Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current issues in teaching: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 11:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
===[[Current issues in teaching]]===
:{{la|Current issues in teaching}}
:<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Current issues in teaching|View single debate]]</includeonly>
Line 6 ⟶ 13:
*'''Delete''' or a complete rewrite. The concept is valid but an article like this needs to be presented in a more encyclopedic tone and less like an POV essay. [[User:MrMurph101|MrMurph101]] 16:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
::Why is the concept valid?--[[User:Dmz5|Dmz5]] 20:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
:::The current issues in teaching, especially in the United States, is notable. Especially in dealing with [[No Child Left Behind]], budgeting issues, teaching standards, providing equity for affluent and poor areas, lack of parent support, etc. There is a lot to go on this issue and their is plenty of research on the issue out there. [[User:MrMurph101|MrMurph101]] 21:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Teachers are having lots of issues, but this is just ''terribly'' POV. -[[User:Amarkov|Amarkov]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Amarkov|blah]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/User:Amarkov|edits]]</sub></small> 20:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Essay. Topic itself is not encyclopedic. --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 05:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. -[[User:WarthogDemon|WarthogDemon]] 22:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', personal essay, no content worth saving, I tagged it for OR months ago and nothing came of it. [[User:Szyslak|<span style="color:green;">szyslak</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Szyslak|t]], [[Special:Contributions/Szyslak|c]], [[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]])</small> 23:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||