Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrupp: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:08, 28 December 2004

Latest revision as of 06:50, 4 May 2022

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate" class="metadata" id="vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; ">

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. <br >The result of the debate was '''delete'''. [[User:Joy Stovall|Joyous]] 01:33, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

===[[Thrupp]]===

Line 4 ⟶ 7:

* '''Delete''', '''Neologism'''. [[User:JRM|JRM]] 17:02, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', it's not really a neologism. Just a joke word that [[Douglas Adams]] made up for a book. As much as I like Douglas Adams, this is non-encyclopedic. [[User:Rje|Rje]] 17:08, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

*: Ahem. Joke words that Douglas Adams made up for a book would be [[neologism]]s. It doesn't actually have to be used or be intended to be used for that. I highly doubt the word is cromulent enough to be in the Wiktionary. [[User:JRM|JRM]] 19:48, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

*: Concur. [[User:Edeans|Edeans]] 06:08, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', copying more than the odd entry from ''Meaning of Liff'' would be a copyvio. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><span style="color:green;">*</span></SMALL>]] 17:12, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', mainly 'cause it's utterly nn. [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 19:43, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.

</div >