Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Operation Rolling Thunder: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Prev. edit had broken wiki-formatting |
|||
Line 26:
I went in and wiki-fied dates. While there, I re-did some links to specific aircraft to keep a consistent style throughout, and while I was at it I changed all the "pps." to "pp.".
[[User:Rjray|Rjray]] 02:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
====PocklingtonDan====
*I think I read somewhere that articles entitled "Operation X" are frowned upon because they inherently cover only one side of the conflict. Is there an alternative non-combatant-specific term that oculd be used instead here?
*List of cites is excellent, so you are to be commended on that
*Acronyms are overused. I know it is handy to use a phrase once, assign it an acronym, and thereafter use the acronym, but I feel you have overused this. Quite apart from it being good to refer to a thing using a variety of terms for reader interest, if you forget what an acronym means, you have to scroll up to find out. I would especially avoid using acronyms in section headers, and I would introduce each term using its full name at least once per section in case someone clicks down fromt he TOC without having read the sections above it, especially since many are clearly USMIL acronyms I for one am not familiar with
*I would try and balance the account with more Vietnamese sources, since almost all (maybe absolutely all?) your sources are western.
Generally, though, a very impressive article - <span style="color:#ccf;background:#ccf;border-style: single">[[User:PocklingtonDan|PocklingtonDan]]</span> 08:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
| |||