Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
in favor of (object-oriented programming). |
||
Line 88:
* [[inheritance (computer science)]] -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]]
** In favour:
** Against: 1 [[User:JohnOwens|John Owens]], [[User:Mbecker|MB]], [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]]
* [[inheritance (object-oriented programming)]]
** In favour: 1 [[User:JohnOwens|John Owens]], [[User:Mbecker|MB]], [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]]
** Against:
This doesn't really cover inheritance as used in CSS etc., which are also part of computer science. BTW, Taku, did you mean to vote for that? -- [[User:JohnOwens|John Owens]] 20:07 5 Jun 2003 (UTC)
I must admit I've played devil's advocate somewhat here. In the end I must say I'm in favor of (object-oriented programming). John makes a good point about CSS, which I hadn't considered, but then, that's not even part of Computer Science, really. Someday someone may write [[Inheritance (Cascading Style Sheets)]] but until then... -- [[User:Wapcaplet|Wapcaplet]] 01:55 6 Jun 2003 (UTC)
|