Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Newshunter12 (talk | contribs) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 26:
==== Category:American inspired aircrafts ====
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this section.''
:''The result of the discussion was:'' <!-- Template:Cfd top --> '''delete'''. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]], [[User talk:CambridgeBayWeather|Uqaqtuq (talk)]], [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|Sunasuttuq]] 04:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
:* '''Propose renaming''' [[:Category:American inspired aircrafts]] to [[:Category:American inspired aircraft]]
:* '''Propose renaming''' [[:Category:Soviet inspired aircrafts]] to [[:Category:Soviet inspired aircraft]]
Line 45 ⟶ 49:
* '''Delete''' Fully agree with Marco, it's not defining but an article may be appropriate. --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 20:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per Nigel Ish. These categories as is are [[WP:OR]], which has no place on Wikipedia. [[User:Newshunter12|Newshunter12]] ([[User talk:Newshunter12|talk]]) 00:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
----
:''The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>
==== Category:Australian first-class cricketers of South African origin ====
Line 52 ⟶ 58:
:''The result of the discussion was:'' <!-- Template:Cfd top --> '''merge''' to parents. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 15:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
:* '''Propose deleting''' {{lc|Australian first-class cricketers of South African origin}}<br />
:'''Nominator's rationale:''' For the same reason an [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_December_14#Category:New_Zealand_first-class_cricketers_of_South_African_origin|almost indentical category]] was deleted at the end of last year. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<
*'''Comment''' what we deleted was a NZ category. "First class" is redundant, because any others will be NN anyway. The category is in practice about South African expratriate cricketers in Autralia. At worst it should be upmerged, rather than deleted, but I suspect there may be scope for populating it better and getting it up to the normal minimum of 5. [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 16:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' it is conceivable that a played would play either T20I or ODI matches without playing first-class cricket, but that would be more likely for minor cricketing nations. It does seem like an unnecessary addition to the category name, however. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small>[[User_talk:Grutness|<span style="color: #008822;">wha?</span>]]</small>'' 05:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Line 127 ⟶ 133:
==== Category:Institutes of the Roman Curia ====
<div class="boilerplate cfd vfd xfd-closed" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this section.''
:''The result of the discussion was:'' <!-- Template:Cfd top --> '''merge'''. Renaming of the target should be considered in a new nomination. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 09:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
:* '''Propose merging''' [[:Category:Institutes of the Roman Curia]] to <s>[[:Category:Offices of the Roman Curia]]</s> [[:Category:Dicasteries]] ''meanwhile the target has been renamed''
:'''Nominator's rationale:''' '''merge or reverse merge''', it is not clear how the scope of these two categories is different. Note if the [[Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_23#Category:Offices_of_the_Roman_Curia|related discussion of yesterday]] is closed as merge, then this proposal is turning into merging with [[:Category:Roman Curia]]. [[User:Marcocapelle|Marcocapelle]] ([[User talk:Marcocapelle|talk]]) 04:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Line 135 ⟶ 145:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 09:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Merge''' per the nom. Upon evaluation, as far as I can tell, these two categories have the same general scope. I am no expert on the Roman Catholic Church, but these categories appear the same. [[User:Newshunter12|Newshunter12]] ([[User talk:Newshunter12|talk]]) 00:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' under either [[:Category:Dicasteries and institutes of the Roman Curia]] or [[:Category:Organizations of the Roman Curia]], with slight preference for [[:Category:Dicasteries and institutes of the Roman Curia]] since those are the terms actually used for these institutions. --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 09:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' There seems to be a consensus in favor of a merger, but the preferred name is uncertain, I believe a close to either name would be in order with a further nomination to move it if necessary. I've therefore filed an [[WP:ANRFC]] since keeping it open for longer won't do any good. --[[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 11:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
----
:''The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>
==== Category:Cow and Chicken ====
| |||