Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:01, 2 June 2020

Latest revision as of 06:42, 2 September 2025

Line 1:

{{/header}}

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed|{{PAGENAME}}]]

{{skip to top and bottom}}

[[Category:Pages that should not be manually archived]]

[[Category:WikiProject Articles for creation]]

Line 8 ⟶ 9:

__TOC__

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/20202025 MayAugust 27}}

= MayAugust 28 =

== 03:32:0912, 28 MayAugust 20202025 review of submission by Khetarpals.aIanResearch ==

{{Lafc|username=Khetarpals.aIanResearch|ts=03:32:0912, 28 MayAugust 20202025|pagedraft=Draft:ZigZagZurich}}

Hi editors, just wanted to ask what I can do to improve my draft and write it in a way that is aligned with Wikipedia's guide and tone. Thank you! [[User:IanResearch|IanResearch]] ([[User talk:IanResearch|talk]]) 03:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:The draft just tells of the offerings and activities of the company; a Wikipedia article must do more, it must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the [[WP:ORG|special Wikipedia definition of a notable company]].

}}

:The awards are meaningless towards establishing notability; for an award to contribute to notability, it must itself merit an article(like [[Nobel Peace Prize]] or [[Academy Award]]). [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 05:28, 28 August 2025 review of submission by AndeHuang ==

[[User:Khetarpals.a|Khetarpals.a]] ([[User talk:Khetarpals.a|talk]]) 03:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=AndeHuang|ts=05:28, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Winmate Inc.}}

The draft has been declined multiple times. I have already revised the wording to make the tone more neutral, but it was still labeled as containing false information. Could you please review the draft and provide guidance on how to correct the issues and bring it in line with Wikipedia’s requirements? [[User:AndeHuang|AndeHuang]] ([[User talk:AndeHuang|talk]]) 05:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:I don't see where anyone has said it contains false information, but it does say that it appears to have been written by an AI/LLM.

:Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about a company and what it does, a Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:56, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 06:40, 28 August 2025 review of submission by 109.252.122.222 ==

i dont understand why is it said that I have violated the copyright. The article published on soolegal is written by me only, and I published the article there also. So how does this violate any copyright.

{{Lafc|username=109.252.122.222|ts=06:40, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Maxim_Lazarev}}

Good day!

Thank you for your work!

Help, as a professional, to correct this page, to work on it, so that it is acceptable for Wikipedia.

This is a famous Russian entomologist who studies the world fauna of longhorn beetles. For Wikipedia, such personalities are important, as for the world encyclopedia.

Help improve this page.

Maybe it should be shortened, and leave some small extract? Until new sources.

With respect. [[Special:Contributions/109.252.122.222|109.252.122.222]] ([[User talk:109.252.122.222|talk]]) 06:40, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If something changes in the future, you are welcome to edit the draft and then appeal to the rejecting reviewer. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Khetarpals.a}} If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy, you can license that text so that it can be republished elsewhere. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]].

:Even if you are able to establish a [[Wikipedia:COMPLIC|compatible license]], it likely will be impossible to use the text here. Material on that website has been written to encourage the hiring of an immigration attorney, a purpose which is fundamentally incompatible with Wikipedia. Writing an encyclopedia article is an entirely different undertaking. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 14:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 0508:10:1037, 28 MayAugust 20202025 review of submission by TerminalbudCasa Coto ==

{{Lafc|username=TerminalbudCasa Coto|ts=0508:10:1037, 28 MayAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Ine_Back_IversenOtto Bihler Maschinenfabrik}}

Hello Wikipedians, I'm kindly asking for advice. Many months ago, I created a draft on the Bihler company ([[Draft:Otto Bihler Maschinenfabrik]]). It has since been declined multiple times, but I don't quite understand why. It is said that [[WP:NCORP]] is not met. However, in that draft, I have demonstrated, using a source assessment table, why I believe that the Bihler company has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. I know that not every source that I have cited falls within the [[WP:SIRS]] criteria, but still, I feel that, the number of sources that do, is sufficient. It would be very helpful to have a second thought on this. Any advice is very much appreciated. Thank you! @ [[User:Novem Linguae]]. -- [[User:Casa Coto|Casa Coto]] ([[User talk:Casa Coto|talk]]) 08:37, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:I haven't done a detailed analysis yet, but if other reviewers are still declining it, maybe your source assessment table is being too generous. Do all your sources have 3 meaty paragraphs of detail about the company? Are they independent (i.e. no press releases disguised as articles, no articles that are mostly quotations, no [[advertorials]], etc)? Is at least one of the sources regional, national, or international? These are all things needed to pass [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]]. See also [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Nuances of GNG]] and [[User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Novem's words of wisdom]] #6. It's been 2 months since you submitted this... if you think it passes, maybe submit it again and add a comment asking for detailed source feedback in the event of a decline. Hope this helps. Good luck. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting a re-review of this article because the reasons given for it being declined feels both vague and simply untrue.

:cc {{u|Casa Coto}}. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 13:53, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

First of all it states I did not add sources after the second review, which i did and even made sure to write in the details of in the editing log.

:Comments on your assessment table:

Second of all, it says it sounds like a biography, i have just followed the way other biographies have been written on Wikipedia, but i personally don't know miss Iversen, so if the reviewer is indicating that I am not reliable enough to write this article because i don't actually know her then fair enough, but i was under the impression that anyone can write articles about someone as long as the sources of information is legit. and everything i have found for this article is directly translated from online articles and magazines i have found and they are all added linked in the source section.

:* You list the Hesse source as secondary, but describe it as an encyclopedia. That means it's a tertiary source.

[[User:Terminalbud|Terminalbud]] ([[User talk:Terminalbud|talk]]) 05:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:* You assess four sources in total to meet the criteria of reliable, independent, and significant coverage. Those would be good sources, but...

:* it isn't clear that they provide significant coverage of the company, its products, the punch-bending process, or Otto Bihler himself. Those are four different topics, and this draft is about ''one'' topic. For example, the Kolbe source discusses the technology and how the machine works, but what about the company, which is the topic of this draft?

:The assessment table is a great start, but reading it only brings up more questions. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 15:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

::<small>Quick note that in my experience, tertiary sources are usually accepted as counting towards GNG. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 15:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>

:::<small>I wasn't saying that they aren't acceptable, although our policies recommend using them more to assess due weight. I was just pointing out an error in the table. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 16:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)</small>

== 12:11, 28 August 2025 review of submission by 78.150.201.201 ==

:{{ping|Terminalbud}} Between the second review on 5 March and the reject on 9 May, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3AIne_Back_Iversen&type=revision&diff=944773880&oldid=944076017 you made two edits] to the draft. Those edits did not add any sources. What you say above is simply untrue.

{{Lafc|username=78.150.201.201|ts=12:11, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Fusion_candle}}

:The problems identified in the first two reviews have not been fixed. The first section, for example, cites IMDB and an article in ''[[Halden Arbeiderblad]]''. IMDb, being user-generated, is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. The ''Halden Arbeiderblad'' article supports only that she graduated from NISS in 2011-2012, which is a small part of the section. If you aren't being employed by Iversen to write this, then reviewers will wonder where you got information like: {{tq|"Iversen grew up on the countryside of Norway before she moved to the City Trondheim where she studied ... from 2007 to 2009. This is also where she started her hosting career as a main host for the weekly show, created for and by students, Student Magasinet."}}

Because I cannot find any more references to fusion candles [[Special:Contributions/78.150.201.201|78.150.201.201]] ([[User talk:78.150.201.201|talk]]) 12:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Six of the inline citations are split between ''Halden Arbeiderblad'' and ''{{ill|Kampanje|no}}''. Possibly they could form the foundation of a draft. But the remaining citations do nothing to establish notability. Seven are to TV2 and NRK Radio, which are her employers, so not independent (they have a vested interest in promoting her). VGTV is an interview without analysis by the interviewer, it's Iversen in Iversen's words, so not independent. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 15:30, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:Then this topic doesn't merit an article at this time. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 07:07:59, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88 ==

{{Lafc|username=70.59.84.88|ts=07:07:59, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Catchfood}}

[[Special:Contributions/70.59.84.88|70.59.84.88]] ([[User talk:70.59.84.88|talk]]) 07:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 09:08:54, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Abhinavsidharth ==

{{Lafc|username=Abhinavsidharth|ts=09:08:54, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:ExpertRec}}

Can I know which of the citations are reliable and which of them I should take off? Also, how many more reliable citations do I need?

[[User:Abhinavsidharth|Abhinavsidharth]] ([[User talk:Abhinavsidharth|talk]]) 09:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:Hi {{U|Abhinavsidharth}}. None of the citations are to independent, [[WP:RS|reliable]], secondary sources containing significant coverage of the company; all of them should be removed. The draft doesn't need a greater ''quantity'' of citations. The topic would need higher ''quality'' citations to demonstrate [[WP:NCORP|notability]] (suitability for inclusion in the encyclopedia). The reviewer's analysis is that no good sources exist, so no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable, and volunteers do not intend to review it again. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 19:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 09:37:47, 28 May 2020 review of submission by LuckyAnimations ==

{{Lafc|LuckyAnimations=LuckyAnimations|ts=09:37:47, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:'_(film)}}

Because It is my favorite movie and there is no info about it, anywhere. You ca only see it in the cinemas.

[[User:LuckyAnimations|LuckyAnimations]] ([[User talk:LuckyAnimations|talk]]) 09:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|LuckyAnimations}} If there's no info about it, then it's not [[WP:NOTE|notable]]. [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 09:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 10:34:13, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 2A02:587:DC14:8500:3D09:D167:1416:1B90 ==

{{Lafc|username=2A02:587:DC14:8500:3D09:D167:1416:1B90|ts=10:34:13, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Vasileios_Diagoumas}}{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hey I want to know why want to delete the Vasileios Diagoumas article? If you search on the internet you will see many articles of that person, please answer me so I can know what you think

:The page hasn't been deleted yet. The submission was declined because [[WP:NPERSON|the submission didn't indicate how the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines]]. Note that many Youtubers dont meet them. You can read [[Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 17:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:15:13, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Dbloom81 ==

{{Lafc|username=Dbloom81|ts=14:15:13, 28 May 2020|page=

Draft: Underberg & Kessler LLP

}}

Hi, I was looking for some help. My article got rejected with the comment that Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION or WP:ADVERTISEMENT - I crafted my page around this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_Beach. The company this linked article is about is also a law firm, and I structured it in a very similar way. I was wondering what that article does differently versus what I did, and what I have to change to get my article accepted. All help in this regard would be greatly appreaciated!

[[User:Dbloom81|Dbloom81]] ([[User talk:Dbloom81|talk]]) 14:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, {{U|Dbloom81}}, The [[Harris Beach]] article was an unfortunate choice of model -- it is tagged as being promotional, and its [[WP:N|notability]] has been challenged. it may be significantly rewritten or even deleted in the near future.

:The key issue here is [[WP:N|notability]] (a term which Wikipedia uses in a special sence. See [[WP:NCORP|our guideline o9n the notability of companies]] and [[WP:CORPDEPTH]]. In general an article should demonstrate the notability of the topic by including citations to multiple [[WP:IS|independent]] published [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that each discuss the topic in [[WP:SIGCOV|some depth and detail]]. In the current draft:

:* ref 1 is to the firms o0wn web site -- not independent.

:* Ref 2 is to bestlawfirms, which ranks firms but gives no details -- no significant coverage.

:* Ref 3 is to a ''Rochester Business Journal'' article behind a paywall, so I cannot evaluate it. But it would be only one source at best.

:* Ref 4 is to a list of articvles written '''by''' (not about) a firm member in the '' NY Daily Record'' -- not independent, and no significant coverage of the firm.

:* Ref 5 is the same as ref 4, for a different member of the firm

:In short, none of these (except possibly the ''Rochester Business Journal'' article, has anything to demonstrate the notability oif this firm. News coverage or other '''independent''' writing '''about''' (no9t by) the firm would be needed. Not blogs, not passing mentions or directory entries, and not anything based on PR from the firm.

:The secondary issue here is promotion. The lists (with no detail) of areas of practice and office locations do not add much to the encyclopedic value of teh text, and do have a flavo9r of promotion. The areas of practice in particular should probably go, unless there are noted achievements in some of them that are discussed by indentation sources in some detail. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 22:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:24:11, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 27.4.7.178 ==

{{Lafc|username=27.4.7.178|ts=14:24:11, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Kritn_Ajitesh}}

[[Special:Contributions/27.4.7.178|27.4.7.178]] ([[User talk:27.4.7.178|talk]]) 14:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

{{SAFESUBST:Void|<!--

When you have finished, click the "Publish changes" button or your request will not be posted!!!-->}just give me few more changes to make please to all administrators.

Let me Put all relevant sources once again please .

And do help me with it requesting all

== 14:27:29, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Swasti Salecha ==

{{Lafc|username=Swasti Salecha|ts=14:27:29, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:SAATH_CHARITABLE_TRUST}}

Because I am not given any particular reason as to why my article is rejected. Please explain me and share the details since I am doing all this for the first time.

[[User:Swasti Salecha|Swasti Salecha]] ([[User talk:Swasti Salecha|talk]]) 14:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:It was rejected because it is a blatant advertisement sourced to their own website. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 14:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

::See further the answer I gave at the [[WP:TH|Teahouse]]. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 14:42, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:31:42, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Tauqir baig ==

{{Lafc|username=Tauqir baig|ts=14:31:42, 28 May 2020|declined=User:Tauqir_baig/sandbox}}

[[User:Tauqir baig|Tauqir baig]] ([[User talk:Tauqir baig|talk]]) 14:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Tauqir baig}} This isn't even close to being an article. Please note that [[WP:NOTSOCIAL|Wikipedia is not a social network]]. You can read [[WP:YFA]] for information about writing your first article. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 17:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 15:15:20, 28 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA ==

{{Lafc|username=SONGEZO SA|ts=15:15:20, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Tshego}}

[[User:SONGEZO SA|SONGEZO SA]] ([[User talk:SONGEZO SA|talk]]) 15:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 15:43:02, 28 May 2020 review of draft by RoyBuchanan ==

{{Lafc|username=RoyBuchanan|ts=15:43:02, 28 May 2020|draft=Draft:112_Drive-In}}

Hello! I am trying to create a basic Wiki page for the 112 Drive-In movie theater in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Doing so would start the process of beginning to link to it on other Wiki pages that list remaining drive-in theaters in America (there are only about 330 left in the country), so it can be easily found by people seeking such information. My submission was rejected, and I was told, "The sources you currently have don't demonstrate any particular importance." However, I feel as though the establishment itself — which is the oldest remaining drive-in in the state, and one of only three left in the entire state — demonstrates particular importance in and of itself, due to its rarity, and that needing to provide such a description from a source, which I am unable to find via Google Books, local/state media, etc., will keep me from creating the page.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

[[User:RoyBuchanan|RoyBuchanan]] ([[User talk:RoyBuchanan|talk]]) 15:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|RoyBuchanan}} first of all, your draft was declined, not rejected. I am going to ping the reviewer, {{re|Sam-2727}} as I am not that comfortable with special notability stuff like here. Howewer, for the sources of your draft:

* #1 appears to be a directory listing, I am unsure if its [[WP:RS|reliable]] but most are not

* #2 could be useable

* #3 is a book I wasn't able to check right now, but it could be. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 17:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

*:{{u|RoyBuchanan}} all of what {{u|Victor Schmidt}} says is correct. #3 I would doesn't indicate notability because it's a list of drive in theaters in the United States. Surely not every drive in theater is notable or deserves a Wikipedia article! If it is indeed a "rarity" then there are likely news articles that discuss it in the depth. Looking up "112 drive-in" (with quotes) on google finds plenty of sources. Just add these sources and you should be good to go. An interesting direction you could take here is mentioning the drive-in theater during COVID-19. It seems that there are a lot of news articles online that discuss that. [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 17:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

*::You can of course submit your article again once you add these sources. [[User:Sam-2727|Sam-2727]] ([[User talk:Sam-2727|talk]]) 17:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 16:19:51, 28 May 2020 review of draft by S.elrefaie ==

{{Lafc|username=S.elrefaie|ts=16:19:51, 28 May 2020|draft=User:S.elrefaie/sandbox}}

[[User:S.elrefaie|S.elrefaie]] ([[User talk:S.elrefaie|talk]]) 16:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|S.elrefaie}} your draft currently does not establish how this subject meets [[WP:NMUSIC]]. You have a single [[WP:INDEPENDENT|non-independent]] source linked. We require at least three [[WP:RS|reliable]], independent sources. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 17:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 16:24:25, 28 May 2020 review of submission by 2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403 ==

{{Lafc|username=2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403|ts=16:24:25, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Matthew_Chen}}

[[Special:Contributions/2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403|2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403]] ([[User talk:2601:646:4201:AE40:75D7:9382:98A7:2403|talk]]) 16:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

The topic is notable enough, as it is searchable on all streaming platforms, and you can find It on many social media sites. There is also already a Google knowledge panel on the topic.

:Social media networks are not eigible for establishing [[WP:NPERSON|notability]]. Please read [[WP:42]] for what wikipedia looks for. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 17:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 17:45:54, 28 May 2020 review of submission by BristolAlex ==

{{Lafc|username=BristolAlex|ts=17:45:54, 28 May 2020|page=

Draft:Noah_Fischer

}}

Hello, my submission of this draft was declined. It said it's not "qualified" and doesn't meet the formal tone.

The draft is a 1:1-translation from the German article about the same person, which was approved and is online for quite a while now. I know that the two Wikipedias are different things, nevertheless I don't have a clue what to improve. IMO it is written in a formal, neutral tone and every detail has got a reference to it.

Thank you very much for your help.

[[User:BristolAlex|BristolAlex]] ([[User talk:BristolAlex|talk]]) 17:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{U|BristolAlex}} Non neutral content includes "the saxophonist with the famous german musician", "participated on the highly successful albums", "at the renowned", "taking place in the sold-out „Stadthalle Sigmaringen", " multifaceted and versatile". [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 18:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 19:16:57, 28 May 2020 review of submission by Coder196 ==

{{Lafc|username=Coder196|ts=19:16:57, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Fengqi_You}}

The page has been substantially revised to meet Wikipedia's rules. Please re-review and provide advice. Thank you!

[[User:Coder196|Coder196]] ([[User talk:Coder196|talk]]) 19:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

== 19:27:17, 28 May 2020 review of submission by মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার ==

{{Lafc|username=মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার|ts=19:27:17, 28 May 2020|declined=Draft:Nurunnahar}}

[[User:মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার|মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার]] ([[User talk:মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার|talk]]) 19:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{Uমোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার|মোছাঃ নূরুন্নাহার}} [[Draft6:Nurunnahar]] does not cite any [[WP:IS|independent sources]] There is nothing in it to indicate that the subject is [[WP:N|notable]]. In particular it does not indicate that this person comes close to meeting the criteria in [[WP:NACTOR|our guideline on notability for actors]] or [[WP:GNG|our general notability guideline]]. Most professional actors are '''not''' notable, and will not have Wikipedia articles. Unless there are multiple, professionally published [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that each discuss Nurunnahar in depth and that are independent of him, or unless he fulfills one of the other criteria of [[WP:NACTOR]] (which does not seem to be the case) he is not notable at this time, and there will not be an accepted article, no matter how it is written. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 21:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

= May 29 =

== 05:26:21, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Kary591995 ==

{{Lafc|username=Kary591995|ts=05:26:21, 29 May 2020|declined=User:Kary591995/sandbox}}

Hello everyone there is a channel on YouTube named as "Kdt cool games" it deals with the tutorial of how to play a certain game and it also include gameplay.

[[User:Kary591995|Kary591995]] ([[User talk:Kary591995|talk]]) 05:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 05:50:06, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Cirinsusaki ==

{{Lafc|username=Cirinsusaki|ts=05:50:06, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Otonashi_Shrine}}

== 14:57, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Aras2025 ==

{{Lafc|username=Aras2025|ts=14:57, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Radio_Duhok}}

Hello,

My article has been dismissed for the following reason : This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

I used Japanese sources, that I translated myself from Wikipedia and the sources shown in the Japanese page.

Unfortunately except Japanese sources, there are no English sources on the Internet. Are Japanese sources not seen as "reliable sources"?

Thank you in advance,

Cirinsusaki

[[User:Cirinsusaki|Cirinsusaki]] ([[User talk:Cirinsusaki|talk]]) 05:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:00:05, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88 ==

{{Lafc|username=70.59.84.88|ts=06:00:05, 29 May 2020|declined=Draft:Catchfood}}

[[Special:Contributions/70.59.84.88|70.59.84.88]] ([[User talk:70.59.84.88|talk]]) 06:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:13:47, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88 ==

{{Lafc|username=70.59.84.88|ts=06:13:47, 29 May 2020|declined=Draft:Catchfood}}

can you please check my draft

[[Special:Contributions/70.59.84.88|70.59.84.88]] ([[User talk:70.59.84.88|talk]]) 06:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

:Stop asking. This is the third time in two days that you asked about this draft. Note to other reviewers: based on this question and the draft's history I suspect the IP to be a sockpuppet of the [[User:Adam Naa]]-complex. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 18:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 09:26:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA ==

{{Lafc|username=SONGEZO SA|ts=09:26:41, 29 May 2020|declined=Draft:Tshego}}

[[User:SONGEZO SA|SONGEZO SA]] ([[User talk:SONGEZO SA|talk]]) 09:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|SONGEZO SA}} You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that there is little to no chance that it can be improved enough to meet Wikipedia's standards. Please review the advice you were given by the reviewers. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 10:39:47, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Uros77 ==

{{Lafc|username=Uros77|ts=10:39:47, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Vega_IT_Sourcing}}

Hi,

I would need help to get my draft reviewed. Im not sure if everything is okay and as it should be. I did everything I was suggested. Can you help me? :)

[[User:Uros77|Uros77]] ([[User talk:Uros77|talk]]) 10:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 11:50:18, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Benedict2005 ==

{{Lafc|username=Benedict2005|ts=11:50:18, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Baldivis_Secondary_College}}

Hello this is Benedict2005, and I am requesting help to deliver a message to the reviewers of wikipedia regarding my Draft Article "Baldivis Secondary college" I am a student who attends Baldivis Secondary College and have gathered as much information of the school to the draft article. Is it possible that because i attend there and have gathered as much information regarding the school to the article, that i also prove that my referencing are not just non-noteable and just passing mentions? I have gathered as much information regarding the college and im certain that there is no Bias, nor false information.

Thank you.

[[User:Benedict2005|Benedict2005]] ([[User talk:Benedict2005|talk]]) 11:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 12:39:08, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 87.238.210.51 ==

{{Lafc|username=87.238.210.51|ts=12:39:08, 29 May 2020|declined=Draft:Ferizaj24}}

[[Special:Contributions/87.238.210.51|87.238.210.51]] ([[User talk:87.238.210.51|talk]]) 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:05:59, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Saitoti Torome ==

{{Lafc|username=Saitoti Torome|ts=14:05:59, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Saitoti_Torome}}

[[User:Saitoti Torome|Saitoti Torome]] ([[User talk:Saitoti Torome|talk]]) 14:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:56:56, 29 May 2020 review of draft by 1freedom ==

{{Lafc|username=1freedom|ts=14:56:56, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Mo_Asumang}}

Hallo,

I want to create the english wikipedia site for filmdirector, acrtress Mo Asumang.

She already has a german and frensh site.

Since I do not see the site published yet I am not sure if I worked correct.

Would you be so kind and give me a short feedback, thanx.

Bye for now,

1freedom

[[User:1freedom|1freedom]] ([[User talk:1freedom|talk]]) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, {{U|1freedom}}. [[Draft:Mo Asumang]] has not yet been submitted for review, so it hasn't been reviewed. But if it were submitted as it now stands it would not be accepted. The draft does not cite any sources at all, and it does not in any way establish that Asumang is [[WP:N|Notable]]. Please understand that Wikipedia uses the term "notable" in a special technical sense, follow the link for details. The most common way to establish a person's notability is to find and cite multiple (usually at least 3) [[WP:IS|independent]] professionally published [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that discuss the person in [[WP:SIGCOV|some depth and detail]]. This means no blogs, no fan or personal sites, and nothing written by the person or her employer or buisness associates, or based on a press release. it also means that directory entries, and brief mentions in discussions of other matters, film credits without critical comment, and the like, are of no value in establishing notability. Please follow the blue links for details. Please find and add sources that are independent of Asumang, reliable, and discuss her in detail before submitting this for review.

:Please understand that having an article on the German and French language editions of Wikipedia in no way qualifies a person for an article on the English-language edition -- the projects are separate, with different polices and customs. Nor can the other Wikipedia articles be used as sources, although sources cited in them can often be used. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 16:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|1freedom}} (edit conflict) First of all, all different Wikipedia languages are different projects with their own set of rules, so the existence of an article in one project cannot be cited as an argument for the existence in another. For your draft:

* It currently cites zero [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and therefore fails the [[WP:VER|verifiability policy]].

* [[WP:BLUE|It makes excessive use of links]]. Please only link the important stuff where a link will be usefull for the reader

* "brave" is [[WP:PUFFERY]] and doesn't belong in an encyclopedic article. We want to maintain a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]].

* I have fixed the image transclusion for you. Here on enwiki, you use "File:" instead of "Datei:" and "thumb" instead of "mini". The latter ones are project-specific (here for the german wikipedia) while the former work global.

: I am going to link you [[User:Ian.thomson/Howto]], a guide on how to write articles that wont be declined, rejected or deleted. Since your draft is only one sentence so far, there isn't much to save. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

== 17:52:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Daimen Carter (Musician) ==

{{Lafc|username=Victorysriram|ts=17:52:41, 29 May 2020|page=

Draft:Daimen Carter (Musician)

}}

[[User:Daimen Carter (Musician)|Daimen Carter (Musician)]] ([[User talk:Daimen Carter (Musician)|talk]]) 17:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello my article was not approved. I need further help

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daimen_Carter_(Musician)

:{{re|Victorysriram}} Assuming this is about [[Draft:Daimen Carter (Musician)]], [[WP:USERG|blogs and forums are not reliable sources]] and stuff [[WP:INDEPENDENT|written by the subject or someone affilated with the subject]] also don't help to establish [[WP:NPERSON|notability]]. Note that [[WP:COI|if you are affilated with the subject in anyway]] or [[WP:PAID|are compensated or expect compensation for your edits]] there are some declarations to make. The latter would be a [[:wmf:Terms of Use|Terms of Use]] requirement. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 18:15:42, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6 ==

{{Lafc|username=2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6|ts=18:15:42, 29 May 2020|page=

}}

[[Special:Contributions/2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6|2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6]] ([[User talk:2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6|talk]]) 18:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Mission Jaihind , ?? India's leading newspaper

== 20:05:32, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Mtennysdotter ==

{{Lafc|username=Mtennysdotter|ts=20:05:32, 29 May 2020|draft=Draft:Darren_Prince}}

Can someone please look over my https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Darren_Prince and give me some feedback? I feel stuck at what else to add.

[[User:Mtennysdotter|Mtennysdotter]] ([[User talk:Mtennysdotter|talk]]) 20:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

= May 30 =

== 00:08:09, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Mtennysdotter ==

{{Lafc|username=Mtennysdotter|ts=00:08:09, 30 May 2020|draft=Draft:Darren_Prince}}

Not sure how to proceed or what to add. Thought I wrote the article objective but getting feedback that it's not. Can someone help me improve it? It's my first one I do.

[[User:Mtennysdotter|Mtennysdotter]] ([[User talk:Mtennysdotter|talk]]) 00:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{on hold}} pending paid editing disclosure, see [[User talk:Mtennysdotter#Declare any connection]]. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 13:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 00:12:39, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Chicago20092016 ==

{{Lafc|username=Chicago20092016|ts=00:12:39, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:Fengqi_You}}

The page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fengqi_You) has been substantially revised to meet Wikipedia's rules. It is significantly shorten, and all possible violations to copyrights are removed. Could you please re-review and provide advice? Thank you!

[[User:Chicago20092016|Chicago20092016]] ([[User talk:Chicago20092016|talk]]) 00:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== Draft:British Nuclear Medicine Society ==

== 01:13:42, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Earthianyogi ==

{{Lafc|username=Earthianyogi|ts=01:13:42, 30 May 2020|draft=Draft:British_Nuclear_Medicine_Society}}

Hi, This article has been declined three times, and I am not sure why it does not fulfil the notability requirements. I have read this wiki link:

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:British_Nuclear_Medicine_Society .

However, I am not sure why the following list is not enough? What more an organisation needs to demonstrate enough notability? My article is very similar to another article successfully published on Wikipedia with only 10 references - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Association_of_Nuclear_Medicine

{{cot|title=References}}

'''JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS/CONFERENCE POSTERS:'''

1. Competencies and training of radiographers and technologists for PET/MR imaging - a study from the UK MR-PET network" European Journal of Hybrid Imaging. 4 (1): 1. doi:10.1186/s41824-019-0070-6. ISSN2510-3636. (2020).

2. Clinical trials in molecular radiotherapy—Tribulations and Triumphs Report of the NCRI CTRad meeting held at the Lift Islington, 8 June 2018 : https://www.birpublications.org/doi/abs/10.1259/bjr.20190117?journalCode=bjr

3. Evaluation of Radiopharmaceutical Adverse Reaction Reports to the British Nuclear Medicine Society from 2007 to 2016: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/58/12/2010.short

4. Quality assurance in myocardial perfusion tomography: a collaborative BNCS/BNMS audit programme. British Nuclear Cardiology Society/British nuclear Medicine Society. https://europepmc.org/article/med/10581589

5. A survey of nuclear cardiological practice in Great Britain https://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/67/3/273.full.pdf

6. Global shortage of medical isotopes threatens nuclear medicine services BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1577 (Published 05 September 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1577

7. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence: A consensus conference organised by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society and the British Nuclear Medicine Society, endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Radiologists https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5

8. The radiation dose to ward nurses from patients having nuclear medicine investigations: https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=18036859

9. Improving information for nuclear medicine department outpatients. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8047325

10. Hogg P, Holmes K. The interpretation of nuclear medicine data by non-medical health care professionals: Developments in the United Kingdom. Journal of Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging. 2000; 3: 77–85.

11. Audit of nuclear medicine scientific and technical standards: Nuclear Medicine Communications: August 2004 - Volume 25 - Issue 8 - p 771-775; https://journals.lww.com/nuclearmedicinecomm/Abstract/2004/08000/Audit_of_nuclear_medicine_scientific_and_technical.3.aspx

12. Evidence-based indications for the use of PET-CT in the United Kingdom 2016. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/27207376

13. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence: https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC2562441&blobtype=pdf

14, Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service: clinical and business aspects. https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC1876393&blobtype=pdf

15. Guidelines for the provision of radiopharmacy support to nuclear medicine. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/12744229

16. Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling. Nuclear Medicine Communications: August 2004 - Volume 25 - Issue 8 - p 759-769. https://journals.lww.com/nuclearmedicinecomm/Abstract/2004/08000/Guidelines_for_the_measurement_of_glomerular.2.aspx

17. The new BNMS guidelines for measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Nuclear Medicine Communications, 01 Aug 2004, 25(8):755-757DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000136714.77658.4a PMID: 15266168

18. Isotope shortage is limiting nuclear medicine across Europe. BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1575 (Published 05 September 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1575; https://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a1575.extract

19. Guidelines for the Provision of Physics Support to Nuclear Medicine; Nuclear Medicine Communications, 1999, 20, 781–787; http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.6208&rep=rep1&type=pdf

20. Nuclear medicine in district general hospitals. Br Med J 1979; 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6201.1336 (Published 24 November 1979)

'''BNMS STAFF RELATED POST:'''

21. BNMS Vision - British Nuclear Medicine Society". www.bnms.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

22. McCready, Ralph; Gnanasegaran, Gopinath; Bomanji, Jamshed B. (9 March 2016). A History of Radionuclide Studies in the UK: 50th Anniversary of the British Nuclear Medicine Society. ISBN25. McCready, V. Ralph (2019-11-01). "The 70th anniversary of automated radionuclide imaging". European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 46 (12): 2414–2417. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04413-5. ISSN1619-7089.

'''UK GOVT'''

23. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880548/ARSAC_NfG_Apr_2020.pdf

24. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/134202/bma-briefing-euratom-and-brexit.pdf

'''BOOKS:'''

25. Hamilton, David (David I.), 1951- (2011). Diagnostic nuclear medicine: a physics perspective. Springer. p.318. ISBN. OCLC1065219450.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) pg. 373

26. Sharp, Peter F. (2005). Practical Nuclear Medicine. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. p.65. ISBN. OCLC300259694.

27. Feld, Michael; Roo, Michel de (2003). History of Nuclear Medicine in Europe. p.81. ISBN.Festschrift – the Institute of Nuclear Medicine: 50 Years. 23 October 2011. ISBN. Pg 33.“The University of Leeds Review". 1987. Pg 278

'''REPORTS:'''

28. Royal College of Physician: Hybrid imaging guidance on legislative, reporting and training aspects Read the guidance". RCP London. 2016-11-25. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

29. The society of Radiographers: Covid-19 nuclear medicine recovery guidance | Society of Radiographers". www.sor.org. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

30. No-deal Brexit guidance for nuclear medicine teams | The Royal College of Radiologists". www.rcr.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-05.

'''BLOG:'''

31. Nottingham University: “Far more talent than we counted on". Postgraduate Placements. 2019-10-21. Retrieved 2020-05-05.http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/postgraduateplacements/2019/10/21/far-more-talent-

than-we-counted-on/

32. ECMC: https://www.ecmcnetwork.org.uk/news/announcement/cert-welcomes-support-british-nuclear-medicine-society

'''AWARDS:'''

33. The PET Centre". www.sthpetcentre.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

34. King's College London.mp4, retrieved 2020-05-29

35. IPEM > About IPEM > Prizes and Awards > IPEM Members winning external awards". www.ipem.ac.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

36. https://www.uhs.nhs.uk/ContactUs/Directoryofconsultants/Consultants-by-service/Radiology-scans-and-imaging-consultants/SaadDrZia.aspx

{{cob}}

Thank you for your help.

[[User:Earthianyogi|Earthianyogi]] ([[User talk:Earthianyogi|talk]]) 01:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Earthianyogi|Earthianyogi]] ([[User talk:Earthianyogi|talk]]) 01:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Earthianyogi}} the concerns aren't about the count of references, its about their type. Wikipedia reqires [[WP:RS|reliable]] [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] sources for establishing notability. I haven't checked them all, but [[WP:SELFPUB|stuff written by the subject or the article (or persons working at the subject of the article]] are not accepted. (and btw said page has 5 references, at least 2 of them appearing reliable and independent) [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Victor Schmidt}}, thank you. I initially thought so. But when my article got rejected a couple times, I am forced to think that numbers do matter. [[User:Earthianyogi|Earthianyogi]] ([[User talk:Earthianyogi|talk]]) 15:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 01:45:06, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Watermelen ==

{{Lafc|username=Watermelen|ts=01:45:06, 30 May 2020|page=

}}

[[User:Watermelen|Watermelen]] ([[User talk:Watermelen|talk]]) 01:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Why was my draft about Lydia Palmatier declined?

:{{ping|Watermelen}} As stated on [[Draft:Lydia Palmatier]] and on your user page, the draft fails to show that Palmatier is [[WP:BIO|notable]] (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, your family, or your friends. Its articles are not a [[WP:NOTFANSITE|place to express your opinions]]. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 13:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 03:04:57, 30 May 2020 review of submission by 2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E ==

{{Lafc|username=2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E|ts=03:04:57, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:Mic_Neumann}}

This is my first complete article to be written from scratch and entered for submission. I know I am not very good at it yet, but I am trying hard to get better by taking the advice given and making the changes suggested. I feel like I might have gotten it right this time, which is why I am requesting a re-review, but I know that I need others to feel the same way for it to be able to actually be published, so please let me thank you all who have helped me for both your great patience and continued kind consideration. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E|2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E]] ([[User talk:2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E|talk]]) 03:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

[[Special:Contributions/2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E|2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E]] ([[User talk:2601:8C:C100:CE62:1150:B1CB:5D96:EC5E|talk]]) 03:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:Pinging {{re|1292simon}} as the reviewer who rejected. For the talkpage: I wasn't able to check the first two sources, but for the third one could argue that it is not [[WP:SIGCOV]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

::Hi {{u|Victor Schmidt}}. Thanks for checking. I am happy for the article to be re-submitted now, so that someone else can review it. Cheers, [[User:1292simon|1292simon]] ([[User talk:1292simon|talk]]) 00:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:11:39, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Benedict2005 ==

{{Lafc|username=Benedict2005|ts=06:11:39, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:The_Goodwin_Family}}

Im sorry if the wikipedia Article i created (The Goodwin Family) for review was not pleasing, or appropriate. However, is it ok to still work on my Article and still submit it for review if i just remove the "Place of Memorials"? The Goodwin family are in fact a significant family for the Titanic.

[[User:Benedict2005|Benedict2005]] ([[User talk:Benedict2005|talk]]) 06:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:Hi {{U|Benedict2005}}. Removing some small part is unlikely to transform the draft from a [[WP:NOTMEMORIAL|memorial]] into an encyclopedia article. The first source is a dead link. The second is a personal blog, so not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. ''Find-a-grave'' is a generally unreliable source. ''Encyclopedia Titanica'' is user-generated content, so not a reliable source either, see the [[WP:RSN]] archives. To continue working on the draft you would need to blow it up and start over from scratch, using [[WP:HISTRS|reliable sources for history]], like books from academic publishers.

:Wikipedia has some articles about [[:Category:RMS Titanic's crew and passengers|RMS Titanic's crew and passengers]], and possibly another one could be acceptable. However, the overwhelming majority of people involved will never meet the encyclopedia's [[WP:BIO|notability]] guidelines (inclusion criteria). Given the popularity of the topic and the number of Wikipedia editors, you can assume that articles about the most clearly notable people already exist. None of those articles is very good. Your time might be better spent improving an existing article instead of trying to create a new one. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 13:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:18:20, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Saileshkolanu ==

{{Lafc|username=Saileshkolanu|ts=06:18:20, 30 May 2020|page=

Sailesh Kolanu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Saileshkolanu

}}

I am unable to create a biography page.

[[User:Saileshkolanu|Saileshkolanu]] ([[User talk:Saileshkolanu|talk]]) 06:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Saileshkolanu}} Writing an autobiographical article (not just a "page") is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, please see the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]]. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, that's what social media is for. Wikipedia summarizes only what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of [[WP:N|notability]](in this case, that of a [[WP:DIRECTOR|notable creative professional]] like a director). If you truly meet that criteria, independent editors will eventually take note of you and your work and write about you.

:Please also note that a Wikipedia article is [[WP:PROUD|not necessarily desirable]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 17:15:09, 30 May 2020 review of draft by Hana Moh HN ==

{{Lafc|username=Hana Moh HN|ts=17:15:09, 30 May 2020|draft=Draft:Nasser_Al-Aswadi}}

For the Draft:Nasser Al-Aswadi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nasser_Al-Aswadi

Mr.1292simon put this question for me: This BLP does not include events that pass Wikipedia's notability thresholds. Does the WP:SPA author have a COI that should be disclosed?

I am from Yemen, and I am interested in writing about artists in my country. This artist is a famous artist who has many artworks that you can search about and find on the internet. His exhibitions international ones. I hope you confirm it to be published.

[[User:Hana Moh HN|Hana Moh HN]] ([[User talk:Hana Moh HN|talk]]) 17:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 17:31:17, 30 May 2020 review of submission by YiruoLiu ==

{{Lafc|username=YiruoLiu|ts=17:31:17, 30 May 2020|page=

OpenResty Inc.

}}

I was wondering why my submission was declined? I'm aware that there is already an OpenResty wikipedia page, but OpenResty and OpenResty Inc. are different things.

[[User:YiruoLiu|YiruoLiu]] ([[User talk:YiruoLiu|talk]]) 17:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:Hi {{U|YiruoLiu}}. As stated on [[Draft:OpenResty Inc.]] and on your user page, the draft fails to show that the company is [[WP:NCORP|notable]] (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia), separate from the product [[OpenResty]] (which also fails to demonstrate [[WP:NSOFT|notability]], and will likely be deleted shortly). --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 00:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 18:21:01, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Jackbigfan ==

{{Lafc|username=Jackbigfan|ts=18:21:01, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:Cameron_Gainley}}

What did i do wrong

[[User:Jackbigfan|Jackbigfan]] ([[User talk:Jackbigfan|talk]]) 18:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|Jackbigfan}} Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, your family, or your friends. Its articles are not a [[WP:NOPROMO|place to promote]] or adulate anyone. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 00:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 18:51:50, 30 May 2020 review of submission by Amitmgosavi ==

{{Lafc|username=Amitmgosavi|ts=18:51:50, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:Amit_Gosavi}}

[[User:Amitmgosavi|Amitmgosavi]] ([[User talk:Amitmgosavi|talk]]) 18:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 20:43:08, 30 May 2020 review of submission by RichardZack ==

{{Lafc|username=RichardZack|ts=20:43:08, 30 May 2020|page=OUR.NEWS}}

Hello, an article submission I made was declined due to alleged notability reasons, however, multiple articles from independent sources were provided, including from TechCrunch and the Times Union, both well respected, independent publications. Can anyone help me understand why this wouldn't be considered notable?

[[User:RichardZack|RichardZack]] ([[User talk:RichardZack|talk]]) 20:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== 20:52:49, 30 May 2020 review of submission by D.rainer ==

{{Lafc|username=D.rainer|ts=20:52:49, 30 May 2020|page=

Draft:Pixstash.net

}}

Editor said there are not enough sources. Which sources does it need for the article to be released?

[[User:D.rainer|D.rainer]] ([[User talk:D.rainer|talk]]) 20:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|D.rainer}} [[WP:NWEBSITE]] requires at least three [[WP:RS|reliable]] [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] sources. Your draft currentely has two sources:

* #1, alexa.com appears to be a directory listing, which are generally not accepted

* #2 is the subject's own terms of use page. (which is not [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]])

: [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 21:13:21, 30 May 2020 review of submission by DenverBB ==

{{Lafc|username=DenverBB|ts=21:13:21, 30 May 2020|declined=Draft:Aaron_LaPedis}}

[[User:DenverBB|DenverBB]] ([[User talk:DenverBB|talk]]) 21:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, could I please get advice on which areas of this article are causing the it to get rejected? All sources used are secondary sources not connected with the subject. All language is objective and fact-based from sources given.

I would like to know what to change and how to avoid these issues on any other articles I contribute to in the future. Thank you!

:Your submission has been rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. The draft just tells about LaPedis. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] ''with significant coverage'' say about the subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:N|notability]](in this case, the definition of [[WP:NAUTHOR|a notable author]]). Your sources don't have in depth, significant coverage, they just tell things this author has done. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] for more information. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 21:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

= May 31 =

== 05:28:26, 31 May 2020 review of submission by ChrisParker92 ==

{{Lafc|username=ChrisParker92|ts=05:28:26, 31 May 2020|page=

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mark_Liu

}}

Can someone please take a closer look at [[Draft:Mark Liu]]? It was recently rejected for not having significant coverage but there are quite a few sources that show significant coverage of Liu, not just passing mentions. Here are a few examples which include the world's largest financial newspaper and Taiwan's Central News Agency.

*https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/TSMC-s-new-leadership-A-picture-in-contrasts

*https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201710020386.aspx

Here is more significant coverage:

*https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/200905140004/%E5%89%B5%E9%80%A0%E4%B8%80%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%83%E5%84%84%E7%87%9F%E6%94%B6%E7%9A%84%E5%85%A9%E5%A4%A7%E6%88%B0%E5%B0%87

*https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/201710240002/%E9%80%8F%E8%A6%96%E5%8F%B0%E7%A9%8D%E9%9B%BB%E7%9A%84%E7%B9%BC%E6%89%BF%E8%80%85%E5%80%91

*https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80394/post/201312120012/%E5%8A%89%E5%BE%B7%E9%9F%B3%E3%80%81%E9%AD%8F%E5%93%B2%E5%AE%B6%20%E8%83%BD%E8%AE%93%E5%8F%B0%E7%A9%8D%E9%9B%BB%E5%86%8D%E8%BC%95%E8%88%9E%EF%BC%9F

From what I see from the time stamps, the article was turned down four minutes after it was put up. Could that really be enough time for an editor to carefully review the sources, particularly when many of them are foreign language sources? I would appreciate another look. Thanks! [[User:ChrisParker92|ChrisParker92]] ([[User talk:ChrisParker92|talk]]) 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

[[User:ChrisParker92|ChrisParker92]] ([[User talk:ChrisParker92|talk]]) 05:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:32:17, 31 May 2020 review of submission by 24.229.146.136 ==

{{Lafc|username=24.229.146.136|ts=06:32:17, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Elise_Ecklund}}

[[Special:Contributions/24.229.146.136|24.229.146.136]] ([[User talk:24.229.146.136|talk]]) 06:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further as there is little to no chance it can be sufficiently improved to meet standards. It appears that the person you wrote about does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:BAND|a notable musician]]. You also do not offer independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support the content of the article; the article should only summarize what such sources state. Social media accounts are not independent reliable sources. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] for more information. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 06:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 06:59:09, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Sachinlathiya007 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sachinlathiya007|ts=06:59:09, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Ahval_News_Six}}

[[User:Sachinlathiya007|Sachinlathiya007]] ([[User talk:Sachinlathiya007|talk]]) 06:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Sachinlathiya007}} your only source so far is [https://postnewsgroup.com/2018/03/15/ahval-news-six-independent-online-news-webiste/]. Wikipedia requires at least three [[WP:RS|reliable]] [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] sources for [[WP:N|notability as defined by Wikipedia]]. I don't have an opinion on wether postnewsgroup.com is reliable, but the last reviewers, {{re|GoingBatty|Sulfurboy}} seem to concour that it is not. Note that the two references appear to be the same. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 07:39:05, 31 May 2020 review of draft by Pretoriandlz ==

{{Lafc|username=Pretoriandlz|ts=07:39:05, 31 May 2020|draft=Draft:Ernest_Pierce}}

I submitted [[Draft:Ernest_Pierce]] for AfC. It was declined on the grounds that it has no inline citations for the Early Life and Education section. I have since removed it and resubmitted for review. My question here is that the information provided therein was pulled from the actor's IMDB profile: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2720736/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

Could someone elaborate if would be acceptable to cite IMDB Profile when the following non-contentious information is cited:

"Pierce was born in Chicago, Illinois, the son of Ernest Pierce Sr and Michelle Williamson.

Ernest began his career in off-Broadway and theatrical and musicals in New York and Chicago. He landed the role of Tyrone in FAME the Musical in College with the Illini Union Board Spring Musical, followed up with West Side Story. Prior to moving to Film/TV, he performed in Broadway productions such as the Son of a Preacher Man, Something’s Afoot, Death of a Salesman, The Piano Lesson and a host of others."

Thank you! [[User:Pretoriandlz|Pretoriandlz]] ([[User talk:Pretoriandlz|talk]]) 07:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Pretoriandlz|Pretoriandlz]] ([[User talk:Pretoriandlz|talk]]) 07:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Pretoriandlz}}, IMDB is not a reliable source as it uses user-generated content. As such, it should very rarely be used. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 07:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 07:41:57, 31 May 2020 review of submission by [[User:Belamp|Andrej Shadura]] ==

{{Lafc|username=Belamp|ts=07:41:57, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:BiglyBT}}

I was told my submission has tone issues. Apparently the fact I wrote this submission prevents me from seeing them, but I paid attention to using neutral tone as much as possible. How can I improve on that?

I would also like to point out my original thought was to expand the article on Vuze to include the information on BiglyBT since in the situation when the original project is more or less dead, and continues under a new brand, it seemed like a better fit to me, but my initial addition of a paragraph on that has been reverted as an attempt to spam and I was told that not until an article on that is written and accepted, it can be re-added. I’m honestly a bit afraid of touching that article again (I did add a paragraph on the original project being dead and to be fair I expected it to be reverted just because I added it.)

I have no conflict of interest whatsoever in this case, this is not part of any promotion campaign, and to be honest it hurts quite a bit to be seen as a spammer after editing Wikipedia for many years and having proven track record of never spreading spam or being involved in any similar activity.

[[User:Belamp|Andrej Shadura]] ([[User talk:Belamp|talk]]) 07:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 07:49:30, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Anujjaju ==

{{Lafc|username=Anujjaju|ts=07:49:30, 31 May 2020|declined=User:Khushi.m0505/sandbox}}

Khushi Maheshwari is a famous social media personality from India having 5M+ followers. When People search for her name, they should have proper information about her. Like other social media personalities eg. Garima Chaurasiya, Priya Prakash Warrior this page has full potential to be added to Wikipedia. Why it is being rejected?

[[User:Anujjaju|Anujjaju]] ([[User talk:Anujjaju|talk]]) 07:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Anujjaju}} It appears that this person does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:BIO|a notable person]]. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about someone, and has no interest in enhancing search results for a subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] state about a subject, showing how they meet the Wikipedia definition of notability. Your draft had no sources at all. Please read [[WP:YFA|Your First Article]] for more information. It does not matter if a person has five followers, or five million, or fifty million, they must be written about in independent sources to merit a Wikipedia article. Subscriber/follower numbers are easily gamed(a person can create more than one account to "like" someone) so that is not an indicator of notability. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 07:52:46, 31 May 2020 review of submission by 71.104.11.211 ==

{{Lafc|username=71.104.11.211|ts=07:52:46, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff}}

[[Special:Contributions/71.104.11.211|71.104.11.211]] ([[User talk:71.104.11.211|talk]]) 07:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 08:32:55, 31 May 2020 review of draft by Indy beetle ==

{{Lafc|username=Indy beetle|ts=08:32:55, 31 May 2020|draft=Draft:Richard_Tuwangye}}

I'm trying to review the above draft (which would be my first). I've followed all the steps laid out at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script]], and yet I am unable to launch the script. I'm not seeing a "More" collapsible tab under which to find the script and run it. -[[User:Indy beetle|Indy beetle]] ([[User talk:Indy beetle|talk]]) 08:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Indy beetle|Indy beetle]] ([[User talk:Indy beetle|talk]]) 08:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Indy beetle}} Which skin are you using? Only vector (the default skin since 2013) has a "More" dropdown, for other skins the links to activate the AFC helper script are elsewhere. If that doesn't help, please check your browser console. All modern browsers (but not nessesarely the mobile versions thereof) have a feature called Console or similar. Look for things that are in red. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 11:41:20, 31 May 2020 review of draft by BoldLuis ==

{{Lafc|username=BoldLuis|ts=11:41:20, 31 May 2020|draft=Draft:Back_Market/2}}

[[User:BoldLuis|BoldLuis]] ([[User talk:BoldLuis|talk]]) 11:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 12:08:22, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Pn1919 ==

{{Lafc|username=Pn1919|ts=12:08:22, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Tom_Bertram_(Singer)}}

We are trying to get Tom Bertram's encylopedic article on Wikipedia, but seem to keep running into issues.

Please can you recommend resolutions to have an article approved.

[[User:Pn1919|Pn1919]] ([[User talk:Pn1919|talk]]) 12:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use. If you are being paid to edit this you need to declare this. Interviews, Wikipedia, Blogs, YouTube and Twitter are not suitable sources, so the draft does not shown that he is [[WP:GNG|notable]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 12:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 12:18:36, 31 May 2020 review of submission by EmanuelB2019 ==

{{Lafc|username=EmanuelB2019|ts=12:18:36, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Carmen_Harra}}

Hello, moderators and contributors to Wikipedia!

I respectfully ask for the help of this world elite community to publish the page of the American writer of Romanian origin "Carmen Harra" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Carmen_Harra, whose books (6 books) are found in the Library of the American Congress. I published on the page the link that proves the existence of the books in the Library of Congress, at the request of the moderators to justify the creation of this page. In addition, I provided links to the page showing the writer's appearances in the Central American press, in newspapers such as the New York Post, and on television stations such as NBC New York and CBS Los Angeles. It is equally easy to verify that the writer Carmen Harra was a well-known singer in Europe in the 70s and 80s and that she currently has her own radio show at the American station OMTimes Radio.

I have browsed many pages published by Wikipedia in recent years, about all kinds of people who have performed in their fields of activity and who deserve to be included in an index of the most important online encyclopedia. And I noticed that this writer, who is on the same level as other public figures on Wikipedia, does not have the page.

Six months ago, I started working on this page, an absolutely new experience for me. I received valuable guidance from [[User:MurielMary|MurielMary]] and [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] on what a Wikipedia page should look like and I would like to thank them on this occasion for their help.

I sent the page for moderation, and the other day, [[User:1292simon|1292simon]] rejected it because of the reason "promotional article". I requested arguments for this opinion, especially since other moderators appreciated that the page is written in a neutral style, specific to Wikipedia. Please help me to correct the errors on this page so that it can be published. There are many similar pages already published about the Romanian beautician Anastasia Soare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anastasia_Soare, about the Romanian singer Andreea Balan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreea_Bălan, about the TV presenter Andreea Esca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreea_Esca and about the writer Colette Baron-Reid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colette_Baron-Reid.

Wikipedia also indexes many people who have "stood out" publicly by committing abominable deeds or as mere politicians. All this information is normal to appear in an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia, like Wikipedia, groups information from absolutely all fields of activity. And since no one is a specialist in all areas and no one is all-knowing, it is normal to find out with Wikipedia about people we have never heard of, even though these people have been around for years and have performed in their fields. Even though we are all human and are often subjective, it is normal to recognize the professional merits of others.

I call on the fairplay of the Wikipedia community to apply the same rules to all published pages. The "Carmen Harra" page reached its present form after six months of editing together with the moderators who gave their precious time to help the correct and verified presentation of the information.

Please offer your contribution objectively and support me in this endeavor which is done from my exclusive position as a reader of books written by Carmen Harra. Thank you and I look forward to your feedback!

[[User:EmanuelB2019|EmanuelB2019]] ([[User talk:EmanuelB2019|talk]]) 12:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 12:53:01, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Triantares ==

{{Lafc|username=Triantares|ts=12:53:01, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:Elive}}

Dear reviewers,

I'm sorry but I'm at a loss now.

You mention there are still WP:PROMO issues there which I don't see at all...nor any WP:COI as I am not in anyway affiliated with said distribution other than being an avid user and having volunteered to edit and re-submit the English WP entry which had been deleted for some reason a while back.

If anything the only thing that can be done (in the sense of less WP:PROMO) now IMO is delete the whole entry, which would be kind of silly considering that the Elive Linux distribution has been around for at least 15 years and certainly should be mentioned and linked as such together with other distributions.

Looking and comparing with other WP entries concerning (especially commercial) Linux distributions: They might as well '''all''' be removed with even more promotional issues and COIs than the current Elive submission IMO.

Notably EliveLinux is the '''only''' distribution that does not have an internal link [[Comparison_of_Linux_distributions|here]] and here[[List_of_Linux_distributions#Third-party_distributions]] and there's definitely more.

I do agree that the links in the article might be a little overdone, in the sense that they're too many and distracting. To some degree that was due to a first review pointing out too few reliable 3rd party references.

It would be greatly helpful if the issues could be clearly pointed out as, like I stated I do not see them and certainly do not want to keep making the same mistakes in other entries or articles.

Thanks in advance,

any guidance will be greatly appreciated.

[[User:Triantares|Triantares]] ([[User talk:Triantares|talk]]) 12:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 14:09:51, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Marcywinograd ==

{{Lafc|username=Marcywinograd|ts=14:09:51, 31 May 2020|accepted=Electronic_monitoring_in_the_United_States}}

[[User:Marcywinograd|Marcywinograd]] ([[User talk:Marcywinograd|talk]]) 14:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

------

Hi, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and wondering about redirects. I noticed that articles that have a lot of page views (many thousands) are redirects from topics that do not have a Wikipedia page. If I want to redirect from an unpublished Wikipedia topic (decarceration) similar to my Wikipedia entry (Decarceration in the United States), do I need to 1) Create a new page for Decarceration 2) Go to page settings and redirect that page to my page: Decarceration in the United States 3)Submit that redirection/page for approval, as though I am submitting a real article that an administrator will have to approve?

Thanks for any guidance you can offer. Warm regards, Marcy[[User:Marcywinograd|Marcywinograd]] ([[User talk:Marcywinograd|talk]]) 14:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Marcywinograd}} as far as I can see you are [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED]], so you can yust go on and create the redirect page. You don't need an approval. You can find the policy regarding redirects at [[Wikipedia:Redirect]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 15:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Victor, for your prompt reply. I did read the Redirect page and tried to figure it out, but am confused as to how to redirect from an unpublished topic, like "prison inmate reduction" to "decarceration in the United States" which is published. As an autoconfirmed user, what do I do? Thank you for your patience. Best wishes, Marcy[[User:Marcywinograd|Marcywinograd]] ([[User talk:Marcywinograd|talk]]) 15:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== Request on 17:35:11, 31 May 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Yellowmajestymusic ==

{{anchor|17:35:11, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Yellowmajestymusic}}

{{Lafc|username=Yellowmajestymusic|ts=17:35:11, 31 May 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Yellow_Majesty}}

<!-- Start of message -->

Dear Wikipedia,

I need help with publishing an article 'Yellow Majesty'. The article describes my music project and I don't know how to fullfil all the requirements needed in order to get the article published. Any further (explicit) assistance would thus be highly appreciated!

Thank you in beforehand.

Amir

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Yellowmajestymusic|Yellowmajestymusic]] ([[User talk:Yellowmajestymusic|talk]]) 17:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:Your draft has zero sources, writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged and you would need to pass the criteria at [[WP:NMUSICIAN]] first. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 19:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

== 18:40:56, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Mye ==

{{Lafc|username=Mye|ts=18:40:56, 31 May 2020|declined=Draft:UKRCARD}}

I am preparing an article about a Ukrainian processing company existing since 1995.

Previously, only the Ukrainian version of the page existed.

But now we are working with foreign clients, and it would be more correct to have information in different languages

Tanks

usb31 18:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:<s>{{on hold}} pending paid editing</s> disclosure, see [[User talk:Mye#Declare any connection]]. --[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 02:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 23:21:59, 31 May 2020 review of submission by Jschwam ==

{{Lafc|username=Jschwam|ts=23:21:59, 31 May 2020|page=

Colin Burke (lacrosse)

}}

The article was declined because of lack of sport notability criteria, but did not specify which line was problematic, and what kind of source would be more accurate and be able to pass the criteria. Please advise. Thank you!

[[User:Jschwam|Jschwam]] ([[User talk:Jschwam|talk]]) 23:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

:{{re|Jschwam}} If Wikipedians are talking about notability, its usally not a specific line of the draft or article, but rather the sources used. in this case, {{re|Robert McClenon}} stated on [[Draft:Michael Kraus (lacrosse)]] that [[WP:NSPORTS]] isn't met (click the blue link to find out the criteria). I am not an expert at sportlers notability, and, as such, don't have an opinion on the notability, but it would help if you indicated which of the notability guidelines you used. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

::[[User:Jschwam]] [[User:Victor Schmidt]] - The issue isn't what line is problematic or an issue with any particular source. For [[WP:SPORTS|sports notability]], there is a long list of notability criteria, one for which sport, but there isn't a criterion for [[field lacrosse]]. So to accept a field lacrosse player, they must either satisfy [[WP:GNG|general notability]], or one of the criteria in the sports notability list must apply. I didn't see a criterion that applies. So the issue isn't what was wrong with the submission, but what wasn't right with the submission. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

::My advice about [[field lacrosse]] would be that lacrosse fans can form a task force to add a special notability criterion for lacrosse players. I don't have any other advice. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

::In summary, it isn't what was wrong; it was what wasn't right. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

= June 1 =

== 06:15:46, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Gidicloud ==

{{Lafc|username=Gidicloud|ts=06:15:46, 1 June 2020|draft=Draft:Sellbeta}}

[[User:Gidicloud|Gidicloud]] ([[User talk:Gidicloud|talk]]) 06:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm asking based on my first article which I wrote now it was declined, I want to asked what exactly is the problem, was the article not good enough and what can I do to make it approved

:{{re|Gidicloud}} Your draft currently cites two sources:

* alexa.com, which is afaik [[WP:RS|not considered a reliable source]]

* [https://www.sitejabber.com www.sitejabber.com] which doesn't appear to be reliable either

:As such, the draft doesn't meet [[WP:NWEBSITE]] and cannot be approved in its current version. The criteria for websites are, in short, that multiple, [[WP:RS|reliable]] [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] sources are cited in the article/draft. Note that it is important that such sources are given in the draft, asserting their existence without having them in there wont make a draft approved. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 06:22:07, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Sachi1307 ==

{{Lafc|username=Sachi1307|ts=06:22:07, 1 June 2020|draft=Draft:Huion_(2)}}

Hello, Could you let me know if the list of product looks like a advertisement, but there are other Articles listing of product which are not deleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XP-PEN

[[User:Sachi1307|Sachi1307]] ([[User talk:Sachi1307|talk]]) 06:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Sachi1307}} Please read [[WP:OSE|other stuff exists]]. It is usually a poor argument to cite other similar articles as a reason for yours to exist. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address what we know about. In addition, as time passes, standards change and what was once acceptable may not be any longer. Your draft looks like an advertisement because it just tells about the company and its products. Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] with significant coverage(not brief mentions, routine announcemments, staff interviews, etc.) say about a subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of [[WP:N|notability]](in this case, the definition of [[WP:ORG|a notable company]]).

:If you know of other inappropriate articles, please point them out so they can be addressed. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for letting me know, I will revise it and resubmit again. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sachi1307|Sachi1307]] ([[User talk:Sachi1307#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sachi1307|contribs]]) 09:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Request on 08:07:37, 1 June 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by DominicanWikiEdit1996 ==

{{anchor|08:07:37, 1 June 2020 review of submission by DominicanWikiEdit1996}}

{{Lafc|username=DominicanWikiEdit1996|ts=08:07:37, 1 June 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:We_Got_Next}}

<!-- Start of message --> I'm requesting assisstance because I have edit several draft of a page and it keeps getting declined. It's a draft about a bachata group's album call "We Got Next" from [[Xtreme (group)|Xtreme]]. This album was released in 2003 and there's barely information about it because the album didn't have notoriety at the time. The group never really mentioned a lot about the album because they were later on signed to a record label and then their 2005 album became know as their debut album. I've put in references and extra links to prove that the article is accurate, but it still gets rejected.

This is the link to the draft: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:We_Got_Next_(Xtreme_Album) Xtreme - We Got Next (Album)]

<!-- End of message -->[[User:DominicanWikiEdit1996|DominicanWikiEdit1996]] ([[User talk:DominicanWikiEdit1996|talk]]) 08:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|DominicanWikiEdit1996}} I answered you at the Teahouse, please only use one method of seeking assistance, to avoid duplication of effort. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

My Apologies [[User:331dot|331dot]], that was done by mistake. I didn't realize I had send it twice <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DominicanWikiEdit1996|DominicanWikiEdit1996]] ([[User talk:DominicanWikiEdit1996#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DominicanWikiEdit1996|contribs]]) 18:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== 12:28:09, 1 June 2020 review of submission by VidhyadhariK ==

{{Lafc|username=VidhyadhariK|ts=12:28:09, 1 June 2020|page=

Draft:Chaithra Rai

}}

Dear Team,

I just got to know the Draft:Chaithra Rai, got a mail saying that my article submission was declined, I what to the reason for rejection and also what to know what I am missing and in what criteria I have to improve my self and the data to be added resubmission.

[[User:VidhyadhariK|VidhyadhariK]] ([[User talk:VidhyadhariK|talk]]) 12:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 12:46:28, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Luca929 ==

{{Lafc|username=Luca929|ts=12:46:28, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:Treo_(Drink)}}

[[User:Luca929|Luca929]] ([[User talk:Luca929|talk]]) 12:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I've never written a wikipedia page before so I am very clueless at what I am doing. I was tasked with doing for someone I know, thinking it would be simple but I was wrong.

:{{re|Luca929}}

*Unfortunally I have to tell you that creating ''a new wikipedia article'' (not yust page) is one of the '''hardest''' tasks on Wikipedia, as writing a new article requires extended knowlegde of wikipedia content policies.

* Since you describe that you have a relationship with the crator of that drink, we call that a [[WP:COI|Conflict of Interest]] at Wikipedia, its even harder.

* If you are compensated for your edit in any way, [[WP:PAID|you have to declare that]] to remain [[:foundation:Terms of Use|in consistence with the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use]].

* The draft in ist current state is [[WP:PUFFERY|full of puffery words]], which may not be used in Wikipedia.

* I currently have no opinion on wether the used sources are [[WP:RS|reliable]] and [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]] (the first ref is not), but maybe {{re|Amkgp}} has more for this part. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

*:{{u|Victor Schmidt}}, Thank for the detailed explanations. As explained I echo the same thing, plus the tone of the draft seems to be purely [[WP:ADVERTISEMENT]] and reference sources read like they were sponsored by the company to report. {{ping|Sulfurboy}} has 'rejected' the draft. {{ping|Theroadislong}} has also flagged the draft for 'undisclosed paid'. I think both of them may provide additional reasons and feedback on the problems with the draft. Thank you. [[User:Amkgp| ~ Amkgp]] [[User talk:Amkgp#top|<big>✉</big>]] 17:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

*::Run of the mill advert that would require [[WP:TNT]] to fix created by a UPE. [[User:Sulfurboy|Sulfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sulfurboy|talk]]) 17:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 14:02:38, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Newlywo ==

{{Lafc|username=Newlywo|ts=14:02:38, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:Ori_Isaac}}

hello, I do not understand how Mr Isaac isnt notable.. we are talking about an Israeli journalist, editor and presenter on the biggest most viwed channel in Israel and mostly, a known personallty in Israel. There 5 Links and 19 References. I'm asking for a fair and new review to be made. Thank you.

[[User:Newlywo|Newlywo]] ([[User talk:Newlywo|talk]]) 14:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 13:38:00, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Amkgp ==

{{Lafc|username=Amkgp|ts=13:38:00, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:Blockchain App Factory}}

[[User:Amkgp|Amkgp]] ([[User talk:Amkgp|talk]]) 13:438, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Team, I've never written a Wikipedia page before. In fact, I got a warning before, for editing in Article Space without trying a sandbox edit. so I am very clueless about what I am doing. Now I got a review from Amkgp(Wikipedia member) that my article creation was disappointing. I am sorry for this action. Actually My idea was creating a company page article. But I don't know about the full editing about the article creation. Can you give me the solution for creating this page? Thank you in Advance.

: (Note) This subject appears to be inside the the cryptocurrency area, which is currently under [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Blockchain_and_cryptocurrencies|general sanctions]]. [[User:Victor Schmidt|Victor Schmidt]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt|talk]]) 16:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

::{{ping|Riyasteve}} You may go through [[WP:YFA|Help:Your first article]], and keep in mind what {{u|Victor Schmidt}} has pointed out. Its very important. You can always ask for assistance at the [[WP:TEA|Teahouse]]. Thank you

== 15:07:21, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Luca929 ==

{{Lafc|username=Luca929|ts=15:07:21, 1 June 2020|declined=User:Luca929/sandbox/Robert_Golden}}

This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page. Can anyone give advice or assist on how to get this published?

[[User:Luca929|Luca929]] ([[User talk:Luca929|talk]]) 15:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

:It’s actually your second time creating a Wikipedia page, as this [[Draft:Treo (Drink)]] was also rejected. The topics are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 15:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 15:32:53, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Amanniste ==

{{Lafc|username=Amanniste|ts=15:32:53, 1 June 2020|draft=Draft:Rachel_de_Joode}}

I would request a second look by an editor who might be more familiar with the subject of art as far as determination of notability is concerned

[[User:Amanniste|Amanniste]] ([[User talk:Amanniste|talk]]) 15:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 15:53:59, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Himanshuaroraa ==

{{Lafc|username=Himanshuaroraa|ts=15:53:59, 1 June 2020|page=

Draft: Anup Kumar Prashar

}}

Hi, I was trying to create an article for someone I know, I wrote content and added citations. but I did some mistakes, Now I am trying to figure out where I can make some improvements to get it live on Wikipedia. I got permission from Itsanupkumar. I do not what citations could be more reliable to Wikipedia. I request you to help me with this. Information I am providing is hundred per cent genuine. What tone can be acceptable?

This article has one more copy on Wikipedia as a draft. Can you also remove that and consider this?

[[User:Himanshuaroraa|Himanshuaroraa]] ([[User talk:Himanshuaroraa|talk]]) 15:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 18:31:31, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Nasimarad ==

{{Lafc|username=Nasimarad|ts=18:31:31, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:Shahrokh_Keshavarz}}

[[User:Nasimarad|Nasimarad]] ([[User talk:Nasimarad|talk]]) 18:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Please somebody help me!

I've tried many ways to put this article on Wikipedia which is about a really professional man but every time someone rejects it and I don't know why.

If you know how I can fix this and if you can help me please do me a favor and contact me. I'm new in Wikipedia and I don't know why it is so hard to put a single article about someone's personal & professional life.

== 19:11:56, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Mye ==

{{Lafc|username=Mye|ts=19:11:56, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:UKRCARD}}

My draft, "Draft:Radio Duhok," has been declined multiple times due to a lack of "in-depth coverage" from reliable, independent sources, according to the last reviewer.

=== Volunteering ===

I have tried my best to find good sources and have included:

[[File:Question.svg|left|25px|alt=question icon]]Hello [[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]]

1. Two official announcements from the Duhok Governorate's website congratulating the radio on its anniversary.

2. A feature article about the radio in the well-known regional "Gulan Magazine" (Issue 829, 2010), which refers to it as the "authentic voice of the governorate."

Could an experienced editor please take a look at these sources and provide some feedback? I am struggling to understand why these are considered insufficient for notability. Specifically, I would like to know if the Gulan Magazine article is just a "brief mention" and what an example of an "in-depth" source would look like for a subject like this.

No i don't get any pay for trying to create this article.

I have been working in this company for a long time (more than 19 years) and recently discovered that we don't have normal information on the Ukrainian wikipadia, and in general there is no page in the English version.

I have no relation to the PR team or something like that, but I always like to see quality information. I act here as a volunteer, and as a person who knows the history of the company

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. [[User:Aras2025|Aras2025]] ([[User talk:Aras2025|talk]]) 14:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

My contribution to the wiki is so small that I don’t think anyone would be interested in my personal story on Mye profile.

Although after you pointed out its absence, the thought of its creation was born.

:An in depth source will, on its own, go into detail about the topic and discuss what they see as important/significant/influential about it- what makes it [[WP:N|notable]]. Mere congratulations and a mention do not qualify. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

usb31 19:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

:The English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than other language versions; I don't know if this content would be acceptable on the Arabic Wikipedia, which has its own policies. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 16:50, 28 August 2025 review of submission by Saysky2 ==

{{Lafc|username=Saysky2|ts=16:50, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Ajay_Taneja}}

may i know the reason why the article has been stoped

[[User:Saysky2|Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Saysky2|talk]]) 16:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 1917:41:4910, 128 JuneAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by Caryplace7Saysky2 ==

{{Lafc|username=Caryplace7Saysky2|ts=1917:41:4910, 128 JuneAugust 20202025|draft=Draft:Mike_GreenhausAjay Taneja}}

May i know the exact reason of rejecting the article. Even i had asked weather i can use newspapers cuts as reliable sources or not as in 2000s no digital media was there no any answered to my question. This i really disgusting no supports [[User:Saysky2|Saysky2]] ([[User talk:Saysky2|talk]]) 17:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:'''This draft has been rejected [[WP:IDHT|for failing to heed previous criticism]] and will not be considered further.''' The reviewers explained a fair bit in their comments, and the draft was rejected once it became clear you were blowing them off. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 17:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

::{{ping|Saysky2}} <small>re-signing to fix ping</small> —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 17:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:You have three non-independent sources, and one which might be independent, but gives a 404 when I look at it. (Even if it is both independent and gives substantial coverage, one source is not enough).

:{{HD/WINI}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 15:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 18:10, 28 August 2025 review of submission by 80.41.119.0 ==

I wrote a biography on Mike Greenhaus, Editor-in-Chief of Relix Magazine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Greenhaus) I have been working on the biography for several weeks and it has been looked at by several editors. Last week an editor said I had enough articles (3) to show notability and that I should resubmit. However, another editor just rejected the claim of notability How do I proceed?

{{Lafc|username=80.41.119.0|ts=18:10, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Fusion_candle}}

please dont remove my draft when i send it to you even if its rubbish [[Special:Contributions/80.41.119.0|80.41.119.0]] ([[User talk:80.41.119.0|talk]]) 18:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Don't waste reviewer time with rubbish. We don't accept AI-generated articles, period. It has been deleted. If you want to submit an article on that topic, you must write it in your own words and cite actual reliable sources. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 18:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Caryplace7|Caryplace7]] ([[User talk:Caryplace7|talk]]) 19:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 1918:56:5826, 128 JuneAugust 20202025 review of submission by YoshiiiiiiiSindhuG2025 ==

{{Lafc|username=YoshiiiiiiiSindhuG2025|ts=1918:56:5826, 128 JuneAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:SOUL_(audio)Aligireddy_Kasi_Vishwanath_Reddy}}

Hello team,

I have submitted an article on an Indian agriculturist AligiReddy Vishwanath Reddy but the article has been declined. Could you please assist me in improving the article. [[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] ([[User talk:SindhuG2025|talk]]) 18:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:[[User:SindhuG2025|SindhuG2025]] it seems like no one has declined the article. When you created the page you included a 'decline' banner in the page. I've fixed it for you.

I am asking for a re-review because I added more context to who SOUL was and provided better citations to provide further context.

:In its current state, the article would not be accepted. In addition to a lack of inline citations to support the claims made in the article, the article seems like it was written for the express purpose of promoting the subject rather than to be encyclopedic.

[[User:Yoshiiiiiii|Yoshiiiiiii]] ([[User talk:Yoshiiiiiii|talk]]) 19:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

:Also, it's best to avoid external links in the body of an article, unless necessary. See the page [[WP:External links]]. [[User:Sungodtemple|Sungodtemple]] ([[User talk:Sungodtemple|talk]] &#8226; [[Special:Contributions/Sungodtemple|contribs]]) 04:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:Those blank decline templates are made up by ChatGPT and the like. [[User:Sarsenet|Sarsenet]]•<small>he/they</small>•([[User talk:Sarsenet|talk]]) 04:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 19:01, 28 August 2025 review of submission by RavenFireblade ==

{{Lafc|username=RavenFireblade|ts=19:01, 28 August 2025|draft=Draft:Jack_Logan}}

We have edited the article along with new, reliable, independent sources. Please help us improve it. Thank you! [[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]] ([[User talk:RavenFireblade|talk]]) 19:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @[[User:RavenFireblade|RavenFireblade]]. Who is "we" and "us"? <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 20:01, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

== 20:31:49, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Dylan Hendricks ==

::{{reply to|RavenFireblade|Qcne|Kalaboomsky|Athaenara|SoWhy|Bearcat|MWFwiki}} back in August 2018 at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Santos]], {{User5|User=Kalaboomsky}} wrote "Just tell '''us''' what needs to be removed or questionable areas on the article that needs removing" [[Special:Diff/855337532|here]]. It would appear to me that [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jack Logan Show]] back in 2018 may possibly also be relevant here. All that said, [[:Jack Logan (filmmaker)]] is now a mainspace article: any windmills I chose to joust here in 2025 may [[:2018|seven years too late]], I guess. [[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 🦘 11:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=Dylan Hendricks|ts=20:31:49, 1 June 2020|page=

:::I was the approver. For what it is worth, this was a borderline pass. I felt the subject ''just'' meets notability, especially when considering [[WP:NOTLEVEL]] (I realize this is not a policy). However, even keeping the COI in-mind (and I have a feeling the disclosed COI may be a "sacrificial lamb" disclosure, and the actual COI may be deeper... But, AGF and all that) I feel that the article was ready for mainspace. Particularly with the additional COI labelling. Anyways, I am of the opinion that we have enough notability to push us over the edge, and that any further discussion regarding the article should take place via AfD. I would abstain from such a discussion. '''[[User:MWFwiki|MWFwiki]]''' ([[User talk:MWFwiki|talk]]) 20:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Plant Memory

}}

I started this article on my own and have a draft page started, but I want to know how to add specific collaborators to my draft so we can work on it together.

[[User:Dylan Hendricks|Dylan Hendricks]] ([[User talk:Dylan Hendricks|talk]]) 20:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

= August 29 =

== 20:39:35, 1 June 2020 review of submission by Belltown9 ==

{{Lafc|username=Belltown9|ts=20:39:35, 1 June 2020|declined=Draft:John_Moehring}}

Hi there:

I'm sorry I'm having so much trouble with this page.

== 01:29, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Hyperbolick ==

For what little it's worth, I'm on the board of [http://trps.org The Rock Poster Society], and have written extensively on rock-poster artists at [https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/ben-marks/ Collectors Weekly] and [https://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/where-hard-rock-meets-pop-art/ elsewhere]. I've also curated rock-poster exhibitions, such as this one at [https://www.sfomuseum.org/exhibitions/when-art-rocked-san-francisco-music-posters SFO Museum].

{{Lafc|username=Hyperbolick|ts=01:29, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Jimmy "Ninja" Chaikong}}

I am confessedly not entirely objective on this because Jimmy was a longtime acquaintance.

He drowned in a boating accident this weekend. Had one of those quirky lives where he did many different things, MMA fighting, recording music, winning [[American Gladiator]], publishing philosophy, managing the Texas Songwriting Championship. He was a guest menace in a few episodes of [[Burn Notice]] (no media source for that, but he posted it on his socials and if you watch the episodes you can see him plain as day). His death was reported more than anything else in his life, but it was quite a life. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 01:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

The problem with an artist like the late John Moehring, who I got to know before his death, is that the Seattle rock-poster artists in the late 1960s never got the attention and press from mainstream, traditional media outlets like their counterparts in San Francisco. As a result, their contributions have gone largely unsung. I have tried to correct that by contributing to a book on the subject, by [https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/seattles-trippiest-rock-poster-artist-tells-all/ writing about John], and by building a Wikipedia page in his memory. Collectors know how rare and valuable this work is, which is why I linked to a [https://auction.classicposters.com/auctions/1-1BJRXQ/november-december-2018-auction?limit=36&search=moehring recent auction] where many pieces went for above their high estimates. I have also linked to references to John (albeit passing ones) in publications by the University of Washington Press and testimony by [[Art Chantry]]. I even posted a link to all the John Moehring posters in the collection of the [https://d3h6k4kfl8m9p0.cloudfront.net/uploads/2016/05/25231550/MoPOP-John-Moehring-material.pdf Museum of Pop Culture] in Seattle.

:Do you have a specific question about the draft? [[user:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#70A67A">-- NotC</span><span style="color:#396340">hariza</span><span style="color:#0D2311">rd</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Notcharizard|<span style="color:#0D2311">🗨</span>]]} 06:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

There will never be a reference to John in Time or Newsweek or anything like that, so how does this important '60s psychedelic rock-poster artist get his Wikipedia page? Again, forgive me, but I'm stumped.

:: Yes, does Jimmy's eclectic set of points of notability add up to actual notability? Could probably find a few more sources touching on a few more points (he was a high school gymnastics champ and an FAU cheerleader before going to Oklahoma), but this is close to being what there is. [[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]] ([[User talk:Hyperbolick|talk]]) 06:47, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Hyperbolick|Hyperbolick]]. [[WP:Notability|Notability]], as Wikipedia uses the word, is not about what the subject is, or does, or has done, but about whether enought independent material has been reliably published ''about'' the subject to base an article on. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== How to add extra references which helps draft will go for mainspace. ==

Best,

Ben Marks

[[User:Belltown9|Belltown9]] ([[User talk:Belltown9|talk]]) 20:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

hello ! Help on article [[Draft:Tanka Timilsina]] ! Please improve and take this article to mainspace.i will be very thankful for your kindness. [[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]] ([[User talk:MountainWriter42|talk]]) 10:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 3 May 2020 review of submission by Cdg1072 ==

:Hello, @[[User:MountainWriter42|MountainWriter42]]. Wikipedia is a volunteer project, where people work on what they choose. It is unlikely - not impossible, but unlikely - that anybody will decide to work on your draft just because you ask.

Sam-2727 advises that I seek another opinion about my article the Change of Fortune Paradox, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Change_of_fortune_paradox. He suggested I point out the fact that it went through several declines, although this was because I resubmitted a few times. Subsequent to that string of submissions, finally some needed changes were actually suggested, and now those changes have been made. For example, theoretical views cited in the article are now attributed directly to their authors in all cases, not synthesized as plain declarative facts. Second, all the several theories (except one!) in the article are now at least linked to a third party, who mentions each view somewhere else--each viewpoint is tied to another secondary source. In accordance with that, the theories presented are being treated as primary sources--not secondary ones. If they were secondary sources, then they wouldn't need a secondary source to back them up. I would mention that there are numerous other Wikipedia articles that rely on primary sources too much. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche%27s_views_on_women

:It is possible (no more than that) that if you asked at [[WP:WikiProject Music|WikiProject Music]] or [[WP:WikiProject Nepal|WikiProject Nepal]] you might find somebody interested enough to work on it. But don't set your hopes too high. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 16:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:YouTube, press releases and interviews are not reliable independent sources. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

The other main problem with the Change of Fortune Paradox, at least in Sam-2727's opinion, is the structure.

I'm surprised he's still unhappy with the structure. He seems to feel that the straight listing of a series of views on a problem, is too plodding and dull, as a structure. Sam-2727 doesn't state clearly that this is the problem, but I don't know what else he means. However, many Wikipedia articles that have no problem with structure, have this same structure. For example, the one I just showed you, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche%27s_views_on_women, and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_humor.[[User:Cdg1072|Cdg1072]] ([[User talk:Cdg1072|talk]]) 20:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

== 11:32, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Newacctowork ==

{{Lafc|username=Newacctowork|ts=11:32, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Trinity_Private_School}}

I am requesting assistance with my draft article Draft:Trinity_Private_School. Each word of the text was written manually without the use of AI tools. However, three times I received feedback that the draft was written by AI. I respectfully emphasize that I wrote the article myself, and therefore I ask you to indicate exactly which sentences or parts appear to you as AI-generated.

In addition, I was told that my sources are “not relevant.” Could you please clarify how relevance is determined? For example, [[The Heritage Private School]] article was accepted with only one source, while my draft contains 17 independent sources, yet it has not passed review.

Finally, the article cannot be considered promotional, because it contains no evaluative or laudatory language. I removed all subjective judgments and left only verifiable, encyclopedic content supported by citations.

I would greatly appreciate clear feedback on what exactly prevents the draft from being accepted and what specific improvements are required. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 11:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you will note that the most recent decline, by me, was not for AI but for promotionality and lack of any evidence of [[WP:notability|notability]].

== 22:14:00, 1 June 2020 review of draft by Honeymaidgrahamcrackers ==

:You then resubmitted the draft without any attempt at addressing those reasons. Why did you do that? Are you disputing my review, or did you think if you keep submitting it will eventually go through by brute force? You only have finite number of chances, so I would suggest you make the most of them.

{{Lafc|username=Honeymaidgrahamcrackers|ts=22:14:00, 1 June 2020|draft=Draft:Grace_Van_Dien}}

:And yes, [[The Heritage Private School]] is even weaker in terms of sourcing (in that, it has none), and I have tagged it accordingly. That doesn't mean we should create more insufficiently sourced articles, though. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] No, I submitted it by accident. Could you please clarify what exactly needs to be fixed? I have already removed most of the adjectives that could make the text appear promotional. What further steps should I take? How can I rewrite it so that it reads as neutral, rather than advertising? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: you're normally meant to summarise what the sources say. But on this occasion, those sources are just churnalism etc., therefore summarising them will only ever result in a promotional draft. So you should go back to square one and look for sources that are entirely independent of the subject (meaning no interviews, press releases, advertorials, sponsored content, etc.) and base your draft on them. Personally, I doubt you will find such sources, but nothing to stop you trying. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 12:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] There is a category, [[:Category:International schools in Cyprus]]. Could you provide an example? From my perspective, I do not see any pages there that match what you are describing. At the moment, all the pages appear to be in the main space. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 12:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: don't concern yourself with any other articles that may exist, we're talking about whether ''your'' draft can be accepted; [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] is invariably a red herring.

:::::The long and short of it is that the vast majority of schools are not notable enough to justify an article. At two years old, this school is basically a startup, and the vast majority of startups are likewise not notable. Any media coverage that may exist is therefore almost by definition likely to originate in the school's marketing team, as is clearly the case with the sources cited in this draft. If the school was a major new initiative or an attempt at educational reform by the gov't of Cyprus, there might be independent mainstream media coverage of it, but here we're talking about a niche private school for a particular group of expats. As I said, you're welcome to search for better sources, but I wouldn't hold my breath. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] "No, we are just talking about other articles. When I take another article as a reference, I see that it has far fewer sources than mine, yet it passed. Can this be considered a biased approach? What does the marketing team have to do with it, if there is no link to any commercial offer and not a single word about cost? This is exactly what concerns me: does it comply with Wikipedia rules that a school without media coverage is published, while a school with coverage is not? For Cyprus, these media are public and authoritative. For comparison, my house has also stood since 1987. There are no publications about it — can I publish an article about it without coverage, as others did? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@[[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]]: no, you cannot {{tq|"publish an article about it without coverage"}}. Your draft's subject must meet our notability requirements, which it has not yet demonstrated.

:::::::If you've found existing articles which also fall short of the standards required, you're very welcome to improve them, or to commence deletion proceedings ([[WP:AFD]] is that-a-way) if that's not possible. But just because such articles exist, is no reason to create more such problems. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] L’Officiel Cyprus, Cyprus Times, and Boussias News (in Greek) - are these not considered reliable sources? Could you please explain the definition and criteria of reliability in this case? These outlets are public and widely recognized in Cyprus. There is no 'churnalism' here, as you described earlier, and no interviews with the school itself. What exactly is wrong with these sources? [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 13:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::I will note that just because another article exists does not necessarily mean it was "approved" by anyone. There are many reasons this could be, and that cannot justify adding more inappropriate articles. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:56, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::Are you connected to this school in some way? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::@[[User:331dot|331dot]] Absolutely not. I just saw an article on the Internet and decided to create an entry about them, since I am from Ukraine myself. [[User:Newacctowork|Newacctowork]] ([[User talk:Newacctowork|talk]]) 14:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 12:00, 29 August 2025 review of submission by GeorgeHav ==

Hey! What does it mean when you say that there isn't significant coverage?

{{Lafc|username=GeorgeHav|ts=12:00, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:FlightSimExpo}}

Article was denied for npov, but I'm not sure i can personally see specifically where/why that's the case? Any thoughts on how I could improve that? [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 12:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:All the draft does is document occurrences of this event- in essence, promoting them. [[User:Honeymaidgrahamcrackers331dot|Honeymaidgrahamcrackers331dot]] ([[User talk:Honeymaidgrahamcrackers331dot|talk]]) 2213:1457, 129 JuneAugust 20202025 (UTC)

::Interesting, what would you recommend then in this case? Adding a section on "Reception"? [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 23:11, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::I would talk much less about occurrences of the event and much more about what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] say about it. You meed to show that it is [[WP:NEVENT|a notable event]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 23:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::Awesome, thanks for the advice. [[User:GeorgeHav|GeorgeHav]] ([[User talk:GeorgeHav|talk]]) 23:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== 13:02, 29 August 2025 review of submission by Vaibhav9786 ==

{{Lafc|username=Vaibhav9786|ts=13:02, 29 August 2025|draft=Reason for Article Rejection}}

Could you please let me know why my article was rejected. Just wanted to get an understanding so I do not make the same mistakes again [[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]] ([[User talk:Vaibhav9786|talk]]) 13:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{courtesy link|Draft:Virtual CFO Services in India}}

= June 2 =

:@[[User:Vaibhav9786|Vaibhav9786]]: your draft was purely promotional, and written not like an encyclopaedia article but a sales brochure.

:Presumably you work for YourCFO, which is what the spam link at the end of the draft was pointing to? In which case, you need to disclose your paid-editing-status (this has already been queried on your talk page), and I would also advise against continuing down this promotional road, lest you get blocked. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

== Request on 0117:21:1125, 229 JuneAugust 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles2025 forreview creation|AfC]]of submission by Caryplace7FurretSuperFan ==

{{Lafc|username=FurretSuperFan|ts=17:25, 29 August 2025|draft=Draft:Greatest_Idol}}

{{anchor|01:21:11, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Caryplace7}}

Hi my article got denied for the reason that it does not qualify for a Wikipedia article due to not having reliable sources. I'm trying to aim for the notability that the album charted in a national music chart, specifically in the Oricon and Billboards charts. I just wanted to make sure that these links count towards reliability and notability under secondary or independent sources

{{Lafc|username=Caryplace7|ts=01:21:11, 2 June 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Mike_Greenhaus}}

https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/products/1042567/1/

<!-- Start of message -->

Hello I have been trying for a few weeks to publish a bio of Journalist Mike Greenhaus, Editor-in-Chief of Relix Magazine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mike_Greenhaus) This is my first bio, though I have added references and edit over 100 other articles, so I am still learning how to do this properly. I have gone few a few drafts with a few editors after being denied and have been able to successfully clear that there is no conflict of interest and that I have enough independent third-party sources focused on the subject to make this worthy of acceptance. However user Chris just denied by post within minutes of my posting it. Chris' comments suggested that a majority of the references I cited were by the subject I was writing about when in fact NONE of the links are by him, nor from the magazine he edits (expect the masthead as proof of his current position) The four articles I cited as best references had all been cleared as OK by another editor and are focused specifically on the subject of my bio. In addition, the other articles cite him as an expert reference which according to my research is the type of articles that should be included as proof of notability. I understood I have perhaps too many references; I was trying to balance a mix of articles focused solely on Mr. Greenhaus with citations on his work from larger references. Please let me know how I can improve. Thank you so much[[User:Caryplace7|Caryplace7]] ([[User talk:Caryplace7|talk]]) 01:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

<!-https://www.billboard-japan.com/charts/detail?a=top_albums&year=2013&month=11&day=18 End of message -->[[User:Caryplace7FurretSuperFan|Caryplace7FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:Caryplace7FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 0117:2125, 229 JuneAugust 20202025 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]]. A sales site is almost never acceptable as a source: it is not independent.

:The Billboard might be reliable, but does not contain [[WP:significant coverage|significant coverage]], as it is just a listing, and I don't think it would count as a [[WP:secondary source|secondary source]] either. We really need independent, in-depth reviews. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::Would this link work for Oricon instead?

::https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/552646/rank/album/ [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::Would this link cunt for a secondary source?

::https://otakumode.com/otapedia/vocaloid/hatsune_miku/mitchie_m [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

:::Count* [[User:FurretSuperFan|FurretSuperFan]] ([[User talk:FurretSuperFan|talk]]) 20:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

::::It doesn't matter which link you use for Oricon - sales sites are almost never acceptable, period.

::::The Otakemode bit appears to be a wiki, with no byline. It therefore fails to be a [[WP:reliable source|reliable source]], and it is very likely not an [[WP:independent source|independent source]] either - we can't tell who submitted it, but it is likely to be the subject or their agents. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== 18:02:58:09, 229 JuneAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by AchamJetsonesque ==

{{Lafc|username=AchamJetsonesque|ts=18:02:58:09, 229 JuneAugust 20202025|draft=Draft:John_McNamara_(sportswriter)Sam_Bregman}}

Can anyone provide any guidance or input on the latest draft?

Regarding comments on 29 April by editor Paul W, a public media search likely supports relevance/notoriety for Sam Bregman, but that was not established with proper sources and citations.

Earlier entries for Sam Bregman were rejected for relevance, formatting, peacocking and lack of supporting citations. The latest edits attempt to remove problematic text, clean up formatting and citations, comply with tone and informational intentions of Wikipedia entries for public figures, and establish relevance.

It may be helpful to compare with the entry for former Las Cruces Mayor, Ken Miyagishima. Intention of latest edition is to create a similar entry for Bregman, with similar tone and proper support material.

Not sure why the many references "do not establish notability" for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_McNamara_(sportswriter)

[[User:Jetsonesque|Jetsonesque]] ([[User talk:Jetsonesque|talk]]) 18:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

"During his life, McNamara was a prolific journalist, covering sports and news in Maryland. He had written and edited for the St. John's College High School Sabre newspaper, the University of Maryland College Park Diamondback newspaper,[1] the Washington Post, the Hagerstown Herald-Mail, the Prince George's County (MD) Journal[2] and The Capital[3] in Annapolis, MD. He wrote three books on sports prior to his death,[4] and appeared as a guest commentator on line for the Washington Post,[5] and on radio on the Rick "Doc" Walker" show, and with Johnny Holliday to discuss Baltimore Orioles, and Washington Nationals baseball and on the Maryland Sports Radio Network. McNamara was a voter[6] in the Associated Press Top 25 NCAA basketball poll.[7] He won several awards for his writing from the Maryland - DC - Delaware Press Association. [8]"

:Hello, @[[User:Jetsonesque|Jetsonesque]]. It is almost ''never'' relevant to compare articles with existing article. Unless the article you are comparing with is either a [[WP:good article|good article]] or a [[WP:featured article|featured article]], its quality is unclear, and may be terrrible. See [[WP:other stuff exists|other stuff exists]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 19:29, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

I provided info on 4 books, on-line commentary, and multiple radio appearances. Can you provide specifics for what you need to establish notability? Of course, there are references are to his own writing, as would be the case for most journalists. However, 4 books, multiple interviews of him including in the Washington Post, and hundreds of articles that he wrote, would seemingly meet your qualifications. I am sure I have what you need, but I am having trouble imagining what else to include. Thank you.

= August 30 =

[[User:Acham|Acham]] ([[User talk:Acham|talk]]) 02:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== Feedback on revised draft: Gerald P. Curatola ==

== 04:20:41, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Nova9944 ==

Hello, I’m seeking feedback on [[Draft:Gerald P. Curatola]], which was previously declined for formatting and sourcing issues. I have now:

{{Lafc|username=Nova9944|ts=04:20:41, 2 June 2020|page=

Dodici Alternative Music Notation

}}

I finished a userspace draft and clicked the "submit your draft for review" button. There was no indication as to whether it was submitted or not. Also I do not know how I will receive your reply so please email me if possible.

[[User:Nova9944|Nova9944]] ([[User talk:Nova9944|talk]]) 04:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:Answered at [[WP:HD]]. {{re|Nova9944}} please don't ask the same question at two different places. [[User:Victor Schmidt mobil|Victor Schmidt mobil]] ([[User talk:Victor Schmidt mobil|talk]]) 05:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

* Rewritten in neutral prose.

== Request on 05:54:29, 2 June 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Sachi1307 ==

* Replaced weak/self-published links with strong independent sources (Forbes, Miami Herald, Vogue, New York Post, Purist, Yahoo).

{{anchor|05:54:29, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Sachi1307}}

* Corrected citations (ISBN for book, Vogue link, NYU Nexus PDFs confirming Acton Medal and Curatola Wing).

{{Lafc|username=Sachi1307|ts=05:54:29, 2 June 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Huion_(2)}}

* Removed Markdown formatting that triggered the last decline.

Could someone review and let me know if the draft now appears ready for resubmission?

<!-- Start of message -->

Thanks very much.

I don't understand how to make it into an Article, different reviewers have different suggestion. Firstly, there are no any advertisement, and then it create by others with a draft not a article, why can I not create to be an article. Who can guide me how to do it？

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Sachi1307GCNYdentist|Sachi1307GCNYdentist]] ([[User talk:Sachi1307GCNYdentist|talk]]) 05:5441, 230 JuneAugust 20202025 (UTC)

:Your autobiography is totally unsourced please don't use AI here it is notoriously bad at creating articles. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 08:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== 0609:40:4017, 230 JuneAugust 20202025 review of submission by RiHuangRsakib188 ==

{{Lafc|username=RiHuangRsakib188|ts=0609:40:4017, 230 JuneAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Rixiang_Huang2025_CUCSU_election}}

My submission was rejected and the reason that was given is "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.". Although there are similar articles on wikipedia. Such as [[2025 DUCSU election]] and [[2019 DUCSU election]]. Want to know how can I improve this arcticle to that it get published. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Could you please review it? I provided all the correct and authentic information! Thank you!

[[User:RiHuang|RiHuang]] ([[User talk:RiHuang|talk]]) 06:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:Please see [[WP:OSE|other stuff exists]], each article or draft is judged on its own merits and not based on the presence of other articles that themselves may be inapproprate and just not yet addressed. Perhaps those two articles should be removed. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::I'm really struggling to understand why we should have any information on some students' union elections (!) in a global encyclopaedia. (I'm even doubtful about the viability of [[Draft:Chittagong University Central Students' Union]].) -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:::There are four autonomous public universities (out of 41 public universities) in Bangladesh that has student parliament (simply called student union) and those are of big deal, as these parliment shape national issues and the elected leaders of these student parliament gets to play role in national politics and even become future national leaders and ministers. These parliment also has say on appointment of Vice-chancellors and teachers of these university. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 09:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::::Then provide some reliable independent sources that talk about the union in depth, @[[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]]. Without several sources that each meet all the criteria of [[WP:42]], a draft (or an article) is like a house without foundations, and not acceptable to Wikipedia. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 10:23, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::::Are you saying that by law these student bodies have formal input into the operation of the public universities they are associated with? I ask because that's unusual- in the US, at least- where most student bodies are advisory or only have privileges at the pleasure of the university, not in law. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 12:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:::::Yes, by law student leaders have 5 seat in university senate. And these four universities were established and govern by the act of Bangladeshi parliament as autonomous body. [[User:Rsakib188|Rsakib188]] ([[User talk:Rsakib188|talk]]) 17:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 0613:45:1324, 230 JuneAugust 20202025 review of submission by RixiangHDevolver789 ==

{{Lafc|username=RixiangHDevolver789|ts=0613:45:1324, 230 JuneAugust 20202025|declineddraft=UserDraft:RIXIANGHUANG/sandboxSteal_a_Brainrot}}

You wouldn't know Steal a Brainrot would be suitable for Wikipedia if you looked for proper, notable and reliable citations yourself [[User:Devolver789|Devolver789]] ([[User talk:Devolver789|talk]]) 13:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

How can I revise it to be able to pass?

[[User:RixiangH|RixiangH]] ([[User talk:RixiangH|talk]]) 06:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:Sorry, was that a question? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 13:25, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Devolver789}} There is a very distinct possibility that ''Steal a Brainrot'' is a notable subject. The problem is that [[WP:UNDUE|pretty much all of your sources]] [[WP:RSCONTEXT|waste time on the feud between]] its and ''[[Grow a Garden]]'''s lead developers. Only GameRant discusses ''Steal a Brainrot'' in the context of a review. I have no trouble finding sources that are actually ''about'' the game and not the tangential beef. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 14:35, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::I would like to note I attempted to help out with the draft, locating reviews from Polygon, Kotaku, and GameRant. Problem is, two of the sources fall under purview of [[WP:VALNET]], and [https://www.nme.com/news/gaming-news/steal-a-brainrot-is-robloxs-latest-viral-hit-grow-a-garden-3888650 an additional NME source] I've discovered doesn't qualify as [[WP:SIGCOV]]. As such, I had to regrettably abandon my efforts pending the publication of more reliable reviews. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] ^{[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]} 04:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:::One option would've been to post at [[WP:VG]] to seek the input of editors more familiar with reliable videogame sourcing, but then I discovered the Kotaku source was listed under the opinions section, which was the nail in the coffin for me. If any other editors feel [[Special:Diff/1308406121|this version]] is salvageable feel free to do so. — [[User:VolatileAnomaly|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] ^{[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly|''' 📲T''']] | [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly|'''⌨️C''']]} 04:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 0618:46:0601, 230 JuneAugust 20202025 review of submission by Armonia3iVasyaPetrovna ==

{{Lafc|username=Armonia3iVasyaPetrovna|ts=0618:46:0601, 230 JuneAugust 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Škoda_iVSak-Bahlán}}

Hi - this is the first time I've created a new page. The documentation is a little overwhelming? 😅 I tried submitting the draft for review but the "Draft article not currently submitted for review" box came up, and I don't know what to do next. [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 18:01, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|VasyaPetrovna}} I fixed your header so it links to your draft as intended; you need the "Draft:" portion of the title.

:You just need to click the blue "Submit your draft for review!" button in the bottom right corner of the notice that you speak of. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

::When I click it, it brings up another window, "Template - Generated from: AfC submission." I don't know what if anything I should be changing in that window? [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:::Never mind, I got it - thank you! [[User:VasyaPetrovna|VasyaPetrovna]] ([[User talk:VasyaPetrovna|talk]]) 19:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

== 18:27, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Tanja0615 ==

Can someone please point to specific changes to make, so that the draft shifts to a more neutral perspective ?

{{Lafc|username=Tanja0615|ts=18:27, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Mehmed_Begić}}

Hi, thanks for your review. The draft was not written with ChatGPT. One citation I formatted accidentally contained a tracking parameter (utm_source=chatgpt.com) in the URL, which I have now removed. I spent considerable time collecting and checking references from reliable published sources. Could you please point me to any specific passages where you think the language may not be neutral or where style should be adjusted? I’ll gladly revise those. [[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] ([[User talk:Tanja0615|talk]]) 18:27, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Tanja0615|Tanja0615]] I declined without prejudice, you have now re-submitted which was the correct thing to do. <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 11:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

(Quick background and disclaimer: my first car will probably be a Škoda Citigo iV; as such, I’ve searched Wikipedia for a summary of car and services information, only to find that there is very little available, so I proposed this dedicated wiki article to contain specific information about the features of each of their services/apps; I’m not connected with Škoda Auto in any way, but I have contacted their support email with questions.)

== 21:31, 30 August 2025 review of submission by Matthewbyver ==

I already attempted to make it strictly factual, by summarising and referencing hour-long presentations, and official press releases (available services, exact features of each app, public statements on the brand’s future plans).

{{Lafc|username=Matthewbyver|ts=21:31, 30 August 2025|draft=Draft:Matthew_Byver}}

Would referencing second-hand articles (that replicate this same information) actually aid give a more neutral perspective?

My page is not for promotion, is to help a small music artist to build his career by offering additional informations [[User:Matthewbyver|Matthewbyver]] ([[User talk:Matthewbyver|talk]]) 21:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Are there specific statements that seem speculative or advertorial?

:What you describe is the [[WP:YESPROMO|exact definition of promotion]]. Wikipedia is the last place to write about something, not the first. A subject must have already arrived and be noticed in order to draw the necessary coverage in independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that can be summarized in an article. It needs to show that you are a [[WP:BAND|a notable musician]] already, you cannot use Wikipedia to generate notability. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell about themselves, please read the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]] and also how [[WP:PROUD|an article is not necessarily desirable]]. I wish you luck with your career, I suggest thar you focus on that and allow an article to develop the usual way, when an independent editor takes note of coverage of you and chooses to write about you. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 00:24, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

The article seems to me to have a similar structure as other brands’ in the same electro-mobility category, like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_i but yes, arguably more focused on a future owner or interested party than the general public.

:In other words, you're trying to use Wikipedia as a publicity platform, and [[WP:NOTPUBLICITY|that is not allowed]] under any circumstances. To merit a Wikipedia article, you can't be up-and-coming. You must have already arrived. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 02:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 21:40, 30 August 2025 review of submission by 69.255.14.163 ==

Would contacting someone from the Transportation WikiProject help to get another perspective, and better alignment with existing pages for EV families?

{{Lafc|username=69.255.14.163|ts=21:40, 30 August 2025|draft=User:Wiseman2025/sandbox}}

has my artilce been rejected ? [[Special:Contributions/69.255.14.163|69.255.14.163]] ([[User talk:69.255.14.163|talk]]) 21:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

:Be sure to log in before you write anything here.

[[User:Armonia3i|Armonia3i]] ([[User talk:Armonia3i|talk]]) 06:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:That draft has been ''declined'', not rejected. If it's declined, it means you can improve it and submit it again once you have addressed the reviewer concerns. If it's rejected, then you give up and move on to something else. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 01:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:{{U|Armonia3i}} by basing the draft on {{tqqi|hour-long presentations, and official press releases}} and the like, you are going in exactly the wrong direction. Such presentations and releases are produced by the company, and naturally give the most positive view of the product possible. A Wikipedia article should be based primarily on [[WP:IS|Independent]] published [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], sources that have no connection with the company and no interest in whether the product does well or poorly. They should also be professionally published, not fan or personal sites. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 13:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

= August 31 =

== 06:47:34, 2 June 2020 review of submission by RIXIANGHUANG ==

{{Lafc|username=RIXIANGHUANG|ts=06:47:34, 2 June 2020|declined=Draft:Rixiang_Huang}}

Could you help me? I don't know why my wiki page is not approved.

[[User:RIXIANGHUANG|RIXIANGHUANG]] ([[User talk:RIXIANGHUANG|talk]]) 06:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|RIXIANGHUANG}} Wikipedia is [[WP:NOTSOCIAL|not social media]] for people to tell the world about themselves. Wikipedia does not have "wiki pages", it has '''articles''' typically written by independent editors. Please review the [[WP:AUTO|autobiography policy]] for more information. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 0709:47:3818, 231 JuneAugust 20202025 review of draftsubmission by KcsnookerTxcraig75 ==

{{Lafc|username=KcsnookerTxcraig75|ts=0709:47:3818, 231 JuneAugust 20202025|draft=UserDraft:Kcsnooker/sandbox/Kamal_ChawlaDirty_Thirty_(Texas_politics)}}

I'm a bit gobsmacked that this has been rejected for lack of "reliable sources." Three New York Times articles, an article from the state historical association, a retrospective by the local ABC news affiliate, an article published in an Abilene newspaper, and a published memoir by one of the group's members are not "reliable?" [[User:Txcraig75|Txcraig75]] ([[User talk:Txcraig75|talk]]) 09:18, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:I don't think it's the sources themselves that are the issue, but I see some unsourced sentences. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:20, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

== 19:53, 31 August 2025 review of submission by Thilio ==

I am new to Wikipedia and have a basic question

{{Lafc|username=Thilio|ts=19:53, 31 August 2025|draft=Draft:AY_Poyoo}}

This [[Draft:AY_Poyoo]] got declined by [[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]], Reasons {{tq|"This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics)."}} Okay wait a minute, let me list the independent sources (BBC Newss, Vanguard News, Savanna News, The Guardian Nigeria, Modern Ghana, Pluse Ghana, News Hunter, Daily Guide Network including the Secondary sources et cetera. {{tq|"they do not show significant coverage"}} really?? can other editor please search this subject "AY Poyoo" on Microsoft Bling, Google search or any other search engine, because I did that and I found +50 pages and on and on, I also add new references. I'm just curious, PLEASE can experience Editor go and take a look at it. @[[User:TheBirdsShedTears|TheBirdsShedTears]] thank you though, you can also check and leave afc comment if there is issues that need to be corrected. Thanks [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]^{[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]} 19:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @[[User:Thilio|Thilio]]. You're misunderstanding [[WP:IS|independent]]. If an article is based on an interview or a press release, then it is not independent, irresepctive of who publishes it. Some of your sources certainly have that problem: some may be independent, I haven't looked.

I would like to create an article about myself. It does meet the notability requirement. I have submitted a draft with article name "Kamal Chawla", but not sure if it will get rejected due to Conflict of Interest. If so, what is the best way to get the article published?

:You need several sources which each meet all the criteria in [[WP:42]]. [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 09:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] Thanks, got it [[User:Thilio|Thilio]]^{[[User talk:Thilio|<span class="robot-signature"><span class="robot-text" style="color:green;">R O B O T</span></span><span class="robot-emoji">🤖</span> <span style="color:#00008B;">talk</span>]]} 09:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 21:03, 31 August 2025 review of submission by ProfZacchaeus ==

[[User:Kcsnooker|Kcsnooker]] ([[User talk:Kcsnooker|talk]]) 07:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=ProfZacchaeus|ts=21:03, 31 August 2025|draft=GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING ARTICLES }}

Hello,

I will like to be educated on the vital websites that one can use to cite in line in an article i am writing. infact i need credible sites i can be using. Becuase i have beautiful aricles but i dont have citations for them and when i tried submitting a draft to be considered. It was declined and one of the reasons was that i didnt use credible citations.

and that i was using model language like chatgpt to write my articles.

:Hi, if you are notable enough you'll need to have citations from independent websites, newspapers, books or radio. Generally, you can't make articles about yourself, I'm not an expert but I know you'll need lots of citations for the size of your article. Maybe consider copying and pasting it onto your user page? [[User:Freyr Brown|Freyr Brown]] ([[User talk:Freyr Brown|talk]]) 08:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

So in summary, i need guidelines that can help me avoid declines when i post or publish my article through my sandbox.

== Request on 07:53:54, 2 June 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Freyr Brown ==

{{anchor|07:53:54, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Freyr Brown}}

{{Lafc|username=Freyr Brown|ts=07:53:54, 2 June 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Kallista_Primary_School}}

I am a newbie but a passionate one at that. Thank you [[User:ProfZacchaeus|ProfZacchaeus]] ([[User talk:ProfZacchaeus|talk]]) 21:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

<!-- Start of message -->

:Don't write articles [[WP:BACKWARD]], which is what you are doing. You should find sources ''first'', before you write a single word. Your sources should meet the three criteria in [[WP:Golden Rule]]. And write in your own words. Don't use an AI. ChatGPT is horrible at writing articles, and tends to hallucinate things and write in a non-neutral way, even though it may insist it's neutral.

Hi,

:That's how you avoid your drafts being declined. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 21:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

My article was recently rejected and now (after looking at some articles about notability and citations) I understand why it was rejected. I've now taken the time to get citations from newspapers, books, online newspapers and independent websites. I have cited lots of those and now I'm curious whether that will be enough. I'm also questioning if the amount of information there is online, makes it notable enough. I've found info from a lot of big newspapers and I think it should hopefully be good enough as a topic but I'm very new to all this and I'm not quite sure. I don't know exactly what my question is but if there's anything anybody could tell me that'd be great, thanks! [[User:Freyr Brown|Freyr Brown]] ([[User talk:Freyr Brown|talk]]) 07:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

= September 1 =

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Freyr Brown|Freyr Brown]] ([[User talk:Freyr Brown|talk]]) 07:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Freyr Brown}} As you were informed by the reviewer, lower level schools are not typically notable according to [[WP:ORG|Wikipedia's definition]]. Articles must do more than tell about the subject(as yours does); they must summarize what independent [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] ''with significant coverage'' say about the subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's definition of notability. Your draft just tells that the school exists and some things it offers. Note that even a school where a horrific shooting occurred, [[Sandy Hook Elementary School]], does not merit a Wikipedia article(though the event does). There needs to be a great deal of significant coverage- coverage that goes beyond mere mentions, routine announcements, or just confirmation that the school exists- for a school itself to merit an article. For example, a school that is housed in a historic building that has been written about in that context. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 0805:36:1822, 21 JuneSeptember 20202025 review of submission by Aflantwo濵島 ==

{{Lafc|username=Aflantwo濵島|ts=0805:36:1822, 21 JuneSeptember 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:MADELA_(Video_Game)YOHO_BREWING}}

Hello, I'm the author of this draft. My article submission was declined, but I'm having trouble understanding some of the reasons. Could you please provide some more specific feedback on how to improve the draft and get it approved? Is it okay to cite sources from Japanese sites?Thank you for your help. [[User:濵島|濵島]] ([[User talk:濵島|talk]]) 05:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|濵島}} We accept non-English citations. (We also accept cites to print media and cites to non-English print media.) I would note, however, that most reviewers are going to be using automated translation for non-English sources, and automated translation tends to fare poorly on context-heavy East Asian languages. —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">Jéské Couriano</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^&lowbar;^v</span>]] ^{<small>[[User:Jéské Couriano/AG|threads]] [[User:Jéské Couriano/Decode|critiques]]</small>} 06:51, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Aflantwo|Aflantwo]] ([[User talk:Aflantwo|talk]]) 08:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 11:14, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Amir Gull1 ==

{{Lafc|username=Amir Gull1|ts=11:14, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Amir_Gull_Timuri}}

Hello, I have created a draft article titled "Amir Gull Timuri".

I need assistance to understand what changes or improvements are required so that my draft can be accepted as a Wikipedia article.

Please review it and let me know if there are issues with notability, references, or formatting.

Thank you for your help! [[User:Amir Gull1|Amir Gull1]] ([[User talk:Amir Gull1|talk]]) 11:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:It has been rejected, there is zero evidence of any [[WP:GNG|notability]]. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 11:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Writing about yourself on Wikipedia is very strongly discouraged, because almost nobody has ever managed to do it successfully: see [[WP:autobiography|autobiography]]

:{{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}} [[User:ColinFine|ColinFine]] ([[User talk:ColinFine|talk]]) 12:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 1013:02:3748, 21 JuneSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by AgnieszkasekRahoman ==

{{Lafc|username=AgnieszkasekRahoman|ts=1013:02:3748, 21 JuneSeptember 20202025|draft=Draft:Tools_Up!Cosentino_Group}}

Hi, I asked for help reviewing this article. Several moderators helped me, you can see it here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archive_70#h-Requesting_a_submission,_how_to_procede?-20250731130700). But I haven’t gotten any more replies. Where can I request another review now that I’ve fixed everything that was pointed out? Thanks! [[User:Rahoman|Rahoman]] ([[User talk:Rahoman|talk]]) 13:48, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:First of all, good job adding more sources to the article. Based on the current references, I would say the subject is definitely notable. '''''However''''', the article still [[WP:NOTPROMO|reads like an advertisement]], and not a neutral encyclopedia article. Your edit after my last rejection did nothing to make the article's text less promotional. Furthermore, you still have not responded to repeated questions about whether you have a [[WP:PSCOI|conflict of interest]] regarding the subject. Deal with that first please. <span class="nowrap">—[[User:pythoncoder|<span style="color:#004080">python</span><span style="color:olive">coder</span>]] ([[User talk:pythoncoder|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/pythoncoder|contribs]])</span> 21:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] ==

[[User:Agnieszkasek|Agnieszkasek]] ([[User talk:Agnieszkasek|talk]]) 10:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

{{u|GeorgeM2011}} has asked for assistance on their draft [[User:GeorgeM2011/EYstreem]] at {{slink|User_talk:GeorgeM2011#How_to_Improve}}. Any and all assistance would be appreciated. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your feedback regarding the Tools Up! Wikipedia page draft. I have some questions to ask in order to make sure that the next version of the article will fit the Wikipedia standards better.

1) The feedback mentions that the article "appears to read more like an advertisement" - could you explain which parts of the text read like that?

2) "should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed" - which sources do you deem unreliable? All listed articles are published and available online. Moreover, none of the sources is a material produced by the creator of the subject being discussed.

I'm looking forward to your reply. Thank you for your time.

Best!

:{{U|Agnieszkasek}} The "Gameplay" section in particular reads as if it came from a company promotion, and in any case Wikipedia is not a how-to manual or game guide. The "Reception" section, which lists only positive reviews and reactions, also seems a bit promotional For example, the revieew from Destrutoid (Currently Ref 1) says "To sum it up, there are hints of greatness. But just hints." but no hint of this modified rapture appears in the article, it is merely listed as "positive". No actual quotes from reviews are used. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 13:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:Answered <span style="background-color: RoyalBlue; border-radius: 1em; padding: 3px 3px 3px 3px;">'''[[User:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">qcne</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Qcne|<span style="color: GhostWhite">(talk)</span>]]</small></span> 15:38, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 12:52:47, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Clifffyle2014 ==

{{Lafc|username=Clifffyle2014|ts=12:52:47, 2 June 2020|declined=Draft:PresentationTube}}

== 15:54, 1 September 2025 review of submission by 89.101.68.143 ==

Cliff 12:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

{{Lafc|username=89.101.68.143|ts=15:54, 1 September 2025|draft=User:Michael_miron123/sandbox}}

just a famous lad who wants a Wikipedia account and dose not have any fane [[Special:Contributions/89.101.68.143|89.101.68.143]] ([[User talk:89.101.68.143|talk]]) 15:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for flagging this up, I will go and delete it. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 14:18:03, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Arebello103 ==

{{Lafc|username=Arebello103|ts=14:18:03, 2 June 2020|declined=Draft:World_Awareness_Association}}

I have edited the content to be unbiased and added the review page from GreatNonprofits as a reference.

[[User:Arebello103|Arebello103]] ([[User talk:Arebello103|talk]]) 14:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 16:31, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Mguenego.usparis ==

{{Lafc|username=Mguenego.usparis|ts=16:31, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:Ström_Paris}}

Hello! I'd like to know if my draft is okay and can be published ? Or if I still need to do some modifications ? Thanks a lot. [[User:Mguenego.usparis|Mguenego.usparis]] ([[User talk:Mguenego.usparis|talk]]) 16:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:You have submitted the draft and it is pending. The reviewer will leave you feedback if they do not accept the draft. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

== 14:29:27, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Arebello103 ==

{{Lafc|username=Arebello103|ts=14:29:27, 2 June 2020|declined=Draft:World_Awareness_Association}}

I would like a re-review because WAA is an authentic organization, and I have edited the article to be unbiased and more informative, with additional sources other than the WAA website.

[[User:Arebello103|Arebello103]] ([[User talk:Arebello103|talk]]) 14:29, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 18:22, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Changingwormhole ==

{{Lafc|username=Changingwormhole|ts=18:22, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:V-DOC}}

Hello, I would like some help understanding why my draft was declined. The reviewer noted that the references do not demonstrate notability and that I need more reliable, independent secondary sources.

In my draft, I cited three independent news articles (Kuwait Times, Madhyamam, and Manorama Online) that directly cover the project. I also cited the official company website for technical details (such as the robot’s specifications and ecosystem), since I couldn’t find those details in news reports.

== 14:53:52, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS ==

{{Lafc|username=Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|ts=14:53:52, 2 June 2020|page=

Could the inclusion of the company website as a supporting source have been the problem? If so, am I allowed to use the website only for factual details (like names of components, patent numbers, etc.) while keeping the news articles as the independent coverage that demonstrates notability?

}}

I am asking assistance for a question, here is the question: How do you request for an editor?[[User:Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS]] ([[User talk:Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|talk]]) 14:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

[[User:Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS]] ([[User talk:Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|talk]]) 14:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

14:53:52, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS

{{Lafc|username=Natalia Prislonova Ordenador ASUS|ts=14:53:52, 2 June 2020|link=

<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]] OR [[Draft:Your submission name here]] -->

}}

Any guidance would be much appreciated.

== Request on 16:01:48, 2 June 2020 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Saalves ==

{{anchor|16:01:48, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Saalves}}

{{Lafc|username=Saalves|ts=16:01:48, 2 June 2020|declinedtalk=Draft:Janet_Marie_Smith}}16:01:48, 2 June 2020 review of submission by Saalves

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

{{Lafc|username=Saalves|ts=16:01:48, 2 June 2020|link=

<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]]

Page link for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:V-DOC [[User:Changingwormhole|Changingwormhole]] ([[User talk:Changingwormhole|talk]]) 18:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

<!-- First, tell us why you are requesting assistance. Take as many lines as you need. --> }}

*I fixed your header so that your draft is linked to as intended; you need the full title including the "Draft:" portion. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 18:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

<!-- Start of message --> I have many reliable sources which I cited in the text using <ref> <ref> I thought this meant that this code would populate the notes section. Not sure what is my next step. I checked how to cite my sources but I must not understand something important. Please help.

== 19:11, 1 September 2025 review of submission by Don Wanyama Off ==

{{Lafc|username=Don Wanyama Off|ts=19:11, 1 September 2025|draft=Draft:List_Of_Media_Tycoons_In_Africa}}

Request for re review on the draft List of Media Tycoons In Africa [[User:Don Wanyama Off|Don Wanyama Off]] ([[User talk:Don Wanyama Off|talk]]) 19:11, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:If you have addressed the concern of the first reviewer, you may click the Resubmit button. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:Note that list articles must collect members of the list that merit articles themselves. You're just listing names, none of them have articles, never mind sources. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 19:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

:* [[WP:QUACK]] - SPI filed [[User:KylieTastic|KylieTastic]] ([[User talk:KylieTastic|talk]]) 19:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

= September 2 =

<!-- End of message -->[[User:Saalves|Saalves]] ([[User talk:Saalves|talk]]) 16:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:Hello, {{U|Saalves}} You need to use a pair of {{tag|ref}} tags, not the / character on the closing tag. Withotu this they do not work correctly. Also:

:*Please refer to the subject by last mname only ("Smith" note "Janet Marie Smith") after the initial mention in the lead section, unless another person named smithy is also being referred to, and this would cause confusion.

:*Please read [[WP:REFB|referencing for beginners]]. Please provide the title of each source you cite, and where that source is part of a larger work (such as a newspaper, magazine, or website), please provide the name of that work as well. Please provide the date if publication when known. Please provide the author when known. Please list the publisher when this would help the reader.

:*Section headers should be surrounded by paired double equals signs (==Header here==) for top level headers, and triple equals for 2nd level headers (===Second level here===). Headers should be in sentence case, not all caps. Only the first word is capped except for proper names or other things that would be capitalized in running prose. See [[WP:SECTION]].

:*Please note that since Smith worked/works for MLB, sites run by MLB are not [[WP:IS|Independent]] sources, which are needed to establish notability.

:I hope that helps a bit. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|^(talk)]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|_{DESiegel Contribs}]] 16:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 1601:25:2800, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025 review of submission by The Cat 2020Asf132 ==

{{Lafc|username=The Cat 2020Asf132|ts=1601:25:2800, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:AvyarRao Mulpuri}}

Hi! I am awaiting submission of this biographical article, and despite fixing the initial request from my evaluator, because the article title was "moved" I'm not sure he/she was able to look at the right one. Could someone please ensure everything is ok? I believe it is ready for publishing [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 01:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Who gets to decide whether the article is notable or not? I wrote an article about one of the greatest female philosophers of India. I presented citation of the moral sentences which are timeless. I wrote an article and the some reviewer made factually incorrect statements about it which resulted in the rejection of my draft. My article is written in strict accordance to the rules of English and Wikipedia. The citation is properly attributed, all the works used are properly listed. I met with clear bias towards my article from the very beginning when somebody incorrectly called it "an essay". Then somebody decided to make factually incorrect statements about the references and attribution. Now the final person wrote that, "The subject probably is notable, but this draft does not establish notability." If this is the final verdict then the person who wrote this must read a few things about [[Sir William Jones]] and his Asiatic Researches who I referenced in my article.He should also read a thing or two about the [[Asiatic Society]] and the mythology. Then he should consult [[Godfrey Higgins]] and [[Frederic Shoberl]] who wrote about Avyar in their works and cited her moral sentences. Are those persons are not notable enough as well? All the references to the works cited and/or used are clearly mentioned, attributed and listed along with the page numbers for your convenience.

Finally, the phrase "The subject probably is notable, but this draft does not establish notability." clearly has a double meaning which is unacceptable. It is the polite but an unacceptable way of saying that my material is not welcome on Wikipedia. You should write a bulletin and state what people can or can't add to so-called free encyclopedia. You shouldn't exercise bias toward any material. You shouldn't block an important material from being published. You shouldn't provide false and factually incorrect statements toward the article itself when the facts presented are showing the opposite. I stand by the fact that my article is written in strict accordance to all the rules. The notability of the person has clearly established and the sources with great reputation are listed to prove that. Facts are on my side but the factually incorrect statements were made against me and my material. The latest statement is just a way of saying that my material is great but you are unable to publish it. No real reason for the rejection has been provided so far.

:I also would like to add that I do not believe that my previous evaluator speaks/understands English proficiently, as evidenced by the language used on their "talk" page and does not grasp the magnitude of the content covered by the professionally written secondary-sourced articles (Bloomberg, Business Insider, Fortune, etc.), which was in this case is covering a once multi-billion-dollar company's CEO.. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 03:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:The Cat 2020|The Cat 2020]] ([[User talk:The Cat 2020|talk]]) 16:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] could you please take a look? [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:I have left a comment on your draft, it will need to be completely re-written before it can be re-submitted, it has too much inappropriately written content which I have high lighted for you. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Asf132|Asf132]]: sorry, can you please clarify your question – are you just wanting to fast track your draft's review? -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::The issue in question when I spoke to the reviewer "Như Gây Mê" was a lack of notability, but it seems even by the most pessimistic metric of evaluation the subject would qualify under Wikipedia's standards. The reviewer replied to me in broken English without sufficiently providing an explanation for their evaluation: "Hi, I think this is not the right time for me to publish your article, the information is still too little to show the notability of the subject." So I'm asking for another staff member to evaluate the notability requirements of the individual/the article and if they do indeed suffice then I believe that yes, the article should be published based on that being the "issue" of the article. If that "asks" for a faster review, then I guess that's the answer? But it was more of a prior concern with how this requirement was being evaluated.

::::Thank you! [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::You have resubmitted the draft, and will therefore get a 'second opinion' in due course once a reviewer gets around to assessing it. We don't provide on-demand reviews here at the help desk.

:::::I have no comment to make regarding another reviewer's command of English; nor should you, in my opinion. Any reviewer working on the English Wikipedia will almost certainly have sufficient skills to be able to review a draft and its associated English-language sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::Ok, got it. I also just received your message about managing a conflict of interest, and I would like to let you know that there is no personal or professional connection to my subject. I have studied the subject independently through my own research in the last half-decade as his company was rising and falling. This should be clearly evidenced by my neutrality throughout my draft, which highlights both his professional accomplishments as well as evidence that he played a significant role in the eventual bankruptcy of his company. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 05:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Unusually (for me), I reviewed the draft you refer to, and also had to decline it for lack of evidence of notability. Most of the sources are either primary, or cover the View company with only passing mentions of Mulpuri. I believe the only one that provides significant coverage directly about him is [https://www.businessinsider.com/view-rao-mulpuri-softbank-bankruptcy-cantor-rxr-2024-8 this] ''BI'' piece (also cited for the second time via AOL, for some reason). -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::PS: I did not decline this because of the unreferenced DOB, I declined it because of insufficient evidence of notability. Resubmitting without any attempt at addressing that issue is disruptive. Don't do that again, please, or your draft may be rejected outright. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Thank you, I appreciate your time and feedback. I have found sources that are secondary that cover the subject in depth and added/replaced them now (if applicable to the content). [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::You have replaced one source, and resubmitted. Even if that new source were solid, which it isn't, that would still not be sufficient to satisfy [[WP:GNG]].

:::::::::You do you, I suppose, but just be aware that you do not have unlimited attempts at this. If I were you, I would try to make the most of your chances. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:20, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::Actually, there were an additional two sources added (one of which was to provide a source for the year, which I will concede is not secondary)) and the other was the Forbes article that was added in with new content (which would count as secondary). Only the second mention of the Business Insider article source was swapped for an equivalent one that aimed to resolve your issue earlier about how it was cited twice (which is what you were referring to, unless you did not see my latest edits). So that was not the one in question that I was referring to. But I understand your general point and will add more that would fit the requirement. [[User:Asf132|Asf132]] ([[User talk:Asf132|talk]]) 06:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::Indeed, you did add more than one new source... after my comment here. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 06:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 1802:55:3201, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025 review of submission by NaijaactiveElesha1188 ==

{{Lafc|username=NaijaactiveElesha1188|ts=1802:55:3201, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025|declineddraft=Draft:Holyfield_OlaCyrus_Tang_Foundation}}

Hi, the content that I posted have been declined twice by two peers. And I would like to seek assistance specifically on which part I have to make correction so that I content can edit again and make it live. Thank you ! [[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]] ([[User talk:Elesha1188|talk]]) 02:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Elesha1188|Elesha1188]]: now declined for the third time. As I said in my comments two declines ago, primary sources do not establish notability per [[WP:ORG]], and that's all your draft cites. We need to see significant coverage of this organisation in multiple ''secondary'' sources. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Naijaactive|Naijaactive]] ([[User talk:Naijaactive|talk]]) 18:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

== 04:04, 2 September 2025 review of submission by Goldface2009 ==

{{Lafc|username=Goldface2009|ts=04:04, 2 September 2025|draft=User:Goldface2009/sandbox}}

please review my article and let us know which source is still missing or violate the policy [[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]] ([[User talk:Goldface2009|talk]]) 04:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Goldface2009|Goldface2009]]: we don't provide pre-reviews here at the help desk, you'll get a proper review once you submit your draft. I've added a template to it which has a blue 'submit' button for that. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:13, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

== 2004:01:2733, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025 review of draftsubmission by Mrjava2019Samyfit556b ==

{{Lafc|username=Mrjava2019Samyfit556b|ts=2004:01:2733, 2 JuneSeptember 20202025|draft=DraftUser:Don_DiegoSamyfit556b/sandbox}}

tell me how do i create the sandbox i wnat to create please sir help [[User:Samyfit556b|Samyfit556b]] ([[User talk:Samyfit556b|talk]]) 04:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

:@[[User:Samyfit556b|Samyfit556b]]: it's right there, in the above link. That's where your rejected draft on BBKaPitara is. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

My draft that i wanted to publish got declined beacause the references was not enough and i was told that i need more footnotes. Could you please specify or mark witch statements that need footnotes so that i can apply them?

[[User:Mrjava2019|Mrjava2019]] ([[User talk:Mrjava2019|talk]]) 20:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)