Content deleted Content added
{{WikiProject Computer Science}} class=C |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
| con = RL0919
| condate = 2010-03-22
| conreason = Has several non-online sources listed, should be exposed to a full AFD }}
{{oldafdfull|page=Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm|date=22 March 2010|result='''keep'''}}▼
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Computer Science}}
}}
== COI ? ==
▲{{oldafdfull|page=Brooks-Iyengar Algorithm|date=22 March 2010|result='''keep'''}}
This page was created by [[User:Sitharama.iyengar1]] which strongly suggests issues of [[wp:coi|conflict of interest]] and [[wp:or|original research]]. The article as it currently reads is also not presented to a general encyclopedia audience: the first sentence includes language incoherent to a non-specialist: " multi-dimensional fault tolerant algorithms", "distributed processing of sensor input intervals". [[User:Hairhorn|Hairhorn]] ([[User talk:Hairhorn|talk]]) 22:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
==AfD==
Give me a chance to work on the article... [[User:kgrr|<
===Notability===
Notability is there. I can provide at least a dozen references and several from books. [[User:kgrr|<
===Edits===
It's worthwhile to keep, it just needs to be explained at a layman's level and made encyclopedic. [[User:kgrr|<
== Issues with the two new sections. ==
Line 41 ⟶ 43:
[[WP:COI]]: These two authors have adopted the Algorithm and enhanced it by adding additional features.
Let us know
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lateshkj|Lateshkj]] ([[User talk:Lateshkj#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lateshkj|contribs]]) 14:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
::The links at the beginning of each issues are links to Wikipedia policies. So, answering needs to show that these policies are respected, not, as {{u|Lateshkj}} did, to explain what the editor think that the policies should be. In particular, using material coming to a submitted article is a copyvio that is strictly forbidden by Wikipedia. This suffices to remove the added content, and I'll do that.
::By the way, Wikipedia rules for solving an editorial conflict are summarized in [[WP:BRD]]. In summary, when you are reverted, '''you must not revert the revert''', which is [[WP:edit warring]]. Instead you must discuss on the talk page and wait for a consensus (see [[WP: Consensus]]) for including or rejecting you edit. Because of the number of issues, I doubt that you can get a consensus for accepting your edit. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard|talk]]) 16:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
:{{u|Lateshkj}}, a journal that is still "under review" is likely not published, and does not count as a reliable source. If something is "on its way", do not add it to Wikipedia yet. For text donations, please see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]].
:You do not seem to have addressed the "conflict of interest" concern in your response, despite linking to the guideline. Your response to the "synthesis" point appears to be contradictory ("Yes, It is true"?).
:Focusing on "your algorithm" may cause the article to have an [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] towards the algorithm. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 16:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
== What are ''interval measurements'' ==
The intro refers to "the '''interval measurements''' taken by a distributed sensor network," but interval measurement is not explained here or in [[distributed sensor network]]. - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 11:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
| |||