Test oracle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
restore spacing
Line 1:
{{other uses|Oracle (disambiguation)}}
 
In [[computing]], [[software engineering]], and [[software testing]], a '''test oracle''' (or just '''oracle''') is a mechanism for determining whether a test has passed or failed.<ref>Kaner, Cem; [http://www.testingeducation.org/k04/OracleExamples.htm ''A Course in Black Box Software Testing''], 2004</ref> The use of oracles involves comparing the output(s) of the system under test, for a given [[test case|test-case]] input, to the output(s) that the oracle determines that product should have. The term "test oracle" was first introduced in a paper by William E. Howden.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Howden |first1=W.E. |date=July 1978 |title=Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Program Testing |journal=IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=293–298 |doi=10.1109/TSE.1978.231514 }}</ref> Additional work on different kinds of oracles was explored by [[Elaine Weyuker]].<ref>Weyuker, Elaine J.; "The Oracle Assumption of Program Testing", in ''Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on System Sciences (ICSS), Honolulu, HI, January 1980'', pp. 44-49</ref>
 
Line 6 ⟶ 5:
 
== Categories ==
 
A research literature survey covering 1978 to 2012<ref name="Oracle survey">{{cite journal |last1=Barr |first1=Earl T. |last2=Harman |first2=Mark |last3=McMinn |first3=Phil |last4=Shahbaz |first4=Muzammil |last5=Yoo |first5=Shin |date=November 2014 |title=The Oracle Problem in Software Testing: A Survey |journal=IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering |volume=41 |issue=5 |pages=507–525 |doi=10.1109/TSE.2014.2372785 |url=http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1471263/1/06963470.pdf }}</ref> found several potential categories of test oracles.
 
=== Specified ===
 
These oracles are typically associated with formalised approaches to software modelling and software code construction. They are connected to [[formal specification]],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Börger |first1=E |editor-last1=Hutter |editor-first1=D |editor-last2=Stephan |editor-first2=W |editor-last3=Traverso |editor-first3=P |editor-last4=Ullman |editor-first4=M |date=1999|title=High Level System Design and Analysis Using Abstract State Machines |journal=Applied Formal Methods — FM-Trends 98 |volume=1641 |pages=1–43 |doi=10.1007/3-540-48257-1_1 |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |isbn=978-3-540-66462-8 |citeseerx=10.1.1.470.3653 }}</ref> [[model-based design]] which may be used to generate test oracles,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Peters |first1=D.K. |date=March 1998 |title=Using test oracles generated from program documentation |journal=IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering |volume=24 |issue=3 |pages=161–173 |doi=10.1109/32.667877 |citeseerx=10.1.1.39.2890 }}</ref> state transition specification for which oracles can be derived to aid [[model-based testing]]<ref>{{cite journal| author-last1=Utting |author-first1=Mark |author-last2=Pretschner |author-first2=Alexander |author-last3=Legeard |author-first3=Bruno |title = A taxonomy of model-based testing approaches |journal = Software Testing, Verification and Reliability |volume= 22|issue= 5 |issn= 1099-1689|doi=10.1002/stvr.456 |pages= 297–312|year=2012 |url=https://eprints.qut.edu.au/57853/1/master_pdflatex.pdf }}</ref> and [[conformance testing|protocol conformance testing]],<ref>{{cite book|author-link1=Marie-Claude Gaudel |last1=Gaudel |first1=Marie-Claude |editor-last1=Craeynest |editor-first1=D.|editor-last2=Strohmeier |editor-first2=A|date=2001 |title=Testing from Formal Specifications, a Generic Approach |journal= Reliable SoftwareTechnologies — Ada-Europe 2001 |volume=2043 |pages=35–48 |doi=10.1007/3-540-45136-6_3 |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |isbn=978-3-540-42123-8 }}</ref> and [[design by contract]] for which the equivalent test oracle is an [[assertion (software development)|assertion]].
 
Line 14 ⟶ 15:
 
=== Derived ===
 
A derived test oracle differentiates correct and incorrect behaviour by using information derived from artefacts of the system. These may include documentation, system execution results and characteristics of versions of the system under test.<ref name="Oracle survey"/>{{rp|514}} Regression test suites (or reports) are an example of a derived test oracle - they are built on the assumption that the result from a previous system version can be used as aid (oracle) for a future system version. Previously measured performance characteristics may be used as an oracle for future system versions, for example, to trigger a question about observed potential performance degradation. Textual documentation from previous system versions may be used as a basis to guide expectations in future system versions.
 
A pseudo-oracle<ref name="Oracle survey"/>{{rp|515}} falls into the category of derived test oracle. A pseudo-oracle, as defined by Weyuker,<ref name="pseudo-oracle">{{cite journal |last1=Weyuker |first1=E.J. |date=November 1982 |title=On Testing Non-Testable Programs |journal=The Computer Journal |volume=25 |issue=4 |pages=465–470 |doi=10.1093/comjnl/25.4.465 |doi-access=free }}</ref> is a separately written program which can take the same input as the program or system under test so that their outputs may be compared to understand if there might be a problem to investigate.
 
A partial oracle<ref name="Oracle survey"/>{{rp|515}} is a hybrid between specified test oracle and derived test oracle. It specifies important (but not complete) properties of the system under test. For example, [[metamorphic testing]] exploits such properties, called metamorphic relations, across multiple executions of the system.
 
=== Implicit ===
 
An implicit test oracle relies on implied information and assumptions.<ref name="Oracle survey"/>{{rp|518}} For example, there may be some implied conclusion from a program crash, i.e. unwanted behaviour - an oracle to determine that there may be a problem. There are a number of ways to search and test for unwanted behaviour, whether some call it negative testing, where there are specialized subsets such as [[fuzzing]].
 
Line 26 ⟶ 29:
 
=== Human ===
 
When specified, derived or implicit test oracles cannot be used, then human input to determine the test oracles is required.<ref name="ammann-intro" /> These can be thought of as quantitative and qualitative approaches.<ref name="Oracle survey"/>{{rp|519–520}} A quantitative approach aims to find the right amount of information to gather on a system under test (e.g., test results) for a stakeholder to be able to make decisions on fit-for-purpose or the release of the software. A qualitative approach aims to find the representativeness and suitability of the input test data and context of the output from the system under test. An example is using realistic and representative test data and making sense of the results (if they are realistic). These can be guided by [[heuristic]] approaches, such as gut instincts, rules of thumb, checklist aids, and experience to help tailor the specific combination selected for the program/system under test.
 
== Examples ==
 
Test oracles are most commonly based on [[Specification (technical standard)|specifications]] and [[software documentation|documentation]].<ref>{{cite thesis | last = Peters | first = Dennis K. | citeseerx = 10.1.1.69.4331 | title = Generating a Test Oracle from Program Documentation | publisher = McMaster University | degree = M. Eng. | year = 1995 }}</ref><ref>{{cite conference | last1 = Peters | first1 = Dennis K. | last2 = Parnas | first2 = David L. | url = http://www.engr.mun.ca/~dpeters/papers/issta.pdf | title = Generating a Test Oracle from Program Documentation | book-title = Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis | conference = ISSTA | publisher = ACM Press | pages = 58–65 }}</ref> A formal specification used as input to [[model-based design]] and [[model-based testing]] would be an example of a ''specified test oracle''. The ''model-based oracle'' uses the same model to generate and verify system behavior.<ref>Robinson, Harry; [http://www.harryrobinson.net/MBT-on-a-shoestring.pdf ''Finite State Model-Based Testing on a Shoestring''], STAR West 1999</ref> Documentation that is not a full specification of the product, such as a usage or installation guide, or a record of performance characteristics or minimum machine requirements for the software, would typically be a derived test oracle.
 
Line 41 ⟶ 46:
A heuristic oracle provides representative or approximate results over a class of test inputs.<ref>Hoffman, Douglas; [http://www.softwarequalitymethods.com/Papers/STQE%20Heuristic.pdf Heuristic Test Oracles], Software Testing & Quality Engineering Magazine, 1999</ref> This would be an example of a qualitative approach in human test oracle.
 
== References ==
{{reflist}}
 
== Bibliography ==
 
* Binder, Robert V. (1999). "Chapter 18 - Oracles" in ''Testing Object-Oriented Systems: Models, Patterns, and Tools'', Addison-Wesley Professional, 7 November 1999, {{ISBN|978-0-201-80938-1}}