Wikipedia:Identifying and using style guides: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:18, 9 April 2019

Latest revision as of 11:40, 28 July 2024

(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 23:

Style guides issued by government agencies/ministries are usually specific to that particular legal entity. There are exceptions, intended to normalize style across an entire government, with highly variable success rates; examples include the ''[[US Government Printing Office]] Style Manual'' (''GPO Manual'' for short, on which most American government department manuals are actually closely based); the UK ''Guidance for Governmental Digital Publishing and Services'' (for British government websites; too new to assess); and the Australian government's ''Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers'' (last updated in 2002 and widely ignored). There are also some [[International English|international or world English]] manuals for specific organizational purposes, e.g. UN directorates.

Governmental style guides determine (or attempt to determine) [[wikt:bureaucratese|bureacratesebureaucratese/governmentese/militarese]] – regulatory language. They also exert some effects on national legal style (a field with its own manuals), and business writing to an extent (which also draws heavily on journalism/marketing style, of course). And that's about it. No English class is going to recommend the ''GPO Style Manual'' to its students, for example; nor are these works relied upon by book, news, or academic publishers, except for limited, specialized purposes. Governmentese is a quirky style, full of excessive capitalization and a hatred of hyphens, commas, and much other punctuation.

English has no global or national language authority; there is no equivalent of the French language's [[Académie française]]. Government manuals have no authority to dictate style to non-governmental writers, including Wikipedia. We do borrow from national legal style manuals their citation formats for legal cases, but very little else.

Line 100:

== See also ==

* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] (policy;: the information in our articles must be sourceable and usually already sourc{{em|ed}})

* [[Wikipedia:No original research]] (policy;: includes misuse of sources, especially primary ones)

* [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] (guideline: we accept lots of citation formats; don't edit-war over them)

* [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]] (guideline: author and publisher reputability matter)

* [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources]] (essay: conflicts of interest matter)

* [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources]] (essay;: includes style guides that are prescriptive)

* [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources]] (essay;: includes much that is published in style guides)

* [[Wikipedia:Dictionaries as sources]] (essay;: includes usage dictionaries and style guides that contain them)

* [[Wikipedia:Common-style fallacy]] (essay: just because bloggers or entertainment journalists do something doesn't mean we do)

* [[Wikipedia:Specialized-style fallacy]] (essay: avoid imposing strange stylistic quirks from field-specific writing)

Line 113:

* [[Wikipedia:You are probably not a lexicologist or a lexicographer]] (essay: opinions about word usage do not trump reliable sources on language)

{{Wikipedia essays}}
[[Category:Wikipedia essays onabout reliable sources‎]]