Talk:Universal approximation theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 10:41, 4 September 2020 edit 2001:16b8:403a:3900:10ac:5987:da21:4c5 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:13, 3 June 2024 edit undo Cosmia Nebula (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,296 edits change class to C Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\| ~~{{Maths rating \|class=Start \|priority=Low \|field=applied}}~~ {{WikiProject Mathematics\|priority=Low }} }} == Deep variants == Line 68 ⟶ 69: ::::::::: OK, sounds good. [[User:Koertefa\|''<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''K'''<span style="color:Teal">œrte</span>'''F'''</span><span style="color:Teal">a</span>'']] [[User talk:Koertefa#top\|<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''{'''<i style="color:Teal">ταλκ</i>'''}'''</span>]] 19:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC) == To scientific? Not understandable? == No, I think the article is just fine. At least do not abbreviate it. Perhaps this text could be moved more to the end of the article and a more elementary instruction could be written in an introduction. [[Special:Contributions/139.14.20.177\|139.14.20.177]] ([[User talk:139.14.20.177\|talk]]) 11:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC) ~~== Arbitrary Width Case ==~~ I am wondering if the theorem presented here is correct. In http://www2.math.technion.ac.il/~pinkus/papers/acta.pdf, the neural network has only one node in output layer (so they map to R). Here the numer of output nodes is arbitrary. Is this correct?