Content deleted Content added
m →Further reading: Remove interlanguage links to articles that exist in enwiki |
Matthiaspaul (talk | contribs) →Further reading: improved ref |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4:
== Overview ==
The bus-invert encoding technique uses an extra signal (INV) to indicate the "polarity" of the data. Having a bus-invert code word INV@x where @ is the concatenation operator and x denotes either the source word or its [[ones' complement]], the bus-invert decoder takes the code word and produces the corresponding source word. If the INV signal is 1, the result is
=== Usage scenarios===
Line 23:
== Performance analysis ==
The bus-invert method generates a code that has the property that the maximum number of transitions per time-slot is reduced from n to n/2+1 and thus the peak power dissipation for [[input/output]] (I/O) is reduced by nearly the half. From the [[coding theory]] point of view, the bus-invert code is a time-dependent Markovian code.
While the maximum number of transitions is reduced by half, the average number has a smaller decrease. For an 8-bit bus for example, the average number of transitions, using bus-invert coding becomes 3.27 (instead of 4), or 0.41 (instead of 0.5) transitions per bus-line per time-slot. This means that the average number of transitions is 81.8% of the number with an unencoded bus. This is because the invert line contributes some transitions and the distribution of the Hamming distances is not uniform.<ref name="Stan_1995"/>
Line 42:
==Further reading==
* {{cite book |author-first=Vincent C. |author-last=Gaudet |chapter=Chapter 4.1. Low-Power Design Techniques for State-of-the-Art CMOS Technologies |editor-first=Bernd |editor-last=Steinbach |editor-link=:de:Bernd Steinbach |title=Recent Progress in the Boolean Domain |publisher=[[Cambridge Scholars Publishing]] |
[[Category:Electronics optimization]]
|