Content deleted Content added
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 131:
Then the decision was probably wrong or right in that time but become wrong now. I remember an article called [[immutable object]]. It is mostly discussed in OOP context. But it is also important in languages that adopted reference mode rather than value model, though known far less. And I guess so are other topics that are heavily tied with oop paradigm. Besides, can you tell us the reason why you think (object-oriented programming) suffix is better than (computer science) for disambiguation purpose? To disambiguate, cs is broad enough. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 21:40 9 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:Taku I have told you the answer to that question too many times already and I am tired of repeating myself. [[User:Mintguy|Mintguy]] 03:17 10 Jun 2003 (UTC)
|