Meta:Requests for adminship/lustiger seth3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:04, 1 June 2014

Latest revision as of 05:33, 11 June 2014

(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #f5fff5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki [[:Category:Meta-Wiki requests|request]]. <strong style="color:red">Please do not modify it</strong>.

[[Category:Closed Meta-Wiki requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

=== [[Meta:Requests for adminship/lustiger_seth3|lustiger_seth]] ===

* [[Meta talk:Requests for adminship/lustiger seth3|talk page of this RfA]]

* {{user6|lustiger_seth}}

:''Ending 8 June 2014 15:54 UTC'' <!-- I should place this here, right? --> <!-- Maybe here would be better :) -->

Line 9 ⟶ 14:

:{{question}} How about becoming [[Interface editors|interface editor]] instead? [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 16:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

::That's a good idea; it should give him all the access he requires, though for policy reasons being an admin might be better. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]]<small> ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|talk]])</small> 16:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

::I don't think that is a good idea as the interface editor right is a global one and the user obviously merely needs access to protected pages on metawiki. Adding Lustiger seth under that rationale to athis global user group would be far out of the global right's scope. Regards, [[User:Vogone|Vogone]] ([[User talk:Vogone|talk]]) 17:04, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

:::If the intended scope is metawiki's blacklist only, I agree interface editor rights are unjustified. The right question would be: {{ping|lustiger_seth}} You seem to have worked on the blacklist here, dewiki and enwiki. Do you want to expand your work to other wikis by becoming a global interface editor? [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 00:14, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

::::I don't think that editing projects' blacklists is within the scope of [[interface editors]], as they are entitled to only "maintain templates and the site's JavaScript (*.js) and Cascading Style Sheets (*.css) resources". [[User:LlamaAl|LlamaAl]] ([[User talk:LlamaAl|talk]]) 02:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

:'''support''' —[[User:DerHexer|DerHexer]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:DerHexer|(Talk)]]</small> 19:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{comment}} Maybe it would be advisable to proceed here like in the case of [[Meta:Requests_for_adminship/Dschwen_5|Dschwen]] who got limited adminship assigned which doesn't fall under the inactivity policy and was granted for the sole purpose to edit [[MediaWiki:Wikiminiatlas.js]]. This could be done here as well, but limited to the blacklists instead of the Wikiminiatlas.js. Regards, [[User:Vogone|Vogone]] ([[User talk:Vogone|talk]]) 19:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{s}} Why not? I feel this user is trustworthy and capable of completing admin tasks here on meta. Just try to stay active. [[User:Akifumii|Akifumii]] ([[User talk:Akifumii|talk]]) 22:20, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{s}} [[user:Alexanderps|Alex Pereira]] ^{[[user talk:Alexanderps|falaê]]} 18:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

:{{Support}} Why not? -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:Indigo;font-weight:bold"><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]] 21:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

* {{support}} valued contributor to spam and spamlist management, and spam-management tool building &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 14:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

* '''Support''' [[User:Pmlineditor|Pmlineditor]] ([[User talk:Pmlineditor|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Pmlineditor|c]] '''·''' [[Special:Logs/Pmlineditor|l]]) 18:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

----

'''Promoted''' - [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]} 05:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

</div>