Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 3 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WPAnthro}}, {{WPCE}}, {{WikiProject Cognitive science}}. Tag: |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Cognitive science|importance=Low}}
}}
== Criticism ==
Line 20 ⟶ 22:
== Move (agreed) ==
With accordance to [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]], I think this should be moved to [[dual inheritance theory]]. Are there any reasons why it should have a long and capitalized name? Also, this needs a [[Wikipedia:Lead|lead section]].--[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]] [[User_talk:Piotrus|<sup
Moving right now. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] 00:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Line 35 ⟶ 37:
The cultural evolution part of this should be split off into its own article, and the DIT article should discuss only those processes and findings related to the interaction between biological and cultural evolution. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.99.137.201|62.99.137.201]] ([[User talk:62.99.137.201|talk]]) 08:39, 24 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The Dual Inheritance Theory is not the same as Gene-Culture Coevolution theory and this article should be edited to reflect this comparison. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2600:8801:5:A000:8C97:5AA8:14A4:F565|2600:8801:5:A000:8C97:5AA8:14A4:F565]] ([[User talk:2600:8801:5:A000:8C97:5AA8:14A4:F565#top|talk]]) 19:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Proposed merge of [[Biocultural evolution]] ==
| |||