Talk:Monitor (synchronization): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:34, 18 May 2021

Revision as of 22:21, 2 December 2022

Line 101:

== Error in Monitor (synchronization)-Mesa.png ==

See the file's talk page. [[file:Monitor (synchronization)-Mesa.png|thumb]] [[User:Craig Pemberton|-<fontspan style="color:#006400">Craig Pemberton</fontspan>]] 06:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

: Fixed. Thanks Craig. [[User:Theodore.norvell|Theodore.norvell]] ([[User talk:Theodore.norvell|talk]]) 22:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Line 131:

An edit in October 2013 substantially changed the introductory paragraphs. For example it added this sentence. "In essence, a monitor M = (m, c) is a pair of a mutex (lock) object m and a condition variable c." To me this doesn't look right. Since the start (i.e. Hoare's paper and Brinch Hansen's work) monitors have allowed an arbitrarily large set of condition variables. The restriction to one variable (as in Java) is one variation on the monitor concept. [[Special:Contributions/142.134.201.203|142.134.201.203]] ([[User talk:142.134.201.203|talk]]) 12:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

:Thanks for pointing that out! I changed it. If you think anything else was better before the October 2013 edit feel free to restore it. [[User:InverseHypercube|<fontspan colorstyle="color:blue"; font-size="2px:small;">Inverse</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#6495ED"; font-size="2px:small;">Hypercube</fontspan>]] <small>([[User talk:InverseHypercube|talk]])</small> 02:57, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

== New sections ==