Multiple-document interface: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:02, 2 June 2020

Latest revision as of 18:17, 2 July 2025

(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Type of software application interface}}{{Nf|date=August 2024}}[[Image:Some X windows.svg|thumb|An example of a multiple -document interface layout]]

{{multiple issues|

{{Unreferenced|date=August 2007}}

{{Weasel|date=January 2009}}

}}

[[Image:Some X windows.svg|thumb|An example of a multiple document interface layout]]

A '''multiple-document interface''' ('''MDI''') is a [[graphical user interface]] in which multiple windows reside under a single parent window. Such systems often allow child windows to embed other windows inside them as well, creating complex [[Hierarchy#Nested hierarchy|nested hierarchies]]. This contrasts with '''single-document interfaces''' ('''SDI''') where all windows are independent of each other.

Line 14 ⟶ 9:

Some applications allow the user to switch between these modes at their choosing, depending on personal preference or the task at hand.

Nearly all [[graphical user interface]] toolkits to date provide at least one solution for designing MDIs. A notable exception was [[Cocoa (API)|Apple's Cocoa API]] until the advent of tabbed window groups in [[MacOS High Sierra]]. The [[Java (programming language)|Java]] GUI toolkit, [[Swing (Java)|Swing]], for instance, provides the class {{Javadoc:SE|package=javax.swing|javax/swing|JDesktopPane|module=java.desktop}} which serves as a container for individual frames (class {{Javadoc:SE|package=javax.swing|javax/swing|JInternalFrame|module=java.desktop}}). [[GTK]] lacks any standardized support for MDI.

===Advantages===

* With multiple-document interfaces (and also [[tabbed document interface]]s), a single [[menu bar]] and/or [[toolbar]] is shared between all child windows, reducing clutter and increasing efficient use of screen space. This argument is less relevant on an operating system which uses a common menu bar.

* An application's child windows can be hidden/shown/minimized/maximized as a whole.

* Features such as "Tile" and "Cascade" can be implemented for the child windows.

* Authors of [[Cross-platform software|cross-platform]] applications can provide their users with consistent application behaviour between platforms.

* If the windowing environment and OS lack good window management, the application author can implement it themselves.

* Modularity: An advanced window manager can be upgraded independently of the applications.

Line 26 ⟶ 21:

===Disadvantages===

* Without an MDI frame window, floating toolbars from one application can clutter the workspace of other applications, potentially confusing users with the jumble of interfaces.

* Can be tricky to implement on desktops using multiple monitors as the parent window may need to span two or more monitors, hiding sections.

* [[Virtual desktop]]s cannot be spanned by children of the MDI. However, in some cases, this is solveablesolvable by initiating another parent window; this is the case in [[Opera (web browser)|Opera]] and [[Google Chrome|Chrome]], for example, which allows tabs/child windows to be dragged outside of the parent window to start their own parent window. In other cases, each child window is also a parent window, forming a new, "virtual" MDI [https://web.archive.org/web/20110818050252/http://hypotext.webs.com/web1.htm].

* MDI can make it more difficult to work with several applications at once, by restricting the ways in which windows from multiple applications can be arranged together without obscuring each other.

* The shared menu might change, which may cause confusion to some users. <!-- But if this is a common problem, why is it not a problem on OS X, where the menu bar is shared by ''all'' applications? Can someone actually cite studies on this subject? ( I agree to this comment --~~~~ ) -->

* MDI child windows behave differently from those in [[single -document interface]] applications, requiring users to learn two subtly different windowing concepts. Similarly, the MDI parent window behaves like the desktop in many respects, but has enough differences to confuse some users.

* Deeply nested, branching hierarchies of child windows can be confusing.

* Many window managers have built-in support for manipulating groups of separate windows, which is typically more flexible than MDI in that windows can be grouped and ungrouped arbitrarily. A typical policy is to group automatically windows that belong to the same application. This arguably makes MDI redundant by providing a solution to the same problem.

Line 36 ⟶ 31:

==Application examples==

* [[Adobe Acrobat]]: MDI until version 7.0 ([[Microsoft Windows|Windows]]-only); SDI default in 8.0 (configurable to MDI); SDI only in 9.0; MDI (with a tabbed interface) in version 2015.

* [[Corel Wordperfect]]: MDI. A user can open multiple instances of WP with a single document in each, if they have multiple versions of WordPerfect installed on their computer. Recent versions maintain a list of open documents for a given window on the status bar at the bottom of the window, providing a variant of the TDI.

* [[EmEditor]]: Options for either SDI or MDI.

* [[GIMP]]: SDI with floating windows (MDI is available as an option called "Single-Window Mode" since version 2.8 [http://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.8.html]).

* [[GIMPshop]]: A [[fork (software development)|fork]] of GIMP aiming to be more like Adobe Photoshop. The [[Microsoft Windows|Windows]] version has limited MDI.[https://web.archive.org/web/20050717005118/http://blog.yumdap.net/archives/20-GIMPshop-for-Windows.html]

* [[Google Chrome|Chrome]]: Combination of MDI and TDI.

* [[Internet Explorer 6]]: a typical SDI application

Line 46 ⟶ 41:

* [[Kate (text editor)|Kate]]: Text editor designed for the [[KDE Software Compilation]], with advanced features and a sophisticated MDI

* [[Macromedia Studio]] for Windows: a hybrid interface; TDI unless document windows are un-maximized. (They are maximized by default.)

* [[Microsoft Excel]] 2003: SDI if you start new instances of the application, but MDI if you click the "File ?→ New" menu (but child windows optionally appear on the OS taskbar). SDI only as of 2013.

* [[Microsoft Word]] 2003: MDI until [[Microsoft Office]] 97. After 2000, Word has a [[Multiple Top-Level Windows Interface]], thus exposing to shell individual SDI instances, while the operating system recognizes it as a single instance of an MDI application. In Word 2000, this was the only interface available, but 2002 and later offer MDI as an option. [[Microsoft Foundation Classes]] (which Office is loosely based on) supports this metaphor since version 7.0, as a new feature in [[Visual Studio]] 2002. SDI only as of 2013.

* [[Mozilla Firefox|Firefox]]: TDI by default, can be SDI

Line 57 ⟶ 52:

* [[Visual Studio|Visual Studio 6]] development environment: a typical modern MDI

* [[mIRC]]: MDI by default, can also work on SDI mode

* [[Adobe Photoshop]]: MDI under MS Windows. In newer versions, toolbars can move outside the frame window. Child windows can be outside the frame unless they are minimized or maximized.

<!---

===Classic examples===

This is a list of examples from back in the days of [[Windows 95]], and [[Windows 3.x]]

* [[Program Manager]]

* [[File Manager (Windows)|File Manager]]

<ref>d</ref>--->

==IDE-style interface==

Graphical computer applications with an '''[[Integrated development environment|IDE]]-style interface''' (IDE) are those whose child windows reside under a single parent window (usually with the exception of [[modal window]]s). An IDE-style interface is distinguishable from the Multiple -Document Interface (MDI), because all child windows in an IDE-style interface are enhanced with added functionality not ordinarily available in MDI applications. Because of this, IDE-style applications can be considered a functional superset and descendant of MDI applications.

Graphical computer applications with an '''[[Integrated development environment|IDE]]-style interface''' (IDE) are those whose child windows reside under a single parent window (usually with the exception of [[modal window]]s). An IDE-style interface is distinguishable from the Multiple Document Interface (MDI), because all child windows in an IDE-style interface are enhanced with added functionality not ordinarily available in MDI applications. Because of this, IDE-style applications can be considered a functional superset and descendant of MDI applications.

Examples of enhanced child-window functionality include:

Line 89 ⟶ 83:

* [[Visual Studio|Visual Studio 6]]

* [[Visual Studio .NET]]

* [[Visual Studio Code]]

* [[RSS Bandit]]

* [[JEdit]]

Line 94 ⟶ 89:

* [[Microsoft Excel]] when in MDI mode (see above).

== Macintosh ==

Mac OSMacOS and its GUI are document-centric instead of window-centric or application-centric. Every document window is an object with which the user can work. The menu bar changes to reflect whatever application the front window belongs to. Application windows can be hidden and manipulated as a group, and the user may switch between applications (i.e., groups of windows) or between individual windows, automatically hiding [[Palette window|palettes]], and most programs will stay running even with no open windows. Indeed, prior to [[Mac OS X]], it was purposely impossible to interleave windows from multiple applications.

In spite of this, some unusual applications breaking the [[human interface guidelines]] (most notably [[Photoshop]]) do exhibit different behavior.

==See also==

* [[Graphical user interface]]

* [[Comparison of document interfaces]]

* [[Tabbed document interface]]

* [[Tiling window manager]]

* [[Integrated development environment]]

* [[Center stage (user interface)]] - a user interface pattern used with single-document or IDE-style interfaces

==References==

* {{cite book | title=Human Computer Interaction | publisher=Laxmi Publications | year=2005 | isbn=978-81-7008-795-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lesSGjUsgTkC&pg=PA54 | ref={{sfnref | Laxmi Publications | 2005}} | access-date=2022-07-18}}

==External links==