Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:07, 7 March 2020

Latest revision as of 00:29, 3 September 2025

Line 1:

{{/header}}

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed|{{PAGENAME}}]]

{{skip to top and bottom}}

[[Category:Pages that should not be manually archived]]

[[Category:WikiProject Articles for creation]]

Line 8 ⟶ 9:

__TOC__

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/20202025 MarchAugust 127}}

= MarchAugust 228 =

== 0603:22:4612, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by Sammy singhhIanResearch ==

{{Lafc|username=Sammy singhhIanResearch|ts=06:2203:4612, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Shubham_TeotiaZigZagZurich}}

Hi editors, just wanted to ask what I can do to improve my draft and write it in a way that is aligned with Wikipedia's guide and tone. Thank you! [[User:IanResearch|IanResearch]] ([[User talk:IanResearch|talk]]) 03:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:The draft just tells of the offerings and activities of the company; a Wikipedia article must do more, it must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the [[WP:ORG|special Wikipedia definition of a notable company]].

[[User:Sammy singhh|Sammy singhh]] ([[User talk:Sammy singhh|talk]]) 06:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:The awards are meaningless towards establishing notability; for an award to contribute to notability, it must itself merit an article(like [[Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Academy Award]]). [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Sammy singhh}}, Do you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 08:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

== 0905:08:5228, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by Ca economicsAndeHuang ==

{{Lafc|username=Ca economicsAndeHuang|ts=0905:08:5228, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|draft=Draft:Jonas_HjortWinmate Inc.}}

The draft has been declined multiple times. I have already revised the wording to make the tone more neutral, but it was still labeled as containing false information. Could you please review the draft and provide guidance on how to correct the issues and bring it in line with Wikipedia’s requirements? [[User:AndeHuang|AndeHuang]] ([[User talk:AndeHuang|talk]]) 05:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:I don't see where anyone has said it contains false information, but it does say that it appears to have been written by an AI/LLM.

I am requesting help because I followed the format of an existing Wiki article to create a page on a similar topic but have been rejected twice.

:Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a company and what it does, a Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:56, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Ca economics|Ca economics]] ([[User talk:Ca economics|talk]]) 09:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:[[User:Ca economics|Ca economics]], your article has good formatting. That isn't the problem. The sourcing is the problem here. To be accepted, a Wikipedia article should be supported by multiple independent reliable sources that have significant coverage of the subject of the article. Although plenty of your sources could be considered reliable and having significant coverage of the subject of the article, none of them are independent of the subject of the article. Journal articles written by someone don't qualify for that person for a Wikipedia article because they aren't independent of the subject. While the website of a place the subject of the article works might be reliable, it still isn't independent of the subject. Once you provide multiple sources that meet all three of your thresholds, your article will be accepted. Let me know if you have anymore questions! [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 13:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1006:37:3940, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by JBurger9109.252.122.222 ==

{{Lafc|username=JBurger9109.252.122.222|ts=1006:37:3940, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|draft=Draft:ASB_GlassFloorMaxim_Lazarev}}

Good day!

Thank you for your work!

Help, as a professional, to correct this page, to work on it, so that it is acceptable for Wikipedia.

This is a famous Russian entomologist who studies the world fauna of longhorn beetles. For Wikipedia, such personalities are important, as for the world encyclopedia.

Help improve this page.

Maybe it should be shortened, and leave some small extract? Until new sources.

With respect. [[Special:Contributions/109.252.122.222|109.252.122.222]] ([[User talk:109.252.122.222|talk]]) 06:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If something changes in the future, you are welcome to edit the draft and then appeal to the rejecting reviewer. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 08:37, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Casa Coto ==

Disclosed COI, wanting to remove Tag in order to resubmit the draft for review. Or is there anything else I still need to do?

{{Lafc|username=Casa Coto|ts=08:37, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik}}

Many thanks in advance. [[User:JBurger9|JBurger9]] ([[User talk:JBurger9|talk]]) 10:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedians, I'm kindly asking for advice. Many months ago, I created a draft on the Bihler company ([[Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik]]). It has since been declined multiple times, but I don't quite understand why. It is said that [[WP:NCORP]] is not met. However, in that draft, I have demonstrated, using a source assessment table, why I believe that the Bihler company has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I know that not every source that I have cited falls within the [[WP:SIRS]] criteria, but still, I feel that, the number of sources that do, is sufficient. It would be very helpful to have a second thought on this. Any advice is very much appreciated. Thank you! @ [[User:Novem Linguae]]. -- [[User:Casa Coto|Casa Coto]] ([[User talk:Casa Coto|talk]]) 08:37, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:I haven't done a detailed analysis yet, but if other reviewers are still declining it, maybe your source assessment table is being too generous. Do all your sources have 3 meaty paragraphs of detail about the company? Are they independent (i.e. no press releases disguised as articles, no articles that are mostly quotations, no [[advertorials]], etc)? Is at least one of the sources regional, national, or international? These are all things needed to pass [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]]. See also [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Nuances of GNG]] and [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Novem's words of wisdom]] #6. It's been 2 months since you submitted this... if you think it passes, maybe submit it again and add a comment asking for detailed source feedback in the event of a decline. Hope this helps. Good luck. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:JBurger9|JBurger9]] ([[User talk:JBurger9|talk]]) 10:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:cc {{u|Casa Coto}}. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Comments on your assessment table:

:* You list the Hesse source as secondary, but describe it as an encyclopedia. That means it's a tertiary source.

:* You assess four sources in total to meet the criteria of reliable, independent, and significant coverage. Those would be good sources, but...

:* it isn't clear that they provide significant coverage of the company, its products, the punch-bending process, or Otto Bihler himself. Those are four different topics, and this draft is about ''one'' topic. For example, the Kolbe source discusses the technology and how the machine works, but what about the company, which is the topic of this draft?

:The assessment table is a great start, but reading it only brings up more questions. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 15:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

::<small>Quick note that in my experience, tertiary sources are usually accepted as counting towards GNG. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 15:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>

:::<small>I wasn't saying that they aren't acceptable, although our policies recommend using them more to assess due weight. I was just pointing out an error in the table. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 16:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>

== 12:11:03:46, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by C3alex78.150.201.201 ==

{{Lafc|username=C3alex78.150.201.201|ts=12:11:03:46, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|draft=Draft:Glasfabrik_LambertsFusion_candle}}

Because I cannot find any more references to fusion candles [[Special:Contributions/78.150.201.201|78.150.201.201]] ([[User talk:78.150.201.201|talk]]) 12:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Then this topic doesn't merit an article at this time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am a newbie willing to learn and need help in the following matter: I want to prevent my draft on the [[Draft:Glasfabrik Lamberts|Glasfabrik Lamberts]] being rejected again and then deleted. There have been changes made by another editor since the submisson was declined by Bkissin. In your estimation, is the article now, after these edits, neutral enough to meet the Wikipedia guidelines? Or what passages are still to promotional? (It is really not my intention for it to read like an ad!)

== 14:57, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Aras2025 ==

The second reason given for the decline is the lack of sources with signifiant coverage. I'm a little irritated. All information in the draft is now substantiated by reliable, independent sources (books as well as websites and PDFs). Yes, some sources do not treat the Glasfabrik Lamberts in much detail, but the facts are still referred to and therefore evidenced. I am still working on obtaining a company portrait made by a German newspaper, but I am afraid I don't have more sources at the moment.

{{Lafc|username=Aras2025|ts=14:57, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Radio_Duhok}}

Hello,

My draft, "Draft:Radio Duhok," has been declined multiple times due to a lack of "in-depth coverage" from reliable, independent sources, according to the last reviewer.

Thank you for your help.

I have tried my best to find good sources and have included:

[[User:C3alex|C3alex]] ([[User talk:C3alex|talk]]) 11:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

1. Two official announcements from the Duhok Governorate's website congratulating the radio on its anniversary.

2. A feature article about the radio in the well-known regional "Gulan Magazine" (Issue 829, 2010), which refers to it as the "authentic voice of the governorate."

Could an experienced editor please take a look at these sources and provide some feedback? I am struggling to understand why these are considered insufficient for notability. Specifically, I would like to know if the Gulan Magazine article is just a "brief mention" and what an example of an "in-depth" source would look like for a subject like this.

== 11:28:56, 2 March 2020 review of submission by Abdul.alhazred32 ==

{{Lafc|username=Abdul.alhazred32|ts=11:28:56, 2 March 2020|page=

Draft:Tradd_Moore

}}

Hi,

I submitted this draft yesterday. It was rejected because it says that the subject doesn't qualify for a wikipedia article. I honestly can't see why, since there are tons of comic book artists/writers on wikipedia, even with stub articles, while the one I submitted is quite thorough and researched. Please let me know what differentiates this article from [[Ryan Ottley|this one]] or [[Ryan Stegman|this other one]]. Thank you in advance <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Abdul.alhazred32|Abdul.alhazred32]] ([[User talk:Abdul.alhazred32#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Abdul.alhazred32|contribs]]) 11:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{u|Abdul.alhazred32}} Please read [[WP:OSE]]. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits, as it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years, because this is a volunteer project. Your draft is sourced to an interview with the subject(which is not an independent [[WP:RS|reliable source]]), and two very brief mentions. Wikipedia requires significant coverage of the subject by independent reliable sources. If such coverage does not exist, the subject would not merit an article at this time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. [[User:Aras2025|Aras2025]] ([[User talk:Aras2025|talk]]) 14:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 11:40:29, 2 March 2020 review of draft by Mapmaker88 ==

{{Lafc|username=Mapmaker88|ts=11:40:29, 2 March 2020|draft=Draft:Wise_Blood_(musician)}}

:An in depth source will, on its own, go into detail about the topic and discuss what they see as important/significant/influential about it- what makes it [[WP:N|notable]]. Mere congratulations and a mention do not qualify. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am writing to because I would like further clarification on how my article is not properly supported by reliable sources. It contains links to interviews and profiles in the New York Times, The Guardian, BBC, Pitchfork, MTV etc. ALmost every line is cited and contains 30 sources and it's frustrating to get this type of response again. Thank you.

:The English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than other language versions; I don't know if this content would be acceptable on the Arabic Wikipedia, which has its own policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Mapmaker88|Mapmaker88]] ([[User talk:Mapmaker88|talk]]) 11:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1316:34:4950, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by 2400:1A00:B010:4D67:E05B:C081:8E82:70EDSaysky2 ==

{{Lafc|username=2400:1A00:B010:4D67:E05B:C081:8E82:70EDSaysky2|ts=13:3416:4950, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Prabin_SahAjay_Taneja}}

may i know the reason why the article has been stoped

[[User:Saysky2|Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Saysky2|talk]]) 16:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 17:10, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Saysky2 ==

[[Special:Contributions/2400:1A00:B010:4D67:E05B:C081:8E82:70ED|2400:1A00:B010:4D67:E05B:C081:8E82:70ED]] ([[User talk:2400:1A00:B010:4D67:E05B:C081:8E82:70ED|talk]]) 13:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Saysky2|ts=17:10, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Ajay Taneja}}

:Did you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

May i know the exact reason of rejecting the article. Even i had asked weather i can use newspapers cuts as reliable sources or not as in 2000s no digital media was there no any answered to my question. This i really disgusting no supports [[User:Saysky2|Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Saysky2|talk]]) 17:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:'''This draft has been rejected [[WP:IDHT|for failing to heed previous criticism]] and will not be considered further.''' The reviewers explained a fair bit in their comments, and the draft was rejected once it became clear you were blowing them off. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 17:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

::{{ping|Saysky2}} <small>re-signing to fix ping</small> —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 17:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:You have three non-independent sources, and one which might be independent, but gives a 404 when I look at it. (Even if it is both independent and gives substantial coverage, one source is not enough).

:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 1418:09:3610, 228 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by Brucewalker180.41.119.0 ==

{{Lafc|username=Brucewalker180.41.119.0|ts=1418:09:3610, 228 MarchAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:IronYunFusion_candle}}

please dont remove my draft when i send it to you even if its rubbish [[Special:Contributions/80.41.119.0|80.41.119.0]] ([[User talk:80.41.119.0|talk]]) 18:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

My submission keeps getting denied even though I am finding reliable sources independent from the source. Why is this?

[[User:Brucewalker1|Brucewalker1]] ([[User talk:Brucewalker1|talk]]) 14:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Brucewalker1}} I answered this the last time you asked a week ago. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 14:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:Don't waste reviewer time with rubbish. We don't accept AI-generated articles, period. It has been deleted. If you want to submit an article on that topic, you must write it in your own words and cite actual reliable sources. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 18:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 16:56:58, 2 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4066:204:CE9C:7CF5:1B07:F313:7C1C ==

{{Lafc|username=2409:4066:204:CE9C:7CF5:1B07:F313:7C1C|ts=16:56:58, 2 March 2020|declined=Draft:Tidni}}

== 18:26, 28 August 2025 review of submission by SindhuG2025 ==

[[Special:Contributions/2409:4066:204:CE9C:7CF5:1B07:F313:7C1C|2409:4066:204:CE9C:7CF5:1B07:F313:7C1C]] ([[User talk:2409:4066:204:CE9C:7CF5:1B07:F313:7C1C|talk]]) 16:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=SindhuG2025|ts=18:26, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Aligireddy_Kasi_Vishwanath_Reddy}}

* Wikipedia is not social media - A 9/10 year old that plays PUBG is not notable [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 17:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello team,

I have submitted an article on an Indian agriculturist AligiReddy Vishwanath Reddy but the article has been declined. Could you please assist me in improving the article. [[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] ([[User talk:SindhuG2025|talk]]) 18:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:[[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] it seems like no one has declined the article. When you created the page you included a 'decline' banner in the page. I've fixed it for you.

== 17:21:37, 2 March 2020 review of draft by BethesdaLee ==

:In its current state, the article would not be accepted. In addition to a lack of inline citations to support the claims made in the article, the article seems like it was written for the express purpose of promoting the subject rather than to be encyclopedic.

{{Lafc|username=BethesdaLee|ts=17:21:37, 2 March 2020|draft=Draft:Openpath_Security,_Inc.}}

:Also, it's best to avoid external links in the body of an article, unless necessary. See the page [[WP:External links]]. [[User:Sungodtemple|Sungodtemple]] ([[User talk:Sungodtemple|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/Sungodtemple|contribs]]) 04:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:Those blank decline templates are made up by ChatGPT and the like. [[User:Sarsenet|Sarsenet]]•<small>he/they</small>•([[User talk:Sarsenet|talk]]) 04:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 19:01, 28 August 2025 review of submission by RavenFireblade ==

Hello. I submitted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Openpath_Security,_Inc.#Openpath_Security%2C_Inc. and it was recently rejected as it "reads more like an advertisement." I do not work for Openpath and as a 3rd party industry expert, I am just submitting a viable encyclopedia article on a company in the access control and security market. The articles referenced in the submission are primarily industry publications and although they may not be main stream to people outside of our industry, those are about notable as our industry has (on top of the Techcrunch, Business Insider etc also mentioned). Also in doing my research I emulated prior accepted articles like Eagle Eye Networks who followed a similar format. I am not sure which part comes off as an advertisement so any feedback would be great. If its the "Product" section, I can edit or delete that but even with that portion, it is credible and real. Thank you [[User:BethesdaLee|BethesdaLee]] ([[User talk:BethesdaLee|talk]]) 17:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=RavenFireblade|ts=19:01, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Jack_Logan}}

:{{u|BethesdaLee}}, I would recommend reading the provided links to learn more about our policies here. Some of your comments show that you might not have a good grasp on them yet. In particular, your belief that primary industry publications would be a good source to denote notability when in fact secondary sources are highly preferred. The use of wikipedia as a source in the article is a further indication that you might want to review our policies on [[WP:RS]] reliable sources. The whole article feels like a lowkey advert, whether that was your intention or not. The article can basically be summarized as this: 1) this companies founders are great here's why 2) here's why their product is so great 3) some bragging about awards and customers. The whole thing basically reads like a press release and not like a formal, NEUTRAL article. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

We have edited the article along with new, reliable, independent sources. Please help us improve it. Thank you! [[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]] ([[User talk:RavenFireblade|talk]]) 19:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:BethesdaLee|BethesdaLee]] ([[User talk:BethesdaLee|talk]]) 17:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC). Thank you for the feedback. I made edits based on your suggestions (very much appreciated), what I read, and made the article neutral. I kept to the facts and eliminated any info that came across otherwise and resubmitted. Thank you!

:Hi @[[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]]. Who is "we" and "us"? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 20:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 17:31:48, 2 March 2020 review of submission by Inpuikhuan ==

::{{reply to|RavenFireblade|Qcne|Kalaboomsky|Athaenara|SoWhy|Bearcat|MWFwiki}} back in August 2018 at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Santos]], {{User5|User=Kalaboomsky}} wrote "Just tell '''us''' what needs to be removed or questionable areas on the article that needs removing" [[Special:Diff/855337532|here]]. It would appear to me that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jack Logan Show]] back in 2018 may possibly also be relevant here. All that said, [[:Jack Logan (filmmaker)]] is now a mainspace article: any windmills I chose to joust here in 2025 may [[:2018|seven years too late]], I guess. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 11:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Inpuikhuan|ts=17:31:48, 2 March 2020|page=Draft:Biju Ningombam}}

:::I was the approver. For what it is worth, this was a borderline pass. I felt the subject ''just'' meets notability, especially when considering [[WP:NOTLEVEL]] (I realize this is not a policy). However, even keeping the COI in-mind (and I have a feeling the disclosed COI may be a "sacrificial lamb" disclosure, and the actual COI may be deeper... But, AGF and all that) I feel that the article was ready for mainspace. Particularly with the additional COI labelling. Anyways, I am of the opinion that we have enough notability to push us over the edge, and that any further discussion regarding the article should take place via AfD. I would abstain from such a discussion. '''[[User:MWFwiki|MWFwiki]]''' ([[User talk:MWFwiki|talk]]) 20:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

= August 29 =

sir my first article on Biju Ningombam was rejected ago. I am new user and this is my first attempt also the reason why i chose this article is that this actress has been my idol few years ago and she has captured enough fans in the Manipur Film Industry by winning awards as well and when i miss to find in Wikipedia its really sad therefore I've chosen to publish on this.

Ill be ready to improve whatever feedback reach me. [[User:Inpuikhuan|Inpuikhuan]] ([[User talk:Inpuikhuan|talk]]) 17:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Inpuikhuan}}, Unfortunately your submission has been outright rejected which means that the subject is simply not notable at this time. I know this comes as a disappointment as you said you are a fan of her. However, Wikipedia always encourages that for this reason you should avoid writing about subjects that you may have a conflict of interest with. Cheers. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

== Request on 1801:54:2429, 229 MarchAugust 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles2025 forreview creation|AfC]]of submission by QueenofbostonHyperbolick ==

{{Lafc|username=Hyperbolick|ts=01:29, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Jimmy "Ninja" Chaikong}}

{{anchor|18:54:24, 2 March 2020 review of submission by Queenofboston}}

I am confessedly not entirely objective on this because Jimmy was a longtime acquaintance.

{{Lafc|username=Queenofboston|ts=18:54:24, 2 March 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:James_Kanter}}

He drowned in a boating accident this weekend. Had one of those quirky lives where he did many different things, MMA fighting, recording music, winning [[American Gladiator]], publishing philosophy, managing the Texas Songwriting Championship. He was a guest menace in a few episodes of [[Burn Notice]] (no media source for that, but he posted it on his socials and if you watch the episodes you can see him plain as day). His death was reported more than anything else in his life, but it was quite a life. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 01:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

<!-- Start of message -->

I am trying to create two pages on Wikipedia. These are my first two pages but i have done many edits before.

One of the pages is James Kanter, currently a draft. It got refused once with a comment that the reference articles should not be written by James Kanter but about James Kanter. The second time I added about 5 articles about James Kanter. And I mean articles by respected newspapers, not only the New York Times but also for example La Libre. The article got refused within a day with the comment that there are no direct and secondary sources. This is becoming a bit Kafkaesque.

I have now a good dozen of quality sources in my article and all of this is being ignored and the comment by the editor is just wrong.

Not to mention the double standards when I see other articles about similar topics with close to none quality source.

Thank you in advance for advice.

:Do you have a specific question about the draft? [[user:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#70A67A">-- NotC</span><span style="color:#396340">hariza</span><span style="color:#0D2311">rd</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#0D2311">🗨</span>]]} 06:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Queenofboston|Queenofboston]] ([[User talk:Queenofboston|talk]]) 18:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:: Yes, does Jimmy's eclectic set of points of notability add up to actual notability? Could probably find a few more sources touching on a few more points (he was a high school gymnastics champ and an FAU cheerleader before going to Oklahoma), but this is close to being what there is. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 06:47, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]]. [[WP:Notability|Notability]], as Wikipedia uses the word, is not about what the subject is, or does, or has done, but about whether enought independent material has been reliably published ''about'' the subject to base an article on. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== How to add extra references which helps draft will go for mainspace. ==

:Hi [[User:Queenofboston|Queenofboston]]. I've looked through your draft, and this is why I can say that your submission was declined. The New York Times articles don't count as independent as Kanter was a journalist at the New York Times (all of the articles were in part written by him, from what I can tell). The "La Libre" source does support the notability of this person (from what I can tell, since the article is paywalled and I only speak English). The other article I see that may meet the notability requirements is [https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000006112654.html]. But Wikipedia's notability guidelines state that "One story does not constitute multiple works." Since these sources are on the same story, this wouldn't constitute to be multiple works. The intention behind the "multiple works" requirement is that we want various viewpoints to be represented in the article. If all sources are a virtually first hand perspective of his application for Belgian citizenship, then certaintly doesn't constitute multiple sources. Moreover, if these are firsthand perspectives, then these likely don't meet the "reliability" requirement of notability anyway. I think this is how [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] came to the conclusion that there are no "direct secondary sources" (although I think a case could reasonably be made that a newspaper article on his experience might be considered secondary). Anyhow, the general conclusion still remains that the sources in this article do not currently establish notability. Let me know if you have anymore questions! [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 19:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

::{{u|Sam-2727}}, Spot on. I would like to add I have not ruled out that this person is notable or not. He has a fighting chance, but as Sam said the critical thing we are looking for is secondary and significant coverage of the subject himself. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:::Thank you for clarifying, [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]]. I forgot to mention that the subject may still be notable. [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 19:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

hello ! Help on article [[Draft:Tanka Timilsina]] ! Please improve and take this article to mainspace.i will be very thankful for your kindness. [[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]] ([[User talk:MountainWriter42|talk]]) 10:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 20:00:46, 2 March 2020 review of submission by 2405:201:801:BF34:AC6F:9279:75EB:4C59 ==

{{Lafc|username=2405:201:801:BF34:AC6F:9279:75EB:4C59|ts=20:00:46, 2 March 2020|declined=Draft:Sanat_Sawant}}

I'm submitting a re-review because all the information according to me is added with proper references.Ive been interviewed by many magazines but when I link it to my Wikipedia it gets rejected and I get a message that it's promoting and violates the guide lines.My Co star also has the same type of information on his Wikipedia page and he was accepted. Please tell me on what to improve on because everything is already up there.

[[Special:Contributions/2405:201:801:BF34:AC6F:9279:75EB:4C59|2405:201:801:BF34:AC6F:9279:75EB:4C59]] ([[User talk:2405:201:801:BF34:AC6F:9279:75EB:4C59|talk]]) 20:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:You've been given some accurate advice on the draft itself. Beware in citing other similar articles as a reason for yours to exist, see [[WP:OSE]]. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits. The draft is almost completely unsourced and does not indicate how you meet the notability criteria of [[WP:NACTOR]] or even just [[WP:BIO]]. I(as others have) urge you to read [[WP:AUTO]] to understand why writing about yourself is strongly discouraged; an article about yourself is also [[WP:PROUD|not necessarily desirable]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]]. Wikipedia is a volunteer project, where people work on what they choose. It is unlikely - not impossible, but unlikely - that anybody will decide to work on your draft just because you ask.

== 20:15:35, 2 March 2020 review of submission by Andthefoxsays ==

:It is possible (no more than that) that if you asked at [[WP:WikiProject Music|WikiProject Music]] or [[WP:WikiProject Nepal|WikiProject Nepal]] you might find somebody interested enough to work on it. But don't set your hopes too high. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 16:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Andthefoxsays|ts=20:15:35, 2 March 2020|page=

Jade Konkel

}}

I'm not sure why my article failed approval. The reason given was that it did not meet minimum citation requirements, but could someone be more specific?

[[User:Andthefoxsays|Andthefoxsays]] ([[User talk:Andthefoxsays|talk]]) 20:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:There are at least 7 paragraphs with no sources, all content shoul be cited. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 20:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

:YouTube, press releases and interviews are not reliable independent sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 21:30:45, 2 March 2020 review of submission by 92.236.103.75 ==

{{Lafc|username=92.236.103.75|ts=21:30:45, 2 March 2020|page=

== 11:32, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Newacctowork ==

}}

{{Lafc|username=Newacctowork|ts=11:32, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Trinity_Private_School}}

I am requesting assistance with my draft article Draft:Trinity_Private_School. Each word of the text was written manually without the use of AI tools. However, three times I received feedback that the draft was written by AI. I respectfully emphasize that I wrote the article myself, and therefore I ask you to indicate exactly which sentences or parts appear to you as AI-generated.

In addition, I was told that my sources are “not relevant.” Could you please clarify how relevance is determined? For example, [[The Heritage Private School]] article was accepted with only one source, while my draft contains 17 independent sources, yet it has not passed review.

Finally, the article cannot be considered promotional, because it contains no evaluative or laudatory language. I removed all subjective judgments and left only verifiable, encyclopedic content supported by citations.

I would greatly appreciate clear feedback on what exactly prevents the draft from being accepted and what specific improvements are required. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 11:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you will note that the most recent decline, by me, was not for AI but for promotionality and lack of any evidence of [[WP:notability|notability]].

The article i published was declined, with the suggestion that so far only one line mentions could be found in reliable secondary sources and this is not enough. This doesnt make sense- we are a small-but legitimate-society that was founded by James Cyriax ( originally called the society of orthopaedic medicine, vide https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/19/3/164.full.pdf .I believe that this reference alone is enough for the page to be put up. I have added another reference to the main article. would be very grateful for a review. many thanks

:You then resubmitted the draft without any attempt at addressing those reasons. Why did you do that? Are you disputing my review, or did you think if you keep submitting it will eventually go through by brute force? You only have finite number of chances, so I would suggest you make the most of them.

:And yes, [[The Heritage Private School]] is even weaker in terms of sourcing (in that, it has none), and I have tagged it accordingly. That doesn't mean we should create more insufficiently sourced articles, though. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

[[Special:Contributions/92.236.103.75|92.236.103.75]] ([[User talk:92.236.103.75|talk]]) 21:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] No, I submitted it by accident. Could you please clarify what exactly needs to be fixed? I have already removed most of the adjectives that could make the text appear promotional. What further steps should I take? How can I rewrite it so that it reads as neutral, rather than advertising? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:You need to specify which draft you're talking about. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 05:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you're normally meant to summarise what the sources say. But on this occasion, those sources are just churnalism etc., therefore summarising them will only ever result in a promotional draft. So you should go back to square one and look for sources that are entirely independent of the subject (meaning no interviews, press releases, advertorials, sponsored content, etc.) and base your draft on them. Personally, I doubt you will find such sources, but nothing to stop you trying. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] There is a category, [[:Category:International schools in Cyprus]]. Could you provide an example? From my perspective, I do not see any pages there that match what you are describing. At the moment, all the pages appear to be in the main space. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: don't concern yourself with any other articles that may exist, we're talking about whether ''your'' draft can be accepted; [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] is invariably a red herring.

:::::The long and short of it is that the vast majority of schools are not notable enough to justify an article. At two years old, this school is basically a startup, and the vast majority of startups are likewise not notable. Any media coverage that may exist is therefore almost by definition likely to originate in the school's marketing team, as is clearly the case with the sources cited in this draft. If the school was a major new initiative or an attempt at educational reform by the gov't of Cyprus, there might be independent mainstream media coverage of it, but here we're talking about a niche private school for a particular group of expats. As I said, you're welcome to search for better sources, but I wouldn't hold my breath. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] "No, we are just talking about other articles. When I take another article as a reference, I see that it has far fewer sources than mine, yet it passed. Can this be considered a biased approach? What does the marketing team have to do with it, if there is no link to any commercial offer and not a single word about cost? This is exactly what concerns me: does it comply with Wikipedia rules that a school without media coverage is published, while a school with coverage is not? For Cyprus, these media are public and authoritative. For comparison, my house has also stood since 1987. There are no publications about it — can I publish an article about it without coverage, as others did? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: no, you cannot {{tq|"publish an article about it without coverage"}}. Your draft's subject must meet our notability requirements, which it has not yet demonstrated.

:::::::If you've found existing articles which also fall short of the standards required, you're very welcome to improve them, or to commence deletion proceedings ([[WP:AFD]] is that-a-way) if that's not possible. But just because such articles exist, is no reason to create more such problems. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] L’Officiel Cyprus, Cyprus Times, and Boussias News (in Greek) - are these not considered reliable sources? Could you please explain the definition and criteria of reliability in this case? These outlets are public and widely recognized in Cyprus. There is no 'churnalism' here, as you described earlier, and no interviews with the school itself. What exactly is wrong with these sources? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::I will note that just because another article exists does not necessarily mean it was "approved" by anyone. There are many reasons this could be, and that cannot justify adding more inappropriate articles. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::Are you connected to this school in some way? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::@[[User:331dot|331dot]] Absolutely not. I just saw an article on the Internet and decided to create an entry about them, since I am from Ukraine myself. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 14:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 2212:43:0200, 229 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by LwilliamsonGeorgeHav ==

{{Lafc|username=LwilliamsonGeorgeHav|ts=2212:43:0200, 229 MarchAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Munck_Wilson_MandalaFlightSimExpo}}

Article was denied for npov, but I'm not sure i can personally see specifically where/why that's the case? Any thoughts on how I could improve that? [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 12:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:All the draft does is document occurrences of this event- in essence, promoting them. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

What kinds of sources are needed to get accepted into Wikipedia. I really took my time looking for credible sources. The article itself is not that long and 7 sources seemed sufficient. I guess I confused as to why my article got rejected not just declined, if the sources where "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.". Thanks in advance!

::Interesting, what would you recommend then in this case? Adding a section on "Reception"? [[User:LwilliamsonGeorgeHav|LwilliamsonGeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:LwilliamsonGeorgeHav|talk]]) 2223:4311, 229 MarchAugust 20202025 (UTC)

:::I would talk much less about occurrences of the event and much more about what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about it. You meed to show that it is [[WP:NEVENT|a notable event]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 23:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Lwilliamson}}, Links to what sources were needed to establish notability were provided multiple times along with the message stating that the advert nature of the article needed to be cleaned up. Further, you were instructed to disclose the payments you were receiving and/or your financial stake in the company which was also ignored. The article was continually submitted without major improvement. As such, it was rejected and will not be considered further. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 05:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

::::Awesome, thanks for the advice. [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 23:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 13:02, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Vaibhav9786 ==

Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy: Yes, I completely understand, every time sources were deemed not notable. I would delete them and find new articles. Also, I did address the disclosed payments in the wiki cleanup. I have never been and have no idea why that remark ended up on page. Is it possible to resubmit this article on this same topic. This company has been around for 20 + years. I really tried my best finding articles and I don't want to give up. Thanks! --[[User:Lwilliamson|Lwilliamson]] ([[User talk:Lwilliamson|talk]]) 16:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Vaibhav9786|ts=13:02, 29 August 2025|draft=Reason for Article Rejection}}

:The discussion concluded at [[Wikipedia:Help Desk#My article got rejected, but I want to submit it again]]. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 14:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Could you please let me know why my article was rejected. Just wanted to get an understanding so I do not make the same mistakes again [[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]] ([[User talk:Vaibhav9786|talk]]) 13:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{courtesy link|Draft:Virtual CFO Services in India}}

= March 3 =

:@[[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]]: your draft was purely promotional, and written not like an encyclopaedia article but a sales brochure.

:Presumably you work for YourCFO, which is what the spam link at the end of the draft was pointing to? In which case, you need to disclose your paid-editing-status (this has already been queried on your talk page), and I would also advise against continuing down this promotional road, lest you get blocked. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 17:25, 29 August 2025 review of submission by FurretSuperFan ==

== please help on how to submit this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ummeeta_Rabiu ==

{{Lafc|username=FurretSuperFan|ts=17:25, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Greatest_Idol}}

Hi my article got denied for the reason that it does not qualify for a Wikipedia article due to not having reliable sources. I'm trying to aim for the notability that the album charted in a national music chart, specifically in the Oricon and Billboards charts. I just wanted to make sure that these links count towards reliability and notability under secondary or independent sources

https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/products/1042567/1/

== 05:05:00, 3 March 2020 review of submission by Ummeetaa x ==

{{Lafc|username=Ummeetaa x|ts=05:05:00, 3 March 2020|page=

https://www.billboard-japan.com/charts/detail?a=top_albums&year=2013&month=11&day=18 [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 17:25, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

}}

:Hello, @[[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]]. A sales site is almost never acceptable as a source: it is not independent.

[[User:Ummeetaa x|Ummeetaa x]] ([[User talk:Ummeetaa x|talk]]) 05:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:The Billboard might be reliable, but does not contain [[WP:significant coverage|significant coverage]], as it is just a listing, and I don't think it would count as a [[WP:secondary source|secondary source]] either. We really need independent, in-depth reviews. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Ummeetaa x}}, Your article is currently submitted and awaiting review. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 05:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

::Would this link work for Oricon instead?

::https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/rank/album/ [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::Would this link cunt for a secondary source?

::https://otakumode.com/otapedia/vocaloid/hatsune_miku/mitchie_m [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::Count* [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::It doesn't matter which link you use for Oricon - sales sites are almost never acceptable, period.

::::The Otakemode bit appears to be a wiki, with no byline. It therefore fails to be a [[WP:reliable source|reliable source]], and it is very likely not an [[WP:independent source|independent source]] either - we can't tell who submitted it, but it is likely to be the subject or their agents. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== 0518:55:3302, 329 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by RightWrite1986Jetsonesque ==

{{Lafc|username=RightWrite1986Jetsonesque|ts=0518:55:3302, 329 MarchAugust 20202025|pagedraft=Draft:Sam_Bregman}}

Can anyone provide any guidance or input on the latest draft?

Regarding comments on 29 April by editor Paul W, a public media search likely supports relevance/notoriety for Sam Bregman, but that was not established with proper sources and citations.

Earlier entries for Sam Bregman were rejected for relevance, formatting, peacocking and lack of supporting citations. The latest edits attempt to remove problematic text, clean up formatting and citations, comply with tone and informational intentions of Wikipedia entries for public figures, and establish relevance.

}}

It may be helpful to compare with the entry for former Las Cruces Mayor, Ken Miyagishima. Intention of latest edition is to create a similar entry for Bregman, with similar tone and proper support material.

[[User:RightWrite1986|RightWrite1986]] ([[User talk:RightWrite1986|talk]]) 05:55, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|RightWrite1986}}, You need to read the links provided in the declines on the subject's page. Some of the sources (e.g. facebook) show that you have not yet done so. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 06:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Jetsonesque|Jetsonesque]] ([[User talk:Jetsonesque|talk]]) 18:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I could really use help regarding my article. I feel it has been greatly supported. What can I do to edit it so that it is accepted?

:Hello, @[[User:Jetsonesque|Jetsonesque]]. It is almost ''never'' relevant to compare articles with existing article. Unless the article you are comparing with is either a [[WP:good article|good article]] or a [[WP:featured article|featured article]], its quality is unclear, and may be terrrible. See [[WP:other stuff exists|other stuff exists]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== Request on 06:43:29, 3 March 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Carl J. Weber ==

{{anchor|06:43:29, 3 March 2020 review of submission by Carl J. Weber}}

{{Lafc|username=Carl J. Weber|ts=06:43:29, 3 March 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Etymology_of_Chicago}}

= August 30 =

<!-- Start of message -->

I would like to feel confident that I am going along just fine in putting together my article.

[[User:Carl J. Weber|Carl J. Weber]] ([[User talk:Carl J. Weber|talk]]) 06:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Carl J. Weber|Carl J. Weber]] ([[User talk:Carl J. Weber|talk]]) 06:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

== Feedback on revised draft: Gerald P. Curatola ==

:My observation is exactly the same [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#14:19:26,_28_February_2020_review_of_draft_by_Carl_J._Weber|as before]]. This is an essay with unclear sourcing/attribution. Encyclopedic articles have to state facts and precisely attribute them. It is not at all clear in the draft which are sourced facts and which are your added prose. Stuff like "need to also be looked at", "Well documented", "assumed to be historically authentic" etc. is not appropriate writing. This is something you would see in an academic paper/essay where you are allowed to combine sources and explain your reasoning or propose interpretation. Wikipedia allows no [[WP:OR|original research]] and no [[WP:SYNTH|combining of sources]] in that way. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 13:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I’m seeking feedback on [[Draft:Gerald P. Curatola]], which was previously declined for formatting and sourcing issues. I have now:

* Rewritten in neutral prose.

::An additional problem is that it seems the ''Illinois Historical Journal'' is the only source that actually directly discusses the subject, all the other cited sources are used for [[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]] and [[WP:OR|original research]] by the draft author. [[User:Dodger67|Roger (Dodger67)]] ([[User talk:Dodger67|talk]]) 22:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

* Replaced weak/self-published links with strong independent sources (Forbes, Miami Herald, Vogue, New York Post, Purist, Yahoo).

* Corrected citations (ISBN for book, Vogue link, NYU Nexus PDFs confirming Acton Medal and Curatola Wing).

* Removed Markdown formatting that triggered the last decline.

Could someone review and let me know if the draft now appears ready for resubmission?

== 08:54:36, 3 March 2020 review of submission by G antonakakis ==

Thanks very much.

{{Lafc|username=G antonakakis|ts=08:54:36, 3 March 2020|declined=Draft:Antonios_Karatzis}}

Dears,

[[User:GCNYdentist|GCNYdentist]] ([[User talk:GCNYdentist|talk]]) 05:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

I would like you to re-review this draft "Karatzis Antonios" Also we have an other refererence from the "www.times.com"

:Your autobiography is totally unsourced please don't use AI here it is notoriously bad at creating articles. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 08:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Below you will find the digital magazine. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H_Ov-ADs3UBWzT0lG5lI38KNDwpkvL-h/view

Can you value this reference and add it at draft?

Also at references we have some donations to hospitals. I would like to tell me what i have to do and what i have to change to be public this draft. I want your help for this

[[User:G antonakakis|G antonakakis]] ([[User talk:G antonakakis|talk]]) 08:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:Your draft has been rejected, I suggest you find another topic to write about, there are many thousands of articles that require improvement. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 09:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1209:27:3417, 330 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by AnnisdRsakib188 ==

{{Lafc|username=AnnisdRsakib188|ts=1209:27:3417, 330 MarchAugust 20202025|declineddraft=UserDraft:Annisd/sandbox/SAM_Seamless_Network_(SecuringSAM)2025_CUCSU_election}}

My submission was rejected and the reason that was given is "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.". Although there are similar articles on wikipedia. Such as [[2025 DUCSU election]] and [[2019 DUCSU election]]. Want to know how can I improve this arcticle to that it get published. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

I added reliable source.

Let me know if more changes are required.

Thanks,

[[User:Annisd|Annisd]] ([[User talk:Annisd|talk]]) 12:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:What is needed is significant coverage in multiple independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]; the sources that you have offered are press release type sources(which are not independent) and routine business announcements(which are also not independent and are only a brief mention). [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:Please see [[WP:OSE|other stuff exists]], each article or draft is judged on its own merits and not based on the presence of other articles that themselves may be inapproprate and just not yet addressed. Perhaps those two articles should be removed. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== 16:02:50, 3 March 2020 review of submission by Eddy thoker ==

::I'm really struggling to understand why we should have any information on some students' union elections (!) in a global encyclopaedia. (I'm even doubtful about the viability of [[Draft:Chittagong University Central Students' Union]].) -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Eddy thoker|ts=16:02:50, 3 March 2020|page=

:::There are four autonomous public universities (out of 41 public universities) in Bangladesh that has student parliament (simply called student union) and those are of big deal, as these parliment shape national issues and the elected leaders of these student parliament gets to play role in national politics and even become future national leaders and ministers. These parliment also has say on appointment of Vice-chancellors and teachers of these university. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::::Then provide some reliable independent sources that talk about the union in depth, @[[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]]. Without several sources that each meet all the criteria of [[WP:42]], a draft (or an article) is like a house without foundations, and not acceptable to Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::::Are you saying that by law these student bodies have formal input into the operation of the public universities they are associated with? I ask because that's unusual- in the US, at least- where most student bodies are advisory or only have privileges at the pleasure of the university, not in law. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::Yes, by law student leaders have 5 seat in university senate. And these four universities were established and govern by the act of Bangladeshi parliament as autonomous body. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 17:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 13:24, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Devolver789 ==

}}

{{Lafc|username=Devolver789|ts=13:24, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Steal_a_Brainrot}}

You wouldn't know Steal a Brainrot would be suitable for Wikipedia if you looked for proper, notable and reliable citations yourself [[User:Devolver789|Devolver789]] ([[User talk:Devolver789|talk]]) 13:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:Sorry, was that a question? -- [[User:Eddy thokerDoubleGrazing|Eddy thokerDoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:Eddy thokerDoubleGrazing|talk]]) 1613:0225, 330 MarchAugust 20202025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Devolver789}} There is a very distinct possibility that ''Steal a Brainrot'' is a notable subject. The problem is that [[WP:UNDUE|pretty much all of your sources]] [[WP:RSCONTEXT|waste time on the feud between]] its and ''[[Grow a Garden]]'''s lead developers. Only GameRant discusses ''Steal a Brainrot'' in the context of a review. I have no trouble finding sources that are actually ''about'' the game and not the tangential beef. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 14:35, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::I would like to note I attempted to help out with the draft, locating reviews from Polygon, Kotaku, and GameRant. Problem is, two of the sources fall under purview of [[WP:VALNET]], and [https://www.nme.com/news/gaming-news/steal-a-brainrot-is-robloxs-latest-viral-hit-grow-a-garden-3888650 an additional NME source] I've discovered doesn't qualify as [[WP:SIGCOV]]. As such, I had to regrettably abandon my efforts pending the publication of more reliable reviews. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] ^{[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]} 04:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:::One option would've been to post at [[WP:VG]] to seek the input of editors more familiar with reliable videogame sourcing, but then I discovered the Kotaku source was listed under the opinions section, which was the nail in the coffin for me. If any other editors feel [[Special:Diff/1308406121|this version]] is salvageable feel free to do so. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] ^{[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]} 04:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 18:01, 30 August 2025 review of submission by VasyaPetrovna ==

{{Lafc|username=VasyaPetrovna|ts=18:01, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Sak-Bahlán}}

Hi - this is the first time I've created a new page. The documentation is a little overwhelming? 😅 I tried submitting the draft for review but the "Draft article not currently submitted for review" box came up, and I don't know what to do next. [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 18:01, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|VasyaPetrovna}} I fixed your header so it links to your draft as intended; you need the "Draft:" portion of the title.

:You just need to click the blue "Submit your draft for review!" button in the bottom right corner of the notice that you speak of. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::When I click it, it brings up another window, "Template - Generated from: AfC submission." I don't know what if anything I should be changing in that window? [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:::Never mind, I got it - thank you! [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Please== help18:27, how30 toAugust get2025 review of submission approvalby inTanja0615 wikipedia==

{{Lafc|username=Tanja0615|ts=18:27, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Mehmed_Begić}}

Hi, thanks for your review. The draft was not written with ChatGPT. One citation I formatted accidentally contained a tracking parameter (utm_source=chatgpt.com) in the URL, which I have now removed. I spent considerable time collecting and checking references from reliable published sources. Could you please point me to any specific passages where you think the language may not be neutral or where style should be adjusted? I’ll gladly revise those. [[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] ([[User talk:Tanja0615|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] I declined without prejudice, you have now re-submitted which was the correct thing to do. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 11:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 16:23:10, 3 March 2020 review of submission by Bsitts09 ==

{{Lafc|username=Bsitts09|ts=16:23:10, 3 March 2020|declined=Draft:Joe_Klanderman}}

== 21:31, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Matthewbyver ==

I do not understand why this page was rejected. Almost all coordinators in division one college football have a Wikipedia page. I think the reasoning for the rejection is incorrect.

{{Lafc|username=Matthewbyver|ts=21:31, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Matthew_Byver}}

My page is not for promotion, is to help a small music artist to build his career by offering additional informations [[User:Matthewbyver|Matthewbyver]] ([[User talk:Matthewbyver|talk]]) 21:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:What you describe is the [[WP:YESPROMO|exact definition of promotion]]. Wikipedia is the last place to write about something, not the first. A subject must have already arrived and be noticed in order to draw the necessary coverage in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that can be summarized in an article. It needs to show that you are a [[WP:BAND|a notable musician]] already, you cannot use Wikipedia to generate notability. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell about themselves, please read the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]] and also how [[WP:PROUD|an article is not necessarily desirable]]. I wish you luck with your career, I suggest thar you focus on that and allow an article to develop the usual way, when an independent editor takes note of coverage of you and chooses to write about you. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 00:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Bsitts09|Bsitts09]] ([[User talk:Bsitts09|talk]]) 16:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:In other words, you're trying to use Wikipedia as a publicity platform, and [[WP:NOTPUBLICITY|that is not allowed]] under any circumstances. To merit a Wikipedia article, you can't be up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 02:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Bsitts09}} The notability guidelines ([[WP:NGRIDIRON]]) state that they do not apply to assistant coaches(which would include coordinators). That means you would have to show that the person meets the more general [[WP:BIO|notability guidelines for biographies]] or is also notable for something else. Other coordinators were likely notable for something else besides their coordinating work. In any event, [[WP:OSE|other things exist]] and each article or draft is judged on its own merits. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1721:00:1240, 330 MarchAugust 20202025 review of submission by Wwhitman181969.255.14.163 ==

{{Lafc|username=Wwhitman181969.255.14.163|ts=1721:00:1240, 330 MarchAugust 20202025|pagedraft=User:Wiseman2025/sandbox}}

has my artilce been rejected ? [[Special:Contributions/69.255.14.163|69.255.14.163]] ([[User talk:69.255.14.163|talk]]) 21:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:Be sure to log in before you write anything here.

}}

:That draft has been ''declined'', not rejected. If it's declined, it means you can improve it and submit it again once you have addressed the reviewer concerns. If it's rejected, then you give up and move on to something else. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 01:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Wwhitman1819|Wwhitman1819]] ([[User talk:Wwhitman1819|talk]]) 17:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, what can I change to get my article published? Scarlett Sabet is a bonafide published poet. If I just list basic info (where she was born, educated, and the titles of her publications) will this pass?

All the best,

Whitman

[[User:Wwhitman1819|Wwhitman1819]], I'm deleting my previous comment as I realize I somehow clicked on the wrong article. I'll try taking a look at the article in a bit. [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 14:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:Ok after taking a look I have seen that you have provided more "journalistic" sources. Actually, your article might very well qualify for a Wikipedia article at this point. Some points that I would address before resubmitting it. Use your reliable and independent sources more (the two reliable/independent sources I see are [https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/scarlett-sabet-poetry] and [https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/scarlett-sabet-poetry], although the second one is an interview, so maybe not completely independent?) and for more contentious claims, and the sources that are generally unreliable for basic factual information (if at all). Delete any Daily Mail sources, as their articles are very unreliable. Also I would remove "overcitation" in some areas. For instance, you do not need four citations to support that "Her partner is Jimmy Page of Led Zeplin." Let me know if you have any further questions! [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 15:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 18:43:15, 3 March 2020 review of submission by Jbfitzgerald ==

{{Lafc|username=Jbfitzgerald|ts=18:43:15, 3 March 2020|page=

'''Draft: Jonah Baize'''

}}

[[User:Jbfitzgerald|Jbfitzgerald]] ([[User talk:Jbfitzgerald|talk]]) 18:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Jbfitzgerald}}, What's your question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 00:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 22:39:05, 3 March 2020 review of draft by Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito ==

{{Lafc|username=Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito|ts=22:39:05, 3 March 2020|draft=Draft:Masha's_Tales}}

[[User:Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito|Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito]] ([[User talk:Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito|talk]]) 22:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito}}, What do you need help with? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 00:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

I Need Help In The Draft Revision How I Do?!

== 23:30:40, 3 March 2020 review of draft by Tienasekharan ==

{{Lafc|username=Tienasekharan|ts=23:30:40, 3 March 2020|draft=Draft:The_Big_Nine:_How_the_Tech_Titans_and_Their_Thinking_Machines_Could_Warp_Humanity}}

[[User:Tienasekharan|Tienasekharan]] ([[User talk:Tienasekharan|talk]]) 23:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

The article I wrote has been rejected on the following grounds - “This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.”

I have found the book referenced in the following articles/ academic parapets but am not sure how to include them in the content. Should I just mention these at the end with the references despite them not adding to the article?

The medical AI insurgency: what physicians must know about data to practice with intelligent machines, by D. Douglas Millar

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-019-0138-5 

Why we’re failing to regulate the most powerful tech we’ve ever faced, by Gary Grossman Edelman

https://venturebeat.com/2020/02/01/why-were-failing-to-regulate-the-most-powerful-tech-weve-ever-faced/

What Will Really Determine the Winner of the U.S.-China Rivalry Over A.I.?, by Annie-Marie Slaughter

https://slate.com/technology/2019/03/united-states-china-rivalry-artificial-intelligence.html

In this interview with MarTech CCO, he mentions he is reading Big Nine

https://martechseries.com/mts-insights/interviews/martech-interview-with-henry-iversen-cco-and-co-founder-at-boost-ai/

Nationalism is not our biggest threat, technology is, by James Poulus

https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/29/nationalism-not-biggest-threat-technocracy/

Dessertation - Ideological Misalignment in the Discourse(s) of Higher Education: Comparing University Mission Statements with Texts from Commercial Learning Analytics Providers

https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2754&context=td

Open-Sourcing Civil Society, by Vlad Tarko

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-34937-0_10

Essay- Opportunities and Risks for Citizen Science in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Authors: Luigi Ceccaroni , James Bibby, Erin Roger, Paul Flemons, Katina Michael, Laura Fagan, Jessica L. Oliver

https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/10.5334/cstp.241/

:Hi {{U|Tienasekharan}}. Being used as a reference in statements like "This growth in AI publications has prompted researchers to critically explore the potential promises and risks of AI (Webb 2019)" is not the same as being the subject of the work. Such references don't help satisfy criterion #1 of [[WP:NBOOK]], so I don't see a reason to mention the above articles/papers in the draft.

:Although the draft is not a summary-''only'' description of the work (it has a brief reception section with a few comments of the flap copy variety), it is almost all synopsis. The draft needs a more extensive summary of published analysis of the book to justify a stand alone article separate from the existing Wikipedia article about the author. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 14:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

= March 4 =

== 02:39:51, 4 March 2020 review of draft by 94.192.4.85 ==

{{Lafc|username=94.192.4.85|ts=02:39:51, 4 March 2020|draft=Draft:Harold_Davies_(actor)}}

[[Special:Contributions/94.192.4.85|94.192.4.85]] ([[User talk:94.192.4.85|talk]]) 02:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

How to submit credible references ?

:Take a look at other Wikipedia articles (click random article to see some examples). You should see that blue citations appear, like this: <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://example.com/|title=Example Domain|website=example.com|access-date=2020-03-04}}</ref>. You can create these citations by clicking the "cite" button on the top of the editor window (and can find more information on this here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inline_citation]). But remember that these citations need to be reliable and independent of the subject of the article. For notability purposes, you should have multiple citations that are independent, reliable, and cover the subject of the article significantly (that is, not a mere reference). For more information on these requirements, see [[WP:Notability]]. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions! [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 14:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

== 05:20:52, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Prajnadutta ==

{{Lafc|username=Prajnadutta|ts=05:20:52, 4 March 2020|declined=User:Prajnadutta}}

{{Lafc|username=Prajnadutta|ts=05:20:52, 4 March 2020|link=

<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]] OR [[Draft:Your submission name here]] -->

}}

[[User:Prajnadutta|Prajnadutta]] ([[User talk:Prajnadutta|talk]]) 05:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 07:09:14, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Renukaapollo ==

{{Lafc|username=Renukaapollo|ts=07:09:14, 4 March 2020|declined=User:Renukaapollo/sandbox}}

I have to create Wikipedia Page for my company Apollo Aerospace Components. The one I had written was rejected. Kindly help me how to write the company page. I have all the reference links also for supporting the information.

[[User:Renukaapollo|Renukaapollo]] ([[User talk:Renukaapollo|talk]]) 07:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Renukaapollo}} Wikipedia requires more than just links that support information. We need multiple reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. Please also [[WP:DISCLOSE]] your connection with the subject as per instructions on that page. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 18:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 07:36:42, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Kamimashita ==

{{Lafc|username=Kamimashita|ts=07:36:42, 4 March 2020|draft=Draft:/r/anime Awards}}

Hello, my request to create a new page was recently denied. The reason given for the denial is as follows:

"This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia."

To create this page, I referenced other awards wiki pages, including Crunchyroll's. If you take a look at their references, they literally only reference their own site and social media properties. I have included an image below: https://i.imgur.com/mjn6JVz.png

In fact, the references I have provided include more secondary sources than their page, an article from ANN which is an independent respected news website.

I would just like to understand how I can better format the page, and if Crunchyroll's Anime Awards page is in compliance of this rule, and if so, where my misunderstanding is.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

[[User:Kamimashita|Kamimashita]] ([[User talk:Kamimashita|talk]]) 07:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Kamimashita}} Hi! In short: [[Crunchyroll]] ''is'' a notable topic. [[Crunchyroll Anime Awards]] is ''not'' a notable topic. The reason we have it as a separate page is because it is too long to be in the main article. In contrast, [[/r/anime]] is not a notable topic. Even if it was, you would expand that article first and then [[WP:SPLIT]] the content instead of making a draft. So in this case, we judge [[/r/anime Awards]] as a stand-alone topic on its own without a parent article. And it does not appear to be a notable topic, not unless you have multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, as specified in that message. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 18:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 08:17:50, 4 March 2020 review of submission by MohammedKMS ==

{{Lafc|username=MohammedKMS|ts=08:17:50, 4 March 2020|accepted=British_Libyans}}

Hello,

I have been informed that the page I created (British Libyans) has been created. however whenever I google 'British Libyans' it never appears as a google search result. In addition I have tried to google the entry 'British Libyans Wikipedia', but still no sight of the page in the results which deems my created page as useless since no one can access it upon research.

It has been a while since to finally get it approved and I was happy to finally see it online, although I understand the huge backlog and appreciate your efforts, but was wondering if there is something I can do to see it in appear in google searches.

Please if you can advise on where is the problem.

thank you and all the best,

[[User:MohammedKMS|MohammedKMS]] ([[User talk:MohammedKMS|talk]]) 08:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

::{{ping|MohammedKMS}} - hi there. New articles can't be seen in search engines until they've been a) been patrolled by a new page patroller, which authorises it to be indexed by search engines and b) a search engine actually indexing it.

::I believe a has happened (the system should have notified you) as I'm not getting an option to review it when I go to the page and page info states it is indexable. At that stage indexing would usually be pretty quick by the search engines, but we don't have any control over that aspect. If you check your notifications you might be able to see ''when'' it was patrolled. [[User:Nosebagbear|Nosebagbear]] ([[User talk:Nosebagbear|talk]]) 10:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 10:56:46, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Radmaipid ==

{{Lafc|username=Radmaipid|ts=10:56:46, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:Craig_MacFarlane}}

Hello! I need help with my article. Can you please guide me with specific steps to follow? The response I get is too vague and complicated. I just don't know how to make the necessary changes. Thank you for the understanding and consideration.

[[User:Radmaipid|Radmaipid]] ([[User talk:Radmaipid|talk]]) 10:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Radmaipid}} The article seems to be written as more of a information essay that just tells about Mr. MacFarlane rather than an encyclopedia article. It has much promotional/opinionated language("MacFarlane is a dedicated husband and father", "MacFarlane’s business and speaking career began in earnest", "Not willing to end his athletic career on such a low note", etc.). Wikipedia articles need to sound pretty dry and not have excess descriptive language in them. Wikipedia articles should only summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state about a subject. It also appears at least some of your sources are not appropriate; such as an interview with Mr. MacFarlane, which is a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. The article should only describe what others unaffiliated with him say about him, not what he says about himself, routine announcements about his work, or brief mentions. You may wish to read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] and use the [[WP:ADVENTURE|new user tutorial]] to learn more about what Wikipedia is looking for. Successfully writing a new article is the hardest possible task on Wikipedia. It takes much effort, time, and practice.

:If you are affiliated with Mr. MacFarlane, you must review and comply with [[WP:COI|the conflict of interest]] and (if you are paid)[[WP:PAID|paid editing]] policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== Request on 11:33:07, 4 March 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Visuseditor ==

{{anchor|11:33:07, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Visuseditor}}

{{Lafc|username=Visuseditor|ts=11:33:07, 4 March 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Thomas_Ertl}}

<!-- Start of message -->

Dear Article for Creation Team,

I wanted this page to be created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Thomas_Ertl

I got this answer two times (first from Whispering Dec' 6, 2019 and then from Sulfurboy Feb' 28, 2020: '''The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations.'''

There is really no additional source, that could be cited. I used footnotes wherever possible. I don't know what to do. It's just an english version of the german article about Thomas Ertl. I work with him, and know him in person. He asked me to set up this translation.

Could this EN page please be created?

Kind regards,

Leon Kokkoliadis, Visuseditor

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Visuseditor|Visuseditor]] ([[User talk:Visuseditor|talk]]) 11:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Visuseditor}} Please understand that the German Wikipedia is a separate project from the English Wikipedia(and other language versions), each with their own editors and policies. What is acceptable on the German Wikipedia is not necessarily acceptable here. The main issue seems to be that while you have references, it is not clear what the references are citing because you have very few inline citations- citations within the text of the article(as footnotes). Please read about citing sources at [[WP:CITE]].

:Since you state that you work with the man you are writing about, you must review and formally comply with the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and [[WP:PAID|paid editing]] policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 15:38:39, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Tina Rosco ==

{{Lafc|username=Tina Rosco|ts=15:38:39, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:Allegheny_International_Services}}

Upon your rejection notice, I re-read my proposed article and noticed it contained many non-neutral sounding phrases and adjectives, and a few sentences of information that were extraneous and not needed. I have gone through and attempted to remove all non-neutral sounding phrases, adjectives and information. Sometimes it is hard to notice those things until it is pointed out, but I am getting better at it and I think this morning's revisions to the article demonstrate an improvement. With articles about this company in several different countries and in notable sources like ''Forbes Magazine'' and ''Gulf Times'', I believe they are considered notable by Wikipedia's standards. Your feedback is appreciated. Thank you for your time. [[User:Tina Rosco|Tina Rosco]] ([[User talk:Tina Rosco|talk]]) 15:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Tina Rosco

[[User:Tina Rosco|Tina Rosco]] ([[User talk:Tina Rosco|talk]]) 15:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Tina Rosco}}, Your article has been rejected, which means it will not be considered further. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sulfurboy, thanks for getting back to me. Is there anything I can do or try in order to avoid having this draft be a waste? I spent a lot of time on it and I think it's good now, and should be reconsidered. Please let me know. Thank you for your expertise. [[User:Tina Rosco|Tina Rosco]] ([[User talk:Tina Rosco|talk]]) 18:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Tina Rosco

== 17:49:17, 4 March 2020 review of draft by Ufdent98 ==

{{Lafc|username=Ufdent98|ts=17:49:17, 4 March 2020|draft=Draft:Catrinel_Sandu}}

Hello!

I'm writing for two purposes:

1. WikiAviator wrote:<br />

Also, please do not present the article like a lost as you did in "Television Career" section.

I don't understand what "like a lost" means. If it means list... Then I'm unsure how to write any more formally.

2. I'm unsure about what parts of the article aren't formal enough. Could someone please point me to specifics?

Thank you very much!

steve schroeter

[[User:Ufdent98|Ufdent98]] ([[User talk:Ufdent98|talk]]) 17:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

* Hi [[User:Ufdent98|Ufdent98]] as for your first point I think it's just a simple typo [[User:WikiAviator|WikiAviator]] made - I believe they meant "like a list" [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]])

* Thanks, that's a typo and it means list. You have to write in prose, and you're not supposed to break his bio into too many sections and if a section is too long that you have to break it up, you're not logging it event by event. The section's content isn't that long, so you should link these contents together with the appropriate sequencing words to make it read like a prose instead of a shopping list with un-linked events. [[User:WikiAviator|WikiAviator]] ([[User talk:WikiAviator|talk]]) 04:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 18:10:24, 4 March 2020 review of draft by TamaraJW2020 ==

{{Lafc|username=TamaraJW2020|ts=18:10:24, 4 March 2020|draft=Draft:Second_Nature_(company)}}

I am requesting help as my draft has been rejected as it says additional references are required and the submission is written from the point of view of the company. However, everything written is a fact, not opinion, and many of the references are from high-quality journals, as well as some news pieces. I am not sure why this hasn't been accepted.

[[User:TamaraJW2020|TamaraJW2020]] ([[User talk:TamaraJW2020|talk]]) 18:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|TamaraJW2020}}, Have you read what is required by us to show notability [[WP:NCORP]] and what are considered reliable sources [[WP:RS]]? And just because something is factual, doesn't mean it can't be written with inherent bias and undue weight on certain viewpoints. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 18:58:10, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Emmalee03 ==

{{Lafc|username=Emmalee03|ts=18:58:10, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:Yesong_Sophie_Lee_Violinist}}

This violinist, Yesong Sophie Lee, is one of the most popular young upcoming violinists. She has over 10 pages of google searches, and has concerts regularly. I am a big fan of hers and would like to create a wikipedia page about her. The last reviewer said that she was not notable enough for a wikipedia page, but that is not true. I have gone to one of her signing events and there was a really long line, and the security had to cut the line off because it was so long. She also was the youngest winner of the Menuhin International Violin Competition (considered the olympics of vioiln) when she was 12, and has performed all over the world since. She is all over youtube and I really hope you reconsider having this draft made into an article. She is a classical violinist, and classical music is less popular than pop songs, but it's no less important. Yesong Sophie Lee is such a wonderful young musician and deserves a wikipedia page and I'm sure a lot of people will agree. THank you and hopefully, you will reconsider my submission. THank you so much and have a great day!

[[User:Emmalee03|Emmalee03]] ([[User talk:Emmalee03|talk]]) 18:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Emmalee03}}, Your comments show that you might not have taken the time to review our notability requirements, see [[WP:NARTIST]]. Someone being all over youtube, the amount of hits they have in google, and/or your personal opinion of them are not valid criterion that we employ. A previous editor has outright rejected the article, which means the draft will not be considered any further. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 19:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 20:10:53, 4 March 2020 review of submission by JennaNeiterman ==

{{Lafc|username=JennaNeiterman|ts=20:10:53, 4 March 2020|page=

Nicole Sahin

}}

Hi!

For this article, we are having trouble toeing the line between being self-promotional while also proving that the subject is noteworthy enough to be published in Wikipedia! I did receive some feedback about editing the awards section, which I am happy to do. Is there a way that it can be outlined/marked up so that we can see what is interpreted as self-promotional?

Also, in regards to the comment on linking to LinkedIn, if a website is reliable, but shouldn't be included in an external link, how do we reference that information? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites I intepreted this as being ok since it linked to her LinkedIn page!

[[User:JennaNeiterman|JennaNeiterman]] ([[User talk:JennaNeiterman|talk]]) 20:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|JennaNeiterman}}, Who is the "we" in that post? Do you work for a PR/marketing firm or for the subject? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 20:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 20:11:36, 4 March 2020 review of submission by JianSun2008 ==

{{Lafc|username=JianSun2008|ts=20:11:36, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:Atlantic_Signs_Ltd}}

[[User:JianSun2008|JianSun2008]] ([[User talk:JianSun2008|talk]]) 20:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|JianSun2008}}, Do you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 20:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 21:32:58, 4 March 2020 review of submission by 123.201.225.143 ==

{{Lafc|username=123.201.225.143|ts=21:32:58, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:Swarup_solanki}}

because we have many other references if below references are sufficiant for article creation so please move to Main Article space

<ref>https://conf.researchr.org/profile/VMCAI-2017/swarupsolanki</ref>

<ref>https://www.todayindia.live/2020/02/digital-expert-swarup-solanki.html</ref>

<ref>https://www.worldexpressnews.in.net/2020/03/image-credit-by-today-india-news-swarup.html</ref>

<ref>https://www.bhaskar.com/news/HAR-OTH-MAT-latest-gharaunda-news-033006-1834854-NOR.html</ref>

{{talk-reflist}}

[[Special:Contributions/123.201.225.143|123.201.225.143]] ([[User talk:123.201.225.143|talk]]) 21:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

* After getting so many accounts globally blocked I'm really surprised you haven't got the message yet. Go do something useful with your life. [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 21:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

*:{{u|KylieTastic}}, [[List of burn centers in the United States]] [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 22:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

== 21:37:53, 4 March 2020 review of draft by JordanDRobinson ==

{{Lafc|username=JordanDRobinson|ts=21:37:53, 4 March 2020|draft=Draft:William_Kitchen_(Inventor)}}

Hello Everyone! I've reviewed the beginner guide and just want to make sure I'm on the right track. My feedback was that my article does not meet the in-line requirements for citations. Before I begin to alter this, I was hoping perhaps I could ask for further information in regards to what needs to be changed. For example, I see that one auto-generated footnote has a red notice regarding a missing title. I'm not certain how to fix that, or if it is considered a problem, both the source and title are clear.

Or have I over-cited? (is that possible?)

I DO have a reference that is problematic that I can see regarding Ancestry.com, as it requires a login that will clearly not be available to the average reader. So I can remove that, and I have a hard time believing the family information listed there will be disputed as it is directly from both the subject and a genetic/family tree website.

I know you are all incredibly busy and I appreciate your time and consideration being as new as I am to this, but overall I felt that the majority of the facts put forth were very clearly backed up by clear and legitimate sources, so any insights you could provide would be wonderful.

Thank You!!

= August 31 =

== 09:18, 31 August 2025 review of submission by Txcraig75 ==

[[User:JordanDRobinson|JordanDRobinson]] ([[User talk:JordanDRobinson|talk]]) 21:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Txcraig75|ts=09:18, 31 August 2025|draft=Draft:Dirty_Thirty_(Texas_politics)}}

I'm a bit gobsmacked that this has been rejected for lack of "reliable sources." Three New York Times articles, an article from the state historical association, a retrospective by the local ABC news affiliate, an article published in an Abilene newspaper, and a published memoir by one of the group's members are not "reliable?" [[User:Txcraig75|Txcraig75]] ([[User talk:Txcraig75|talk]]) 09:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think it's the sources themselves that are the issue, but I see some unsourced sentences. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:20, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{U|JordanDRobinson}}. I've fixed the reference that was missing a title for you.

:You may not use Ancestry.com or similar genealogy websites as a source, nor may you use information you obtained directly from Mr. Kitchen. Primary source public documents on Ancestry.com [[WP:BLPPRIMARY|may not be used]] to support assertions about a living person. The user-generated content on the site may not be used because such content is not [[WP:RS|reliable]]. Personal communications from Kitchen may not be used because they are not published. Unless you can cite published, reliable, secondary sources for the material, you will have to remove the entire biography section and corresponding portions of the infobox. It is not a question of whether the information is true or not, but whether it is [[WP:V|verifiable]]. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 13:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 19:53, 31 August 2025 review of submission by Thilio ==

Thank You {{U|WorldBruce}}!! I'll see what I can do about potentially finding public records or something of that sort, and remove whatever I can't verify before I resubmit. Even this gives me a better indication of how strict I need to be with citations, so I'll keep that in mind and go back through it. Your help/advice is greatly appreciated! (also I hope I did even this response correctly...)

{{Lafc|username=Thilio|ts=19:53, 31 August 2025|draft=Draft:AY_Poyoo}}

This [[Draft:AY_Poyoo]] got declined by [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]], Reasons {{tq|"This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics)."}} Okay wait a minute, let me list the independent sources (BBC Newss, Vanguard News, Savanna News, The Guardian Nigeria, Modern Ghana, Pluse Ghana, News Hunter, Daily Guide Network including the Secondary sources et cetera. {{tq|"they do not show significant coverage"}} really?? can other editor please search this subject "AY Poyoo" on Microsoft Bling, Google search or any other search engine, because I did that and I found +50 pages and on and on, I also add new references. I'm just curious, PLEASE can experience Editor go and take a look at it. @[[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] thank you though, you can also check and leave afc comment if there is issues that need to be corrected. Thanks [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]^{[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]} 19:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Thilio|Thilio]]. You're misunderstanding [[WP:IS|independent]]. If an article is based on an interview or a press release, then it is not independent, irresepctive of who publishes it. Some of your sources certainly have that problem: some may be independent, I haven't looked.

== 21:59:42, 4 March 2020 review of submission by Spiritletters ==

:You need several sources which each meet all the criteria in [[WP:42]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Spiritletters|ts=21:59:42, 4 March 2020|declined=Draft:The_Toven}}

::@[[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] Thanks, got it [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]^{[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]} 09:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 21:03, 31 August 2025 review of submission by ProfZacchaeus ==

{{Lafc|username=ProfZacchaeus|ts=21:03, 31 August 2025|draft=GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING ARTICLES }}

Hello,

I will like to be educated on the vital websites that one can use to cite in line in an article i am writing. infact i need credible sites i can be using. Becuase i have beautiful aricles but i dont have citations for them and when i tried submitting a draft to be considered. It was declined and one of the reasons was that i didnt use credible citations.

Wiki citations were removed and replaced as advised. Please assist with further edits needed?

Thanks!

[[User:Spiritletters|Spiritletters]] ([[User talk:Spiritletters|talk]]) 21:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

and that i was using model language like chatgpt to write my articles.

[[User:Spiritletters|Spiritletters]] ([[User talk:Spiritletters|talk]]) 21:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:The Wikipedia references are still there and none of the other sources are suitable, the draft has been rejected. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 22:12, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

So in summary, i need guidelines that can help me avoid declines when i post or publish my article through my sandbox.

= March 5 =

I am a newbie but a passionate one at that. Thank you [[User:ProfZacchaeus|ProfZacchaeus]] ([[User talk:ProfZacchaeus|talk]]) 21:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== Request on 05:54:00, 5 March 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Toorkhan Taj ==

{{anchor|05:54:00, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Toorkhan Taj}}

{{Lafc|username=Toorkhan Taj|ts=05:54:00, 5 March 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:JF17_android_game}}

:Don't write articles [[WP:BACKWARD]], which is what you are doing. You should find sources ''first'', before you write a single word. Your sources should meet the three criteria in [[WP:Golden Rule]]. And write in your own words. Don't use an AI. ChatGPT is horrible at writing articles, and tends to hallucinate things and write in a non-neutral way, even though it may insist it's neutral.

<!-- Start of message -->

:That's how you avoid your drafts being declined. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 21:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

= September 1 =

== 05:22, 1 September 2025 review of submission by 濵島 ==

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Toorkhan Taj|Toorkhan Taj]] ([[User talk:Toorkhan Taj|talk]]) 05:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=濵島|ts=05:22, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:YOHO_BREWING}}

Is it possible to write a page for your own achievement or work. Which is already available on other internet platforms. Like Google play store etc.

Hello, I'm the author of this draft. My article submission was declined, but I'm having trouble understanding some of the reasons. Could you please provide some more specific feedback on how to improve the draft and get it approved? Is it okay to cite sources from Japanese sites?Thank you for your help. [[User:濵島|濵島]] ([[User talk:濵島|talk]]) 05:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

If not them is there any alternative? Or is there anyone can write it for me. Or why someone has to write a page about my game. Why not me? Why I get objection that is advertisement or promotion? In fact everything is written about anything is promotion or advertisement. Thanks

:{{u|Toorkhan Taj}} Wikipedia is not a platform for people to tell the world about themselves or what they do. That's what social media is for. Wikipedia only summarizes what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of [[WP:N|notability]]. Wikipedia is not interested in what a subject wants to say about itself or its own work. You have what we call a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. If you just want to tell the world about your work, you should use social media or some other [[WP:OUT|alternative forum]] where that is permitted. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|濵島}} We accept non-English citations. (We also accept cites to print media and cites to non-English print media.) I would note, however, that most reviewers are going to be using automated translation for non-English sources, and automated translation tends to fare poorly on context-heavy East Asian languages. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 06:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 06:40:54, 5 March 2020 review of submission by DipSagarregmi12 ==

{{Lafc|username=DipSagarregmi12|ts=06:40:54, 5 March 2020|page=

== 11:14, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Amir Gull1 ==

}}

{{Lafc|username=Amir Gull1|ts=11:14, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Amir_Gull_Timuri}}

Hello, I have created a draft article titled "Amir Gull Timuri".

I need assistance to understand what changes or improvements are required so that my draft can be accepted as a Wikipedia article.

Please review it and let me know if there are issues with notability, references, or formatting.

Thank you for your help! [[User:Amir Gull1|Amir Gull1]] ([[User talk:Amir Gull1|talk]]) 11:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:It has been rejected, there is zero evidence of any [[WP:GNG|notability]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Writing about yourself on Wikipedia is very strongly discouraged, because almost nobody has ever managed to do it successfully: see [[WP:autobiography|autobiography]]

:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 13:48, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Rahoman ==

[[User:DipSagarregmi12|DipSagarregmi12]] ([[User talk:DipSagarregmi12|talk]]) 06:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Rahoman|ts=13:48, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Cosentino_Group}}

Hi, I asked for help reviewing this article. Several moderators helped me, you can see it here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archive_70#h-Requesting_a_submission,_how_to_procede?-20250731130700). But I haven’t gotten any more replies. Where can I request another review now that I’ve fixed everything that was pointed out? Thanks! [[User:Rahoman|Rahoman]] ([[User talk:Rahoman|talk]]) 13:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:First of all, good job adding more sources to the article. Based on the current references, I would say the subject is definitely notable. '''''However''''', the article still [[WP:NOTPROMO|reads like an advertisement]], and not a neutral encyclopedia article. Your edit after my last rejection did nothing to make the article's text less promotional. Furthermore, you still have not responded to repeated questions about whether you have a [[WP:PSCOI|conflict of interest]] regarding the subject. Deal with that first please. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:pythoncoder|<span style="color:#004080">python</span><span style="color:olive">coder</span>]] ([[User talk:pythoncoder|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/pythoncoder|contribs]])</span> 21:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 06:54:33, 5 March 2020 review of submission by DipSagarregmi12 ==

{{Lafc|username=DipSagarregmi12|ts=06:54:33, 5 March 2020|declined=User:DipSagarregmi12/sandbox}}

== [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] ==

[[User:DipSagarregmi12|DipSagarregmi12]] ([[User talk:DipSagarregmi12|talk]]) 06:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|DipSagarregmi12}}, Did you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{u|GeorgeM2011}} has asked for assistance on their draft [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] at {{slink|User_talk:GeorgeM2011#How_to_Improve}}. Any and all assistance would be appreciated. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Answered <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 15:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 08:04:32, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Prajnadutta ==

{{Lafc|username=Prajnadutta|ts=08:04:32, 5 March 2020|declined=User:Prajnadutta}}

{{u|Prajnadutta}} I have removed your draft from this page, as it is not necessary to place it here. Looking at it, you seem to be attempting to tell the world about yourself- please read the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]] to learn why this is not a good idea. Wikipedia is interested in what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state about a subject, not what the subject says about itself. This is usually very hard for people to do about themselves, as people naturally write favorably about themselves. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 0915:32:1354, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of submission by Basilseo89.101.68.143 ==

{{Lafc|username=Basilseo89.101.68.143|ts=0915:32:1354, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025|declineddraft=DraftUser:JoboyMichael_miron123/sandbox}}

just a famous lad who wants a Wikipedia account and dose not have any fane [[Special:Contributions/89.101.68.143|89.101.68.143]] ([[User talk:89.101.68.143|talk]]) 15:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for flagging this up, I will go and delete it. -- [[User:BasilseoDoubleGrazing|BasilseoDoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:BasilseoDoubleGrazing|talk]]) 0915:3256, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025 (UTC)

:{{u|Basilseo}} You don't ask a question, but the advice you have already been given is quite correct. If Joboy is your client, you must review and formally comply with the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and [[WP:PAID|paid editing]] policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1016:52:4931, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by StephaniePolystreamMguenego.usparis ==

{{Lafc|username=StephaniePolystreamMguenego.usparis|ts=1016:52:4931, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025|draft=Draft:Criterion_Software_LimitedStröm_Paris}}

Hello! I'd like to know if my draft is okay and can be published ? Or if I still need to do some modifications ? Thanks a lot. [[User:Mguenego.usparis|Mguenego.usparis]] ([[User talk:Mguenego.usparis|talk]]) 16:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:You have submitted the draft and it is pending. The reviewer will leave you feedback if they do not accept the draft. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 18:22, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Changingwormhole ==

I am trying to submit a new page on wikipedia, however, it has been declined. Please can you assist? I have added relevant references and hyperlinks to the page.

{{Lafc|username=Changingwormhole|ts=18:22, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:V-DOC}}

Hello, I would like some help understanding why my draft was declined. The reviewer noted that the references do not demonstrate notability and that I need more reliable, independent secondary sources.

In my draft, I cited three independent news articles (Kuwait Times, Madhyamam, and Manorama Online) that directly cover the project. I also cited the official company website for technical details (such as the robot’s specifications and ecosystem), since I couldn’t find those details in news reports.

Could the inclusion of the company website as a supporting source have been the problem? If so, am I allowed to use the website only for factual details (like names of components, patent numbers, etc.) while keeping the news articles as the independent coverage that demonstrates notability?

[[User:StephaniePolystream|StephaniePolystream]] ([[User talk:StephaniePolystream|talk]]) 10:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|StephanisPolystream}} You were given some advice when you draft was declined. The sources you have offered seem to be press releases or routine announcements; these do not establish that this company meets Wikipedia's special definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. What is required are independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage, written by sources that have chosen on their own to give significant coverage of the company itself(not just its products). You may find it helpful to read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] and use the [[WP:ADVENTURE|new user tutorial]] to learn more about Wikipedia.

:If you work for this company, you must review and comply with the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and [[WP:PAID|paid editing]] policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 10:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Any guidance would be much appreciated.

== 14:38:12, 5 March 2020 review of submission by DipSagarregmi12 ==

{{Lafc|username=DipSagarregmi12|ts=14:38:12, 5 March 2020|page=

Page link for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:V-DOC [[User:Changingwormhole|Changingwormhole]] ([[User talk:Changingwormhole|talk]]) 18:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

}}

*I fixed your header so that your draft is linked to as intended; you need the full title including the "Draft:" portion. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 19:11, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Don Wanyama Off ==

[[User:DipSagarregmi12|DipSagarregmi12]] ([[User talk:DipSagarregmi12|talk]]) 14:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Don Wanyama Off|ts=19:11, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:List_Of_Media_Tycoons_In_Africa}}

Why my article is rejected ?

:{{u|DipSagarregmi12}}Request for Ire assumereview thison refersthe todraft yourList sandbox-of youMedia wereTycoons givenIn extensiveAfrica explanation there. Is there something about it that you do not understand? [[User:331dotDon Wanyama Off|331dotDon Wanyama Off]] ([[User talk:331dotDon Wanyama Off|talk]]) 1419:4411, 51 MarchSeptember 20202025 (UTC)

:If you have addressed the concern of the first reviewer, you may click the Resubmit button. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Note that list articles must collect members of the list that merit articles themselves. You're just listing names, none of them have articles, never mind sources. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:* [[WP:QUACK]] - SPI filed [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 19:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

= September 2 =

Actually i am new to wikipedia ...What i did not understand the reason from sandbox also [[User:DipSagarregmi12|DipSagarregmi12]] ([[User talk:DipSagarregmi12|talk]]) 14:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:You have not provided independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage showing how this man meets the Wikipedia definition of a [[WP:BAND|notable musician]] or a [[WP:WRITER|notable songwriter]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 14:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 01:00, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Asf132 ==

:[[User:DipSagarregmi12/sandbox]] was rejected because the topic is not [[WP:BIO|notable]]. ''Nepalireport'' is a self-published blog, so not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. ''[[Saptahik]]'' is reliable, but that article appears to be [[churnalism]], so lacking in independence. ''Nepali Times Australia'' is of dubious reliability. It does not appear to have any connection to the reliable ''[[Nepali Times]]''. Self-published YouTube videos do nothing to help establish notability. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 14:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Asf132|ts=01:00, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Rao Mulpuri}}

Hi! I am awaiting submission of this biographical article, and despite fixing the initial request from my evaluator, because the article title was "moved" I'm not sure he/she was able to look at the right one. Could someone please ensure everything is ok? I believe it is ready for publishing [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 01:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:I also would like to add that I do not believe that my previous evaluator speaks/understands English proficiently, as evidenced by the language used on their "talk" page and does not grasp the magnitude of the content covered by the professionally written secondary-sourced articles (Bloomberg, Business Insider, Fortune, etc.), which was in this case is covering a once multi-billion-dollar company's CEO.. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 03:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 15:21:43, 5 March 2020 review of draft by Djblackwood ==

::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] could you please take a look? [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Djblackwood|ts=15:21:43, 5 March 2020|draft=Draft:Rider's_Harbour}}

:::@[[User:Asf132|Asf132]]: sorry, can you please clarify your question – are you just wanting to fast track your draft's review? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::The issue in question when I spoke to the reviewer "Như Gây Mê" was a lack of notability, but it seems even by the most pessimistic metric of evaluation the subject would qualify under Wikipedia's standards. The reviewer replied to me in broken English without sufficiently providing an explanation for their evaluation: "Hi, I think this is not the right time for me to publish your article, the information is still too little to show the notability of the subject." So I'm asking for another staff member to evaluate the notability requirements of the individual/the article and if they do indeed suffice then I believe that yes, the article should be published based on that being the "issue" of the article. If that "asks" for a faster review, then I guess that's the answer? But it was more of a prior concern with how this requirement was being evaluated.

::::Thank you! [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::You have resubmitted the draft, and will therefore get a 'second opinion' in due course once a reviewer gets around to assessing it. We don't provide on-demand reviews here at the help desk.

:::::I have no comment to make regarding another reviewer's command of English; nor should you, in my opinion. Any reviewer working on the English Wikipedia will almost certainly have sufficient skills to be able to review a draft and its associated English-language sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::Ok, got it. I also just received your message about managing a conflict of interest, and I would like to let you know that there is no personal or professional connection to my subject. I have studied the subject independently through my own research in the last half-decade as his company was rising and falling. This should be clearly evidenced by my neutrality throughout my draft, which highlights both his professional accomplishments as well as evidence that he played a significant role in the eventual bankruptcy of his company. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Unusually (for me), I reviewed the draft you refer to, and also had to decline it for lack of evidence of notability. Most of the sources are either primary, or cover the View company with only passing mentions of Mulpuri. I believe the only one that provides significant coverage directly about him is [https://www.businessinsider.com/view-rao-mulpuri-softbank-bankruptcy-cantor-rxr-2024-8 this] ''BI'' piece (also cited for the second time via AOL, for some reason). -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::PS: I did not decline this because of the unreferenced DOB, I declined it because of insufficient evidence of notability. Resubmitting without any attempt at addressing that issue is disruptive. Don't do that again, please, or your draft may be rejected outright. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Thank you, I appreciate your time and feedback. I have found sources that are secondary that cover the subject in depth and added/replaced them now (if applicable to the content). [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::You have replaced one source, and resubmitted. Even if that new source were solid, which it isn't, that would still not be sufficient to satisfy [[WP:GNG]].

:::::::::You do you, I suppose, but just be aware that you do not have unlimited attempts at this. If I were you, I would try to make the most of your chances. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:20, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::Actually, there were an additional two sources added (one of which was to provide a source for the year, which I will concede is not secondary)) and the other was the Forbes article that was added in with new content (which would count as secondary). Only the second mention of the Business Insider article source was swapped for an equivalent one that aimed to resolve your issue earlier about how it was cited twice (which is what you were referring to, unless you did not see my latest edits). So that was not the one in question that I was referring to. But I understand your general point and will add more that would fit the requirement. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::Indeed, you did add more than one new source... after my comment here. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 02:01, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Elesha1188 ==

I don't understand why my page [[Draft:Rider's Harbour]] has been rejected when there are other similar pages such as [[Barton, Newfoundland and Labrador]] which have less information and no sources. These are both abandoned communities in Newfoundland. How is one different from the other?

{{Lafc|username=Elesha1188|ts=02:01, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Cyrus_Tang_Foundation}}

Hi, the content that I posted have been declined twice by two peers. And I would like to seek assistance specifically on which part I have to make correction so that I content can edit again and make it live. Thank you ! [[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]] ([[User talk:Elesha1188|talk]]) 02:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]]: now declined for the third time. As I said in my comments two declines ago, primary sources do not establish notability per [[WP:ORG]], and that's all your draft cites. We need to see significant coverage of this organisation in multiple ''secondary'' sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Djblackwood|djblackwood]] ([[User talk:Djblackwood|talk]]) 15:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]].

:{{u|Djblackwood}} They aren't, so I have proposed the other article for deletion. Beware in citing other similar articles as a reason for yours to exist, see [[WP:OSE]]. As this is a volunteer project, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address inappropriate articles when they are pointed out. Any article must do more than describe the mere existence of something, [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage must also be provided; the article must summarize those sources. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{HD/WINI}}

:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 04:04, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Goldface2009 ==

There are hundreds of such pages (see [[List of ghost towns in Newfoundland and Labrador]]), that constitute a significant part of the history of Newfoundland. Simply deleting them all is a rather arbitrary and unreasonable solution. Once again Wikipedia'a arcane rules are driving contributors away rather than encouraging their contributions. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Djblackwood|Djblackwood]] ([[User talk:Djblackwood#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djblackwood|contribs]]) 15:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

{{Lafc|username=Goldface2009|ts=04:04, 2 September 2025|draft=User:Goldface2009/sandbox}}

please review my article and let us know which source is still missing or violate the policy [[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]] ([[User talk:Goldface2009|talk]]) 04:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]]: we don't provide pre-reviews here at the help desk, you'll get a proper review once you submit your draft. I've added a template to it which has a blue 'submit' button for that. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Djblackwood}} The applicable arcane rule (a.k.a. notability guideline) is [[WP:GEOLAND]]. Under it, even abandoned places are typically presumed to merit a stand alone article, so long as they were once populated and legally recognized. Any content, however, must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], and two of the three cited sources in [[Draft:Rider's Harbour]] were not reliable. You may be able to use the two paragraphs on page 597 of the [http://collections.mun.ca/cdm/ref/collection/cns_enl/id/3907 Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador, volume 4], or some of the books in [https://www.worldcat.org/search?q=su%3ARandom+Island+%28N.L.%29+History.&qt=hot_subject], to either bring the draft up to scratch or to improve [[Random Island]], which makes many unsourced statements. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 23:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 1604:45:3933, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of submission by Keglemitch1Samyfit556b ==

{{Lafc|username=Keglemitch1Samyfit556b|ts=1604:45:3933, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025|pagedraft=User:Samyfit556b/sandbox}}

tell me how do i create the sandbox i wnat to create please sir help [[User:Samyfit556b|Samyfit556b]] ([[User talk:Samyfit556b|talk]]) 04:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Kid unboxing

}}

I didn't understand very well the reasons why my draft about kid unboxing is not correct. Is it a problem of references and sources? How can I adjust it?

[[User:Keglemitch1|Keglemitch1]] ([[User talk:Keglemitch1|talk]]) 16:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Keglemitch1}}, The concern is that there already seems to be an existing article at [[Unboxing]] which is essentially covering the same issue. I think that any useful content could be condensed into one or two parapgraphs and added to the Unboxing article, instead of being a separate article. [[User:CaptainEek|<span style="color:#6a1f7f">'''CaptainEek'''</span>]] ^{[[User talk:CaptainEek|<span style="font-size:82%"><span style="color:#a479e5">''Edits Ho Cap'n!''</span></span>]]}[[Special:Contributions/CaptainEek|⚓]] 19:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:@[[User:Samyfit556b|Samyfit556b]]: it's right there, in the above link. That's where your rejected draft on BBKaPitara is. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 17:12:16, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Antiques26 ==

{{Lafc|username=Antiques26|ts=17:12:16, 5 March 2020|page=Draft:WorthPoint

}}

== Requesting Review for Draft:Dhiman (Caste) ==

Hello, my draft of [[Draft:WorthPoint]] was rejected for notability and I'm hoping that I can get some additional feedback as to what kind of sourcing mistakes I've made. There are many more possible references out there, but I have read the standards and am not clear on why the existing ones fail so I don't know which others may be helpful to add. Thank you!

Hello! I have created and submitted a draft article titled '''[[Draft:Dhiman (Caste)]]'''. I have done my best to follow Wikipedia's guidelines regarding notability, neutrality, and sourcing.

[[User:Antiques26|Antiques26]] ([[User talk:Antiques26|talk]]) 17:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Antiques26}} The sources do not have the significant coverage of this company itself that is required, they are all brief coverage of things the company has done, not of the company itself. One is an interview with the company CEO, which is not an independent source. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 17:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if an editor could take a look and provide feedback or review it for publication. Thank you for your time and help!

== 17:46:30, 5 March 2020 review of draft by Adavolo ==

{{Lafc|username=Adavolo|ts=17:46:30, 5 March 2020|draft=Draft:Ezlogz}}

[[User:Indiauser1971|Indiauser1971]] ([[User talk:Indiauser1971|talk]]) 08:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'm trying to publish an article about one of the logistics company that is based on the blockchain technology, but my article was declined because of sources and the style of the article. I pointed out the sources as a website when indeed it was news. I want to know if I will rewrite the article and name those sources as news, will my submission be accepted? [[User:Adavolo|Adavolo]] ([[User talk:Adavolo|talk]]) 17:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:You have submitted it for review and it is pending. Please be aware of the rules when editing about social groups in India- I will post them to your user talk page- probably you shouldn't have created this draft at all- but if it is accepted, you cannot edit it again until your account is extended-confirmed(30 days old with 500 edits) [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Adavolo|Adavolo]] ([[User talk:Adavolo|talk]]) 17:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Indiauser1971|Indiauser1971]].

:{{u|Adavolo}} It's difficult to answer you without seeing the improvements you wish to make. It's not just about naming sources, it's about the article content as well, as the article should summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage state. If you work for this company in any way, you must declare as a [[WP:PAID|paid editor]] as well as a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 17:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:Separately from the point 331dot made about Indian social groups, {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 1810:04:0212, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by SageMacG103.182.14.46 ==

{{Lafc|username=SageMacG103.182.14.46|ts=1810:04:0212, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025|draft=Draft:David_Robinson_(artist)Ehtasham_Malik}}

Can you guide me on which words are promotional [[Special:Contributions/103.182.14.46|103.182.14.46]] ([[User talk:103.182.14.46|talk]]) 10:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 10:16, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 102.22.207.86 ==

{{Lafc|username=102.22.207.86|ts=10:16, 2 September 2025|draft=Unite180}}

Article was declined. Any assistance possible with getting it approved and guidance on writing it better or removing references that seem problematic. [[Special:Contributions/102.22.207.86|102.22.207.86]] ([[User talk:102.22.207.86|talk]]) 10:16, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 10:55, 2 September 2025 review of submission by NeutralMMMUser ==

Hello, I'm an brand-new user so I apologize in advance for being unfamiliar with the methods and systems here. I really appreciate the thorough vetting and dedication to good data, and value the time volunteers put into this platform.

{{Lafc|username=NeutralMMMUser|ts=10:55, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Objective_Platform}}

I tried to adjust this article multiples times to the feedback I got but apparently it's still not good enough – can someone help or tell me what exactly is not working? I just quoted external sources and took out everything that I think sounds like "advertisement". [[User:NeutralMMMUser|NeutralMMMUser]] ([[User talk:NeutralMMMUser|talk]]) 10:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:You are making a common, but fundamental, mistake in that you are telling us what you want the world to know about your company. That is the wrong approach. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, or the reporting of routine business activities does not establish notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

I just had my first article rejected, so I carefully read the critique so I could make the article comply with Wikipedia's policies. However, I'm having trouble understanding how the critique applies to my article. The critique was "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed." To address the latter first, all my sources were independent, reliable, published sources and the only material produced by the subject is the 'official site' link in the External links section. To address the former, I believe the only area that reads like an advertisement is "Reviews and Commentary" all of which are independent sources. I've seen other artists pages use this same technique, (for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kelly_(artist)) but I am happy to delete that section if it will make the page publishable.

It would be really helpful if someone could point out specifics of how the content doesn't meet the guidelines.

== 11:59, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 103.182.14.46 ==

Thank you so much in advance to anyone who is willing to volunteer their time to help me with this. I'm really trying to do this fairly in spite of my stated COI.

{{Lafc|username=103.182.14.46|ts=11:59, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Ehtasham_Malik}}

Can tell why reject the article [[Special:Contributions/103.182.14.46|103.182.14.46]] ([[User talk:103.182.14.46|talk]]) 11:59, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:The subject is not [[WP:GNG|notable]] press releases are not reliable independent sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 12:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 12:24, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Talha Sti ==

Thank you!

{{Lafc|username=Talha Sti|ts=12:24, 2 September 2025|draft=User:Talha_Sti/sandbox}}

Why my article is not publishing what is wrong in it [[User:Talha Sti|Sti]] ([[User talk:Talha Sti|talk]]) 12:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:Your draft lacked the coding needed to submit it- this is provided if you use the [[WP:WIZARD|Article Wizard]] to create and submit a draft.

[[User:SageMacG|SageMacG]] ([[User talk:SageMacG|talk]]) 18:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

:However, your draft was throughly promotional and has been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a company. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, or the reporting of routine business activities does not establish notability.

:If you work for this company/website, you are required by the Terms of Use to disclose that, see [[WP:PAID]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 2013:30:2345, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by MortgageGuru23Kay3233 ==

{{Lafc|username=MortgageGuru23Kay3233|ts=2013:30:2345, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025|draft=Draft:TrussleAPAC_Tower}}

Hello, I noticed the article on APAC Tower was rejected for notability. I would like guidance on whether the coverage I have from independent sources is sufficient, or what additional sources would be needed.

I have few questions.

1. Do the awards (Fitwel 3-Star 2025, Thailand Property Award) count as notable recognition for the building?

2. Do independent news reports from Bangkok Biz News, RE Talk Asia, and AustCham Thailand establish enough secondary coverage?

3. Would mentioning prominent multinational tenants (Asia Pulp & Paper, Mazda Sales, TOA Electronics) help demonstrate significance?

Thank you, [[User:Kay3233|Kay3233]] ([[User talk:Kay3233|talk]]) 13:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I was wondering if someone could take a look at my draft before I submit it. I feel like I have taken a lot of guidance and fixed many of the issues that other editors have mentioned. I have also confirmed that I am not being paid for my edits (see discussion on my talk page).

:Awards only contribute to notability if the award itself merits an article, like [[Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Academy Award]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Let me know if there's anything more I need to do...

== 14:13, 2 September 2025 review of submission by TurnipShadow ==

thanks!

{{Lafc|username=TurnipShadow|ts=14:13, 2 September 2025|draft=User:TurnipShadow/sandbox}}

I've drafted something but cant see how I move it to be considered for publish [[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]] ([[User talk:TurnipShadow|talk]]) 14:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]]: I've added the submission template, it has a blue 'submit' button with which you can send it for review when you're ready. I've also moved it into the draft name space, at [[Draft:Jools’ Law]]. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 14:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:MortgageGuru23|MortgageGuru23]] ([[User talk:MortgageGuru23|talk]]) 20:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

::Thank you very much [[User:TurnipShadow|TurnipShadow]] ([[User talk:TurnipShadow|talk]]) 14:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 15:55:24, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Psymba ==

[[User:MortgageGuru23|MortgageGuru23]] ([[User talk:MortgageGuru23|talk]]) 20:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Psymba|ts=15:55:24, 2 September 2025|link=Mike_Abrams_(psychologist)

== 21:05:52, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Guettli ==

<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]] OR [[Draft:Mike_Abrams_(psychologist)]] -->

{{Lafc|username=Guettli|ts=21:05:52, 5 March 2020|page=

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Canonical_URL

}}

This entry was moved to draft space by OwenX who acknowledged its improvement after several weeks of edits and added citations, writing "I see you've made significant improvements to the draft, both in content and in sourcing" [[User talk: OwenX#Review for Dr. Mike Abrams (psychologist)]]. I invite anyone to suggest or make improvements or who may feel it is ready to return as an entry where it previously was for several years. [[User:Psymba|Psymba]] ([[User talk:Psymba|talk]]) 15:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

My first reviewer told me this:

:You have submitted it for review and it is pending. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 17:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Canonicalization#Search engines and SEO. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

== 17:56, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Mamaazhi'iwe ==

I think his reason is not valid since "Canonical URL" is not just important for search engines or SEO. It is important and used for intranets, too. Especially in intranets it makes sense to define canonical URLs. These URLs are the starting points for new employers to discover/learn a new topic.

{{Lafc|username=Mamaazhi'iwe|ts=17:56, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Mishiiken Tribe of Mackinac Island}}

I am trying to create a page for the Mishiiken Tribe of Mackinac Island. The first time I submitted it was tagged as appearing to be original research. The second time it was tagged as being written by AI. I did try to use ChatGPT to put things in order and properly format everything, as I find it difficult. Can you tell me what exactly is wrong with it now or how I can fix it? [[User:Mamaazhi&#39;iwe|Mamaazhi&#39;iwe]] ([[User talk:Mamaazhi&#39;iwe|talk]]) 17:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @[[User:Mamaazhi'iwe|Mamaazhi'iwe]]. Have you checked the output to make sure that ChatGPT has not made up any content, or stated anything that is not verified by the sources? A Wikipedia article is <u>only</u> a summary of what existing reliable published sources state: nothing more. When you use an AI chatbot to help with drafts they have a habit of adding what we call "[[Wikipedia:No original research|original research" or "synthesis]]": information which is ''not'' supported by existing reliable published sources.

I think "Canonical URL" has enough value for an own article.

:I would recommend going through the draft and carefully check every line for any evidence that ChatGPT has added any original research or synthesis. Likewise, if you have included any original research or synthesis, please remove this and focus on only summarising what the existing reliable published sources have stated. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::To add to what qcne says, AIs will [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|quite blatantly fabricate sources that don't exist]] in order to satisfy a prompt. (As an example, see [https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/27/business/chat-gpt-avianca-mata-lawyers this CNN article] about a couple of lawyers who used AI to write a legal brief which cited fictitious legal cases.) —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 23:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 18:51, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Jrpartlowiv ==

Nevertheless, first reviewer provided useful feedback: It makes sense to provide a hyperlink from "Canonicalization" to the new article "Canonical URL".

{{Lafc|username=Jrpartlowiv|ts=18:51, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:William "Bill" Kirk}}

Thanks for your recent review of my Article Page! So that I can meet the mark this next time, can you please tell me what I should add or edit before resubmitting. Any flags and recommendations are welcome as well. Thanks in advance. [[User:Jrpartlowiv|Jrpartlowiv]] ([[User talk:Jrpartlowiv|talk]]) 18:51, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Jrpartlowiv|Jrpartlowiv]] Fundamentally you have not proven how this person meets [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion (people)]]. All your sources are primary and as such they do not "count" towards proving how this person meets that criteria. We're looking for significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that cover this person. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 19:08, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Jcgaylor ==

[[User:Guettli|Guettli]] ([[User talk:Guettli|talk]]) 21:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Jcgaylor|ts=19:08, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:South Carolina Human Affairs Commission}}

Hi all! My first article draft ([[Draft:South Carolina Human Affairs Commission]]) is under review. I'd love to get some feedback or critiques on what I did right/wrong, and how I can make it better!

[[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]] ([[User talk:Jcgaylor|talk]]) 19:08, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 21:31:56, 5 March 2020 review of draft by Sbarclay000 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sbarclay000|ts=21:31:56, 5 March 2020|draft=Draft:Adam_Eli}}

:Hi @[[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]]. You've submitted the draft for review - but you will note that the top of the draft states ''This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,139 pending submissions waiting for review.'' <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I submitted an article for review but was declined with the comment "adv,bio" from DGG. What does this mean? What do I need to change? Please be as specific as possible. Thanks!

::Right... which is why I said it is under review and am seeking feedback on how to improve it in the meantime... [[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]] ([[User talk:Jcgaylor|talk]]) 19:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::But, that's what a review is for: to give feedback on how to improve it. You're asking for a ''pre''review, which we don't really do. However, what might make it easier for reviewers to review the draft is for you to highlight on the Draft Talk Page the three (and only three) best sources that each meet: independent of the commission (not based off their website, or a press release, or an interview with staff, or any kind of primary source); devote significant transformational coverage to the commission (some kind of critical analysis, debate, discussion, commentary etc). <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 19:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::I know as a matter of fact that I am not the first person to ask for casual feedback on the state of a draft, but point taken, I reckon! [[User:Jcgaylor|Jcgaylor]] ([[User talk:Jcgaylor|talk]]) 21:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::As I said, doing a [[User:RoySmith/Three best sources]] would be useful. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 21:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 20:04, 2 September 2025 review of submission by 102.88.52.199 ==

[[User:Sbarclay000|Sbarclay000]] ([[User talk:Sbarclay000|talk]]) 21:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=102.88.52.199|ts=20:04, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:Oluwaseun_Medayedupin}}

:Hi {{U|Sbarclay000}}. I've fixed the way the decline reasons are displayed on [[Draft:Adam Eli]] so that you can read all the details there. The short answer is usually that you need to change your topic - write about something else. Wikipedia has over six million subjects to choose from, and nearly all of them need improvement. See [[Wikipedia:Community portal]] if you aren't sure where to start. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 23:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

haha, make your research on medayedupin.org [[Special:Contributions/102.88.52.199|102.88.52.199]] ([[User talk:102.88.52.199|talk]]) 20:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:Hello IP editor, that isn't a question. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 20:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 21:49:40, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Aditya belnekar07 ==

{{Lafc|username=Aditya belnekar07|ts=21:49:40, 5 March 2020|declined=Draft:Aditya_Belnekar}}

== 21:07, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Cueterna ==

[[User:Aditya belnekar07|Aditya belnekar07]] ([[User talk:Aditya belnekar07|talk]]) 21:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Cueterna|ts=21:07, 2 September 2025|draft=Draft:ITTF_Foundation}}

Hello - I am working on behalf of ITTF Foundation (a sports foundation) - already clarified on my page my affiliation - and have been running into the same issues with a few submissions, especially this one. Can you please help me understand how I can improve this page in order to be accepted? I guess it needs to be in a more formal tone, with a more neutral point of view? [[User:Cueterna|Cueterna]] ([[User talk:Cueterna|talk]]) 21:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:The trouble you are having (which is common for others like you) is that you are telling us what you want the world to know about your organization. That's the wrong approach; instead you need to limit yourself to summarizing what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about your organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable organization]]. Interviews, press releases, brief mentions, and the reporting of routine activities does not establish notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 21:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:I would suggest that you read [[WP:BOSS]], and show it to your superiors/colleagues. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 21:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 21:51:2237, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by Yesness89Wikimonday2 ==

{{Lafc|username=Yesness89Wikimonday2|ts=21:51:2237, 52 MarchSeptember 20202025|draft=Draft:Pro_Football_Retired_Players_AssociationTBPN}}

I’d like to clarify that I’m not socking and I’m not involved in undisclosed paid editing. I’m a new editor who went through drafts, and submitted this page because TBPN has received significant coverage in reliable sources (added NYT and Bloomberg newsletter/podcast, to go along with Business Insider, The Information, Bloomberg Businessweek, and The Washington Post)

If there are concerns with tone, structure, or how I’ve presented the sources, I’d really appreciate advice on how best to bring this draft in line with Wikipedia’s expectations. I want to make sure I’m following policy and improving the draft the right way. [[User:Wikimonday2|Wikimonday2]] ([[User talk:Wikimonday2|talk]]) 21:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:Blocked as a sock. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 00:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

= September 3 =

I want to make sure I resubmitted my new draft. I cannot tell if I did.

[[User:Yesness89|Yesness89]] ([[User talk:Yesness89|talk]]) 21:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

* Hi [[User:Yesness89|Yesness89]], no you haven't resubmitted it - press the blue "Resubmit" button - then save with "Publish changes". [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 21:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 22:02:09, 5 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4040:405:4E7A:24F0:C971:7F6:F66F ==

{{Lafc|username=2409:4040:405:4E7A:24F0:C971:7F6:F66F|ts=22:02:09, 5 March 2020|declined=Draft:Aditya_Belnekar}}

Help my client to create his wikipedia page

[[Special:Contributions/2409:4040:405:4E7A:24F0:C971:7F6:F66F|2409:4040:405:4E7A:24F0:C971:7F6:F66F]] ([[User talk:2409:4040:405:4E7A:24F0:C971:7F6:F66F|talk]]) 22:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

== 22:54:56, 5 March 2020 review of submission by Winston16 ==

{{Lafc|username=Winston16|ts=22:54:56, 5 March 2020|declined=Draft:Rabbi_Dovid_Tugendhaft}}

Hi,

Please could you elaborate on the specific reasons why this draft was rejected as there are now enough reputable sources to back-up the information provided in the article.

If any more sources are needed please could you specify which ones in order for me to be able to improve the article to a higher standard so that it will be accepted.

Thanks in advance, your assistance is much appreciated

Winston16

[[User:Winston16|Winston16]] ([[User talk:Winston16|talk]]) 22:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

= March 6 =

== 02:33:15, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Johnpaterno ==

{{Lafc|username=Johnpaterno|ts=02:33:15, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Jonn_Poker}}

[[User:Johnpaterno|Johnpaterno]] ([[User talk:Johnpaterno|talk]]) 02:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 02:35:31, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Johnpaterno ==

{{Lafc|username=Johnpaterno|ts=02:35:31, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Jonn_Poker}}

[[User:Johnpaterno|Johnpaterno]] ([[User talk:Johnpaterno|talk]]) 02:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 05:40:20, 6 March 2020 review of draft by 88.119.152.93 ==

{{Lafc|username=88.119.152.93|ts=05:40:20, 6 March 2020|draft=Draft:RutOS}}

[[Special:Contributions/88.119.152.93|88.119.152.93]] ([[User talk:88.119.152.93|talk]]) 05:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

An article about RutOS was rejected. Perhaps you could indicate specific places that I should add and where to edit?

Article page address: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:RutOS

== 08:04:02, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Ranudas01 ==

{{Lafc|username=Ranudas01|ts=08:04:02, 6 March 2020|page=

}}

[[User:Ranudas01|Ranudas01]] ([[User talk:Ranudas01|talk]]) 08:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 08:45:41, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Renukaapollo ==

{{Lafc|username=Renukaapollo|ts=08:45:41, 6 March 2020|declined=User:Renukaapollo/sandbox}}

I have gathered information about my company page. The page Apollo Aerospace Components is also deleted. Please help me retrieve this page. I want to update information about my company

[[User:Renukaapollo|Renukaapollo]] ([[User talk:Renukaapollo|talk]]) 08:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Renukaapollo}} You will need to comply with the [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and [[WP:PAID|paid editing]] policies on your user page. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] to learn what is being looked for- your text was just a promotional piece for your company, with no sources at all. Wikipedia only summarizes the content of independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] in articles- this does not include republished press releases, staff interviews, routine business announcements, or other [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 09:11:50, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Nazimbnrpk ==

{{Lafc|username=Nazimbnrpk|ts=09:11:50, 6 March 2020|declined=User:Nazimbnrpk/sandbox}}

[[User:Nazimbnrpk|Nazimbnrpk]] ([[User talk:Nazimbnrpk|talk]]) 09:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 09:20:36, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Carscd ==

{{Lafc|username=Carscd|ts=09:20:36, 6 March 2020|page=

}}

I received a response to my paste-up to to my usersandbox that: the material appeared to be a test edit and unworthy of a page in Wikipedia. I drafted the topic in response to a pop-up on a Wikipedia page that said that a page had not yet been created for the subject of the pop up. For context, my draft has links to other Wikipedia pages but no footnote references. I could create some if these are required to provide standing - I thought the article could stand alone within the context of the linked Wikipedia pages. I do not mind that the various links might send readers away from my article: the topic is historical. have encyclopaedic knowledge of the topic and am willing to perservere to publication. Since I am a novice Wikipedia author I would like to know if the next step is forget it or something else.

[[User:Carscd|Carscd]] ([[User talk:Carscd|talk]]) 09:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Carscd}} The sandbox is for drafting articles, not for what you did. You submitted the note in your sandbox as if you wanted it to become an article. Simply paste whatever you have in your word document into your sandbox and submit it for review. '''[[User:NotTheFakeJTP|<span style="color: red">JTP</span>]] ^{([[User talk:NotTheFakeJTP|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/NotTheFakeJTP|contribs]])}''' 14:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 09:56:35, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Nazimbnrpk ==

{{Lafc|username=Nazimbnrpk|ts=09:56:35, 6 March 2020|declined=User:Nazimbnrpk/sandbox}}

[[User:Nazimbnrpk|Nazimbnrpk]] ([[User talk:Nazimbnrpk|talk]]) 09:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:No indication that Nazimullah Agarai Buner is [[WP:GNG|notable]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 10:04:16, 6 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4066:1D:F698:295B:33E:A7A:64EC ==

{{Lafc|username=2409:4066:1D:F698:295B:33E:A7A:64EC|ts=10:04:16, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Banned_people}}

[[Special:Contributions/2409:4066:1D:F698:295B:33E:A7A:64EC|2409:4066:1D:F698:295B:33E:A7A:64EC]] ([[User talk:2409:4066:1D:F698:295B:33E:A7A:64EC|talk]]) 10:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:Did you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 10:16:09, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Sworrubt ==

{{Lafc|username=Sworrubt|ts=10:16:09, 6 March 2020|page=

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester

}}

My article submission has been rejected because "it is very exceptional that we consider an individual academic department notable". But the other eight departments in the Faculty of Science and Engineering at The University of Manchester have pages, so I'm just wondering why this one is deemed unacceptable?

[[User:Sworrubt|Sworrubt]] ([[User talk:Sworrubt|talk]]) 10:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{U|Sworrubt}} Your draft has zero independent sources and also reads like an advert for the department. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 12:33:08, 6 March 2020 review of submission by 2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5 ==

{{Lafc|username=2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5|ts=12:33:08, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Blake_Ridder}}

I believe it should be as it was published in many reliable sources

[[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5|2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5|talk]]) 12:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:Do you have a question? [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:: Yes, my question is why has this been rejected if he was mentioned in many reliable sources? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5|2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5#top|talk]]) 16:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::: Just mentions are not sufficient. It needs to be significant coverage of the subject. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 18:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't just a passing mentions, those articles were specifically about the person in draft wholly and exclusively. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5|2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C6:4882:8401:B18D:374:E410:99A5#top|talk]]) 20:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I hadn't checked the sources, I only commented on "mentions". But looking at them, the articles are about the movie, not the actor. The coverage of actor in the articles is not significant enough. If anything, the movie itself could be notable, although these random churnalism current event hype articles are probably not be enough. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 20:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 13:10:53, 6 March 2020 review of draft by Sanjay1205 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sanjay1205|ts=13:10:53, 6 March 2020|draft=User:Sanjay1205/sandbox}}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sanjay1205/sandbox all references posted from reliable sources and notable person in tamil film industry

[[User:Sanjay1205|Sanjay1205]] ([[User talk:Sanjay1205|talk]]) 13:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Sanjay1205}}, Except they aren't. Please review [[WP:RS]]. You also will need to provide inline citations. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 14:40:11, 6 March 2020 review of draft by Sanjay1205 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sanjay1205|ts=14:40:11, 6 March 2020|draft=User:Sanjay1205/sandbox}}

[[User:Sanjay1205|Sanjay1205]] ([[User talk:Sanjay1205|talk]]) 14:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

@surfboy any examples template for this what you mean can ypu explain please need to provide inline citations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sanjay1205/sandbox

:Links explaining inline citations have already been provided to you in the decline messages on the draft page.[[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 14:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 18:14:40, 6 March 2020 review of draft by Dontwantone ==

{{Lafc|username=Dontwantone|ts=18:14:40, 6 March 2020|draft=Draft:Bob_Quaranta}}

I'd like to delete the article on Bob Quaranta and any comments connected to the draft.

[[User:Dontwantone|Dontwantone]] ([[User talk:Dontwantone|talk]]) 18:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:Done. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

::{{u|331dot}}, I don't think that guy was the original page creator? Iirc, it was an article that was draftified from mainspace and he was just the one that recently was submitting it. I could be remembering wrong though. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 21:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:::This user has worked on it since 2011, the user that actually created it hasn't edited since 2009. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 22:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 18:48:16, 6 March 2020 review of draft by 2605:6000:1525:83C5:FC78:563C:8D27:9F99 ==

{{Lafc|username=2605:6000:1525:83C5:FC78:563C:8D27:9F99|ts=18:48:16, 6 March 2020|draft=Draft:Michael_K._Healey}}

[[Special:Contributions/2605:6000:1525:83C5:FC78:563C:8D27:9F99|2605:6000:1525:83C5:FC78:563C:8D27:9F99]] ([[User talk:2605:6000:1525:83C5:FC78:563C:8D27:9F99|talk]]) 18:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

May I please ask how this page would be different from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Geoghegan? Michael Healey was also an American hero involved in a historically significant event.

Very respectfully submitted.

:Other articles should not be cited to justify the existence of yours, see [[WP:OSE|other stuff exists]]. It is possible the article you cite is not appropriate as well. Merely being involved in a historical event does not necessarily merit any individual an article. An individual merits an article if there is significant coverage of the person in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] showing how they meet the Wikipedia definition of [[WP:BIO|a notable person]]. [[WP:BLP1E]] is also relevant here. Per that guideline, a person does not merit an article:

# If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.

# If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a [[Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individual]]. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. In such cases, it is usually better to [[Wikipedia:Merging|merge]] the information and [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect]] the person's name to the event article.

# If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. [[John Hinckley Jr.]], for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the [[Reagan assassination attempt]], was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented.

:I don't say these things to minimize the loss of the firefighter, which is horribly tragic. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 21:53:55, 6 March 2020 review of submission by Dotanmeirov ==

{{Lafc|username=Dotanmeirov|ts=21:53:55, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Middiamonds}}

Hello,

I read as much as I can and revised this contribution many times. I think that this company is important and should be part of Wikipedia.

It is genuinely understandable not to write anything that is advertisement. It makes sense that everything should stay factual and to the point.

But, I hit a wall with "not qualifying for Wikipedia" This is a company that was presented an award from the state of Israel, By the President Himself, Shimon Peres.

If that is not qualifying then what is? I revised the wording to pure facts with nothing else.

What should I remove, What should I change?

Dotan Meirov --[[User:Dotanmeirov|Dotanmeirov]] ([[User talk:Dotanmeirov|talk]]) 21:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Dotanmeirov|Dotanmeirov]] ([[User talk:Dotanmeirov|talk]]) 21:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Dotanmeirov}}, The article has been rejected, which mean it will no longer be further considered. Whether or not it was factual or not doesn't matter. Most advertisements are completely factual. The problem is putting undue weight on accomplishments and awards instead of writing a formal, neutral article The fact that you see nothing wrong with the article shows that you have a debilitating conflict of interest. The article was resubmitted multiple times without seriously addressing the issues and in a manner that shows our policies were not actually read. I would highly advise that if you continue to do paid editing that you take the time to read our policies. Thanks. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 21:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

== 23:28:45, 6 March 2020 review of submission by 38.140.155.66 ==

{{Lafc|username=38.140.155.66|ts=23:28:45, 6 March 2020|declined=Draft:Alexander_Dellal}}

I would like an explanation as to why the article was denied for publication. The stated reason seems arbitrary at best. Seems to me he is as worthy as many others included.

[[Special:Contributions/38.140.155.66|38.140.155.66]] ([[User talk:38.140.155.66|talk]]) 23:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

:Your opinion on whether someone is worthy bears zero weight. We have strict notability policies in place. The reviwer has rejected the article as they have determined this subject does not meet those standards. As such, the draft will not be reviewed further. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 23:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

= March 7 =

== 05:57:48, 7 March 2020 review of submission by 2409:4073:407:87A3:A5D2:149D:F793:FEA2 ==

{{Lafc|username=2409:4073:407:87A3:A5D2:149D:F793:FEA2|ts=05:57:48, 7 March 2020|page=

Amrutha Suresh

}}

The decline template says: ''This submission's references do not show that the subject [[WP:N|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]] sources that are [[WP:IS|independent]] of the subject''

She satisfies [[WP:SIGCOV]] and [[WP:BASIC]], subject has significant coverage from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that is [[WP:IS|independent]] of the subject. Another article written by myself ([[Abhirami Suresh]]) successfully passed review and I was even [[User talk:Kingboyk#Draft:Abhirami Suresh|complimented]]. Actually, Amrutha is more notable than Abhirami and has more coverage than her. I tried [[User talk:Brihaspati#Draft:Amrutha Suresh|talking this]] (now archived) to the reviewer, but did not received a reply. BTW, I did have used few [[WP:PRIMARY|primary]] sources (interviews) as well but those mainly goes for citing her personal details rather than things that establish her notability. What do you think ?

[[Special:Contributions/2409:4073:407:87A3:A5D2:149D:F793:FEA2|2409:4073:407:87A3:A5D2:149D:F793:FEA2]] ([[User talk:2409:4073:407:87A3:A5D2:149D:F793:FEA2|talk]]) 05:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:Please see [[WP:INN]] [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 08:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

::{{U|Sulfurboy}}, OK, keep that aside. What if it is independently analysed ? [[Special:Contributions/2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6|2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6]] ([[User talk:2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6|talk]]) 08:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:::I haven't analyzed it. I was pointing out the fallacy in you attempting to bring in another article's notability to compare to this one. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 08:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

::::It is said in the decline template ''If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors''. I came here because I did not got a reply from the reviewer, who now archived it. I can improve a draft only if a reviewer gives feedback on what to improve or what was the issue at the first place. And I don't think this reviewer is qualified enough to review drafts, because when I checked his contributions, out of 44 articles created 2 were deleted within the last 7 months through [[WP:AFD]] and [[WP:PROD]], and BLP articles created are weak. [[Special:Contributions/2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6|2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6]] ([[User talk:2409:4073:20C:64CD:8DDB:66E0:2B55:D7A6|talk]]) 09:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:::::Maybe people would be more willing to help you if you didn't attack other editors' credibility? {{shrug}} [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 09:18, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

::::::Maybe I wouldn't have done that if he did not insulted me by ignoring a decently worded discussion. No explanation ? It prompted me to check his credibility. [[Special:Contributions/2409:4073:405:3BA6:B4F1:94C3:2F8F:4A34|2409:4073:405:3BA6:B4F1:94C3:2F8F:4A34]] ([[User talk:2409:4073:405:3BA6:B4F1:94C3:2F8F:4A34|talk]]) 09:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:I re-reviewed the draft, checked the sources and I believe it passes GNG. Sources could be better, but plenty of them focus on the subject and have significant coverage. Plus, there's a whole lot of them, so there's no shortage of material to use. I didn't compare it to other articles, for the reason already mentioned above. I can see how the depth of sourcing can be disputed, but I think this falls on the side of notable. I don't know why the original reviewer did not reply to your query and just removed your message or what the history here may be. I understand AfC is frustrating and going through dozens of sources is mind-numbing. Anyway, in my opinion the subject is notable and that's my reason for approval after source check. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;[[user:Hellknowz|<span style="color: #B00;">HELL</span>KNOWZ]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;▎[[User talk:Hellknowz|TALK]]</small> 14:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

== 09:42:42, 7 March 2020 review of submission by Ltpicard ==

{{Lafc|username=Ltpicard|ts=09:42:42, 7 March 2020|declined=User:Ltpicard/sandbox}}

Links to sources added for more notability.

[[User:Ltpicard|Ltpicard]] ([[User talk:Ltpicard|talk]]) 09:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

== 09:46:56, 7 March 2020 review of submission by Johnjacksonblog ==

{{Lafc|username=Johnjacksonblog|ts=09:46:56, 7 March 2020|declined=Draft:Amschel_de_Rothschild_II}}

Amschel Rothschild is a public figure, he is a music entertainer who has fans who want to know about him. Please help me with creating this page.

[[User:Johnjacksonblog|Johnjacksonblog]] ([[User talk:Johnjacksonblog|talk]]) 09:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Johnjacksonblog}} The draft is a blatant promotional piece for Rothschild("greatest unknown producer of all time") and almost completely unsourced. Wikipedia has no interest in enhancing search results for him or in aiding his fans. Wikipedia has '''articles'''(not mere "pages") about subjects shown with significant coverage in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to meet Wikipedia's special definition of [[WP:N|notability]]; in this case, that of a [[WP:BIO|notable person]] or [[WP:BAND|notable singer]]. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] to learn more about creating a new article, the hardest task to undertake on Wikipedia. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

== 12:06:14, 7 March 2020 review of submission by Aditya belnekar07 ==

{{Lafc|username=Aditya belnekar07|ts=12:06:14, 7 March 2020|declined=Draft:Aditya_Belnekar}}

Plz review its a request its abput a public figure aditya belnekar he is indian Entrepreneur he is doing something great and he is verified on many social media sites therefore he must get a wikipedia page

[[User:Aditya belnekar07|Aditya belnekar07]] ([[User talk:Aditya belnekar07|talk]]) 12:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Aditya belnekar07}} Are you Aditya Belnekar? If you are not, you should not be using his name as your username, please change your username at [[Special:GlobalRenameRequest]]. Regarding the draft, the sources you have offered are completely inappropriate. Wikipedia articles should summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with ''significant coverage'' state about article subjects, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:N|notability]], in this case, the definition of [[WP:BIO|a notable person]]. Your sources seem to be fluff pieces about Mr. Belnekar or interviews with him, which are not acceptable for establishing notability. Having verified social media accounts is completely irrelevant. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] to learn more about creating an article- which is the hardest task on Wikipedia. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

== 16:32:06, 7 March 2020 review of draft by Porrohmann ==

{{Lafc|username=Porrohmann|ts=16:32:06, 7 March 2020|draft=Draft:Hurricane_Energy}}

I have drafted extensive changes to this article since 2nd January and ensured that all references are to independent sources. Hopefully the draft can now be re-reviewed approved and published?

[[User:Porrohmann|Porrohmann]] ([[User talk:Porrohmann|talk]]) 16:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Porrohmann}} A lot of the sources seem to be press releases or routine announcements, which does not establish notability(as they really aren't ''independent'' sources, even if republished). Please review Wikipedia's definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable business]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:54, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

== 17:07:37, 7 March 2020 review of submission by Callmeabhisheksingh ==

{{Lafc|username=Callmeabhisheksingh|ts=17:07:37, 7 March 2020|page=

}}

[[User:Callmeabhisheksingh|Callmeabhisheksingh]] ([[User talk:Callmeabhisheksingh|talk]]) 17:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)