Revision as of 00:50, 14 February 2005 edit StefenTower (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 196,173 edits m →Define "major" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:19, 15 February 2005 edit undo Wernher (talk \| contribs) 16,218 edits m →Define "major": split acad major langs into their own tpl? Next edit →
Line 86: — [[User:Stevietheman\|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold">Stevie is the man!</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Stevietheman\|<span style="color:blue">Talk</span>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman\|<span style="color:blue">Contrib</span>]]</sup> 00:45, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC) :OK, now we're talking. Currently, I think the template reflects no. 1 and 3 of Stevie's criteria. I would argue that those criteria are necessary and sufficient for this particular template, i.e., that they constitute a reasonably good definition of "major", which leaves the academically-only significant languages to another separate template (easily found by navigating to such a language from one of several language list articles and from one of the pertinent language articles). My conclusion: two templates rather than three. --[[User:Wernher\|Wernher]] 06:19, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Template talk:Programming languages: Difference between revisions