Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep 2 different ratings in {{WikiProject Spaceflight}}, {{WikiProject Rocketry}}. (Fix Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter) Tag: |
||
| (572 intermediate revisions by 79 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk page of redirect}}{{Old merge full
| otherpage = SpaceX Starship
| date = 6 May 2023
| result = Merge
| talk = Talk:SpaceX Starship#Reorganise pages relating to Starship program
| URL = https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1153462063#Reorganise_pages_relating_to_Starship_program}}
{{Old AfD multi |page=SpaceX Starship development |date=26 November 2021 |result='''keep'''}}
{{Archives|age=90|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|large=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes |1 =
{{WikiProject Spaceflight
| importance = Mid
| spacex = yes
|class=<!-- Formerly assessed as B-class -->}}
{{WikiProject Rocketry |importance=Mid|class=<!-- Formerly assessed as C-class -->}}
{{WikiProject Astronomy|solar_system=yes|importance=na|ss-importance=Mid|mars=yes|mars-importance=Mid}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|minthreadsleft =
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:
|counter = 3
|maxarchivesize=150K
}}
{{section sizes}}
== Replacing main image? ==
I feel like updating the first image on the page would be relevant, as SN9 is a little old news. [[User:Cocobb8|Cocobb8]] ([[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]]) 03:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
== Copyedits ==
I"m doing a copyedit. Comments:
* The article should be renamed SpaceX Starship System development.
* First pass removed a lot of minutiae and shortened the article by ~40%. More to go.
[[User:Lfstevens|Lfstevens]] ([[User talk:Lfstevens|talk]]) 04:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
== Colors in tables, and accessibility ==
There's an accessibility tag at the top of the article about the colors used in tables. By my testing, every color/text combination gets a triple A accessibility rating. Can we remove the tag? If not, any proposals for how to adjust the colors? [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 16:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
:It doesn't actually get a triple AAA against link color, see {{Template|ColorCell}} and [[MOS:COLORS]]. The article {{oldid|SpaceX Starship development|1065319311|used to employ}} common [[Template:Table cell templates|table cell templates]] with an associated meaning instead of a (new) arbitrary pallette. {{Template|ColorCell}} was created by the same editor that applied it to this page. I would suggest going back to templates with meaning as follows:
:{| class="wikitable"
! Template used before 2022
! Current use of {{Template|ColorCell}}
! Proposed color
! Proposed template
|-
| {{nightly|Under construction}}
| style="background:#5ed6ff;text-align:center;" | Under construction
| {{scheduled|Under construction}}
| {{Template|scheduled}}
|-
| {{center|''Not present''}}
| style="background:#83ff84;text-align:center;" | At site
| {{active|At site}}
| {{Template|active}}
|-
| {{terminated|Scrapped}}
| style="background:#fff55d;text-align:center;" | Scrapped
| {{unreleased|Scrapped}}
| {{Template|unreleased}}
|-
| {{terminated|Intentionally destroyed}}
| style="background:#ffc18a;text-align:center;" | Intentionally destroyed
| {{terminated|Intentionally destroyed}}
| {{Template|terminated}}
|-
| {{lost|Destroyed}}
| style="background:#ffb2b2;text-align:center;" | Destroyed
| {{lost|Destroyed}}
| {{Template|lost}}
|-
| {{dropped|Retired}}
| style="background:#c4c4c4;text-align:center;" | Retired
| {{dropped|Retired}}
| {{Template|dropped}}
|}
:--[[User:Ftrebien|Fernando Trebien]] ([[User talk:Ftrebien|talk]]) 23:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
::I'd missed the link colors. Support the proposed colors, better than the current and the old. Though I believe the color for "retired" is unchanged between old and proposed — [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 00:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
:::Just to be sure, do you propose we use the old color (and template) for ''retired''? It's the same color and template proposed for ''intentionally destroyed''. I'm ok with the coincidence, but some might prefer a distinction. --[[User:Ftrebien|Fernando Trebien]] ([[User talk:Ftrebien|talk]]) 00:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
::::I'm proposing we use the new, but I think it [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SpaceX_Starship_development&oldid=1065319311 used to be] yellow, not pink — [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 09:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
:::::You are right. I fixed this in the table above. --[[User:Ftrebien|Fernando Trebien]] ([[User talk:Ftrebien|talk]]) 11:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
::::::Shouldn't "Scrapped" and "Intentionally destroyed" be the same? <span style="color:#AAA"><small><nowiki>{{u|</nowiki></small>[[User:Gtoffoletto|<span style="color:darkGreen;font-weight:bold">Gtoffoletto</span>]]<small><nowiki>}}</nowiki></small></span> <sup>[[User talk:Gtoffoletto|'''talk''']]</sup> 11:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
:::::::They could employ the same template, but I think they mean slightly different things in the article. I think ''scrapped'' refers to the idea of disposal during construction taking parts to reuse, while ''intentionally destroyed'' refers to irrecoverable disposal after construction during some operation, usually a test. --[[User:Ftrebien|Fernando Trebien]] ([[User talk:Ftrebien|talk]]) 15:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
== Article will be merged ==
NOTICE TO ALL EDITORS: This article has been nominated to be merged into the [[SpaceX Starship]]. @[[User:Gtoffoletto|Gtoffoletto]] will be proceeding with the merge. [[User:Cocobb8|Cocobb8]] ([[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]]) 14:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
| |||