Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Alter: isbn, title, url. Add: citeseerx, title-link. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated. |
m →Concept: CS1 Multiple Author Names fix - split authors to separate first/last name parameter pairs |
||
(35 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Learning model}}
The concept of double-loop learning was introduced by [[Chris Argyris]] in the 1970s'''. Double-loop learning''' entails the modification of [[goal]]s or [[decision-making]] rules in the light of experience. In double-loop learning, individuals or organizations not only correct errors based on existing rules or assumptions (which is known as single-loop learning), but also question and modify the underlying assumptions, goals, and norms that led to those actions. The first loop uses the goals or decision-making rules, the second loop enables their modification, hence "double-loop". Double-loop learning recognises that the way a problem is defined and solved can be a source of the problem.<ref name=c-argyris-learning>{{cite journal |last1=Argyris |first1=Chris |
==
Double-loop learning is contrasted with "single-loop learning": the repeated attempt at the same
{{
Double-loop learning is used when it is necessary to change the mental model on which a decision depends. Unlike single loops, this model includes a shift in understanding, from simple and static to broader and more dynamic, such as taking into account the changes in the surroundings and the need for expression changes in mental models.<ref>{{cite book |
<gallery caption="Reference models I and II" widths="280px" heights="280px" align="center">
Line 16 ⟶ 17:
''[[A Behavioral Theory of the Firm]]'' (1963) describes how organizations learn, using (what would now be described as) double-loop learning:
{{
In a 2019 article, Geoffrey Sloan said that the double-loop learning framework can be used to understand how the [[Western Approaches Tactical Unit]] (WATU) of the Royal Navy during [[World War II|WW2]] solved a critical tactical problem by changing the organization's basic standards, policies, and goals.<ref name=Sloan2019/> WATU was able to develop and update anti-submarine tactical doctrine between 1942 and 1945 as new technology and assets became available, enabling the Royal Navy to "replicate a learning organization that successfully could challenge existing norms, objectives, and policies pertaining to trade defense even when applied to geographically diverse theaters of operation".<ref name=Sloan2019>{{cite journal |last=Sloan |first=Geoffrey |date=Autumn 2019 |title=The Royal Navy and organizational learning—the Western Approaches Tactical Unit and the Battle of the Atlantic |journal=[[Naval War College Review]] |volume=72 |issue=4 |pages=9:1–25 |jstor=26775522 |url=https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss4/9}}</ref>
== See also ==
{{Div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Absorptive capacity]]
* {{section link|Coherence therapy|Hierarchical organization of constructs}}
* [[Higher-order thinking]]
* [[Learning cycle]]
* [[Learning organization]]
* [[Mental model]]
* [[Metacognition]]
* [[Neurathian bootstrap]]
* [[Reflective equilibrium]]
* [[Reflective practice]]
Line 33 ⟶ 40:
== Further reading ==
* {{cite book |last=Bassot |first=Barbara |date=2015 |chapter=Bringing assumptions to the surface |title=The reflective practice guide: an interdisciplinary approach to critical reflection |___location=Abingdon; New York |publisher=[[Routledge]] |isbn=9781138784307 |oclc=898925915 |pages=79–92
* {{cite journal |last1=Bochman |first1=David J. |last2=Kroth |first2=Michael |date=2010 |title=Immunity to transformational learning and change |journal=The Learning Organization
* {{cite book |last1=Fraser |first1=J. Scott |last2=Solovey |first2=Andrew D. |date=2007 |title=Second-order change in psychotherapy: the golden thread that unifies effective treatments |___location=Washington, DC |publisher=[[American Psychological Association]] |isbn=978-1591474364 |oclc=65195322
* {{cite book |last1=Brockbank |first1=Anne |last2=McGill |first2=Ian |date=2012 |
* {{cite book |last=Argyris |first=Chris |
* {{cite journal |last1=Blackman |first1=Deborah |last2=Connelly |first2=James |last3=Henderson |first3=Steven |date=January 2004 |title=Does double loop learning create reliable knowledge? |journal=The Learning Organization
* {{cite book |last1=Torbert |first1=William R. |last2=Cook-Greuter |first2=Susanne R. |last3=Fisher |first3=Dalmar |last4=Foldy |first4=Erica |last5=Gauthier |first5=Alain |last6=Keeley |first6=Jackie |last7=Rooke |first7=David |last8=Ross |first8=Sara Nora |last9=Royce |first9=Catherine |last10=Rudolph |first10=Jenny |date=2004 |title=Action inquiry: the secret of timely and transforming leadership |___location=San Francisco |publisher=Berrett-Koehler |isbn=978-1576752647 |oclc=53793296
* {{cite web |last=Smith |first=Mark K. |date=2013 |
* {{cite book |last=Nielsen |first=Richard P. |date=1996 |chapter=Double-loop, dialogue methods |title=The politics of ethics: methods for acting, learning, and sometimes fighting with others in addressing ethics problems in organizational life |___location=New York |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0195096651 |oclc=34517566 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/politicsofethics00rich/page/75 75–105] |
* {{cite book |last=Argyris |first=Chris |
* {{cite journal |last=Isaacs |first=William N. |date=September 1993 |title=Taking flight: dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning |journal=Organizational Dynamics |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=24–39 |doi=10.1016/0090-2616(93)90051-2 |url=http://wayra.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Dialogue-Collective-Thinking-and-Org-Learning_WilliamIsaacs_MIT_1993.pdf
* {{cite book |last=Argyris |first=Chris |
* {{cite book |last1=Argyris |first1=Chris |
* {{cite journal |last=Argyris |first=Chris |
[[Category:Learning methods]]
|