Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Ring (programming language): Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 15:
*'''Delete'''. Fails [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] and wider [[WP:N]] policy, passing mentions outside primary sources. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 10:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
** Thanks, '''The article is updated to establish notability using secondary resources''' (6 articles in printed journals in [[Youm7]] and [[Al_Riyadh_(newspaper)|Al Riyadh]] Newspapers), 3 articles in printed magazines ([[Computer!Totaal|Computer Total]], BIMArabia and Muslim Researchers), and reviewed articles in CodeProject. Also a lot of resources could be added, I'm working on improving the article. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 01:10, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
*<s>'''Delete'''</s> No significant coverage from third-party sources and also no indication of meeting NSOFT. --<span style="text-shadow:0 1px 5px #99FFFF">[[User:94rain|<
** Thanks, The article is updated to establish notability using secondary resources, '''also a lot of third-party sources are added'''. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 01:10, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
***Which source? I see plenty of them are en.wikibooks/rosettacode/GitHub/Quora/reddit/Sourceforge/Steam/Youtube/Wordpress. They are not reliable. The below discussion is too long and I do not have sufficient time to look through it.--<span style="text-shadow:0 1px 5px #99FFFF">[[User:94rain|<
****'''Summary''' Article Topic : '''A programming language called Ring and related projects (Supernova and PWCT)'''.
The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article.
Line 278:
*'''Comment''' The article is updated to establish notability using printed journals, magazines and reviewed articles. I will not repeat them again. The table in the top list some of these resources. Also, the article topic (Ring and related projects : Supernova and PWCT) are open source project and from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(software)#Reliability_and_significance_of_sources] we notice "The way the app is distributed. It is reasonable to allow relatively informal sources for free and open-source software, if significance can be shown.". So we have more options too. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 01:18, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
**Thank you for your effort in improving this article. But please do not rush to close the discussion, which would hinder the generation of clearer consensus. I've striken my previous vote for deletion, but I still hesitate whether to vote for keep before further identifying those sources and knowing others' opinions. Let's be patient and see how it goes. By the way, please do not cite too many primary sources ( en.wikibooks/rosettacode/GitHub/Quora/reddit/Sourceforge/Steam/Youtube/Wordpress). --<span style="text-shadow:0 1px 5px #99FFFF">[[User:94rain|<
*** Thank you very much, I will not cite too many primary sources again. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 02:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
**Relisting is not an opportunity to !vote again. If you want to amend your earlier 'keep' recommendation you can edit your comment and [[WP:strikethrough|strikethrough]] the previous text. [[User:Colin M|Colin M]] ([[User talk:Colin M|talk]]) 03:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
|