.233.164|88.219.233.164]] ([[User talk:88.219.233.164#top|talk]]) 12:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Connection to measure theory ==

I would like to know the full connection to measure theory. It seems if I have a probabilistic measure space <math>(A,\mathcal{A},P_A)</math> and a measurable function <math>X\colon A\to \mathbb{R}</math> it might be the pushforward measure <math>X_* P_A= P_A \circ X^{-1}</math> which I guess would be a mapping <math> (\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), ||\cdot||_2)\mapsto \mathbb{R}</math> which for some reason is then restricted to half open sets <math>F_X \overset{?}{:=} (X_* P_A)\restriction [-\infty , r)\times \mathbb{R}</math>. But this is original research and feels a bit patchy (unclear to me how to generalize to random variables with values in <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>) so please if someone who has connected the dots could add the connection. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rostspik|Rostspik]] ([[User talk:Rostspik#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rostspik|contribs]]) 05:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Check Required ==

Hello! I am new editor of Wikipedia and I have tried to do some edits and give some citations I hope I have done things right if not pls let me know my mistakes. This would help me a lot Thank you. [[User:Stobene45|Stobene45]] ([[User talk:Stobene45|talk]]) 09:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

:Hello! ALong with your addition to my talk page I have taken a look at some of your edits. I would like to direct you to the teahouse to actually ask a question about what to add to the article and what not to add to articles (most of which can be found in the [[WP:MOS|Manual of Style]]). I have reverted your edits however please note that I do see your edits as being in good faith considering you contacted me first saying that you are a new user wanting to learn. Otherwise, I probably would've given you warnings. [[User:Blaze The Wolf|Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor]] ([[User talk:Blaze The Wolf#top|talk]]) 18:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

:{{re|Stobene45}} this is mostly a matter of Wikipedia's accepted style conventions. We don't artificially underline subheadings, but rather use the pre-defined styles generated by the staggered classes of headings; and while italics can be used for emphasis, this should be done very sparingly (see [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Text_formatting#Emphasis]]). As for the citations, references to Google results are not suitable anywhere on Wikipedia - the cited source must be the specific work used, not just a search result containing the work's title. Cheers! --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 16:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

== Mild error in Examples section ==

In the paragraph beginning "Suppose is [[Normal distribution|normal distributed]]. Then the CDF of  is given by" there is an error. The dummy variable "x" is used as the function argument F(x) rather than the upper limit of integration, "t". I will edit to make this F(t). [[Special:Contributions/2601:1C2:B00:C640:D541:DF77:FC10:64EF|2601:1C2:B00:C640:D541:DF77:FC10:64EF]] ([[User talk:2601:1C2:B00:C640:D541:DF77:FC10:64EF|talk]]) 23:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

:@[[User:Joe Gatt|Joe Gatt]] This edit and thread was created by me, I just hadn't logged in. Your edit was incorrect. I think you were confused by the notation - it's OK to have F(x) = int ^ x. What wouldn't be OK would be to have F(X) = int ^ X as a CDF definition (see [[Probability integral transform]]). Technically, X is a function of a probability space. Under certain restrictions, X(w) = x where w is in some original psp and x is in the support or range of the function X.

:As written, the CDF definition is back to being correct. [[User:Chjacamp|Chjacamp]] ([[User talk:Chjacamp|talk]]) 00:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

== Please clarify how area inequalities follow from diagram ==

The "Properties" section states the inequalities <math display="block">

x (1-F_X(x)) \leq \int_x^{\infty} t\,dF_X(t)

</math>

and

<math display="block">

x F_X(-x) \leq \int_{-\infty}^{-x} (-t)\,dF_X(t)

</math>

for a random variable <math>X</math> with a finite <math>L_1</math>-norm. These inequalities are straightforward to derive from the formula for the expected value of <math>X</math> using integration by parts. But the article claims that we can instead see why the inequalities are true from the included diagram by "consider[ing] the areas of the two red rectangles and their extensions to the right or left up to the graph of <math>F_X</math>". I don't see how these equalities follow from the diagram; please clarify. [[User:Ted.tem.parker|Ted.tem.parker]] ([[User talk:Ted.tem.parker|talk]]) 00:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

== Hatnote to pdf ==

There is [[Talk:Cumulative density function#RfC on redirect, disambig, article, or deletion|a discussion]] (RfC) on what to do with the page [[cumulative density function]]. One option is that it should redirect to this page. Some editors suggest that there should then be a hatnote here linking to [[probability density function]]. Please join the discussion! —[[User:St.nerol|St.Nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/St.nerol|contribs]]) 16:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)