Library and Information Science Abstracts: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:57, 23 August 2020

Latest revision as of 13:42, 25 December 2024

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|US periodical}}

{{Infobox bibliographic database

| child =

Line 10 ⟶ 11:

| providers =

| cost = Subscription

| disciplines = [[library and information science]]

| depth =

| formats =

Line 20 ⟶ 21:

| p_dates =

| ISSN =

| web = {{URL|1=https://about.proquest.com/en/products-services/lisa-set-c.html}}

| titles =

}}

The '''Library and Information Science Abstracts''' ('''LISA''') is an international abstracting and indexing tool designed for library professionals and other information specialists. LISA covers the literature in [[Library and information science]] (LIS) since 1969 and currently abstracts 440+ periodicals from 68+ countries and in 20+ languages.

LISA was originally published by the [[Library Association]]. [[Bowker-Saur]] began publishing LISA in 1991.<ref>[{{cite web |url=https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2488422 |title=Library & information science abstracts |work=NLA Catalog }}</ref> [[Cambridge Information Group]] acquired Bowker in 2001 and LISA began being produced by subsidiary [[Cambridge Scientific Abstracts]].<ref>{{cite press release |date=31 August 2001 |title=Cambridge Information Group Acquires R.R. Bowker |url=https://librarytechnology.org/document/24817 }}</ref> CSA merged with [[ProQuest]] in 2007.

Library & information science abstracts - NLA Catalog]</ref> [[Cambridge Information Group]] acquired Bowker in 2001 and LISA began being produced by subsidiary [[Cambridge Scientific Abstracts]].<ref>{{Cite journal| title = Cambridge Information Group Acquires R.R. Bowker| accessdate = 2020-08-16| date = 2001-08-31| url = https://librarytechnology.org/document/24817}}</ref> CSA merged with [[ProQuest]] in 2007.

==Coverage==

Meho & Spurgin (2005)<ref>Meho, Lokman I. & Spurgin, Kristina M. (2005). Ranking the Research Productivity of Library and Information Science Faculty and Schools: An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods. ''Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology'', 56(12), 1314–1331.</ref> found that in a list of 2,625 items published between 1982 and 2002 by 68 faculty members of 18 schools of [[library and information science]], only 10 databases provided significant coverage of the LIS literature. Data showed that [[Library Literature and Information Science]] (LLIS) indexes the highest percentage of LIS faculty publications (31.2%), followed by [[INSPEC]] (30.6%), [[Social Sciences Citation Index]] (SSCI)(29.6%), and LISA (27.2%). LISA is thus the fourth most comprehensive in this study.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Meho |first1=Lokman I. |last2=Spurgin |first2=Kristina M. |title=Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods |journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |date=October 2005 |volume=56 |issue=12 |pages=1314–1331 |doi=10.1002/asi.20227 }}</ref>

==Other important databases covering library and information science==

Line 43:

{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==

*Gilchrist, A. & Presanis, A. (1971). Library and information science abstracts: the first two years. ''ASLIB Proceedings'', 23(5), 251-256.

* {{cite journal |last1=Gilchrist |first1=Alan |last2=Presanis |first2=Alexandra |title=LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE ABSTRACTS: The FIRST TWO YEARS |journal=ASLIB Proceedings |date=1 May 1971 |volume=23 |issue=5 |pages=251–256 |doi=10.1108/eb050289 }}

*Gonzalez {{cite journal |last1=González-Alcaide, G.;|first1=Gregorio Castello|last2=Castelló-Cogollos, L;|first2=Lourdes |last3=Navarro-Molina, C;|first3=Carolina |last4=Aleixandre-Benavent, R;|first4=Rafael Valderrarna|last5=Valderrama-Zurian,Zurián J.C.|first5=Juan (2008).Carlos |title=Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in LISA,lisa ''|journal=Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology'', |date=January 2008 |volume=59( |issue=1), 150-154|pages=150–154 |doi=10.1002/asi.20720 }}

*Kumar, T.V.R. & Parameswaran, M. (1998). Chain indexing and LISA. ''Knowledge Organization'', 25(1-2), 13-15.

* {{cite journal |id={{INIST|2354934}} |last1=Remesh Kumar |first1=T. V |last2=Parameswaran |first2=M. |title=Chain indexing and LISA |journal=Knowledge Organization |date=1998 |volume=25 |issue=1–2 |pages=13–15 }}

*Montesi, M. & Owen, J.M. (2007). Revision of author abstracts: how it is carried out by LISA editors. ''ASLIB Proceedings'', 59(1), 26-45.

* {{cite journal |last1=Montesi |first1=Michela |last2=Mackenzie Owen |first2=John |title=Revision of author abstracts: how it is carried out by LISA editors |journal=ASLIB Proceedings |date=23 January 2007 |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=26–45 |doi=10.1108/00012530710725197 }}

==External links==

Line 53 ⟶ 54:

{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Library and information science journals]]

[[Category:Library science journals]]

[[Category:Library science]]

[[Category:Information science]]

[[Category:Bibliographic databases and indexes]]