Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Revert to revision 1003453568 dated 2021-01-29 01:45:00 by FeanorStar7: was correct. |
||
Line 1:
[[File:Mozart (unfinished) by Lange 1782.jpg|250px|thumb|<center>Mozart portrayed by his brother-in-law [[Joseph Lange]]</center>]]
Scholars have long studied how [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] created his works.
==Mozart's approach to composition==
Line 88:
Mozart appears to have possessed an excellent memory for music, though probably not the quasi-miraculous ability that has passed into legend. In particular, the use of keyboards and sketches to compose, noted above, would not have been necessary for a composer who possessed superhuman memory. Various anecdotes attest to Mozart's memory abilities.
Two of the violin sonatas gave rise to anecdotes to the effect that Mozart played the piano part at the premiere from memory, with only the violinist playing from the music. This is true for the Violin Sonata in G, K. 379/373a, where Mozart wrote in a letter to Leopold (8 April 1781) that he wrote out the violin part in an hour the night before the performance<ref>Solomon 1995, 309. {{harvnb|Irving
One may question whether, in these instances, Mozart remembered the entire keyboard part note-for-note. Given the independent testimony (above) for his ability to fill in gaps through improvisation, it would seem that Mozart could have done this as well in performing the violin sonatas.
Line 109:
Although it has been influential in historical conceptions of Mozart, the letter is no longer regarded as an accurate description of Mozart's compositional process.<ref>Konrad, 101</ref> On the other hand, Mozart's first biographer, in collaboration with Mozart's wife, related a congruent account of how Mozart composed:
<blockquote>Mozart wrote everything with a facility and rapidity, which perhaps
The contents of the Rochlitz letter were relayed by such authorities as the mathematician [[Henri Poincaré]] and the musician [[Albert Lavignac]]<ref>Albert Lavignac, ''L'éducation musicale'', p. 290</ref> and had a great influence on the popular view of Mozart's compositional process. As late as 1952 a volume of collected papers from a symposium on the creative process reproduce the letter, albeit with a warning that "the authenticity of this letter remains in doubt".<ref>Brewster Ghiseli (editor), ''The Creative Process: A Symposium'', University of California Press, 1952, p. 34</ref>
Line 117:
'''Sources'''
*{{cite book|last=Braunbehrens|first=Volkmar|author-link=Volkmar Braunbehrens|year=1990|title=Mozart in Vienna: 1781–1791|___location=New York|publisher=Grove Weidenfeld}}
*{{cite book|last=Deutsch|first=Otto Erich|author-link=Otto Erich Deutsch|year=1965|title=Mozart: A Documentary Biography|___location=Stanford, California|publisher=Stanford University Press}}
*{{cite encyclopedia|last=Irving
*[[Simon P. Keefe|Keefe, Simon P.]] (2006) "Rochlitz, (Johann) Friedrich," in Cliff Eisen and Simon P. Keefe, ''The Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*[[Ulrich Konrad|Konrad, Ulrich]] (2006) "Compositional method," in Cliff Eisen and Simon P. Keefe, ''The Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Line 135 ⟶ 134:
{{Portal bar|Classical music}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:
[[Category:
[[Category:
|