Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 983695605 by HectorVisalia (talk) If you're going to do that, you could try harder to not leave commas at ends of sentences, remove references, and otherwise leave things worse than the passive you replaced. |
add animation gif |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of comparison sorting algorithm}}
In [[computer science]], '''merge-insertion sort''' or the '''Ford–Johnson algorithm''' is a [[comparison sort]]ing algorithm published in 1959 by [[L. R. Ford Jr.]] and [[Selmer M. Johnson]].{{r|fj|c4cs|distrib|knuth}} It uses fewer comparisons in the [[worst case analysis|worst case]] than the best previously known algorithms, [[insertion sort|binary insertion sort]] and [[merge sort]],{{r|fj}} and for 20 years it was the sorting algorithm with the fewest known comparisons.{{r|nonopt}} Although not of practical significance, it remains of theoretical interest in connection with the problem of sorting with a minimum number of comparisons.{{r|distrib}} The same algorithm may have also been independently discovered by [[Stanisław Trybuła]] and Czen Ping.{{r|knuth}}
[[File:Ford-janson.gif|thumb|An animation of the [[Merge algorithm|merge-algorithm]] sorting an array of randomized values.]]
==Algorithm==
Line 5 ⟶ 7:
#Group the elements of <math>X</math> into <math>\lfloor n/2\rfloor</math> pairs of elements, arbitrarily, leaving one element unpaired if there is an odd number of elements.
#Perform <math>\lfloor n/2\rfloor</math> comparisons, one per pair, to determine the larger of the two elements in each pair.
#Recursively sort the <math>\lfloor n/2\rfloor</math> larger elements from each pair, creating a sorted sequence <math>S</math> of <math>\lfloor n/2\rfloor</math> of the input elements, in ascending order, using the merge-insertion sort.
#Insert at the start of <math>S</math> the element that was paired with the first and smallest element of <math>S</math>.
#Insert the remaining <math>\lceil n/2\rceil-1</math> elements of <math>X\setminus S</math> into <math>S</math>, one at a time, with a specially chosen insertion ordering described below. Use [[binary search]] in subsequences of <math>S</math> (as described below) to determine the position at which each element should be inserted.
Line 40 ⟶ 42:
Merge-insertion sort also performs fewer comparisons than the [[sorting number]]s, which count the comparisons made by binary insertion sort or merge sort in the worst case. The sorting numbers fluctuate between <math>n\log_2 n - 0.915n</math> and <math>n\log_2 n - n</math>, with the same leading term but a worse constant factor in the lower-order linear term.{{r|fj}}
Merge-insertion sort is the sorting algorithm with the minimum possible comparisons for <math>n</math> items whenever <math>
For 20 years, merge-insertion sort was the sorting algorithm with the fewest comparisons known for all input lengths.
However, in 1979 Glenn Manacher published another sorting algorithm that used even fewer comparisons, for large enough inputs.{{r|distrib|nonopt}}
Line 110 ⟶ 112:
| pages = 441–456
| title = The Ford-Johnson Sorting Algorithm Is Not Optimal
| volume = 26
}}</ref>
<ref name=pec>{{citation
Line 139 ⟶ 142:
[[Category:Comparison sorts]]
[[Category:1959 in computing]]
| |||