Talk:Inheritance (object-oriented programming): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:49, 6 June 2003

Revision as of 08:21, 7 June 2003

Line 127:

I can agree with this. Then the article should be named like inheritance in object-oriented programming or something because it can be seen as subtopic of inheritance article in cs. Any problem? -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 23:49 6 Jun 2003 (UTC)

:Well beleive it or not. This article WAS originally called [[Inheritance in object-oriented programming]] as was [[Class in object-oriented programming]], [[Polymorphism in object-oriented programming]] and[[Abstraction in object-oriented programming]]. Other articles on the subject of OOP were variously named and disambiguated to differentiate them from other uses of the pertinent words. Then, somebody decided to make the disambiguation consistent by using the parenthesis. And everybody was happy, until you decided that it had to be changed for some reason. So why move it? What is the point in breaking the consistency of disambiguation. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] 08:21 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)