Content deleted Content added
m 2pou moved page Talk:ID-based encryption to Talk:Identity-based encryption without leaving a redirect: requested move; consensus at Talk:Identity-based encryption |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Cryptography}}. Tag: |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Cryptography|importance=High}}
}}
I don't know this area well - but it looks to me as if this should be merged into [[identity based encryption]] now. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 21:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
: I think we need to verify that there's no copyright problems first :( [[User:Matt Crypto|— Matt <small>Crypto</small>]] 22:28, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Line 43 ⟶ 44:
While the statement "IBE solutions may rely on cryptographic techniques that are insecure against code breaking quantum computer attacks (see Shor's algorithm)" is true, I do not think that this drawback is specific to ID-based encryption, so I feel it is a bit unfair to account to it as its disadvantage. There is absolutely nothing that would disallow quantum algorithm attack resistance encryption to be used in ID-based encryption.
== Requested move 30 September 2020 ==
Line 67 ⟶ 66:
: ''The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''<!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>
== What does ''IBS system'' mean ? ==
THe article states that ''IBS systems cannot be used for non-repudiation''. What does IBS refer to ?<br/>
Or is it a typo error and should read ''IBE systems cannot be used for non-repudiation'' ? -- Juergen [[Special:Contributions/89.244.93.204|89.244.93.204]] ([[User talk:89.244.93.204|talk]]) 14:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||